Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on Social Media

Mar 22, 2012 Full story: Wall Street Journal 66,335

Social media has put the spotlight on the story Trayvon Martin , an unarmed African-American teenager who was shot to death last month by a neighborhood watch captain in Florida.

Read more

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Colima, Mexico

#44430 Dec 22, 2012
Be Truthful Be Free wrote:
<quoted text>Very good. Then Thug Zimmerman would be in his grave and not begging for money.

You make too much sense!
Let me rephrase it for you

The black punk would have been shot just as soon as he threatened me

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#44431 Dec 22, 2012
Hey tex, where you at dawg?

They won't give you a passport over there in Singapore?

Don't worry. Just tell them you need to come over and get your award. They'll cut right through the red tape.

Hurry up, dawg, you got a challenge to deal with. You done already told us how you deal with challenges. Don't let us down, dawg.

Hurry up!

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#44432 Dec 22, 2012
Be Truthful Be Free wrote:
Hey tex, where you at dawg?

They won't give you a passport over there in Singapore?

Don't worry. Just tell them you need to come over and get your award. They'll cut right through the red tape.

Hurry up, dawg, you got a challenge to deal with. You done already told us how you deal with challenges. Don't let us down, dawg.

Hurry up!
CORRECTION

Oops, my bad...

dawg = dog

HA!

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#44433 Dec 22, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>Let me rephrase it for you

The black punk would have been shot just as soon as he threatened me
You got the wrong phrasing.

Thug Zimmerman isn't Black.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Colima, Mexico

#44434 Dec 22, 2012
Be Truthful Be Free wrote:
<quoted text>It's also reasonable to assume that, but for Thug Zimmerman, Trayvon wouldn't be dead from Thug Zimmerman's gun.

We all can agree on that.
Of course the black punk has no responsibility for attacking Zim for simply asking why the black punk was in the back yard of a house recently broken into

Or why the black punk refused to answer why he was in the gated community when he did not live there
tex

Singapore, Singapore

#44437 Dec 22, 2012
Be Truthful Be Free wrote:
<quoted text>
"A loss of consciousness" cannot allow someone to murder another.
Sooner or later you'll read AND understand what you're posting...even if it is Thug Zimmerman saying that mess.
Do you know what "unconscious" means?
lol..you never even been in a fight have you punk?..you don't know what you're talking about or when to shut up.. you're just a race baiter, a liar, a punk, a moron, an imbecile, a pervert, a thug, and a coward..all the same things you post about others..o unconscious means you just been silly slapped.
Dummy.

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#44438 Dec 22, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>Of course the black punk has no responsibility for attacking Zim for simply asking why the black punk was in the back yard of a house recently broken into

Or why the black punk refused to answer why he was in the gated community when he did not live there
Ok, we get it. You have a thing for Blacks.

I believe punks come in all shades, but you're only obsessed with the Black ones. We get get it. We get what you are.

Trayvon was no punk and he was not engaged in ANY unlawful act. That's a fact jack!

Now, Trayvon had no responsibility to answer ANY questions from Thug Zimmerman.

Every morning when millions of parents send their kids out the door, they tell them not to talk to strangers, not to take candy from strangers, not to take rides from strangers.

But you and your cohorts turn millions of parents' daily advice to their children on its head.

You wanted Trayvon to disregard that very important advice. What nonsense!!!

You want your children to be accosted and questioned by a gun-toting, drug-induced, woman-beating, Mexican-hitting, cop-assaulting pervert?

REALLY?

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#44439 Dec 22, 2012
tex wrote:
lol..you never even been in a fight have you punk?..you don't know what you're talking about or when to shut up.. you're just a race baiter, a liar, a punk, a moron, an imbecile, a pervert, a thug, and a coward..all the same things you post about others..o unconscious means you just been silly slapped.
Dummy.
My dog, they done fixed up your paperwork, good.

Is that your way of saying you missed us? Well, don't worry, you ain't been missed.

But you do got some work ahead of you. Remember what you said about challenges, now. You got one. So, chop, chop...get to it.

If you don't, you'll just be proving yourself to be a Liar.

You're no Liar, are you Buffalo? Oops, I mean tex?
tex

Singapore, Singapore

#44440 Dec 22, 2012
Be Truthful Be Free wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you read that mess before you posted it? Ever had circles run around you?
You say...
"I never said I knew what the shooters identity was"
----------
No, but you sure can chastise others about knowing it. In order to challenge anyone on anything, you need to know the facts yourself. Just because you don't know the Truth doesn't mean others don't. You must not have been on the debate team in high school. Oops, I mean in junior high school.
The sun is hot. You want someone to prove that to you too?
Next...
You say...
"You were the one who said the sandy hook shooter wasn't Hispanic..."
----------
HA! You're much too funny. In your opening sentence you tell us what you never said then in your next you tell us something I never said.
Please point to the exact post where I said that. Careful now, be very careful. That might take you awhile.
Next...
You say...
"..so i merely asked you to tell us what his ethnic background was..."
----------
MERELY?
Here's how you asked...
"What is his ethnic background idiotic moron?" (Your Post# 44351)
Perhaps you've forgotten the definition of "merely." Let me help you out...
"Only as specified, nothing more; simply."
It was not "merely" a question. It was laced with disdain, disrespect and foolishness. Perhaps you'll allow anyone to ask you questions in such a way and give them an answer.
I won't.
Next...
Oh, we all know damn well I can slice and dice your entire idiotic post to pieces...easily. But let's skip to the end of it where you so eloquently reasoned and wrote...
"then gfy"
----------
When all else fails, let's resort to base mentality, eh?
Yes, all else always fails you!
lol..You might not have said that the sandy hook shooter wasn't hispanic but you backed up the other poster so you assumed that he wasn't hispanic..you were caught off guard..you made an assumption about another persons background without the least bit of thought, like a bigot..so what's his ethnic background?...You still don't know..lol..all you can say is he's white..

why should ! prove that he's not white? I never said he was not white.. I asked you a question, disrespectfully perhaps but you didn't answer because you didn't know the ethnic background of the sandy hook shooter even though you implied that he was not hispanic. lol..you're just a liar.. and not a very good one.

if you had your way you'd argue this point till you die, you're sick..lol. I knew you didn't know the ethnicity of the shooter, and by agreeing with the other poster that he “wasn't” hispanic exposes you for the racist and scumbag that you really are underneath your facade..lol.
tex

Singapore, Singapore

#44441 Dec 22, 2012
Be Truthful Be Free wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, we get it. You have a thing for Blacks.
lol..No moron, we have a thing for YOU..please don't try to drag blacks down into your hell hole.. we have no beef with blacks.. just you, and race baiters like you, you lazy pr!ck..
We get it.

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#44442 Dec 22, 2012
tex wrote:
lol..You might not have said that the sandy hook shooter wasn't hispanic but you backed up the other poster so you assumed that he wasn't hispanic..you were caught off guard..you made an assumption about another persons background without the least bit of thought, like a bigot..so what's his ethnic background?...You still don't know..lol..all you can say is he's white..

why should ! prove that he's not white? I never said he was not white.. I asked you a question, disrespectfully perhaps but you didn't answer because you didn't know the ethnic background of the sandy hook shooter even though you implied that he was not hispanic. lol..you're just a liar.. and not a very good one.

if you had your way you'd argue this point till you die, you're sick..lol. I knew you didn't know the ethnicity of the shooter, and by agreeing with the other poster that he “wasn't” hispanic exposes you for the racist and scumbag that you really are underneath your facade..lol.
Ahhhhh, you're losing your touch Buffalo. I mean tex. I should start calling you Buffalo tex! HA!

Well, I see you finally came to your senses and realized I didn't say what you said I said. I just knew your research skills were above average. At least you came back and admitted your folly.

But then you had to mar it with all that silliness. You can NEVER catch me off guard. NEVER! NEVER! NEVER!

You should prove he's not White because you challenge what others know. In order for you to challenge something it has to mean you don't believe it because you have other information. So let's see it.

Unless you're just challenging to be contrary and affording yourself the ability to call names.

The ethnicity of the shooter is not, and never has been, in doubt. Your ability to see and know the Truth is.

Remember...the Truth exists whether you acknowledge it or not.
tex

Singapore, Singapore

#44444 Dec 22, 2012
Be Truthful Be Free wrote:
<quoted text>
You should prove he's not White because you challenge what others know. In order for you to challenge something it has to mean you don't believe it because you have other information. So let's see it.

The ethnicity of the shooter is not, and never has been, in doubt. Your ability to see and know the Truth is.
lol..My ability to see and know truth is stellar..the shooter certainly appears to be white, that was my impression, but Zimmerman also appeared to be white, and it turned out that he had a rich ethnic background,..caucasian, hispanic, african american, jewish,...

The ethnicity of the sandy hook shooter IS in doubt because it has not yet come to light..white, or caucasian, is a race. White is not an ethnicity..

Truth is....you don't know the ethnicity of the sandy hook shooter..no matter how many times you say that you do..lol..

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#44445 Dec 22, 2012
tex wrote:
<quoted text>lol..No moron, we have a thing for YOU..please don't try to drag blacks down into your hell hole.. we have no beef with blacks.. just you, and race baiters like you, you lazy pr!ck..
We get it.
No, he didn't mention me.

But he did keep saying "black" over and over. Did you read his post? And you call me lazy.

You just spouting nonsense again?

Get some sleep, Buffalo tex....Sunday School starts early.
tex

Singapore, Singapore

#44446 Dec 22, 2012
Be Truthful Be Free wrote:
<quoted text>
You should prove he's not White because you challenge what others know. In order for you to challenge something it has to mean you don't believe it because you have other information. So let's see it.

The ethnicity of the shooter is not, and never has been, in doubt. Your ability to see and know the Truth is.
Zimmermans ethnicity includes German, Jewish, and Peruvian among others..Adam Lanza's ethnicity hasn't been reported..but if you think it has been reported please tell us what you insist everybody knows..but ! know you haven't got a clue..lol..

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#44447 Dec 22, 2012
tex wrote:
<quoted text>lol..My ability to see and know truth is stellar..the shooter certainly appears to be white, that was my impression, but Zimmerman also appeared to be white, and it turned out that he had a rich ethnic background,..caucasian, hispanic, african american, jewish,...

The ethnicity of the sandy hook shooter IS in doubt because it has not yet come to light..white, or caucasian, is a race. White is not an ethnicity..

Truth is....you don't know the ethnicity of the sandy hook shooter..no matter how many times you say that you do..lol..
Just because YOU have not seen the light does NOT mean the Truth is in doubt.

The Truth is NEVER in doubt. I try to give you analogies to help you out. Check this one out...

The Earth is round. But you doubt it and believe it to be flat. The Truth is that the Earth is round. Because you are not enlightened as to the Truth of that does not put Truth in doubt.

The Truth is NEVER in doubt. You are.

Always.
zazz

United States

#44448 Dec 22, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course the black punk has no responsibility for attacking Zim for simply asking why the black punk was in the back yard of a house recently broken into
Or why the black punk refused to answer why he was in the gated community when he did not live there
You didn't get the memo did you? It is the twenty-first century. White and multi-racial men no long have the right to stop and accost Black law abiding citizens. Trayvon had the right to defend himself from his stalker and attacker. Sadly, he lost because he was not a gun toting thug like his murderer.
zazz

United States

#44449 Dec 22, 2012
tex wrote:
<quoted text>
lol..My ability to see and know truth is stellar..the shooter certainly appears to be white, that was my impression, but Zimmerman also appeared to be white, and it turned out that he had a rich ethnic background,..caucasian, hispanic, african american, jewish,...
The ethnicity of the sandy hook shooter IS in doubt because it has not yet come to light..white, or caucasian, is a race. White is not an ethnicity..
Truth is....you don't know the ethnicity of the sandy hook shooter..no matter how many times you say that you do..lol..
The Truth is... I know his race and ethnicity. It has been published, in addition to the derivation of his last name. You're just too sorry to look it up, you want others to do it for you.
tex

Singapore, Singapore

#44450 Dec 22, 2012
Be Truthful Be Free wrote:
<quoted text>
No, he didn't mention me.
But he did keep saying "black" over and over. Did you read his post? And you call me lazy.
You just spouting nonsense again?
Get some sleep, Buffalo tex....Sunday School starts early.
It was no doubt directed at you, you lazy pr!ck. You got a thing for farm animals you sick pr!ck?.! think yo're a skunk..like to piss in peoples faces you do.. here's piss in yours..go piss up a rope..you don't fool me racist.
tex

Singapore, Singapore

#44451 Dec 22, 2012
zazz wrote:
<quoted text>
The Truth is... I know his race and ethnicity. It has been published, in addition to the derivation of his last name. You're just too sorry to look it up, you want others to do it for you.
the only thing you know is what you crave at the moment.. you don't know jack..i bet you don't even know how to properly disinfect and maintain a toilet..i bet you don't even know how to use one properly..i bet your diseased carcass is getting ready to explode..lol..pop goes the weasel.
tex

Singapore, Singapore

#44452 Dec 22, 2012
pop = plop

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Senate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Poll: Hillary Clinton most admired woman 1 hr Headstride 318
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 hr shinningelectr0n 1,207,932
News GOP 2016 hopefuls back Indiana's new law 4 hr Marcavage s Trick 20
News To spare confusion, cost, move city's election ... 5 hr HELL ON EARTH 6
News Indiana religious freedom act: What's behind th... 5 hr Marcavage s Trick 26
News Pence: 'Not going to change' religious freedom law 5 hr Peterwad 47
News Boise Immigration Rally Draws Hundreds, Call fo... (May '13) 5 hr Gary 136
More from around the web