Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1536276 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#1160887 Jul 4, 2014
harmonious wrote:
<quoted text>
ridiculous buffoon, this co*ksu*king lying failure of a president who you adore stifles actual energy dependence by putting all federal lands and offshore exploration and production off limits and refuses to allow the XL pipeline.
Deny it you dumbazz liar.
Stupid dumber than shit Dave goes off on a tangent bellowing and lying about who supports Iran while douchebag BO is holding secret talks with them, you are the one who is dumber than a cold turd.
Fliberals are sooooooooooo f ing stupid.
Got you, ya stupid bas turd. Obama has approved far more offshore permits than did Bush, you idiot. DUH

----------

Deepwater Permits in U.S. Gulf Exceed Pre-BP Spill Level
By Kasia Klimasinska Oct 17, 2012 12:00 AM ET

The Obama administration has issued this year the most deep-water oil-drilling permits for the Gulf of Mexico since 2007 as high crude prices revive exploration slowed by the 2010 BP Plc (BP/) spill.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-17/deep...

----------

A Rebuttal To Stupid Republicans Who Believe Obama Halted Domestic Oil Production

By: Raymore from Ray
Thursday, March, 15th, 2012, 9:06 pm

According to the Bureau of Land Management, the agency tasked with reporting oil drilling permits, etc. on federal lands has reported that in 2001, the Bush administration approved only 3,439 permits increasing slightly to 3,802 by 2003. It wasnít until 2004 that Bush doubled the permits approved, but by they dropped dramatically back down to 4,579 in 2005.

In 2009 under President Obama, there were 4,487 oil drilling permits approved to drill on federal land and in 2010 there were 4,090 permits issued and finally by 2011 there were 4,244.

Now, letís look at new wells started.

In 2001,under President Bush, 3,448 wells were started dropping dramatically down to 2,871 in 2002, then only 2,957 new wells in 2003, and only 2,702 in 2004 and finally dropping to 1,742 in 2005. In comparison in 2009 under Obama there were 3,267 new wells started, in 2010 there were 3,166 and 2011 there were 3,260.

http://www.politicususa.com/2012/03/15/obama-...

----------

Deny that, you stupid POS.
FakeLeosAnusTeac her

Palm Coast, FL

#1160888 Jul 4, 2014
Patrick wrote:
<quoted text>
Wonder if she really like anything at all?
Doubt if she supported Bush's expansion of Medicare to include prescription drugs.
Your ghetto ebonics are on full display in your first incorrect sentence.

“Stop Child Slavery”

Since: Apr 14

Location hidden

#1160889 Jul 4, 2014
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
You can't read. I didn't say they were similar. I merely showed you that genital mutilation is common in many cultures worldwide. Bot male and female.
Show me where I said they were similar, liar.
From there, you just made shit up, like you always do.
Enjoy your meltdown, crazy person.
All you do is come here and lie.
Still waiting tfor you to back up the Janet Yellen welfare comment you've been running from for days.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You are now attempting to change your words from circumcision to calling both genital mutilation. WHO does not regard male circumcision as a violation of Human Rights--skippy.

This is not helping you.

As you frequently make up stuff. I will only respond to my original comment not your interpretation of it.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

Gauley Bridge WV

#1160890 Jul 4, 2014
By TIM STEVENSCNETJuly 1, 2014, 5:00 AM
The Google Lunar Xprize: The world's next great space race
When innovation stalls, sometimes it just needs a little push. A bit of force applied in the right direction and then, momentum imparted, the rest takes care of itself. That push can come from many sources, but one tends to be the most effective: money.
It was a monetary prize that spurred Charles Lindbergh to strap into the Spirit of St. Louis and become the first to cross the Atlantic in one shot. It was a monetary prize that encouraged Scaled Composites to build SpaceShipOne, ultimately spawning Virgin Galactic. And, next year, it will be a monetary prize that puts the first non-government-funded rover on the moon. Or, possibly, multiple rovers.
The new competition is called the Google Lunar Xprize. And, like the Ansari Xprize from a decade ago that greatly accelerated the race toward commercial space travel, this new competition is already bringing the same increase in pace to lunar surveying and exploration. Along the way, it's giving the members of 18 independent teams around the world the challenge and opportunity of a lifetime.
Creating an Xprize
Xprize calls itself an "innovation engine." Its website states: "Rather than throw money at a problem, we incentivize the solution and challenge the world to solve it." Its first competition was the Ansari Xprize, and the problem was: how do we kickstart the commercial space industry? Scaled Composites won in 2004 at the Mojave Air and Space Port, a $10 million check handed over after the team launched its craft to the edge of space twice within the span of two weeks.
That's so far been the organization's most famous competition, but there have been dozens more, typically funded by charitable individuals or organizations. In 2010, the Very Light Car won the Progressive Insurance Automotive Xprize, a $5 million award for the first car to manage more than 100 miles per gallon. However, that car still had to be built in such a way that would ultimately allow for its eventual mass-production. A year later, Elastec/American Marine won the $1 million Wendy Schmidt Oil Cleanup Xchallenge by developing technology that skims oil from the surface of the ocean three times faster than the previous best solution to the problem.
It was back in 2007 that the organization introduced the Google Lunar Xprize, a $30 million purse of prizes for the first independent team to land a rover on the moon and move 500 meters or more across the lunar surface, all while sending back high-definition video to those of us still stuck on Earth. It's been nearly seven years and, finally, we're almost ready for launch.
Countdown to ignition
Teams from around the world were invited to enter to compete in the GLXP. Thirty-three of them made the cut to become official entrants. But, over the years between then and now, many of those would drop out. Others would others join forces and resources, resulting in a pool of 18 current teams that are still in the running.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

Gauley Bridge WV

#1160891 Jul 4, 2014
All the remaining teams face the same engineering challenges in getting their landers on the moon, but ask them what their biggest hurdle is overall and they'll all tell you the same thing: funding. Getting something into space is not cheap, with costs easily spiraling into the tens of millions of dollars for the launch alone. Getting there without the full backing of a wealthy government entity makes it all the more difficult.(GLXP teams can accept up to 10 percent of their total funding from a government entity, but no more.)
To help with that part of the equation, Xprize created what are called Milestone Prizes. These are a sort of interim competition, a $6 million pool to be paid out to the teams capable of proving to Xprize judges that their landers can land, their rovers can rove, and their imaging systems are capable of capturing the unique visual essence of the lunar surface.
Five teams were accepted into the Milestone Challenge phase: Astrobotic and Moon Express from the U.S., Indus from India, Part Time Scientists from Germany, and Hakuto from Japan.
Those five will be demonstrating their lunar technology through the summer of 2014 and we will be there. We'll be bringing you in-depth profiles of each of these teams, plus the other competitors, along with footage and reports from the ground as they make their way through this summer's Milestone tests ahead of ultimately landing on the moon by the end of 2015.
Olive Oil

Buffalo, NY

#1160892 Jul 4, 2014
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Stock markets hitting record highs and Flake plays Chicken Little again.What a dummy!!
You've been wrong for so long, you have no credibility at all.
You've been calling for an economic collapse for several years.
You've been proven to be an idiot by facts and events.
Keep whining, Flake. Smart people have been making big money on this historic rally!!
You've been and left and nuts for so long ...
You never had ANY credibility.

You've been proven to be an idiot by your own words.
You're every post.

Keep ranting. People have been entertained on your histrionics!!

Happy 4th. Go celebrate your dependence on The Government!!!
Olive Oil

Buffalo, NY

#1160893 Jul 4, 2014
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Got you, ya stupid bas turd. Obama has approved far more offshore permits than did Bush, you idiot. DUH
----------
Deepwater Permits in U.S. Gulf Exceed Pre-BP Spill Level
By Kasia Klimasinska Oct 17, 2012 12:00 AM ET
The Obama administration has issued this year the most deep-water oil-drilling permits for the Gulf of Mexico since 2007 as high crude prices revive exploration slowed by the 2010 BP Plc (BP/) spill.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-17/deep...
----------
A Rebuttal To Stupid Republicans Who Believe Obama Halted Domestic Oil Production
By: Raymore from Ray
Thursday, March, 15th, 2012, 9:06 pm
According to the Bureau of Land Management, the agency tasked with reporting oil drilling permits, etc. on federal lands has reported that in 2001, the Bush administration approved only 3,439 permits increasing slightly to 3,802 by 2003. It wasnít until 2004 that Bush doubled the permits approved, but by they dropped dramatically back down to 4,579 in 2005.
In 2009 under President Obama, there were 4,487 oil drilling permits approved to drill on federal land and in 2010 there were 4,090 permits issued and finally by 2011 there were 4,244.
Now, letís look at new wells started.
In 2001,under President Bush, 3,448 wells were started dropping dramatically down to 2,871 in 2002, then only 2,957 new wells in 2003, and only 2,702 in 2004 and finally dropping to 1,742 in 2005. In comparison in 2009 under Obama there were 3,267 new wells started, in 2010 there were 3,166 and 2011 there were 3,260.
http://www.politicususa.com/2012/03/15/obama-...
----------
Deny that, you stupid POS.
Looks like you've already started celebrating ...

You goofy drunken bastard!!!

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#1160894 Jul 4, 2014
RoxLo wrote:
<quoted text>
I have absolutely NO interest in debating with your confusion/craziness. Find the post that says what you are alleging and respond to that.
I am saying ultrasounds do not require vaginal probes--this was an exaggerated claim.
I am saying that everything about an abortion procedure is invasive.
The topic is the Repugnetard war on women.

You have no problem with women's rights being abridged.

Yet you pretend to be a woman, JasonJay.

The original Virginia bill had an invasive vaginal probe in it. Public outrage forced the Repugnetards to rewrite it.

You're so stupid.

And there is a huge difference between a woman voluntarily having an abortion and being forced by Big Brother.

----------

"A previous version of the bill would have forced women to undergo an invasive, likely painful transvaginal ultrasound procedure if she was too early into the pregnancy for a more typical transabdominal one to detect fetal age. After that bill sparked widespread protests, McDonnell and House Republicans worked together to write a new bill that would allow women to opt out of the more invasive procedure in favor of an external one.

Democrats are still not pleased with the compromise. Critics of the bill say that it's medically unnecessary and constitutes an egregious government overreach into personal medical decisions that women should make with their doctors.

The bill, which some Democrats are comparing to state-sponsored rape, has sparked several protests at Virginia's state Capitol in Richmond.

"We have taken out the state-required rape from the bill, but the way it is now is still an assault because it's an unwanted touching," state Sen. Janet Howell (D) told HuffPost in an interview, "and the woman is being coerced to have that happen in order to exercise her constitutional right to an abortion."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/07/bob-...

“Stop Child Slavery”

Since: Apr 14

Location hidden

#1160895 Jul 4, 2014
Lily Boca Raton Fl wrote:
<quoted text>
What an awful story. Maybe he and his wife should be locked in their car to suffocate to death like they did to their child. She should have had an abortion.
The court has not charged the mother in this case

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#1160896 Jul 4, 2014
Olive Oil wrote:
<quoted text>
You've been and left and nuts for so long ...
You never had ANY credibility.
You've been proven to be an idiot by your own words.
You're every post.
Keep ranting. People have been entertained on your histrionics!!
Happy 4th. Go celebrate your dependence on The Government!!!
Glad I could light you up so easily. LOL

Days later, and you're still whining over the beating I gave you, New Yawk.

So much for your ignorant views on religion, which I stuffed down your throat!!

Have a lovely 4th. Your meltdown fits well with the fireworks!!

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#1160897 Jul 4, 2014
Olive Oil wrote:
<quoted text>
Looks like you've already started celebrating ...
You goofy drunken bastard!!!
Nice to see how well you hold grudges against those who embarass you, nitwit!!

Have a nice meltdown!!
Nostrilis

Kissimmee, FL

#1160898 Jul 4, 2014
Hello fellow patriots and hard working Americans!

Hello to you too, Democrats/Commies who mooch off of others.

Happy July 4th!
Nostrilis

Kissimmee, FL

#1160899 Jul 4, 2014
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
The topic is the Repugnetard war on women.
You have no problem with women's rights being abridged.
Yet you pretend to be a woman, JasonJay.
The original Virginia bill had an invasive vaginal probe in it. Public outrage forced the Repugnetards to rewrite it.
You're so stupid.
And there is a huge difference between a woman voluntarily having an abortion and being forced by Big Brother.
----------
"A previous version of the bill would have forced women to undergo an invasive, likely painful transvaginal ultrasound procedure if she was too early into the pregnancy for a more typical transabdominal one to detect fetal age. After that bill sparked widespread protests, McDonnell and House Republicans worked together to write a new bill that would allow women to opt out of the more invasive procedure in favor of an external one.
Democrats are still not pleased with the compromise. Critics of the bill say that it's medically unnecessary and constitutes an egregious government overreach into personal medical decisions that women should make with their doctors.
The bill, which some Democrats are comparing to state-sponsored rape, has sparked several protests at Virginia's state Capitol in Richmond.
"We have taken out the state-required rape from the bill, but the way it is now is still an assault because it's an unwanted touching," state Sen. Janet Howell (D) told HuffPost in an interview, "and the woman is being coerced to have that happen in order to exercise her constitutional right to an abortion."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/07/bob-...
Mornin' Mental Cae!

"Pew Poll: Proud to Be American? You're Probably Not a Liberal"

"Sixty percent of American liberals say "proud to be American" does not describe them."
Patrick

United States

#1160900 Jul 4, 2014
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
The topic is the Repugnetard war on women.
You have no problem with women's rights being abridged.
Yet you pretend to be a woman, JasonJay.
The original Virginia bill had an invasive vaginal probe in it. Public outrage forced the Repugnetards to rewrite it.
You're so stupid.
And there is a huge difference between a woman voluntarily having an abortion and being forced by Big Brother.
----------
"A previous version of the bill would have forced women to undergo an invasive, likely painful transvaginal ultrasound procedure if she was too early into the pregnancy for a more typical transabdominal one to detect fetal age. After that bill sparked widespread protests, McDonnell and House Republicans worked together to write a new bill that would allow women to opt out of the more invasive procedure in favor of an external one.
Democrats are still not pleased with the compromise. Critics of the bill say that it's medically unnecessary and constitutes an egregious government overreach into personal medical decisions that women should make with their doctors.
The bill, which some Democrats are comparing to state-sponsored rape, has sparked several protests at Virginia's state Capitol in Richmond.
"We have taken out the state-required rape from the bill, but the way it is now is still an assault because it's an unwanted touching," state Sen. Janet Howell (D) told HuffPost in an interview, "and the woman is being coerced to have that happen in order to exercise her constitutional right to an abortion."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/07/bob-...
War on Women is working well for the Democrats
Olive Oil

Buffalo, NY

#1160901 Jul 4, 2014
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
The topic is the Repugnetard war on women.
You have no problem with women's rights being abridged.
Yet you pretend to be a woman, JasonJay.
The original Virginia bill had an invasive vaginal probe in it. Public outrage forced the Repugnetards to rewrite it.
You're so stupid.
And there is a huge difference between a woman voluntarily having an abortion and being forced by Big Brother.
----------
You have stated MANY times your support of Islamic Sharia Law which makes your argument for Women's Rights null and void, without merit.

In short, you're just a loud mouthed hypocrite.

And Male circumcision IS NOT similar to FGM.

You sit up here in your ignorance calling everybody else "stupid" ...

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
HAPPY 4th JULY

Lillington, NC

#1160902 Jul 4, 2014
The Unanimous Declaration of the
Thirteen United States of America
In Congress, July 4, 1776
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Natureís God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness; that, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and, when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them, and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for opposing, with manly firmness, his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise; the state remaining, in the mean time, exposed to all the dangers of invasions from without and convulsions within.

“Stop Child Slavery”

Since: Apr 14

Location hidden

#1160903 Jul 4, 2014
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Got you, ya stupid bas turd. Obama has approved far more offshore permits than did Bush, you idiot. DUH
----------
Deepwater Permits in U.S. Gulf Exceed Pre-BP Spill Level
By Kasia Klimasinska Oct 17, 2012 12:00 AM ET
The Obama administration has issued this year the most deep-water oil-drilling permits for the Gulf of Mexico since 2007 as high crude prices revive exploration slowed by the 2010 BP Plc (BP/) spill.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-17/deep...
----------
A Rebuttal To Stupid Republicans Who Believe Obama Halted Domestic Oil Production
By: Raymore from Ray
Thursday, March, 15th, 2012, 9:06 pm
According to the Bureau of Land Management, the agency tasked with reporting oil drilling permits, etc. on federal lands has reported that in 2001, the Bush administration approved only 3,439 permits increasing slightly to 3,802 by 2003. It wasnít until 2004 that Bush doubled the permits approved, but by they dropped dramatically back down to 4,579 in 2005.
In 2009 under President Obama, there were 4,487 oil drilling permits approved to drill on federal land and in 2010 there were 4,090 permits issued and finally by 2011 there were 4,244.
Now, letís look at new wells started.
In 2001,under President Bush, 3,448 wells were started dropping dramatically down to 2,871 in 2002, then only 2,957 new wells in 2003, and only 2,702 in 2004 and finally dropping to 1,742 in 2005. In comparison in 2009 under Obama there were 3,267 new wells started, in 2010 there were 3,166 and 2011 there were 3,260.
http://www.politicususa.com/2012/03/15/obama-...
----------
Deny that, you stupid POS.
Your article linked to an a chart that showed all applications for drilling--not just drilling for oil.
Drilling for gas using franking is a new and fast growing industry.

You should have known given the title of the article that this was probably NOT a credible source.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#1160904 Jul 4, 2014
RoxLo wrote:
<quoted text>
The court has not charged the mother in this case
Courts don't charge people with crimes, JasonJay. DUH

Your ignorance shies through!!

did you take school courses in ignorance, or did it come naturally?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Since: Apr 09

Elmont, Long Island NY

#1160905 Jul 4, 2014
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Only because of a crooked electoral college.
This kind of corrupt BS is why other countries have so much contempt for us and our elitist's battle to secure "democracy" around the world.
This country won't last another 20 years with lying sacks of shyt like her and her socialist buddies running it into the ground.
oh sure knock on the electorial college now, where were you in 2000 when Gore won the popular vote but SCOTUS gave bush the electorial college vote?/

but I have to agree with you, the electorial college gives more weight to the voters of rural red state America than the votes from liberal states like California, Illnois, New York etc.

time to do away with the electorial college

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
HAPPY 4th JULY

Lillington, NC

#1160906 Jul 4, 2014
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise; the state remaining, in the mean time, exposed to all the dangers of invasions from without and convulsions within.
He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.
He has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers.
He has made judges dependent on his will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies, without the consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the military independent of, and superior to, the civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution and unacknowledged by our laws, giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation:
For quartering large bodies of armed troops
among us;
For protecting them, by a mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states;
For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world;
For imposing taxes on us without our consent;
For depriving us, in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury;
For transporting us beyond seas, to be tried for pretended offenses;
For abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries, so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these colonies;
For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments;
For suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated government here, by declaring us out of his protection and waging war against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burned our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation, and tyranny already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow-citizens, taken captive on the high seas, to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren, or to fall themselves by their hands.
He has excited domestic insurrection among us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes, and conditions.
In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms; our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have we been wanting in our attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them, from time to time, of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity; and we have conjured them, by the ties of our common kindred, to disavow these usurpations which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Senate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Ann Coulter's Anti-Semitism Runs Deep (May '16) 6 min Katrina 80
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 26 min bad bob 2,783
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 1 hr TomInElPaso 25,657
News Flynn invokes 5th Amendment, refuses to comply ... 1 hr Retired SOF 54
News Hillary Clinton Wants To Be Buried With All The... 2 hr Ronald 7
News Reports: Comey knew Clinton email info was fake... 2 hr joe 10
News Hillary Clinton Calls Third Party Voters 'Crazy... 4 hr Dee Dee Dee 5
More from around the web