Why Romney lost

The GOP started the presidential campaign in the black cold of the Iowa winter, appealing to evangelicals and other cultural conservatives. Full Story
freebird

Long Beach, CA

#886 Nov 18, 2012
Pete-o wrote:
<quoted text>
You couldn't be more wrong, stay tuned for the 2nd term, 1st term was dealing with the shytbag Bush handed him, the US is far from a 3rd world country. People voted for Obama because he was huge contrast as to what Romney would have been. The middle class wanted someone that would stand up for them and even now Romney is showing just how bad a President he would have been with his comments this week.
Who's become the middle class? Government union workers! Where do they get the money? Taxes! Why should I pay more taxes so that government workers live better that I do?

Romney wasn't the answer for most Americans but neither is Obama.

Since: Feb 08

Hypoluxo Fl

#887 Nov 18, 2012
soapmann wrote:
youtube.com/watch?v=6-t4wtt72A Q&feature=plcp FM Romney just didnt have what it takes,,,a Kenyan Birth Certificate and skin tone like a Tootsie Roll lets face guys Obama just got lucky that all.Romney will just have to Tan heavy before elections,
Birther nut.
Mr Big Bad John Roberts

Irmo, SC

#888 Nov 18, 2012
soapmann wrote:
youtube.com/watch?v=6-t4wtt72A Q&feature=plcp FM Romney just didnt have what it takes,,,a Kenyan Birth Certificate and skin tone like a Tootsie Roll lets face guys Obama just got lucky that all.Romney will just have to Tan heavy before elections,
Yo' pissface, you don't have what it takes to take one step out of your trailer park reservation ya' stupid COONservative yard monkey. The Black president ended lying Romney's stinking career as a serious political contender. Even a lot of your fellow Republiklans are turning against him. The Black president won and Romney sucks, get over it punkkk.
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Mr Big Bad John Roberts

Irmo, SC

#889 Nov 18, 2012
chickpea wrote:
<quoted text>
Just so you don't go through your life uninformed, no matter how heavily tan Romney gets he'll NEVER, EVER be president of the USA.
He blew it big time. Even his fellow repubs are running away from him.
What a waste of a billion dollars.
He underestimated the people. He didn't pay attention to our voice. He lived in a bubble of denial and threw up all night after losing. even Ann told him to STFU.
If he was the best choice the repubs had to offer , their party is in dire straits.
Romancing the Latinos isn't going to work next time around either.
Right On! Way to tell that stupid klan monkey. LOFL!!!!!
Mr Big Bad John Roberts

Irmo, SC

#890 Nov 18, 2012
chickpea wrote:
The funeral has been arranged.
The coffin is set.
The dirt and shovels are at the ready.
Romney needs to lie down.
His political life is dead.
President Obama ends yet another Republiklan's career as a presidential contender. LOFL!!!!!!
Mr Big Bad John Roberts

Irmo, SC

#891 Nov 18, 2012
Stuipd Citizens wrote:
<quoted text>
and poor white people voted for A rich white man that wouldn't let them in his house let alone cared about you..Now that's dumb. YOU MAD? Well I"m glad you're mad, and I"m glad you're stupid, and immature.. having a hissy fit but there's nothing you can do.. I LOVE IT.
A fine example of irony.
Bird

Santa Fe, NM

#892 Nov 18, 2012
freebird wrote:
<quoted text>

.
brain
Mr Big Bad John Roberts

Irmo, SC

#893 Nov 18, 2012
Post Turtle wrote:
Negro's run to obama like a dog to his own vomit.
A klanigguh-racist like you run to Romney like a truck stop hooker to turn a trick with anyone.
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Really

Santa Fe, NM

#894 Nov 18, 2012
Pamela wrote:
<quoted text>
Now Ron Paul would have cut $1 trillion in spending and not had the country default on the debt. He would have forgiven the amount the Fed printed up, shut down the Fed, reduced military spending, refused to have a war with Iran, legalized pot, ended the war on drugs, and cut income taxes and welfare programs, so as far as solving problems and economic intelligence, that is Ron Paul, not Obama and not Romney.
now. He couldn't even attract a tiny minority of the voters - nevermind deal with congress on any kind of radical program. You live in a fantasyland and so does he. The only thing he ever accomplished in all his years in Congress was to ask some pointed questions.
Mr Big Bad John Roberts

Irmo, SC

#895 Nov 18, 2012
Post Turtle wrote:
<quoted text>Ha /vigger STFU,Worthless POS
Yo' post turd, you are a stupid klannigguh monkey racist. DO NOT stfu because the rest of this forum want you to keep reminding us that even after President Obama ended Romney's stinking career, there are still people like you that are stupid ya' COONservative yard monkey.
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Pamela

Citrus Heights, CA

#896 Nov 18, 2012
freebird wrote:
<quoted text>
Who's become the middle class? Government union workers! Where do they get the money? Taxes! Why should I pay more taxes so that government workers live better that I do?
Romney wasn't the answer for most Americans but neither is Obama.
Exactly. The ONLY people left who can make middle class wages without any education are the government workers, and we pay for it. We don't even pay for it. We borrow $1 trillion a year to hand out to the states. So we pay $450 a year in interest on the debt. But our tax revenues don't even cover their salaries and pensions.

I agree neither party is the answer. Ron Paul was the answer.
Pamela

Citrus Heights, CA

#897 Nov 18, 2012
Really wrote:
<quoted text>
now. He couldn't even attract a tiny minority of the voters - nevermind deal with congress on any kind of radical program. You live in a fantasyland and so does he. The only thing he ever accomplished in all his years in Congress was to ask some pointed questions.
Both parties took the U.S. to bankruptcy and you all think they know one thing. They have no clue what they are doing, and Ron Paul is saying just that. He was talking about the insanity of running up debt back in the 2007 debates when Bush was running up debt. He has the real answers and young people love him. It's just that everyone only votes for who they think will give them money from the government. NO one is interested yet in solving the real problems. Only after the dollar is no longer the world's reserve currency, only after we default on our debt, only after deep austerity measures begin, then people will look to Ron Paul for the spending cuts and for the real solutions. This is all status quo crap. People voted back in a guy who ran up $5 trillion of debt in 4 years and cannot do one real thing ever. It's a joke. As long as all looks well as long as we can borrow TRILLIONS, people have no idea that the U.S. dollar is about to collapse, that we will default on our debt because we pay $450 billion a year in interest on the debt. They have no clue the U.S. is out of jobs, going third world, has half the young people on welfare and half the nation is old people on the government with no one to pay for any of it. We have fallen down in education standards, we have an old infrastructure. We have no way to keep going. Ron Paul was right about everything. What did you all accomplish by fighting over Romney and Obama all these years? Not one thing has changed. Billions of dollars in campaign commercials and not one thing changed. House is R, senate and president is D. Same stuff.
Pamela

Citrus Heights, CA

#898 Nov 18, 2012
Really wrote:
<quoted text>
now. He couldn't even attract a tiny minority of the voters - nevermind deal with congress on any kind of radical program. You live in a fantasyland and so does he. The only thing he ever accomplished in all his years in Congress was to ask some pointed questions.
You all wanted change. What do you propose to do to get rid of both major political parties?? At least I had a vehicle to do it, Dr. Paul. No one else even gets it that we need to get rid of both parties' big huge spending policies and no one even attempts to stop both parties. So you are solving nothing and the truth is, Ron Paul was the perfect vehicle to take down both parties corruption and dysfunctions and big, huge spending.

Since: Jan 08

San Mateo, CA

#899 Nov 19, 2012
Pamela wrote:
<quoted text>You all wanted change. What do you propose to do to get rid of both major political parties?? At least I had a vehicle to do it, Dr. Paul. No one else even gets it that we need to get rid of both parties' big huge spending policies and no one even attempts to stop both parties. So you are solving nothing and the truth is, Ron Paul was the perfect vehicle to take down both parties corruption and dysfunctions and big, huge spending.
There was no chance Paul would get elected , he has a couple good ideas, but the rest is outright kooky.

Since: Oct 08

Alpharetta, GA

#901 Nov 19, 2012
fedupwiththemess wrote:
He lost because he is a dumbazz.
he lost because he is a honky, in a country that has more non honkies than honkies.
Pamela

Citrus Heights, CA

#903 Nov 19, 2012
He lost because people are too stupid to understand what he is saying. Rather than looking into the things he was talking about - the business cycle, Austerian economics, ending the Federal Reserve, you all sit fat and dumb and let the TV tell you too keep the Republican party, keep everything the way it is, no real changes. You don't believe in yourselves, you figure you have no real way to cause change, that you can't get rid of power politicians, that you have no power and no plan so Ron Paul must be a nut. If your IQ is below 120, yes I guess you don't understand what he is saying. That doesn't mean he is the one who is nuts. That means the U.S. is a country with most people having IQs of 90, they are almost retards, and they only repeat lies from the TV. They are so far behind normal people they never read books nor take classesd and they think only "learning" from a biased fake news channel on TV is some big thing. It is the people who are nuts, not Ron Paul. If you read books and had higher IQs, you would not be saying RP is nuts. Young people in college get it, they get what the real problems are. You have to get rid of both parties. You are old fools who believe Fox TV. Both parties are so addicted to spending they have us paying $450 billion a year in interest on the debt and have us at default. Crazy is you all letting Fox TV tell you that the REpubs are one bit better than the Dems when here Bush was sooooooo bad he's gotten Obama reelected cause people STILL blame Bush for the messes he made. Bush took the country down, Fox works to elect Repubs, and stupid people can't figure it out that both parties are finished, that the U.S. is finished and when Ron Paul says it, they say he is the one who is nuts. No, that would be the American people. They are too dumb to save the country.
Keep

Santa Fe, NM

#904 Nov 19, 2012
Pamela wrote:
If your IQ is below 120, yes I guess you don't understand what he is saying. That doesn't mean he is the one who is nuts. That means the U.S. is a country with most people having IQs of 90, they are almost retards, and they only repeat lies from the TV. They are so far behind normal people they never read books
telling yourself that... LOL

Crackpot
Pamela

Citrus Heights, CA

#906 Nov 19, 2012
Keep wrote:
<quoted text>
telling yourself that... LOL
Crackpot
That's true. The Fox followers all have IQs of about 90, and 80 is retarded. This is WHY they repeat the TV and can't read books nor investigate things for themselves nor think for themselves. They sit in here and fight over TV channels for years now. That is the definition of low IQ. Yes, Ron Paul has an IQ in the 150s. He is an M.D., a Constitutional expert, an economic expert and a Congressman. Yes, he has a very high IQ, and yes, his followers are super smart young educated people. All the dummies repeat Fox TV, and Fox TV got rid of Dr. Paul because the people on fox are war profiteers and they wanted to place someone in the White House who was like Bush and who would have war after war for them to make money off of, so when they saw Dr. Paul is a decent and honest man and would not have a war with Iran, people like Dick Morris and Sean Hannity lied about Dr. Paul and said he is nuts, and, the low IQ Fox followers buy all of it. The country went under from the people being so dumb so they don't think for themselves.

Tell me ONE thing Dr. Paul said that is crazy?? Just because you don't understand sound economics doesn't mean that he is crazy. It means you are stupid.
Pamela

Citrus Heights, CA

#907 Nov 19, 2012
The Fox followers are soooooo stupid they think a TV channel that is clearly a total setup to elect Republicans that only does anti-Dem and pro-Repub made up stories is news. They think those made up one sided stories are real news, and they think being totally slanted and lying is fair and balanced. It takes a very low IQ to not see that stuff as it is.

A retarded level IQ is a person looking at Fox TV all the time watching the people on Fox always only hating on one party and then saying it is fair and balanced. The Fox drones have such low IQs they think if anyone ever says one real thing that they must be an evil liberal and if any news channel ever reports one real fact, it is just evil liberal media bias. They are totally brainwashed by a few uneducated, war profiteer billionaires on Fox TV, and they think that is smart. That is retarded level IQs.

Instead of listening to other citizens, they put billionaires from the TV on a pedestal and blindly believe their every word. That is retarded.
bottlecap

Jonesboro, GA

#908 Nov 19, 2012
Pamela wrote:
<quoted text>Exactly. The ONLY people left who can make middle class wages without any education are the government workers, and we pay for it. We don't even pay for it. We borrow $1 trillion a year to hand out to the states. So we pay $450 a year in interest on the debt. But our tax revenues don't even cover their salaries and pensions.
I agree neither party is the answer. Ron Paul was the answer.
The problem the US faces is simple, as Ron Paul stated. "... the government media complex that controls the news and most political propaganda,

The Unions get out votes so they get favorable media proaganda. They get great pensions by stealing from their fellow citizens but then claim they represent the working class, not the elite privledge class. Same for government workers, they get benefits far above their fellow citizens paid for with borrowed money from China.

On top of that, and most important, the International Banksters get MASSIVE amounts of Money from the US Treasury and then they install people like the Dummy and Uncle Tom in the WH.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barack Obama Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 39 min Teaman 1,154,058
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr jacques Ottawau 181,832
Snowden's nightmare comes true (Jul '13) Fri RayOne 225
Tuesday's election will be hard to take sober Dec 18 swedenforever 190
Not Much Chance of Congress Stopping Cuba Policy Dec 18 Jeff Brightone 1
GOP Victory Sets Stage for Fresh Antiabortion... Dec 17 tha Professor 78
Is Ted Cruz Running For President...In 2008? Dec 16 Le Duped 1
More from around the web