Dick Cheney disses John McCain's 2008...

Dick Cheney disses John McCain's 2008 veep pick

There are 157 comments on the New York Daily News story from Jul 29, 2012, titled Dick Cheney disses John McCain's 2008 veep pick. In it, New York Daily News reports that:

Former Vice President Dick Cheney said that John McCain made a 'mistake' in picking former Alaska governor Sarah Palin as his running mate in 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at New York Daily News.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#61 Jul 30, 2012
swedenforever wrote:
<quoted text>
This is so funny watching southern baptists vote for a mormon flip-flopper from Boston, that's loosing his home state..
(r.i.p) Ted Kennedy
Yep, to reall succeed, Romney needs to drive off a bridge and kill a young girl.........liberals are trash.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#62 Jul 30, 2012
Cheney has the right to his opinion.

However, many of us feel that the real mistake was picking John McCain to be the Presidential candidate.

Sarah Palin, from a purely ideological point of view, would have been better suited to lead the ticket, with McCain as veep.
KlineHilda1

Indialantic, FL

#63 Jul 30, 2012
like Denise explained I'm impressed that someone able to profit $8653 in one month on the internet. have you seen this web link http://zapit.nu/23a
Your Ex

Ashburn, VA

#64 Jul 30, 2012
A losing campaign is an orphan or something, and all the GOP is swearing to Maury that the baby ain’t theirs. And so you have Dick Cheney sneering at John McCain’s Sarah Palin pick — from four years ago — and John McCain smiling that smile where he tries not to murder you while reminding the world that Dick Cheney is a torturer, and everybody leaking to Howard Kurtz that they’ve “interventioned” Mitt Romney, for being so bad at running for president.
~Wonkette
Gravediggers

United States

#65 Jul 30, 2012
When was the LAST TIME a DEMOCRAT criticized its own?

This IS a BAD HABIT of Republicans.

No wonder, they are faltering.

If Romney doesn't win, forget 2016.

Who wants to elect a party that attacks its own?

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#66 Jul 30, 2012
Gravediggers wrote:
When was the LAST TIME a DEMOCRAT criticized its own?
This IS a BAD HABIT of Republicans.
No wonder, they are faltering.
If Romney doesn't win, forget 2016.
Who wants to elect a party that attacks its own?
all it takes, either Romeny needs to attract, six percent more of the blacks, gays, youth vote, unions and military and Obama is finished.........he may already be there because many liberals have lost their energy to suppot Obama this time around.

Democratic Voting Enthusiasm Down Sharply From 2004, 2008Republicans more enthusiastic than in 2008

July 25, 2012
Thirty-nine percent of Democrats say they are more enthusiastic about voting than usual, down from the summers of 2004 (68%) and 2008 (61%).

Republicans (51%) are more enthusiastic than in 2008 (35%) but the same as in 2004 (51%).

Independents favor Romney.

Since: Feb 08

Hypoluxo Fl

#67 Jul 30, 2012
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>Of course the liberal false attacks and faux law suits didn't have anyting to do with it. Salsa baby, Cuba is calling you.
You talkin' about the Faux News Ministry of Disinformation again? DUMBOSPAMMING BIRTHER NUT.

Since: Feb 08

Hypoluxo Fl

#68 Jul 30, 2012
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>all it takes, either Romeny needs to attract, six percent more of the blacks, gays, youth vote, unions and military and Obama is finished.........he may already be there because many liberals have lost their energy to suppot Obama this time around.
Democratic Voting Enthusiasm Down Sharply From 2004, 2008Republicans more enthusiastic than in 2008
July 25, 2012
Thirty-nine percent of Democrats say they are more enthusiastic about voting than usual, down from the summers of 2004 (68%) and 2008 (61%).
Republicans (51%) are more enthusiastic than in 2008 (35%) but the same as in 2004 (51%).
Independents favor Romney.
How would you know. You're a DUMBOSPAMMING BIRTHER NUT.

Since: Feb 08

Hypoluxo Fl

#69 Jul 30, 2012
Cary L Nickel wrote:
Cheney has the right to his opinion.
However, many of us feel that the real mistake was picking John McCain to be the Presidential candidate.
Sarah Palin, from a purely ideological point of view, would have been better suited to lead the ticket, with McCain as veep.
This posts proves you teabaggers are a demented bunch. She can't even keep her own disfunctional family, functional.
Your Ex

Ashburn, VA

#70 Jul 30, 2012
Gravediggers wrote:
When was the LAST TIME a DEMOCRAT criticized its own?
This IS a BAD HABIT of Republicans.
No wonder, they are faltering.
If Romney doesn't win, forget 2016.
Who wants to elect a party that attacks its own?
republicans are destroyed be thier own ethos.
you cant have an 'everyman for himself -i got mine'
mentallity and have a functioning society.
much less a political party that doesn't implode.
individualism is fantasic thing, but coopertion make a civilization.
Your Ex

Ashburn, VA

#71 Jul 30, 2012
Terrible grammar, spelling & punctuation, sorry!.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#73 Jul 30, 2012
Mykro wrote:
<quoted text>You talkin' about the Faux News Ministry of Disinformation again? DUMBOSPAMMING BIRTHER NUT.
Please try to do better, otherwise we will ignore you more than we already are.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#74 Jul 30, 2012
Mykro wrote:
<quoted text>This posts proves you teabaggers are a demented bunch. She can't even keep her own disfunctional family, functional.
Yep, own TV show, new house in Arizona.....such a waste.....what was that...oh yeah, I know you still live in the getto sucking lunch money from children.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#75 Jul 30, 2012
Your Ex wrote:
<quoted text>
republicans are destroyed be thier own ethos.
you cant have an 'everyman for himself -i got mine'
mentallity and have a functioning society.
much less a political party that doesn't implode.
individualism is fantasic thing, but coopertion make a civilization.
So tell us, when asking for civility, why does Obama in reality do everything possible to divide us.
Outta Luck

Ames, IA

#76 Jul 30, 2012
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>Yep, It took Obama 3 years to make 10 million on his half million salary..........more fuzzy math from Obama.
A mere drop in the bucket compared to what Cheney raked in cleaning up all the death and destruction he personaly ordered so Haliburton would be able to profit from cleaning up and rebuilding it.
War Profiteering is a treasonous offense. Cheney is a criminal.

“Romney is a Weasel”

Since: Jan 09

Redwood NY

#77 Jul 30, 2012
Bluebonnets-Thistle wrote:
That's OK, the rest of the country disses obama's VP pick.
Speak for yourself.

“Romney is a Weasel”

Since: Jan 09

Redwood NY

#78 Jul 30, 2012
Bluebonnets-Thistle wrote:
<quoted text>
And how many democrats in the senate and house voted to go into Iraq?? Most of them, dummy. "Oh, but Bush lied~" LMAO the democrats must be one gullible bunch, then you re-elected them!
Halliburton is world wide, several companies including Chinese companies are working in Iraq now. Liberals fell for Soros bullshyte. He didn't want competition for his oil fields in Africa and South America. BTB, HE owns stock in Haliburton.
I remember it was vote for the war or be counted as un-patriotic.
Ghosts of the South

Hammond, LA

#79 Jul 30, 2012
This old bitch has the balls to put down Sarah Palin. He must have forgotten what America thought of him. Bush's biggest mistake.

The only problem with McCain's ticket was it should have read like this:

Palin/McCain2012

We might not be in this fiasco if it had. But men cannot and will not put a woman in the presidency. It hurts their little scrotums too much!
Ghosts of the South

Hammond, LA

#80 Jul 30, 2012
Your Ex wrote:
<quoted text>
republicans are destroyed be thier own ethos.
you cant have an 'everyman for himself -i got mine'
mentallity and have a functioning society.
much less a political party that doesn't implode.
individualism is fantasic thing, but coopertion make a civilization.
Looks like your share share mentality did not work. If democrats worked as hard as Republicans that might work, but too many Republicans are working to feed, house, and raise lazy, no count Democrats. Suppose rich Democrats fed their lazy and unmentionables. Republicans did the same. Which party do you think would disappear?
Your Ex

Ashburn, VA

#81 Jul 30, 2012
Ghosts of the South wrote:
<quoted text>
Looks like your share share mentality did not work. If democrats worked as hard as Republicans that might work, but too many Republicans are working to feed, house, and raise lazy, no count Democrats. Suppose rich Democrats fed their lazy and unmentionables. Republicans did the same. Which party do you think would disappear?
Probably the ones eating each other right now.
Read the article.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Senate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 25 min Grey Ghost 1,432,845
News Clinton blames Republican leaders for a 'paraly... 36 min payme 1,990
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 47 min Rogue Scholar 05 225,385
News Moderator Lester Holt under scrutiny during debate 1 hr Responsibility 2
News Trump calls on GOP to improve African-American ... 2 hr lmao 1,382
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 2 hr Rosa_Winkel 18,469
News Senate blocks bill with $500 million for Louisi... 4 hr Synque 4
More from around the web