Rove: More Judd attacks coming

Rove: More Judd attacks coming

There are 116 comments on the Politico story from Feb 8, 2013, titled Rove: More Judd attacks coming. In it, Politico reports that:

Get your popcorn ready. Karl Rove said Thursday he's planning much more than a sequel to his attack ad his super PAC premiered earlier this week against actress Ashley Judd, a Democrat, considering a run against Sen.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Politico.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#85 Feb 10, 2013
au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>I enjoyed her mother and sister as a group. Let her run, but I agree, since liberals don't usually know anything about who they vote for, only that they do what they are told to do. Rove will get her more votes just by attacking the air head.
Funny coming from the biggest parrot on this site.
sickofit

Northfield, MN

#86 Feb 10, 2013
gossamer wrote:
Judd wouldn't get elected any way. To Kentuckians she is a traitor. She went to Hollywood and put down the very cloth she was cut from.
So she got teeth and stopped being inbred and put down her ole racist nazi KKK ways and grew a heart?? GOOD FOR HER...
gossamer

Roseville, MI

#87 Feb 10, 2013
sickofit wrote:
<quoted text>
So she got teeth and stopped being inbred and put down her ole racist nazi KKK ways and grew a heart?? GOOD FOR HER...
Thats a good one. I'll let Karl Rove know so he can use that it his next ad attack.

I see you live in a lilly white neighborhood. Why is it ni g lers
always move next to whittey.

The animal control officer called. No you will not be getting your sheep back.
Dane Thorsen

Long Beach, CA

#88 Feb 10, 2013
Billy Ringo wrote:
<quoted text>
Shrub on 1/20/09 .......... 22%
LMAO !!!!!!!!!!
These poll numbers indicating a preference for failure confirm a demonic possession. They are terrifying to Red State parents who want to leave something worth having to their kids.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#89 Feb 10, 2013
Dane Thorsen wrote:
<quoted text>
These poll numbers indicating a preference for failure confirm a demonic possession. They are terrifying to Red State parents who want to leave something worth having to their kids.
How is the lowest approval rating ever for the president that left our economy at the lowest in almost a century a preference for failure? seems like it is a sound judgement based on performance.
Dane Thorsen

AOL

#90 Feb 10, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>How is the lowest approval rating ever for the president that left our economy at the lowest in almost a century a preference for failure? seems like it is a sound judgement based on performance.
A vote for anything that runs as a "democrat" in '14 is unthinkable. It gives the diabolical Comrade Pelosi more control over our families lives. We can't let that happen if we are to claim we care about our kids futures. WE must have Checks and Balances in Washington if we are to avoid total Civic and Fiscal
collapse.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#91 Feb 10, 2013
Dane Thorsen wrote:
<quoted text>
A vote for anything that runs as a "democrat" in '14 is unthinkable. It gives the diabolical Comrade Pelosi more control over our families lives. We can't let that happen if we are to claim we care about our kids futures. WE must have Checks and Balances in Washington if we are to avoid total Civic and Fiscal
collapse.
What is the option if the GOP cpontinues its headlong run to the extreme far evangelical right? us conservative really have no place to go, or we vote for write in candidates that just mean a democratic win...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#92 Feb 10, 2013
au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>Awe pookie, you lost it on Friday. The new polls show Obama is dropping
Sunday, February 10, 2013

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Sunday shows that 52% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Obama's job performance. Forty-seven percent (47%) disapprove (see trends).

++

cough

++

Putting aside Rasmussen is biased Republican.

How is that seven point lead working out for you, DUMBO?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#93 Feb 10, 2013
au contraire wrote:
since liberals don't usually know anything about who they vote for
How's that Herman Cain endorsement working out for you, Dumbo?

“JESUS WOULD IMPEACH THE GOP!!!”

Since: May 09

Lake Success, N.Y.

#94 Feb 10, 2013
au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>Awe pookie, you lost it on Friday. The new polls show Obama is dropping due to his ineffective way of constatantly attacking half of America. He and Jarrett neet to stick to being slum lords and keep you's chillins on the liberal plantation.
Let's see them Dumbo/ Au Contraire!

How difficult this must be for you.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#95 Feb 10, 2013
TonyT1961 wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's see them Dumbo/ Au Contraire!
How difficult this must be for you.
I think it depends on which computer he is using...

Were you aware that he was pretending they were ... supposedly... two people for the first month or so?

HAHAHAHAHAHAH!

I don't know who he thinks he is pretending for.

“JESUS WOULD IMPEACH THE GOP!!!”

Since: May 09

Lake Success, N.Y.

#96 Feb 10, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
I think it depends on which computer he is using...
Were you aware that he was pretending they were ... supposedly... two people for the first month or so?
HAHAHAHAHAHAH!
I don't know who he thinks he is pretending for.
LMFAO!!!! What a fcuking dolt Dumbo is!
Responsibility

Redwood City, CA

#97 Feb 10, 2013
gossamer wrote:
She went to Hollywood
Did you say that about Reagan?

Rove is a bully and is trying to stay relevant after his failures in the last election.

He is failng at the relevancy part.
gossamer

Roseville, MI

#98 Feb 10, 2013
Responsibility wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you say that about Reagan?
Rove is a bully and is trying to stay relevant after his failures in the last election.
He is failng at the relevancy part.
Regan didn't belittle the people from where he was from.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#99 Feb 10, 2013
TedsLiver wrote:
Ashley Judd is a complete Hollywood air head. Leave her alone Karl. Let the liberals elect this moron. We need the entertainment.
Speaking of Hollywood airheads, one actually became a Republican president some years ago.
Hint: His hair was prematurely orange.
Billy Ringo

United States

#100 Feb 11, 2013
au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>Dereliction of Duty..........
Sen. Lindsey Graham vowed Friday to hold President Obama "accountable" for his leadership on Benghazi, after the top two Defense Department leaders testified that they had just one conversation with Obama during the course of the Sept. 11 terror attack.
During testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee Thursday, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey said they spoke with Obama at 5 p.m. ET on Sept. 11 last year. They were both on the same call, and said it lasted about 30 minutes.
Dempsey said they did not speak again until the attack was over.
Graham, who had demanded that Panetta testify on Libya as a condition for allowing the nomination of Chuck Hagel to proceed, aggressively questioned both witnesses on the president's actions.
Graham wrote on his Twitter account Friday: "President Obama has to account for his leadership on #Benghazi and I intend it hold him accountable."
He said Thursday on Fox News that "thus far the White House has delayed, denied, deceived and stonewalled and this has to come to an end. He has to account for his leadership."
During the hearing, Graham questioned why there weren't subsequent follow-up conversations with the president.
"It lasted almost eight hours ... did the president show any curiosity?" Graham asked.
Panetta said there was "no question" Obama "was concerned about American lives."
"With all due respect," Graham responded, "I don't believe that's a credible statement if he never called and asked you,'are we helping these people?'"
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/08/pa...
Who?
TedsLiver

New Almaden, CA

#101 Feb 11, 2013
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>Speaking of Hollywood airheads, one actually became a Republican president some years ago.
Hint: His hair was prematurely orange.
. Still better than the current Chicago airhead loser in the oval office now.
gossamer

Roseville, MI

#102 Feb 12, 2013
TedsLiver wrote:
<quoted text>. Still better than the current Chicago airhead loser in the oval office now.
What do they call Obama? The Celebrity presidnet.
gossamer

Roseville, MI

#103 Feb 12, 2013
Meant president.
Billy Ringo

United States

#104 Feb 12, 2013
gossamer wrote:
<quoted text>
What do they call Obama? The Celebrity presidnet.
We call him the Osama Killer ..........

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Senate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Being conservative is not being racist 5 min huntcoyotes 462
News Trump puts moderate GOP governors in awkward spot 6 min anonymous 5
News DNC race tight as Democrats seek gains against ... 11 min spud 114
News White House adviser asked FBI to dispute Russia... 32 min CodeTalker 30
News GOP at war with itself (Mar '16) 58 min Copout 3,118
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 hr Copout 1,497,801
News 13 Times Russian Hackers Sabotaged Clinton's Pr... 2 hr Ms Sassy 484
More from around the web