Federal employees to rally on Capitol...

Federal employees to rally on Capitol Hill against cuts

There are 213 comments on the The Washington Post story from Feb 11, 2013, titled Federal employees to rally on Capitol Hill against cuts. In it, The Washington Post reports that:

The nation's largest federal-employee union plans to rally on Capitol Hill Tuesday, with the group expecting more than 1,500 supporters to urge Congress to shield government programs and services from spending cuts.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Washington Post.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#89 Feb 14, 2013
I wonder how long it will take the anti-gays to go to court to try to stop a vote in Oregon? Gotta love the hypocrisy of that.

au contraire

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#90 Feb 14, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
I wonder how long it will take the anti-gays to go to court to try to stop a vote in Oregon? Gotta love the hypocrisy of that.
Ah yes, affirmative action by sectual preference.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#91 Feb 14, 2013
au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>Ah yes, affirmative action by sectual preference.
What does that have to do with the anti-gays trying to stop the people of Oregon from being able to vote on a constitutional amendment?

I thought you anti-gays were all for these issues being voted on by the people?

Seems you're not that enthusiastic about it now that you've finally realized you can lose a vote.

au contraire

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#92 Feb 14, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
What does that have to do with the anti-gays trying to stop the people of Oregon from being able to vote on a constitutional amendment?
I thought you anti-gays were all for these issues being voted on by the people?
Seems you're not that enthusiastic about it now that you've finally realized you can lose a vote.
Nothing has ever stopped the people from something they really wanted. Without the MSM you would be a closet society living in SF and Hollywood. The sure must add yeast to your propaganda........I mean the way it makes your 2% look like 25%.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#93 Feb 14, 2013
au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>Nothing has ever stopped the people from something they really wanted. Without the MSM you would be a closet society living in SF and Hollywood. The sure must add yeast to your propaganda........I mean the way it makes your 2% look like 25%.
Ooooh, more scary conspiracy nonsense.....

Go back to posting Rasmussen polls showing Romney's going to win.

au contraire

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#94 Feb 14, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Ooooh, more scary conspiracy nonsense.....
Go back to posting Rasmussen polls showing Romney's going to win.
oooooooooooh, where was the conspiracy before your attempted diversion?
Dan Salazar

Long Beach, CA

#95 Feb 14, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
I wonder how long it will take the anti-gays to go to court to try to stop a vote in Oregon? Gotta love the hypocrisy of that.
Gays aren't the enemy. Period!
God isn't against Gays....Religious dogma is anti Gay.

Pelosi's so called "progressive" freak squad are America's enemies within.

“Hello Trump”

Since: Jan 07

Goodby Hillary

#96 Feb 14, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Not if that vote results in legislation which violates our constitutional rights like happened in California.
So.... In essence what you are claiming is that the social conscience of the majority is superceded by the percieved immorality of a minority. Have I got that right? That under the Constitution you have the right to abbrogate the social contract between man/woman that has been the Matrimonial union since time immemorial,down thru mankinds' history,in more societies than we can count. That you have the RIGHT to force the majority to accept that which they feel a natural abhorrance to? Right? Interesting. Get back to me when you've consulted your handlers for a suitable response.

“Hello Trump”

Since: Jan 07

Goodby Hillary

#97 Feb 14, 2013
au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>Nothing has ever stopped the people from something they really wanted. Without the MSM you would be a closet society living in SF and Hollywood. The sure must add yeast to your propaganda........I mean the way it makes your 2% look like 25%.
I think I have figured out WHY flamers want the sanctity of Marriage on their unions. Closet Christians. On the outside they bluff and bluster about not caring about God and Church yet here they are SCREAMING for the "right" to a Matrimonial ceremony to "bless" their union. But in secret they are scared sh1tless about living in sin. Not that the practice of Homosexuality isn't sin enough,THAT part they disregard.... Its the living together without benefit of the social contract of matrimony that they want to rectify,so in God's eyes they are no longer "living in sin",unmarried as it were.

au contraire

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#98 Feb 14, 2013
okimar wrote:
<quoted text>I think I have figured out WHY flamers want the sanctity of Marriage on their unions. Closet Christians. On the outside they bluff and bluster about not caring about God and Church yet here they are SCREAMING for the "right" to a Matrimonial ceremony to "bless" their union. But in secret they are scared sh1tless about living in sin. Not that the practice of Homosexuality isn't sin enough,THAT part they disregard.... Its the living together without benefit of the social contract of matrimony that they want to rectify,so in God's eyes they are no longer "living in sin",unmarried as it were.
You can't start a gay marriage saying; DEARLY BELOVED WE ARE GATHERED HERE BEFORE GOD......When God calls you an abomination.

“Hello Trump”

Since: Jan 07

Goodby Hillary

#99 Feb 14, 2013
au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>You can't start a gay marriage saying; DEARLY BELOVED WE ARE GATHERED HERE BEFORE GOD......When God calls you an abomination.
They just want to go thru the motions to give it some semblence of sanctity. Everyone KNOWS gay marriage is a farce,but like I said they want the psuedo-sanctity in THEIR eyes. To absolve THEIR self guilt.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#100 Feb 14, 2013
okimar wrote:
<quoted text>So.... In essence what you are claiming is that the social conscience of the majority is superceded by the percieved immorality of a minority. Have I got that right? That under the Constitution you have the right to abbrogate the social contract between man/woman that has been the Matrimonial union since time immemorial,down thru mankinds' history,in more societies than we can count. That you have the RIGHT to force the majority to accept that which they feel a natural abhorrance to? Right? Interesting. Get back to me when you've consulted your handlers for a suitable response.
Yes. Any other questions?

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#101 Feb 14, 2013
okimar wrote:
<quoted text>I think I have figured out WHY flamers want the sanctity of Marriage on their unions. Closet Christians. On the outside they bluff and bluster about not caring about God and Church yet here they are SCREAMING for the "right" to a Matrimonial ceremony to "bless" their union. But in secret they are scared sh1tless about living in sin. Not that the practice of Homosexuality isn't sin enough,THAT part they disregard.... Its the living together without benefit of the social contract of matrimony that they want to rectify,so in God's eyes they are no longer "living in sin",unmarried as it were.
Who's talking about religious marriage?

We're fighting for civil marriage with has nothing to do with your precious holy matrimony.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#102 Feb 14, 2013
au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>You can't start a gay marriage saying; DEARLY BELOVED WE ARE GATHERED HERE BEFORE GOD......When God calls you an abomination.
It depends on which version of which god-creature you're talking about.
Dickweed

Ames, IA

#103 Feb 14, 2013
okimar wrote:
<quoted text>They just want to go thru the motions to give it some semblence of sanctity. Everyone KNOWS gay marriage is a farce,but like I said they want the psuedo-sanctity in THEIR eyes. To absolve THEIR self guilt.
What the hell did your mom do to you when you were a kid?

“DONT BELIEVE FAKE RUSSIA”

Since: Mar 09

CONSPIRACIES BY FAKE NEWS!

#104 Feb 14, 2013
I think we the people should decide how much federal employees should make not some fat lazy overpaid union thug..its our money, we should have a say.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#105 Feb 14, 2013
American_Infidel wrote:
I think we the people should decide how much federal employees should make not some fat lazy overpaid union thug..its our money, we should have a say.
Get elected to Congress and then you'll have a say. Otherwise you'd have to change the constitution, which again has to go through Congress first.
Dickweed

Ames, IA

#106 Feb 14, 2013
American_Infidel wrote:
I think we the people should decide how much federal employees should make not some fat lazy overpaid union thug..its our money, we should have a say.
Brilliant.
I bet you would feel really important if you could cut a working man's salary because you don't like liberals.
Call your congress dork about that one. He'll jump right on it.
once again...
Brilliant, Simply Brilliant.

“Hello Trump”

Since: Jan 07

Goodby Hillary

#107 Feb 14, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Who's talking about religious marriage?
We're fighting for civil marriage with has nothing to do with your precious holy matrimony.
Flamers have been offered civil unions in the past only to say that wasn't good enough. The more radical flamers demanded that clergy be FORCED to perform ceremonies,but most have been more sensible about the matter. I have no problem with gay unions recognized by the state as having the same benifits as couples wedded by clergy and sanctioned by society as a couple. Its the MARRIAGE part many don't care to see attached to any gay union. That in itself has a religious connection to it that predates governments stucking their noses into what had been a function of the Church. Governments only became interested in the institution when some smart beaurocrat discovered that an untapped source of revenue was available in selling licenses to marry. Making a union legitimate in the eyes of the State,in addition to the church.

“Hello Trump”

Since: Jan 07

Goodby Hillary

#108 Feb 14, 2013
Dickweed wrote:
<quoted text>
What the hell did your mom do to you when you were a kid?
Raised me with a strong sense of Morality. Where did yours go wrong?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Senate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 3 min Rider on the Storm 16,649
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min Fitius T Bluster 1,565,221
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 7 min Dr Guru 242,281
News Democrats Announce Bipartisan Agreement on Sanc... 8 min Red Crosse 20
News 'Let Obamacare fail,' Trump says after GOP plan... 22 min Dee Dee Dee 63
News Burchett: I'm running for U.S. House or Senate ... 52 min Debating 212
News The Latest: Trump says only crime is leaks 'aga... 54 min Professional Opin... 25
More from around the web