Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...
Comments
791,101 - 791,120 of 1,082,984 Comments Last updated 7 min ago

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859435
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Dweeb, the idiot Constitutionalis...t who's never read the Constitution!!

Not a single word in your post cites where in the Constitution a State can be broken up to create new states!!

ROFLMAO

You're making a fool of yourself again, as you did with your brainless talk about geothermal systems.

Try reading Article IV, Section 3, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution:

""The argument that West Virginia may not be a state rests on the troublesome language of Article IV, Section 3, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution:
New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.
The mandate within the second clause --- that “no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State”–-- appears to flatly prohibit the creation of a new state from within the territory of a preexisting state, irrespective of whether consent is given. The case of West Virginia, carved out from Virginia, would seem to fall under this prohibition.

WVA was created in defiance of the Constitution.

It is UnConstitutional on it's face, and you're still an idot!!

Time for you to run off and hide, greasemonkey!!
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly. Therefore, the state government of the half of Virginia that left the union was never recognized by the federal republic. The state government of the half of Virginia that remained in the federal republic was recognized as the legitimate representation of the state of Virginia. And, that legitimate representation of the state of Virginia petitioned the federal republic to be a separate state in accordance with the requirements written in the Constitution.
Or, the state government that left the federal republic was still recognized as the legitimate representation of the state of Virginia.
The question now is, was the rebel government of the state of Virginia the legitimate representation in the federal republic, or was the loyal government of the state of Virginia that didn't rebel against the federal republic the legitimate representation of the state of Virginia?
If the loyal government that didn't rebel against the federal republic is the legitimate representation of the state of Virginia, then all requirements of the Constitution were satisfied.
Jimmy

Hartford, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859436
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

discordian wrote:
<quoted text>
Lincoln's illegal war cost us 500,000 lives.
Lincoln was an idiot. They say he tried to negotiate, but I doubt he tried very hard. The nmoron thought the war would be a piece of cake but being a "lawyer", he was clueless about practicle matters. The slaves ended up suffering anyways and the war didn't really end until 10 years after it technically ended.

Most people don't know this but Lincoln was a gay boy and liked to sleep with men. Too bad John Wilkes Booth waited so long.
Homer 2016

Stroudsburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859437
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
The legislature was comprised of those representatives that didn't participate in the rebellion. Thus, there was in existence a legislature.
This legislature comprised of representatives that didn't participate in the rebellion became the legitimate representation in the federal republic. Those legislators that participated in the rebellion and became a functioning element in a different country were never acknowledged by the federal republic, thus they were not the legitimate representation of the state of Virginia.
Those legislators who remained loyal to the federal republic were the legitimate representation of the state of Virginia.
Those legislators who participated in the rebellion against the federal republic and became a functioning element of a different country were not part of the legitimate representation of the state of Virginia in the federal republic.
Thus, the legitimate representation of the state of Virginia, petitioned the federal republic to separate itself and form a new state.
Unless the rebel legislature participating as a functioning element of another country was the legitimate representative of the state of Virginia in the federal republic, which the federal republic never acknowledged existed.
If that were the case then West Virginia would in fact be Virginia which it is not.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859438
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
that's less than $15,000 a year for 40 hours. Can you live on that?
Minimum wage jobs are not intended for heads of households, but for teenagers and second incomes.

Want more money, improve your job skills.
Homer 2016

Stroudsburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859439
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

discordian wrote:
<quoted text>
Lincoln's illegal war cost us 500,000 lives.
You could make that argument.
Homer 2016

Stroudsburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859440
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
Why don't we just cut taxes and leave minimum wage where it is? People wouldn't need raises if they were allowed to keep more of what they earned. It's a win win...the employee gets more money, the employer saves more money.
Well for one thing we're broke. But why you yelling at me, take it up with your duly elected representative of the great state of <insert your state here>

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859441
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, you may be correct about that, given that Obama is a puppet for Goldman Sachs, Warren Buffet, and George Soros.
All these war criminals will be drone subjects after the revolution, wherever they flee.
Oh, and who were Reagan and Bush junior puppets of ? The records show ole Ronnie baby did all of Wall St's bidding to give them carte blance on any financial transaction at all without the fed's sticking their nose in. After all that's what you tea bagger's want isn't it ? Look what happened as a result, the whole ponzi scheme collapased like a deck of cards and sent the world bankrupt!
We are all still waiting for the day someone from your clan might post something that sound credible but I wont hold my breath waiting!

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859442
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You are so full of shit.
Go back and reference that post, you goddam liar.
Now, post that time line you talk about so much. Remember to put in all caps when that demonstration Obama lied about for two weeks happened.
Put up or shut up.
It's been posted. We've all seen it. Dave posted it several times.

You just run away from it and demand it all over again, because you know Dave's got you tarred and feathered with your own ignorance.

Your stupid act is growing old.

You lose every discussion due to your ignorance, so you fall back on repetitios dumb questions, hoping all will forget what a fool you are.

Answer this:

Where was Bush while America was under attack on 9-11-01??
TSM

El Paso, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859443
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

3

lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
People making minimum wages should pay no taxes
How about this pay no Taxes get Zero benefits!!
Homer 2016

Stroudsburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859444
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
What you loony left wingers don't understand is that it is a "minimum wage", not a living wage. A 16 year old doesn't need to be making a living wage.
I say drop minimum wage, call it a living wage and make it 9 bucks an hour. Why do rightwingers hate 16 year olds?

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859445
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
The SOTU rap act is already forgotten. Obama cast aside any chance for progress and instead decided to keep campaigning for legislation that has no chance of passage.
Yet the GOP is falling all over themselves to craft an immigration bill!! Contrast that with the anti-immigrant stance that helped lose themthe election!!

The Tea Party has been rejected!!

Obama has them on the run, expect a Reagan style amnesty, as well as the nitwits caving on gay marriage.

Obama has created a Civil War within the Republiclown Party!!

“Gloria Ad Caput Venire”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859446
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

3

discordian wrote:
<quoted text>
Dropping bombs on foreign countries and murdering people, including innocents, women, children, is an act of war, Obama is a criminal and a hypocrite, like you.
Drone strikes kill, maim and traumatize too many civilians, U.S. study ...
www.cnn.com/2012/09/25/world/.../pakistan-us-...
Sep 25, 2012 – Study: Drone strikes in Pakistan have killed far more people than the United States has acknowledged and traumatized innocent residents.
America's deadly double tap drone attacks are 'killing 49 people for ...
www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Americas-deadly-doubl... ...
Sep 25, 2012 – Just one in 50 victims of America's deadly drone strikes in Pakistan are ... drone strikes go much further than simply killing innocent civilians.
US drones kill up to 80% civilians – Pakistan Interior Minister — RT
rt.com/news/pakistan-civilian-victims-drones-...
Oct 18, 2012 –... the people killed by American UAVs in Pakistan are innocent civilians, claims ... If given the drone technology, Pakistan would do a better job,...
In Pakistan, Drones Kill Our Innocent Allies - NYTimes.com
www.nytimes.com/.../in-pakistan-drones-kill-o... ...
Nov 3, 2011 – American drones are killing innocent Pakistanis and alienating our ... I told the elders that the only way to convince the American people of their ...
Obama, war criminal and terrorist.
He is a usurper of our nation's constitution. He needs to face charges for this dastardly act IMAO. And swiftly, before he causes any further damage to our already fragile nation.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859447
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

TSM wrote:
<quoted text>
RealDave Panetta’s testimony directly contradicts President Obama’s own claim to have issued “three directives” as soon as he learned “what was going on” in Benghazi!! Again Dave Panetta said the President and the Secretary of Defense ‘Hillary’ was AWOL!!
Too bad that Hillary is not and never was not the Sec of Defense!!

You're really stupid today, even moreso than usual, you Terminally Stupid Meathead!!

Of course, you can't read well through the tears of failure, eh Betsie??

“Gloria Ad Caput Venire”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859448
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

3

Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, misread your post..in a hurry.
I disagree, everyone should have some skin in the game.
Agree, everyone needs to have a vested interest.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859449
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

TSM wrote:
<quoted text>
How about this pay no Taxes get Zero benefits!!
How about you Rmoney losers STFU!!

You've got nothing useful to say.

Your hatred for your fellow citizens was rejected, alonng with your Mormon standard bearer!!

Deal with it!!

All you do is cry and whine about losing the election.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859450
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
I can see why you were questioning the investment, you thought it cost 6 figures. Now that you've been educated are you still questioning the investment?
I had already seen the TV piece that started yesterdays 3D printer discussion and I was well aware that many are using the inexpensive versions for crafting etc.

It was the use of a printer to produce magazines that haven't been and likely won't be outlawed that I was questioning.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859451
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

positronium wrote:
<quoted text>Agree, everyone needs to have a vested interest.
Everyone pays taxes.

To say otherwise proves you to be the sockpuppet idiot we all know you as.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859452
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, misread your post..in a hurry.
I disagree, everyone should have some skin in the game.
Everybody pays taxes, you nitwit!!

Therefore, everyone has 'skin in the game'. DUH

Since: May 11

Fayetteville, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859453
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You are so full of shit.
Go back and reference that post, you goddam liar.
Now, post that time line you talk about so much. Remember to put in all caps when that demonstration Obama lied about for two weeks happened.
Put up or shut up.
If you are s sure, why can't to answer this: And if I do go back & post where I posted it previously, will you finally STFU & admit what a dumbass lying POS you are????????

When you agree, I'll go back & lo0k.

Until then, remain an ignorant POS.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859454
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

positronium wrote:
<quoted text>He is a usurper of our nation's constitution. He needs to face charges for this dastardly act IMAO. And swiftly, before he causes any further damage to our already fragile nation.
Sockpuppets are such idiots.

""Senate Republicans on Tuesday ruled out placing armed drone strikes under the authority of a special court, arguing the move would be a dangerous intrusion on presidential power.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) last week raised the idea of creating a new oversight court for drones that would be patterned after the checks and balances that govern surveillance.
But senior Republicans in the Senate dismissed that plan as unrealistic, and warned it would undermine critical counterterrorism efforts.
“I think it is a terrible idea,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) told The Hill.
A new court would be “the biggest intrusion ... in the history of [this] country” on the president’s authority as commander in chief, Graham said.""

Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/defcon-hill/policy-a...
Follow us:@thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook

----------

So why is your side so supportive of Obama's Drone Program??

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••