Revenge Voting? Hell Yea

[CBOW]

Black Rhino wrote:

<quoted text>
Iceland?

You mean Iceland's non-violent overthrow and new government?

[Black Rhino]

CBOW wrote:

<quoted text>You mean Iceland's non-violent overthrow and new government?

That's how you respond?

LOL! Turn a blind eye, eh spark plug?

[CBOW]

Black Rhino wrote:

<quoted text>
That's how you respond?
LOL! Turn a blind eye, eh spark plug?

What were you expecting? Iceland?????? That is the most recent events that have taken place in their economy. GEEEEEEZ!

[Black Rhino]

CBOW wrote:

<quoted text>What were you expecting? Iceland?????? That is the most recent events that have taken place in their economy. GEEEEEEZ!

I thought you knew the reason or could make the comparison to what you were saying...Nevermind.

You're just babbling as usual.

[SwagBucks Money]

American Lady wrote:

Did you get your $15 Paypal gift card or did you cash out your SwagBucks for sumthin else???
http://www.swagbucks.com/refer/johnbedellcost...

....
No, I cashed out my SB's for a $10 Papa Johns Giftcard and a $5 CVS Gift card. I had to buy sum supplies at CVS so I used my swagbucks for that. There website really is kick @ss as i have saved a few bucks already! Thanks for showing it to me.

http://www.swagbucks.com/refer/byrdtyrd

[yolodegato]

SwagBucks Money wrote:

<quoted text>
....
No, I cashed out my SB's for a $10 Papa Johns Giftcard and a $5 CVS Gift card. I had to buy sum supplies at CVS so I used my swagbucks for that. There website really is kick @ss as i have saved a few bucks already! Thanks for showing it to me.
http://www.swagbucks.com/refer/byrdtyrd

SWEET!!! I just got 59 SwagBucks for searching the term Obama health reform! How many SB's do I need to cash out for the free gift cards?? thans u this swagbucks thing is new to me lolo

[SwagBucks Money]

yolodegato wrote:

<quoted text>
SWEET!!! I just got 59 SwagBucks for searching the term Obama health reform! How many SB's do I need to cash out for the free gift cards?? thans u this swagbucks thing is new to me lolo
www.swagbucks.com/refer/byrdtyrd

yolo, It depends upon how much of a gift card you want.$5 is like 500points. But they also have a lottery where you can gamble and win more points. its pretty easy. I got the card like dumb fast.

[new hammer time]

FriendofDog wrote:

<quoted text>
Why dont' you carry your ass? I guess you love that stupid-ass that's in the WH and loves all the free cell phones you get.. I don't really give a rat's ass what you think..seriously.

hey kkkracka, you are tee-totally out of line. i ain't going nowhere, my folks were here way before you trans-atlantic savages got here.
free phones was not an obama idea...they are provided by the cell phone industry to boost more profits and to keep track of who is calling who and for what purposes. remember BIG BROTHER....they are listening in. you're so stupid. and another thingy..... i got an attitude :-( and the middle finger is up .!.

[new hammer time]

CBOW wrote:

<quoted text>
Obama is a dem, right?
Dems always ramp up socialism. It's their only way to maintain control over the populace. And since they have paid the lazy socialist lovers in this country to breed more like themselves, they have actually gotten a real foothold. Sooner or later, socialism fails because there aren't enough paying into the pot to keep it afloat. Greece is a fine example.

get use to it or get the hell out whilst you can. have you considered Mars........

[FriendofDog]

new hammer time wrote:

<quoted text>
hey kkkracka, you are tee-totally out of line. i ain't going nowhere, my folks were here way before you trans-atlantic savages got here.
free phones was not an obama idea...they are provided by the cell phone industry to boost more profits and to keep track of who is calling who and for what purposes. remember BIG BROTHER....they are listening in. you're so stupid. and another thingy..... i got an attitude :-( and the middle finger is up .!.

Right back at you. Your folks here way before mine? lol I dont' think so. Your folks were wearing loincloth, jumping over fires and trying to not be devored by lions in Africa.. nice try. lol

[new hammer time]

FriendofDog wrote:

<quoted text>
Right back at you. Your folks here way before mine? lol I dont' think so. Your folks were wearing loincloth, jumping over fires and trying to not be devored by lions in Africa.. nice try. lol

my folk are not from africa pale face. your ppl. migrated from the caves of siberia which makes y'all savages.....and not only that, you're commies.

[Shinichiro Takizawa]

JAL is "Japan Airlines".
JAL is a state-run-Japanese-company.

JAL's pirots (NOT, Flight Attendants, but pilots)
are froming and joining Labor-Union.

This Labor-Union is only for JAL's pirots (NOT, ut pilots).

The avarage salary of JAL's pirots (and ANA's pirots) is about 20-milllion-Yen per year per person.

If your assertions are true,
then JAL and Japanese-pilots are communists!
(with 20-milllion-Yen salary per year per person.)

It seems to me that your salary is low, because you donot belong to Labor-Union.
It seems to me that you donot belong to Labor-Union, because you are stupid.

[1-1]
What is more
JAL has 4 or 5 Labor-Unins!

And, 3 of those are
only for "captains",
for "captains, copilots, and engineers",
and only for "engineers".

[1-2]
[JAL Flight Cres Union]
JAL Flight Cres Union
http://www.jalcrew.jp/jfu/english/index.htm
for "captains, copilots, and engineers" Labor-Union.

[1-3]
[Association Japan Airlines Captain]
http://www.jalcrew.jp/jca/
only for "captains" Labor-Union.

[1-4]
[Senior Engineer Union]
http://www.td-serv.net/jalcrew/seu/about_seu_...
only for "engineers"

[2]
[Avarage salary of pilots(in Japanese-language)]
Avarage salary of pilots
http://nensyu-labo.com/syokugyou_pairotto.htm

Some of you may say
"You donot have to write everything here".

BECAUSE this conclusion is inconvenient for you.

AND, you are talking about friends?

I loove the U.S.A.!
I love all Americans!
Remember Pearl Harbor!
Japan is America's enemy!
I will be an American!

[Shinichiro Takizawa]

Maybe, your "prince on a white horse" is joining Labor-Union.

XDXDXDXDXD XPXPXPXPXP OMGOMGOMGOMGOMG

[new hammer time]

let him give you that white horse, so your arse can ride off this forum with that dumb shyt you're always posting.

[Shinichiro Takizawa]

Yes. Japanese-government is our America's enemy!

[SwagBucks Money]

yolodegato wrote:

http://www.swagbucks.com/refer/byrdtyrd
SWEET!!! I just got 59 SwagBucks for searching the term Obama health reform! How many SB's do I need to cash out for the free gift cards?? thans u this swagbucks thing is new to me lolo

Yolo---
They award upto 1,000 SwagBucks per search, but to be honest the most I ever got i think was like 620-sumthin Swagbucks in a single online search! It was enough to get me dinner since i cashedout with a $5 pre paid giftcard and enetered like a dozen sweepstakes. I almost won a $2,000 Amazon card!! but I did win the plant a tree thing! Thats kinda cool.
http://www.swagbucks.com/refer/byrdtyrd

[Shinichiro Takizawa]

Finally, I understand the connections between
Ronald Reagan's Navy Strategy, Free-Trade, and Mahan's Theory.

The U.S. doesnot have to arm herself with huge Forces.
The U.S. must make cars and export those cars form the U.S. to the world.

[1]
(1) Free-Trade benefits industrially-advanced-nations (technologically-developed-nat ions).
AND, the U.S. is NOT a industrially-advanced-nations (technologically-developed-nat ions).
The U.S. now is exporting soybeans and corns, and the U.S. is importing cars and home-electric-appliances.

(2) So, industrially-advanced-nations (technologically-developed-nat ions) build NAVIES by thermselves in order to protect Free-Trade.
AND, therefore, the U.S. doesnot have to build strong NAcvy.

[2]
I admit that Alfred Thayer Mahan saiod differently.
His concept of "sea power" was based on the idea that countries with greater naval power will have greater worldwide impact.
His ideas still permeate the U.S. Navy Doctrine.

People adopt theories which are profitable to them.

In fact, in W.W.II. not only Germany but also the U.S. condacted commerce-rading.
It is well known that
German-submarines drove British to the brink of asphyxiation twice,
and
the U.S.Navy submarines destroyed Japan.

[3]
In fact, the U.S. have been historically emphasizing the importance of trade between the Atlantic.
After W.W.II., this tendency grew, because today no coyuntry has colonies.

So, doctrine of the U.S. may be different from Mahan's theory.

Only the Pacific Ocean after W.W.II. applies Mahan's theory.

Even in 1930s', the U.S. already gave up to protect Philippines from attacks of Japan.
That is, the U.S. herself admit that the U.S. could not prevent Japan from invading Philippines.
The U.S. would counterattack Japan in order to recapture Philippines after Japan invaded Philippines.

People adopt theories which are convenient for them.

People accept Mahan's theory
only in order to justify "the U.S.-Japan Security Treaty" and "the huge U.S.Navy".

And, this is the reasoning of Ronald Reagan's theory.

In fact, all Battle-Ships in the world were retired.
(Ohio, Iowa, etc.)

Today, Air-Force is the decisive power.
After all, Navy's aircraft-carriers too mean that
aircraft-carriers can provide Air-Forces to any desired places.

[4]
Defence of sea lines of communication (sea lanes) is the main mission of Navies.
Sea lines of communication (sea lanes) means Trade.

By the way, no one imagined that
the U.S. and Soviet-Union could trade till the U.S. exported graines to Soviet-Union in 1972.

Till then, the U.S. had been preparing her Navy
on the assumption that
Soviet-Union would destroy trade between the U.S. and Europe between the Atlantic.

[5]
On the other hand,
Japan and the U.S. admit that
the U.S. can trade with China.

So, if the U.S. can trade with China,
there is no need for the 7th fleet of the U.S.

The problem is only with Japan.
The problem become only the defense problem of Japan.

And, it is Japan's duty.
Protecting Japan is NEVER our Americans' job.
Protecting Jana is Japan's job.

[6]
Navies' job is to keep trade.
The Continental System or Continental Blockade was one example.

Who doenot want to trade with the U.S.?
Who does prevent America's trade?

NO one.

This means that
the U.S. doesnot have to have Navy.
(Yes. I admit that this opinion is extreme.)

The job of Navy is to protect export-trading-partner, import-trading-partner, and trade-partner.
And, today,
those who may and caninterrupt these trade
may be only Iran.

[Shinichiro Takizawa]

[7]
The U.S. is continuing today's trades, which are just like the conditions of colonies.
As long as the U.S. is copntinuing this condition of colonies,
the U.S. doesnot have to have huge-Navy.

contrally,
if the U.S. will have huge-Navy,
then the U.S. must be an industrially-advanced-nation (technologically-developed-nat ion) especially in Heavy-Induistry,
and the U.S. must squeeze foreign-countries.

Today's America is, say, just like that
India or Egypt being British colony
would have huge-Nsvies.

Today's America can be compared to the followings.
* India or Egypt of British colony would try to have huge-Navies.

This is extremely strange.

First of all,
even if a country has a lot of huge-battle-ships,
if the country ignore trade or commerce,
the country can be destroyed.

This is proved by the U.S.Navy in W.W.II. by using commerce-radors of U.S.submarines.

[8]
[Wikipedia]
Alfred Thayer Mahan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Thayer_Ma...
Alfred Thayer Mahan (September 27, 1840 - December 1, 1914) was a United States Navy flag officer, geostrategist, and historian, who has been called "the most important American strategist of the nineteenth century."
His concept of "sea power" was based on the idea that countries with greater naval power will have greater worldwide impact; it was most famously presented in The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660-1783 (1890).
The concept had an enormous influence in shaping the strategic thought of navies across the world, especially in the United States, Germany, Japan and Britain, ultimately causing a European naval arms race in the 1890s, which included the United States.
His ideas still permeate the U.S. Navy Doctrine.

[9]
[Wikipedia]
The Influence of Sea Power upon History
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Influence_of...
The French at first adopted Mahan's theories.
French naval doctrine in 1914 was dominated by Mahan's theory of sea power and therefore geared toward winning decisive battles and gaining mastery of the seas.
But the course of World War I changed ideas about the place of the navy, as the refusal of the German fleet to engage in a decisive battle, the Dardanelles expedition of 1915, the development of submarine warfare, and the organization of convoys all showed the navy's new role in combined operations with the army.

[Shinichiro Takizawa]

The U.S. must withdraw her American-Forces from Japan, from South-Korea, and from Asia.
I love the U.S.A.! I love all Americans!

[Buffalo Bull]

Shinichiro Takizawa wrote:

JAL is "Japan Airlines".
JAL is a state-run-Japanese-company.
JAL's pirots (NOT, Flight Attendants, but pilots)
are froming and joining Labor-Union.

If your assertions are true,
then JAL and Japanese-pilots are communists!
(with 20-milllion-Yen salary per year per person.)
It seems to me that your salary is low, because you donot belong to Labor-Union.
It seems to me that you donot belong to Labor-Union, because you are stupid.

JAL has 4 or 5 Labor-Unins!
".
[1-2]
[JAL Flight Cres Union]
JAL Flight Cres Union
http://www.jalcrew.jp/jfu/english/index.htm
for "captains, copilots, and engineers" Labor-Union.
[
"You donot have to write everything here".
BECAUSE this conclusion is inconvenient for you.
AND, you are talking about friends?
I loove the U.S.A.!
I love all Americans!
Remember Pearl Harbor!
Japan is America's enemy!
I will be an American!

The brevity of your post made a thoughtful reply possible.
The existence of a labor union does not define communism
A state owned enterprise is a socialist appendage, however to accuse the employees of this enterprise of communism is a stretch. Their motive may be as simple as feeding a family. A fair labor agreement is just the good old capitalist concept of gaining as much as one can from the opportunity presented.
If JAL is strangled by a one sided situation, saying that is an enough.
Thinking in conspiratorial terms is not what will make you an American.
In my opinion The Chinese are the proven enemy. They are the only nation on the planet that has the power to screw us really good. To launch a real Pearl Harbor .
Japan is a trading competitor, thus a friend that you compete with for that profitable advantage.