Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...
Comments
767,901 - 767,920 of 1,078,986 Comments Last updated 5 min ago
NATTY BUMPOFF

Zagreb, Croatia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832074
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

12

12

12

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
I know you're about as ignorant of the role the Constitution plays in the authority structure of the government of the United States as Obama is, so I'll help you. Here's a key point that cannot be violated:
All laws are subordinate to the Constitution.
Perhaps you need someone to help you define the English word "all". After all, we all know Democrats have a problem defining words in the English language, like the word "is".
Let's go over some facts:
The Patriot Act is not part of the Constitution.
Therefore, it is subordinate to the Constitution.
Because the Patriot Act is subordinate to the Constitution, then it is impossible for the Patriot Act to supersede the Constitution.
Now, repeat after me:
"All laws are subordinate to the Constitution"
... in a Constitutional Republic like the United States, that is.
In a fascist dictatorship, this isn't true.
So, judging from what you wrote, you are under the impression that we live in a country governed by a fascist dictatorship, right?
DUDE, THE GENIE IS OUT OF THE BOTTLE AND IT'S BARBARA EDEN AGAIN, AND SHE IS HAWT!(MY GOD, HOW MUCH SPERM DID I SPILL OVER THAT WOMAN... MAYBE IT WAS THE "MASTER" THING?) AFTER A COUPLE OF HUNDRED YEARS THE "PEOPLE" ARE BEGINNING TO NOTICE THAT THE FOUNDING FATHERS DON'T LOOK LIKE THEM. THIS CONSTITUTION OF YOURS - AND IT IS YOURS - IS GOING TO BE SCRAPPED AS IT SHOULD BE. IT WILL BECOME AN INTERESTING EXHIBIT AT THE BACK OF THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS IN PUERTO RICO. WYOMING WILL RETURN TO IT'S RIGHTFUL PLACE AS A DESERTED WASTELAND AND THE COASTS - FOR HOWEVER LONG THEY LAST - WILL CONTROL THE NATION. IT'S COMING AND NOTHING YOU CAN DO WILL STOP IT. FURTHERMORE, THANKS TO YOUR INCESSANT CHATTER ABOUT REPRODUCTION AND ABORTION, YOU WILL BE REQUIRED TO HAND OVER ALL YOUR GUNS, EVEN THE ONE YOU KEEP IN YOUR MOTORCYCLE BOOT.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832075
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

12

12

12

NATTY BUMPOFF wrote:
WELL, TO BE FRANK, THE BUSH TAX CUTS BASICALLY DESTROYED THE COUNTRY. WHY WE DON'T JUST THROW THEM AWAY IS BEYOND ME? IT'S LIKE CONSERVATIVES HAVE A 20 MINUTE ATTENTION SPAN - THOUGH I'M SURE THEY'LL STILL BE BABBLING ABOUT BENGHAZI 100 YEARS FROM NOW AS OPPORTUNITIES ARISE FOR GLASS BOTTOM BOAT OWNERS TO MAKE A KILLING ON WALL STREET.
THE BUSH TAX CUTS CAME AT A TIME OF WAR(S) STARTED BY THE SAME GUYS WHO INSTITUTED THE TAX CUT. WHO THOUGHT THAT WAS A GOOD IDEA? WELL, CAROL, APPARENTLY, BUT WHO ELSE? YOU INVADE TWO COUNTRIES HALFWAY AROUND THE WORLD, "PAY FOR IT" BY SUPPLEMENTALS, WHICH ARE UNFUNDED IOU'S, AND THEN ACT ALL SURPRISED WHEN THE WHOLE IDIOTIC PILE OF SHIT BLOWS UP IN YOUR FACES AND CREATES AN ECONOMIC VOID SO DEEP WE MAY NEVER GET OUT OF IT... AND, AFTER ALL THIS, CAROL AND THESE OTHER HALFWITS HAVE THE GALL TO COMPLAIN ABOUT TRYING TO TAKE THE SCORE BACK TO ZERO? HEY, LOUIE, DO WE KNOW ANY HITTERS IN ORLANDO?... SOMEBODY FAMILIAR WITH THE WHORES DOWN THERE...
Kindly explain how the Republicans turned over to the Democrats in January, 2007, an annual deficit of 0.16 (that's zero point one six) trillion dollars. Then, explain to us what the Democrats did to that 0.16 (that's zero point one six) trillion dollar deficit since January, 2007?
Did you say increase it by ONE THOUSAND PERCENT?
RUSH10ME

Warsaw, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832076
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

12

12

12

obammy facing a pessimistic publicpoll says, the percentage of americans satisfied with the direction of the country stands at a paltry23% , usa today \ gallup poll released late tuesday.
NATTY BUMPOFF

Zagreb, Croatia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832077
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

12

11

11

PLUS, AM I THE ONLY ONE WHO IS SICK AND TIRED OF THE WHITE HOUSE? THAT PLACE HASN'T BEEN REDECORATED SINCE THE BRITISH BURNED IT DOWN. COME ON, PEOPLE, HOW LONG ARE YOU GOING TO TRY AND LIVE IN THE PAST? THIS ENTIRE CITY IS A MONUMENT TO MONUMENTS. IT'S UGLY AND DATED AND NO FUN AT ALL. LET'S KNOCK IT DOWN AND START OVER. SAME THING WITH ISRAEL.
carol

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832078
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

12

12

12

lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought you said he was out to get whitey?
Which is why I said making sense of his policies is an exercise in futility.

Keep in mind Rev. Wright, his mentor, said it's all whitey's fault for 20 years, so it's really no wonder, is it? Payback time, I mean?

And let's not forget his Marxist friends in college and his other mentor, Frank Marshall.

Since: May 11

Fayetteville, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832079
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

12

12

12

John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
The reduction of a tax dedicated to a failing Social Security program never made any sense, unless the Social Security were also reduced.
It never made any sense to you & the majority of the right whiners because you are uninformed.

The President wanted to get a tax break to working Americans. The problem being how do you do it.

The payroll tax cut was just a mechanism to accomplish this tax break to working Americans.

The money lost to SS in this tax break was replaced by funds from the general fund.

Social Security did not lose funding.

Try to keep up

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832080
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

12

12

12

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
It has been answered.
The same place Bush got his.
What's the answer, dufus?

Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?

The new taxes will only generate an additional 600 billion dollars over 10 years. The government has an annual deficit of 1.3 trillion dollars, with no plan to reduce it.

So, given these irrefutable facts, where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?

Nobody in the world has answered that question yet.

Since: May 11

Fayetteville, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832081
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

12

12

12

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
I know you're about as ignorant of the role the Constitution plays in the authority structure of the government of the United States as Obama is, so I'll help you. Here's a key point that cannot be violated:
All laws are subordinate to the Constitution.
Perhaps you need someone to help you define the English word "all". After all, we all know Democrats have a problem defining words in the English language, like the word "is".
Let's go over some facts:
The Patriot Act is not part of the Constitution.
Therefore, it is subordinate to the Constitution.
Because the Patriot Act is subordinate to the Constitution, then it is impossible for the Patriot Act to supersede the Constitution.
Now, repeat after me:
"All laws are subordinate to the Constitution"
... in a Constitutional Republic like the United States, that is.
In a fascist dictatorship, this isn't true.
So, judging from what you wrote, you are under the impression that we live in a country governed by a fascist dictatorship, right?
Unfortunately for the rest of us, you don't get to decide which laws are Constitutional.

That is up to the court system.
carol

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832083
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

11

11

11

John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
From who?
Let's hope he feels the pressure from every single American who voted for him.

Raising the debt ceiling yet again, renigging on his promise of a balanced approach (raising taxes AND cutting the budget), the risk of the nation's credit rating being lowered again and the outcry from the military if they get the shaft while reforms in entitlement programs are completely ignored should make all Americans light a fire under his feet.

Especially now since they're going to see even less in their paychecks.
NATTY BUMPOFF

Zagreb, Croatia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832084
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

12

12

11

proud2bwhite wrote:
<quoted text> what's ignorant about that? Every other race of people can be proud ,why is it ignorant for whites? Are you a racist?
OK, LET'S LOOK AT THIS FROM AN OBJECTIVE POINT OF VIEW. FIRSTLY, YOU'RE NOT WHITE, ARE YOU? I MEAN UNLESS YOU'RE A POLAR BEAR OR SOMETHING? SO SHOULDN'T IT READ, "PROUD2BPINK?" OR, "PROUD2BGRAY?"

SECONDLY, LET'S FACE IT, IF YOU WERE SO PROUD OF IT YOU'D NEVER GO OUT IN THE SUN, WEAR MAKE-UP (I'VE SEEN YOU WITH THE BLUSHER...) MOW THE GRASS IN BERMUDAS WITH NO SHIRT ON (I'VE SEEN YOU DO THAT TOO AND YOU NEED TO STOP!) SO, I'M DUBIOUS ABOUT THE PROUD PART TOO.

SO IF YOU'RE NOT REALLY PROUD AND YOU'RE NOT REALLY WHITE, WHAT'S THAT LEAVE? 2B? HOW ABOUT, 2BORNOT2B?

Since: May 11

Fayetteville, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832085
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

11

11

11

John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Your children and grandchildren.
Party on and f*ck the future!
We had a balanced Budget & on the path to paying down the debt.

Then a guy ran for President on the idea that we should not pay down the debt but rather give the money back to the taxpayers.

Dipsticks like you elected him President & the plan to pay down the debt went to Hell in a hand basket.
NATTY BUMPOFF

Zagreb, Croatia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832086
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

11

11

11

NOW, AS TO THE MATTER OF MY RACISM, I'M PART OF THE HUMAN RACE AND THAT'S THE ONLY ONE I RECOGNIZE. WITH THAT SAID, I AM NOT PROUD OF US, ANY OF US. WHAT'VE WE GOT TO BE PROUD OF? FOOTBALL? AIRBOATS?
carol

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832087
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

12

12

12

lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
If Bain bought the company; your husband would be fired, his pension eliminated and no healthcare. But, I'm sure you and he would gladly make that sacrifice to further enrich the the 1% club!!
Did it ever occur to you that those wars cost something? That Bush didn't put them on the books? You rightwingers are so easily duped it's incredible.
His company isn't floundering to begin with and doesn't need help trying to salvage it with an investors' own money.

Since: May 11

Fayetteville, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832089
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

11

11

11

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
What's the answer, dufus?
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
The new taxes will only generate an additional 600 billion dollars over 10 years. The government has an annual deficit of 1.3 trillion dollars, with no plan to reduce it.
So, given these irrefutable facts, where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
Nobody in the world has answered that question yet.
The same place Bush got his. Are you just dense?

Maybe you don't know where Bush got his??? Are you that stupid that you don't know???

We do know that as the economy improves, the deficit will be reduced through higher revenues & fewer dollars helping those caught up in that recession.

Which recession?? The George W Bush recession that created these deficits.

I must have missed the list of legislation the Democrats passed in the first 9 months of 2007 that created this recession. Why is that? You know, the laws & spending the Democrats created that their 49 members in the Senate could pass & Bush would sign.

Until you have a list, please STFU about a budget deficit when two wars were being run off budget. You are as dishonest as the Bush Administration.
Homer

Effort, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832090
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

12

12

12

John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
No. Costs a fortune to rescue them.
Republicans rescuing the homeless? lol, now I have heard everything. Last I heard DBWriter, resident Republican, wanted to find ways for them to pay taxes. Maybe a 'street sleeping' tax? Doorway tax?

“Seriously Misguided Democrat”

Since: Oct 12

Chicago Thugtown

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832091
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

12

11

11

OldRaider wrote:
<quoted text>
John that's not true. Most of my friends are hunters and many of them and myself also have concealed weapons permits. Some of these gun owners believe as you do that no gun should be banned because they buy into the phony slippery-slope argument. There are also many gun owners like myself that are embarrassed that the NRA has portrayed us all as supporters of semi-automatic assault type guns. There has to be a line drawn somewhere that limits what weapons are available to ANY person that wants one.
Most of your friends are hunters? Of course, all hillbillies are hunters and eat squirrels.

So you don't approve of theose semi-automatic rifles, but a hypocrite like you carries a concealed "semi-automatic" handgun?

Baaawwwaaahhhh!!!!!

Typicical moron liberal.

A loon like you should NOT be allowed to carry a gun, period. Mental illness is a real problem, and you have a major case, hypocrite.

Go clean your ears, gramps.
NATTY BUMPOFF

Zagreb, Croatia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832092
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

12

12

12

carol wrote:
<quoted text>
His company isn't floundering to begin with and doesn't need help trying to salvage it with an investors' own money.
JUST ANSWER THE QUESTION, HONEY, HARD AS IT IS. SPEAKING OF WHICH, AFTER YOU ANSWER THE NICE LADY'S QUESTION, BEND OVER AND PULL YOUR PANTIES DOWN SO I CAN MAKE AN INFECTION INSPECTION.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832093
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

11

11

11

carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Which is why I said making sense of his policies is an exercise in futility.
Keep in mind Rev. Wright, his mentor, said it's all whitey's fault for 20 years, so it's really no wonder, is it? Payback time, I mean?
And let's not forget his Marxist friends in college and his other mentor, Frank Marshall.
This is rich!

“Seriously Misguided Democrat”

Since: Oct 12

Chicago Thugtown

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832094
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

11

10

10

NATTY BUMPOFF wrote:
NOW, AS TO THE MATTER OF MY RACISM, I'M PART OF THE HUMAN RACE AND THAT'S THE ONLY ONE I RECOGNIZE. WITH THAT SAID, I AM NOT PROUD OF US, ANY OF US. WHAT'VE WE GOT TO BE PROUD OF? FOOTBALL? AIRBOATS?
What proxy location & name will you use tomorrow, Democrat/socialist sockpuppet?

How about proud2bstupid from Kenya? It will fit.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832095
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

10

10

10

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
The Patriot Act is not part of the Constitution.
Therefore, it is subordinate to the Constitution.
Because the Patriot Act is subordinate to the Constitution, then it is impossible for the Patriot Act to supersede the Constitution.
Now, repeat after me:
"All laws are subordinate to the Constitution"
... in a Constitutional Republic like the United States, that is.
In a fascist dictatorship, this isn't true.
So, judging from what you wrote, you are under the impression that we live in a country governed by a fascist dictatorship, right?
Funny how you nitwits defended the Patriot Act when Bush passed it!! LOL

Sleazy Ed said 'if you haven't done anything wrong, you've nothing to fear from the Patriot Act'.

Looks like Ed had no problem with it. I remember many of the nitwits saying the same thing.

But now that Obama's President, you're all against Bush's signature act as a Dictator!!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Better read up on John Yoo, Bush's legal expert, who wrote much of Bush's Constitution busting PAtriot Act.

AKA John Choon Yoo

Born: 10-Jun-1967
Birthplace: Seoul, South Korea

Gender: Male
Race or Ethnicity: Asian
Sexual orientation: Straight
Occupation: Government
Party Affiliation: Republican

Nationality: United States
Executive summary: Thinks Geneva Conventions are obsolete

Former clerk for Laurence H. Silberman at the Court of Appeals, and later for U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas 1994-95. Served as Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel at the DOJ 2001-03, where he wrote substantial parts of the PATRIOT act with Viet Dinh, and co-authored a report that spat on the Geneva Conventions.

The forty-two page memo in question, which he authored in January 2002, stipulated that since Afghanistan has no formal government to speak of, neither the Geneva Convention nor any other laws of war apply. This breaks a fifty-year U.S. military tradition of upholding those rules, rules that the U.S. adopted because the same rules protect captured American soldiers. When the U.S. state department read Yoo's memo, they were "horrified"; their chief legal advisor calling it "seriously flawed." But George W. Bush approved the policies in the memo, ultimately resulting in the Abu Ghraib fiasco and similar atrocities being committed in other Iraqi prisons as well as those in Afghanistan.

According to a 2010 report from the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility, investigators asked Yoo whether he maintained that the President's authority is broad enough that he could hypothetically "order a village of civilians to be exterminated", to which Yoo responded, "Sure." Among his other zingers are quotes like "There is no constitutional right to privacy of records not in your possession" (said at a University of Virginia conference) and another on the PATRIOT Act, "It seems to me a very modest bill. There is no revolutionary change."

Other related memos discuss how to avoid prosecution of War Crimes that are expected to be committed by Americans following these policies, though it is not clear whether Yoo had a hand in authoring those.

Yoo occasionally appears on news programs such as Lehrer News Hour as a talking head (at least one time with Scott Horton as foil), largely defending Bush administration policies. With all these wonderful ideas coming out of his head Yoo still feels he has enough credibility to author a book on Constitutional law. He remains a tenured law professor at the University of California at Berkeley.

----------

Fact is, nothing is unConstitutional until th eSupreme Court rules so.

Too bad you don't understand the Constitution or the Patriot Act.

But stay ignorant, that will ensure your supporting losers like Rmoney and McLame!!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••