Anti-abortion ad to begin airing Wednesday in Ky.

There are 19 comments on the Sep 25, 2012, The Daily Record story titled Anti-abortion ad to begin airing Wednesday in Ky.. In it, The Daily Record reports that:

An anti-abortion activist who's running for Congress plans to air an especially graphic ad this week in Kentucky and Indiana showing a dismembered fetus and images of dead Christians and Jews.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Daily Record.

First Prev
of 40
Next Last
ONTG

Carol Stream, IL

#848 Oct 26, 2012
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
You assume too much. It makes you look like an ass.
I have no desire to ban Happy Meals.
No do I have a problem with guns or the death penalty, before you make yourself look like an ass again.
Now, if YOU think abortion should be illegal, that makes YOU a busybody. Own it.
It is a fact that it's a woman's legal, and moral, right to make her own decision regarding her own uterus and pregnancy, based upon her own circumstances and moral code, and without interference by busybodies who think their personally held beliefs are superior to everyone else's personally held beliefs.
Awipe
ONTG

Carol Stream, IL

#849 Oct 26, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean sometimes people have opinions on other things besides the right to choose?
Like the majority of people who call themselves "pro-life" favor the death penalty?
I'm pro-choice and beleive in the death penalty- so I guess I am the only one who isn't confused. Now crawl back into your hole you troll.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#850 Oct 26, 2012
ONTG wrote:
<quoted text>I'm pro-choice and beleive in the death penalty-
Goody for you, troll.

Doesn't refute what I said, troll, about antiabortionists who are pro death penalty.

I know the flapping of your lips distract you when you read but do try to follow the thread.
Warned

Terrell, TX

#851 Oct 26, 2012
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
You assume too much. It makes you look like an ass.
I have no desire to ban Happy Meals.
No do I have a problem with guns or the death penalty, before you make yourself look like an ass again.
Now, if YOU think abortion should be illegal, that makes YOU a busybody. Own it.
It is a fact that it's a woman's legal, and moral, right to make her own decision regarding her own uterus and pregnancy, based upon her own circumstances and moral code, and without interference by busybodies who think their personally held beliefs are superior to everyone else's personally held beliefs.
You have more than a problem with all the socialist ideas on hwo to re-engineer this country.

58.3% of hospitals are owned by non-profits, mainly church-religious organizations. Another 20.3% of hospitals are owned by for-profit organizations like doctors and HMO's.

That leaves you abortion zealots with just 21.4% of hospitals owned by state and local governments.

Keep poking your "abortion on demand" stick in the eye of religion.
Keep the name calling up against 60% of the organizations who own hospitals in this country, and that percentage is growing yearly, then see how long it will takes to get back to the 'back alley' operations. You and your ilk are bring it on yourselves.

ONTG

Carol Stream, IL

#852 Oct 26, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Goody for you, troll.
Doesn't refute what I said, troll, about antiabortionists who are pro death penalty.
I know the flapping of your lips distract you when you read but do try to follow the thread.
wpos

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#853 Oct 26, 2012
Warned wrote:
<quoted text>
You have more than a problem with all the socialist ideas on hwo to re-engineer this country.
58.3% of hospitals are owned by non-profits, mainly church-religious organizations. Another 20.3% of hospitals are owned by for-profit organizations like doctors and HMO's.
That leaves you abortion zealots with just 21.4% of hospitals owned by state and local governments.
Keep poking your "abortion on demand" stick in the eye of religion.
Keep the name calling up against 60% of the organizations who own hospitals in this country, and that percentage is growing yearly, then see how long it will takes to get back to the 'back alley' operations. You and your ilk are bring it on yourselves.
Was that supposed to make any kind of sense?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#854 Oct 26, 2012
ONTG wrote:
wpos
~ flap ~flap ~ flap

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#855 Oct 26, 2012
ONTG wrote:
<quoted text>Awipe
Yes, you are.

“And the Horse You Rode in On”

Since: Sep 08

Minneapolis

#856 Oct 27, 2012
JesusMyKing wrote:
<quoted text>
Would you stand against something you believed was wrong?
I believe killing innocent babies is wrong, therefore, I'll make it my business by standing against it.
The only thing you jesus freaks are interested in is controlling women, I think that is wrong and will stand against it. Keep your nose and bible out of my crotch and I will keep my foot out of your balls.

“And the Horse You Rode in On”

Since: Sep 08

Minneapolis

#857 Oct 27, 2012
JesusMyKing wrote:
<quoted text>
Reverting back to the 50's wouldn't be such a bad idea.
WOW!! You really are a backwards fck aren't you?

That is your entire goal....putting women in their place.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#858 Oct 27, 2012
Morgana 9 wrote:
<quoted text>
WOW!! You really are a backwards fck aren't you?
That is your entire goal....putting women in their place.
And don't forget those uppity minorities. These backwards bible thumping fundies really want everything designed for their personal happiness. They want everyone oppressed except them.

“And the Horse You Rode in On”

Since: Sep 08

Minneapolis

#859 Oct 27, 2012
Warned wrote:
<quoted text>
You have more than a problem with all the socialist ideas on hwo to re-engineer this country.
58.3% of hospitals are owned by non-profits, mainly church-religious organizations. Another 20.3% of hospitals are owned by for-profit organizations like doctors and HMO's.
That leaves you abortion zealots with just 21.4% of hospitals owned by state and local governments.
Keep poking your "abortion on demand" stick in the eye of religion.
Keep the name calling up against 60% of the organizations who own hospitals in this country, and that percentage is growing yearly, then see how long it will takes to get back to the 'back alley' operations. You and your ilk are bring it on yourselves.
I think more than a stick needs to be poked in the eye of religious male phallic worshipping male hierarchy institutions that want to discriminate against women....WAY more than a stick!!

Keep pushing religion down the throats of the US population and see what happens. Christians like you want a theocracy likened to your islamic counterparts, the christiantaliban.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#860 Oct 27, 2012
Morgana 9 wrote:
<quoted text>
The only thing you jesus freaks are interested in is controlling women, I think that is wrong and will stand against it. Keep your nose and bible out of my crotch and I will keep my foot out of your balls.
"But let none of you suffer as a murderer, or as a thief, or as an evildoer, or as a busybody in other men's matters." 1 Peter 4:15

Seems they will ignore parts of the Bible when it's convenient to do so.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#861 Oct 27, 2012
JesusMyKing wrote:
wrote:
<quoted text>
Reverting back to the 50's wouldn't be such a bad idea.
Why are fundies such racists?
You think black people should have to sit in the back of the bus? There should be "Whites Only" waiting rooms again?
ask um

Silver City, NM

#862 Oct 27, 2012
not a rocket scientist wrote:
"anti women"?
"anti choice"?
"get those womens under control"?
Keep spewing that hateful nonsense. But killing the unborn is the issue.
Doesn't matter how old they are.
Doesn't matter how formed they are or not.
Doesn't matter whether they can hear, smell, see, feel, etc.
Doesn't matter hwo the mother "feels".
It is a HUMAN-LIFE and unless it is literally threatening the life of the mother, there is no reason to kill it. It's disgusting how abortion, ending a HUMAN LIFE, is used as birth control now. Absolutely disgusting.
your right
SINCE WHEN IS IT ANTI WOMAN not to allow their unborn babies to be murdered .
most women would not choose murder over life for their babies ..
women dont have a right to harm bodies of little cjildren in their wombs any more than men should have a right to murder women in a room they were paying for building and protecting and that belonged to them .
most sane people would recognize both these facts as being simular
some republicans and democrates simply are trying to make their abortions or abortions of their loved ones justified murder when its not..

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#863 Oct 28, 2012
ask um wrote:
your right
SINCE WHEN IS IT ANTI WOMAN not to allow their unborn babies to be murdered .
Antiabortionists have to invent their own language.
Babies Grow Up

United States

#864 Nov 4, 2012
My name is Sherrie. I can't help but wonder about who and what these unwanted babies will grow up to be. Mom forced to carry and then what? Raise a child she doesn't want or adopt it out? Or let her family carry the burden? This is NOT my pitty party but I should have been aborted. I was a mistake. My parents didn't want me. My mom was skitzophrenic and the great state of Utah allowed her to sign custody of my brother and I to a family member (not our dad who was United States Marine) on a small yellow post-it note. The family member used us as free daycare and maid service. I was pulled out of school almost daily to babysit. Other than being a legal slave (starting at age 7) no one cared for us at all. No one cared if I ate, slept, went to school. I lost my virginity to a rapist but to my family it was my fault. As an adult I have no home base, no one to help me or get advice from. At age 13 I ran away. Didn't even know sex made babies cuz when my first daughter came I innocently asked the nurse to open the window for the stork. As a girl In the world with no guidance, I brought 2 kids into the world and then babied them too much as a result of my childhood. One of my teens has a baby age 3 and the other is pregnant on Medicaid. I know in 1974 there weren't abortion issues so I'm not saying I'm a result of a restricted abortion, but I can't help but wonder how many of those kids are going to grow up feeling unloved, unwanted and mad at the world. I never fell into drugs or drinking and I have a job where I'm very much trusted on my word. However I got pregnant young and immediately accepted the role of mother and took care of my children and matured up quick. There will be however many kids who feel like I do and did. No one cares, so that equals to a young person that they can do anything they want without repercussion. This will not lead anywhere good. I am the exception and kept my head above water. My brother didn't fare so well. By forcing these women to have these babies, your forcing these kids into a life of hell. Who knows maybe they'll live with roaches and filth or maybe they'll go hungry. Maybe they'll be used as perverted sex objects or be forced to work harder than any child should. It's possible they could be raised happily in a nice famiky but it's also possible for them to suffer like I did and still do. There are already enough women making babies when they clearly can't even care for themselves. Why are you making the women who are actually using their brain in a time of uncertainty, why are you not allowing them to do what's best for them? I agree abortion should not be used as birth control. But if a woman thinks terminating a pregnancy is the best decision, and she qualifies with humane rules and regulations of it, why must society make her feel guilt? We should not judge her. Let God judge her. As human beings we should be helping each other. To think of all the money spent on stopping a woman's choice. That money could have gone anywhere else to make a better impact in our country. As for me, I have a lot of work ahead of me to make myself feel happy. I feel bad for those kids who end up with a heartbreaking or hard life because mom wasn't allowed the abortion and then couldn't give her baby up at birth. My mom loved me too when I was a baby and the government paid for our housing. Boy did that change when the government stopped paying the bills. I am not exactly the pride of our country. I don't know how to let someone love me. Who knows maybe it's me who can't love. What I do know is BABIES GROW UP! Stop looking at the baby and start looking at the future you're sentencing these unwanted babies to.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#865 Nov 4, 2012
Babies Grow Up wrote:
My name is Sherrie. I can't
Do really think people read this nonsense?

Why not stick to giant posters of fetuses the size of lima beans?

PS: Ask 'sherrie' if the world would have been better off if Hitler's mom had had an abortion.
native american

Tulsa, OK

#866 Nov 5, 2012
Outta Luck wrote:
<quoted text>
Speaking of jumping to conclusions, I have already made 12 posts to this thread, speaking of not reading the posts, did you read any of mine?
No I haven't posted to this in a few days, because what I read was USELESS.
Lots of calling each other names, lots of the same old crap on every abortion thread, I've read them all.
The debate is actually important to me, and no one ever says anything past it's murder, god don't like it, and they knew the consequences.
Stupid stupid debate. The same useless arguments for years and still no real discussion of the men who are involved in every pregnancy except for that one lady 2000 years ago who didn't have sex to get pregnant.
So I put forth a simple question, When young ladies are faced with the decision of birth control or no birth control, Would it be acceptable that young men also consider vasectomy or no vasectomy?
Perhaps putting the responsibility of birch control on both sexes rather then just the ladies would actually make a difference in unwanted, teen pregnancy????? Which are the greatest % of abortion work.
I would appreciate it if someone would respond to my legitimate question?
I'm with you out of luck,I'm a liberal not a republican nut job,can't they tell through x-rays if the embryo is badly deformed? like my post of cousins having a badly deformed child, they didn't want him so they dumped him out at Hissom where he lived on tax payers for 37 years like an animal before he died

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 40
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barack Obama Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min USAsince1680 1,219,716
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr Jacques in Orleans 187,286
News Loretta Lynch Heads for Confirmation as Attorne... 1 hr see the light 23
News 6 reasons why the Trans-Pacific Partnership mat... Wed Japans dark side 1
News IRS: 'Obamacare' caused us to hang up on 8 mill... Apr 22 Stiff N Clean 1
News Republicans' second choice, and he's Hispanic Apr 21 Billy Ringo 11
News Palin: Wisconsin Gov. Walker 'did the right thi... (Apr '11) Apr 17 liberal waiting o... 188
More from around the web