We have propaganda....Teener has de troof!<quoted text>
Realscience and Skepticalscience are well known for being loaded with propaganda and not science. And as far as awards, many works of fiction win awards. The real judge is what they produce and what they have produced is propaganda, pure and simple. The reason you find yourself defending them and the NASA web sites is that the limited amount of source material available to you means that you cannot find other sources to rely on. That you have to resort to claiming I am lying instead of finding additional proof to back up your claims.
OF course you have little choice. That so many of the places you once could rely on have now changed thier stance and are now disagree with man being the primary motivator on climate change or have been discredited.
Funny thing is, Teener equates scientific and communication awards to science fiction awards, making her an honorary PHuD.
Funny thing is, Teener demands more proof than she provides.
I'd like to see some of these sites that have reversed their positions, too. After all.