Who still takes global warming seriou...

Who still takes global warming seriously?

There are 30923 comments on the Farmington Daily Times story from Jan 28, 2010, titled Who still takes global warming seriously?. In it, Farmington Daily Times reports that:

Despite the recent discovery of the e-mails that resulted in "Climate Gate" and the fact this has been one of the coldest and harshest winters in many years, Gov.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Farmington Daily Times.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#31087 Jan 21, 2013
ObamaSUX wrote:
<quoted text>
LIAR! and you JUST PROVED that MY PREDICTION was TRUE....AGAIN.
YOU CAN'T POST any REAL SCIENCE like:
- EVEN "ONE" MEASUREMENT, EVER DONE DONE, IN THE HISTORY OF MANKIND WHERE ANY COLD OBJECT HAS EVER "HEATED-UP" A WARMER OBJECT ?
- EVEN "ONE" MEASUREMENT WHERE THE COLDER ATMOSPHERE HAS "HEATED-UP" A WARMER EARTH ?
- EVEN "ONE" LAW OF SCIENCE that supports the Fantasy "Greenhouse Effect" and the AGW FRAUD?
Why?.... BECAUSE THEY DO NOT EXIST and ALL YOUR LIES to try and AVOID THE TRUTH is APPARENT TO EVERYBODY.
The FACTS are that your WHOLE AGW CULT and YOU are Pathological Liars and HUMAN GARBAGE.
----------
Here are some applicable links that describe the AGW CULT and their MEMBERS:
The Mind of a Pathological Liar (Mental Health Guru)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =UxtJlc8AZe4XX
Are AGW'ers Cult Members?
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
The AGW CULT is a Death Cult full of Psychopaths.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
SUXObama/Gord

Until you can read & refute Wallop10's references, you simply have no leg to stand on. Here ya go:

Fourier, J.-B. J. 1824. "Memoire sur les Temperatures du Globe Terrestre et des Espaces Planetaires." Annales de Chemie et de Physique 2d Ser. 27, 136-167.

Tyndall, J. 1859. "Note on the Transmission of Radiant Heat through Gaseous Bodies." Proceed. Roy. Soc. London 10, 37-39.

Arrhenius, S.A. 1896. "On the Influence of Carbonic Acid in the Air upon the Temperature of the Ground." Phil. Mag. 41, 237-275.

Manabe, S. and R.F. Strickler, 1964. "Thermal Equilibrium of the Atmosphere with a Convective Adjustment." J. Atmos. Sci. 21, 361-385.

Suess, H.E. 1955. "Radiocarbon Concentration in Modern Wood." Sci. 122, 415-417.

Revelle, R. and H.E. Suess 1957. "Carbon Dioxide Exchange between Atmosphere and Ocean and the Question of an Increase of Atmospheric CO2 During the Past Decades." Tellus 9, 18-27.

Hanel, R. A., and B. J. Conrath 1970. "Thermal Emission Spectra of Earth and Atmosphere from Nimbus-4 Michelson Interferometer Experiment." Nature 228, 143-&.

Hoffert, Martin I., Covey, Curt 1992. "Deriving Global Climate Sensitivity from Palaeoclimate Reconstructions." Nature 360, 573-576.

Harries, J.E., H.E. Brindley, P.J. Sagoo, and R.J. Bantges 2001. "Increases in greenhouse forcing inferred from the outgoing longwave radiation spectra of the Earth in 1970 and 1997." Letter, Nature, 410, 355-357.

Griggs, J.A. and J.E. Harries 2004. "Comparison of spectrally resolved outgoing longwave data between 1970 and present." EUMETSAT Conference and Workshop Proceedings 2004.

Philipona, R., B. Du"rr, C. Marty, A. Ohmura, and M. Wild 2004. "Radiative Forcing--Measured at Earth's Surface--Corroborate the Increasing Greenhouse Effect." Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L03202

Hegerl Gabriele C., Crowley Thomas J., Hyde William T., Frame David J. 2006. "Climate Sensitivity Constrained by Temperature Reconstructions over the Past Seven Centuries." Nature 440, 1029-1032 (letter).

W.F.J. Evans, W.F.J., and E. Puckrin 2006. "Measurements of the Radiative Surface Forcing of Climate." 18th Conference on Climate Variability and Change, P1.7

Rowa*n T. Sutton, Buwen Dong, and Jonathan M. Gregory (2006) Land/sea warming ratio in response to climate change: IPCC AR4 model results and comparison with observations, Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 34, L02701, pp. 1-5
http://atmosdyn.yonsei.ac.kr/nrl/seminar/Sutt ...

Royer, D.L. 2006. "CO2-forced climate thresholds during the Phanerozoic" Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 70, 5665-5675.

Came R.E., J.M. Eiler, J. Veizer, K. Azmy, U. Brand, and C.R. Weidman 2007. "Coupling of surface temperatures and atmospheric CO2 concentrations during the Palaeozoic era." Nature 449, 198-201.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#31088 Jan 21, 2013
Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
Gee those 9-12 voters DOWN only appear when you're debating ObamaSux.
Amazing he has THAT many aliases.
Guess you just have to create that many Yahoo accounts is the trick.
Most people would consider that dishonest to use them to vote multiple times.
Why it would take someone who PASSES his CULT test with flying colors, wouldn't you say?
LOL
Wallop,

It seems the only things in SUXObama's brain that work are

1. The multiple aliases he uses to up-vote himself & no-vote others. It's probably a macro that does it easily & quickly with just a couple of keystrokes.

2. The finger that controls his caps lock key.

3. The part of his brain that remembers insults to others.

4. The part of his brain that can read & regurgitate equine excrement from lying right wing websites.

Trouble is, this means his brain must have at least 4 working neurons, which seems awfully unlikely...

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#31089 Jan 21, 2013
ObamaSUX wrote:
<quoted text>
- EVEN "ONE" MEASUREMENT, EVER DONE DONE, IN THE HISTORY OF MANKIND WHERE ANY COLD OBJECT HAS EVER "HEATED-UP" A WARMER OBJECT ?
- EVEN "ONE" MEASUREMENT WHERE THE COLDER ATMOSPHERE HAS "HEATED-UP" A WARMER EARTH ?
- EVEN "ONE" LAW OF SCIENCE that supports the Fantasy "Greenhouse Effect" and the AGW FRAUD?
More science (from Wallop10) full of PROOF that the greenhouse effect is real, & is warming the earth. This is stuff you probably either won't or can't read. If you did read & understand it, you'd see how wrong you are. You'll never admit that, of course.

You have NO credibility as a denier if you can't refute this work:

Part II.

Griggs, J. A., and J. E. Harries 2007. "Comparison of spectrally resolved outgoing longwave radiation over the tropical Pacific between 1970 and 2003 using IRIS, IMG, and AIRS." Journal of Climate 20, 3982-4001.

Horton, D.E. et al. 2007. "Orbital and CO2 forcing of late Paleozoic continental ice sheets" Geophys. Res. Lett. L19708.

Fletcher, B.J. et al. 2008. "Atmospheric carbon dioxide linked with Mesozoic and early Cenozoic climate change" Nature Geoscience 1, 43-48.

Fu, Qiang and Celeste M. Johanson 2005. "Satellite-Derived Vertical Dependence of Tropical Tropospheric Temperature Trends." Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L10703

Vinnikov, K.Y., N.C. Grody, A. Robock, R.J. Stouffer, P.D. Jones, and M.D. Goldberg 2006. "Temperature trends at the surface and in the troposphere." J. Geophys. Res. 111, D03106.
http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2006/2005JD0 ...

Knutti, R. and G. Hegerl 2008. "The equilibrium sensitivity of the earth's temperature to radiation changes." Nature Geoscience 1, 735-743.

W. M. Kurschner et al. 2008. "The impact of Miocene atmospheric carbon dioxide fluctuations on climate and the evolution of the terrestrial ecosystem"Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 499-453.

Lean, J.L. and D.H. Rind 2008. "How natural and anthropogenic influences alter global and regional surface temperatures: 1889 to 2006." Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L18701.

Sherwood, S.C., C.L. Meyer, R.J. Allen, and H.A. Titchner, 2008. "Robust Tropospheric Warming Revealed by Iteratively Homogenized Radiosonde Data." J. Clim. 21, 5336-5350.
http://camels.metoffice.gov.uk/quarc/Sherwood ...

Zachos, J.C. 2008. "An early Cenozoic perspective on greenhouse warming and carbon-cycle dynamics" Nature 451, 279-283.

Allen, R.J. and S.C. Sherwood 2009. "Warming maximum in the tropical upper troposphere deduced from thermal winds." Nature Geosci. 1, 399 - 403.
http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v1/n6/abs/ ... http://cce.890m.com/models/images/allen-sherw ...

Clement, A.C., Burgman R., and J.R. Norris 2009. "Observational and Model Evidence for Positive Low-Level Cloud Feedback." Science 325, 460-464.

Titchner, H.A., P.W. Thorne, M.P. McCarthy, S.F.B. Tett, L. Haimberger, and D.E. Parker 2009. "Critically Reassessing Tropospheric Temperature Trends from Radiosondes Using Realistic Validation Experiments." J. Clim. 22, 465-485.

Oh yeah - your "scientific" paper is STILL wrong. Radiative forcing does NOT work like a heat pump & does NOT violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics.

These things are true no matter how many times you yell that they're not.

Your grandchildren, should the world be so unfortunate, will learn the hard way how wrong you are.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#31090 Jan 21, 2013
Joe Bob Attacks wrote:
Wow, this an old thread. Not sure of the recent conversations, but 2012 was warmest year on record. 2013 will be another scorcher. The cherry blossom trees are blooming in January. What should that tell to the idiots still in denial?
Secondly, I'm a republican who doesn't understand why my party continues to bury its head in the sand on this issue.
Also, there will occasionally be heavy winter storms even with global warming. That doesn't mean global warming doesn't exist. I'm not sure if the entire icecap has to melt before people finally get it.
Please leave the science to scientists....who actually study science. Since when is a politician or an average working Joe (myself included) qualified to make these determinations?
Yet everyone's opinion seems to be valid, just like every kid gets an award at soccer. That's B.S.
Joe Bob,

You're making way, way, way, way, WAY too much sense for the ideological deniers here. SUX is especially cuckoo.

It's too bad you can't thru to your Republican colleagues. The party has been taken over by a right wing cabal, almost Leninist/fascist in their intolerance for dissent.(Had any primary challenges from the right lately?)

Eventually people will realize that AGW/CC is real. Hopefully it won't take the complete collapse of agriculture with mass famine, or a dramatic sea level rise, to convince enough people to oppose the wealth & power of the oil industry (& all the others with financial stakes in AGW/CC denial).
SpaceBlues

United States

#31091 Jan 21, 2013
Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ahh. You are obviously the right wing nut case GORD, by the writing style.
One of you 8 aliases????
He ran to the hills.:-]

You did an awesome thing when you listed some of the relevant literature. I listed references in the past but yours is timely and in focus.

As another poster said, GORD now has to respond to you. In the past people did not demand this. I was left alone with him each time.

You are not alone now. I can think at least four posters who should support you until GORD admits he has been wrong.
gcaveman1

Bay Springs, MS

#31092 Jan 21, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>He ran to the hills.:-]
You did an awesome thing when you listed some of the relevant literature. I listed references in the past but yours is timely and in focus.
As another poster said, GORD now has to respond to you. In the past people did not demand this. I was left alone with him each time.
You are not alone now. I can think at least four posters who should support you until GORD admits he has been wrong.
HA!

Gord won't admit he's wrong until Hell freezes over. He thinks that won't be long, according to his physics, but he still won't admit it even if it did happen.

The rest of us know, according to the physics AND the religion, that Hell won't ever freeze over.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#31093 Jan 21, 2013
ObamaSUX wrote:
<quoted text>
One does have to be a Scientist to understand why AGW is a FRAUD.
The 2nd Law of Themodynamics is taught in Grade School.
“Second Law of Thermodynamics: It is NOT POSSIBLE for heat to flow from a colder body to a warmer body without any work having been done to accomplish this flow. Energy will not flow
spontaneously from a low temperature object to a higher temperature object.”
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/th...
Even a four year old Child knows that an Ice Cube at -20 deg C will NOT HEAT them, it will COOL them.
The AGW FRAUD "science" says EXACTLY the OPPOSITE.
The AGW "scientists" say that a COLD Atmosphere (average temp of -20 deg C) will HEAT-UP a much Warmer Earth Surface that has an average temp of +15 deg C.
That's the fundamental basis of the AGW FRAUD, pure and simple.
A couple of scientists writing condescending emails doesn't make global warming fiction. The earth is clearly warming. Scientist just didn't pull this out of thin air. Extensive research has gone into this. They're not just repeating what they hear from political pundits on tv. Papers have been written, years of research, ice core samples going back hundreds of thousand years.

I did a science experiment on this as a middle schooler in the 1980s of the effects CO on a closed sphere. If a middle schooler can figure that out, why cant you? People have known about for this for decades. That's a heck of a long time to keep a hoax going.

Also, the big question is why? Why would thousands of scientists perpetrate a hoax of this nature? Especially a hoax that is so gloomy? It makes no sense. What do they have to gain collectively?

I'll tell you who has to gain, the polluters, oil and gas companies, and the people they contribute to. They have everything to gain to make people look the other way. Now, I'm still a republican for many reasons, but the GOP really needs to wake up to this issue. Stop letting the D's control common sense with regard to this issue.
ObamaSUX

Calgary, Canada

#31094 Jan 21, 2013
Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
Tsk Tsk. Are you so clueless, pal, you don't notice your extremist RANTS and SCREAMS of certainty mean you are the one who passes your own CULT test.
I see you have MORE than 9 aliases.
So obvious!!! They seem to only follow YOU wherever you go. Nowhere else. LOL.
Hey Wallop10, HAVE YOU POSTED:

- EVEN "ONE" MEASUREMENT, EVER DONE DONE, IN THE HISTORY OF MANKIND WHERE ANY COLD OBJECT HAS EVER "HEATED-UP" A WARMER OBJECT ?
- EVEN "ONE" MEASUREMENT WHERE THE COLDER ATMOSPHERE HAS "HEATED-UP" A WARMER EARTH ?
- EVEN "ONE" LAW OF SCIENCE that supports the Fantasy "Greenhouse Effect" and the AGW FRAUD?

Come on, ANSWER THE QUESTIONS.

Hey Wallop10, WHY CAN'T YOU POST these MEASUREMENTS?

Come on, ANSWER THE QUESTION.
----------
The TRUTH is that Wallop10, despite posting REAMS OF AGW QUACK REFERENCES can ONLY BABBLE and LIE.

That's all he ever can do because AGW is a pure fantasy with no basis in Science, Fact or Measurement.

There will be no "Answers" comming from the Cult Idiot because he avoids the TRUTH like the Plague and can only Deficate his CULT LIES.

Like All the AGW Cult, Wallop10 shares these common Traits:

1. A room temperature IQ
2. Has a "Green Brain"....a symptom of a severe infection.
3. Always loses battles of wits because they are unarmed.
4. What they lack in intelligence, they more than make up for in stupidity.
5. Have nothing to say, but delight in saying it.
6. Have a speech impediment ... their foot.
7. Would still be a virgin except for what nature did to their mind.
8. They are not complete idiots -- some parts are missing.
9. When confronted with the Truth they use their only skill....LYING.
10. When they are confronted with their Lying...they will continue to LIE

Wallop10 has now reached Step #10 and will continue his Pathological Lying FOREVER.

How Pathetic but not surprising for Human Garbage.

JUST WATCH AND LEARN.
ObamaSUX

Calgary, Canada

#31095 Jan 21, 2013
HomoSapiensLaptopicus wrote:
<quoted text>
SUXObama/Gord
Until you can read & refute Wallop10's references, you simply have no leg to stand on. Here ya go:...blah blah.
HomoSapiensLaptopicus wrote:
<quoted text>
More science (from Wallop10) full of PROOF that the greenhouse effect is real, & is warming the earth....blah blah.
HAHAHA...HAHAHA....HAHAHA

My God, ALWAYS REAMS of AGW CULT BABBLE and ABSOLUTELY NO MEASUREMENTS.

You CULT IDIOTS just NEVER LEARN and are SO PREDICATABLE.

Here is a REPOST of what I POSTED FOR YOU .... It's STILL APPLICABLE:
----------
----------
It is a matter of FACT that YOU have ONLY RUN FOR THE HILLS every single time I asked you to POST:

- EVEN "ONE" MEASUREMENT, EVER DONE DONE, IN THE HISTORY OF MANKIND WHERE ANY COLD OBJECT HAS EVER "HEATED-UP" A WARMER OBJECT
- EVEN "ONE" MEASUREMENT WHERE THE COLDER ATMOSPHERE HAS "HEATED-UP" A WARMER EARTH

I say these Measurements DO NOT EXIST and that YOU ARE A JUST ANOTHER AGW CULT LIAR.

Howerver, YOU SAID:

"That is, THE ATMOSPHERE HELPS THE SUN WARM THE EARTH, even though it's significantly cooler than the surface. This is a scientific fact. There are not just thousands, but many millions, perhaps billions, of measurements that support this."

Why don't you EXPLAIN to our Normal People readers why YOU have NOT BEEN ABLE TO POST EVEN "ONE" MEASUREMENT and have been RUNNING FOR THE HILLS ?

Come on, EXPLAIN WHY?
---
Of course, the TRUTH is and the answer to my question is that THE MEASUREMENTS DO NOT EXIST.

But, just like my PREDICTION about the AGW Cult member "gcaveman1" above, Homo-ody will conform to AGW CULT rules of behaviour embedded his "brainwashed" CULT MIND.

AGW CULT rules of behaviour will PROHIBIT HIM FROM ANSWERING my SIMPLE QUESTION."
----------
In this case Homo-ody chose to LIE and say that he "DID explain why".

Of course, he NEVER DID "EXPLAIN WHY" he could NOT POST EVEN "ONE" MEASUREMENT.

And, in keeping with standard Lying practices of his CULT, he continued with this GEM OF A LIE:
"Wallop10's list of references contains one measurement after another."

Notice that he COULD NOT POST "ANY" MEASUREMENT, so he just continues to LIE about the MEASUREMENTS.

Like all CULT MEMBERS, Homo-ody's is behaviour is irrational by Normal Standards but is COMMON for "brainwashed" CULT MEMBERS.
----
Are you Normal People starting to gain some insight into how the AGW Cult thinks and why they are so PREDICTABLE?
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
----------
----------
What a HOOT!
ObamaSUX

Calgary, Canada

#31096 Jan 21, 2013
HomoSapiensLaptopicus wrote:
<quoted text>
Joe Bob,
You're making way, way, way, way, WAY too much sense for the ideological deniers here. SUX is especially cuckoo.
It's too bad you can't thru to your Republican colleagues. The party has been taken over by a right wing cabal, almost Leninist/fascist in their intolerance for dissent.(Had any primary challenges from the right lately?)
Eventually people will realize that AGW/CC is real. Hopefully it won't take the complete collapse of agriculture with mass famine, or a dramatic sea level rise, to convince enough people to oppose the wealth & power of the oil industry (& all the others with financial stakes in AGW/CC denial).
Have you ever seen the Movie Groundhog Day?

Every day is Groundhog Day for the AGW CULT.

They keep on repeating the same old AGW CRAP every DAY and can NEVER post ANY MEASUREMENTS.

Why don't you just ADMIT that THERE ARE NO MEASUREMENTS and stop making a FOOL of YOURSELF over and over and over and over.....like a broken record.

HAHAHA...You CULT IDIOTS just NEVER LEARN and are SO PREDICATABLE.
----------
PS:

The Public already knows that AGW is CRAP from the Daily "predictions" of the END OF THE WORLD, you AGW IDIOTS have made over and over and over.

Don't you know that AGW is COMEDY NOW ?

"Barbra Streisand told Diane Sawyer that we're in a global warming crisis, and we can expect more and more intense storms, droughts and dust bowls. But before they act, weather experts say they're still waiting to hear from Celine Dion." --Jay Leno

"Arnold Schwarzenegger is blaming man for global warming. And today, Al Gore agreed with him. That's so typical. Two cyborgs,'Oh, let's blame the humans.'" --Jay Leno

"According to Time magazine, global warming is 33% worse than we thought. You know what that means? Al Gore is one-third more annoying than we thought." --Jay Leno

"Al Gore announced he is finishing up a new book about global warming and the environment. Yeah, the first chapter talks about how you shouldn't chop down trees to make a book that no one will read." --Conan O'Brien

"Experts say this global warming is serious, and they are predicting now that by the year 2050, we will be out of party ice." --David Letterman

"At a press conference yesterday NASA announced that 2005 was the hottest year on record. It is so hot, and global warming is so bad, if the presidential election were held today, Al Gore would still lose." --Jay Leno

"According to a new U.N. report, the global warming outlook is much worse than originally predicted. Which is pretty bad when they originally predicted it would destroy the planet." --Jay Leno
----------
I don't know what makes you and the rest of the AGW cult so anal... but it really works!
ObamaSUX

Calgary, Canada

#31097 Jan 21, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>He ran to the hills.:-]
You did an awesome thing when you listed some of the relevant literature. I listed references in the past but yours is timely and in focus.
As another poster said, GORD now has to respond to you. In the past people did not demand this. I was left alone with him each time.
You are not alone now. I can think at least four posters who should support you until GORD admits he has been wrong.
Oh Good, a DOPE RING.

Bring as many AGW CULT MEMBERS to the Party as you can get.

Then I can show the "Normal Readers" how STUPID and PREDICTABLE you CULT IDIOTS are, all at the same time.

I will ask the DOPE RING to POST:

- EVEN "ONE" MEASUREMENT, EVER DONE DONE, IN THE HISTORY OF MANKIND WHERE ANY COLD OBJECT HAS EVER "HEATED-UP" A WARMER OBJECT
- EVEN "ONE" MEASUREMENT WHERE THE COLDER ATMOSPHERE HAS "HEATED-UP" A WARMER EARTH

And, the DOPE RING will have a collective Panic Attack, crap in their pants and ALL RUN FOR THE HILLS....BABBLING ALL THE WAY.

What a HOOT!.....and GREAT COMEDY!
ObamaSUX

Calgary, Canada

#31098 Jan 21, 2013
Joe Bob Attacks wrote:
<quoted text>
A couple of scientists writing condescending emails doesn't make global warming fiction. The earth is clearly warming. Scientist just didn't pull this out of thin air. Extensive research has gone into this. They're not just repeating what they hear from political pundits on tv. Papers have been written, years of research, ice core samples going back hundreds of thousand years.
I did a science experiment on this as a middle schooler in the 1980s of the effects CO on a closed sphere. If a middle schooler can figure that out, why cant you? People have known about for this for decades. That's a heck of a long time to keep a hoax going.
Also, the big question is why? Why would thousands of scientists perpetrate a hoax of this nature? blah blah
Did your science experiment include having COLD CO2 in a sphere HEAT-UP a WARMER OBJECT?

That is exactly what the AGW QUACK "scientists" say what happens with AGW.

You can READ the quotes directly from the IPCC AR4 Report here:

Where is the AGW "science"?
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...

We can correctly write the IPCC AR4 Report definition of the Greenhouse Effect as:

Greenhouse Effect: Back Radiation from a Average -20 deg C Atmosphere to a +15 deg C Earth Surface where the Back Radiation is absorbed causing the Earths Surface to warm.
--------
Have you ever seen a COLD Object (like the Atmosphere) ever HEAT-UP a WARMER OBJECT like the Earth's Surface?

It is IMPOSSIBLE as The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics CLEARLY STATES.

“Second Law of Thermodynamics: It is NOT POSSIBLE for heat to flow from a colder body to a warmer body without any work having been done to accomplish this flow. Energy will not flow spontaneously from a low temperature object to a higher temperature object.”
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/th...

And, there is NOT:

- EVEN "ONE" MEASUREMENT, EVER DONE DONE, IN THE HISTORY OF MANKIND WHERE ANY COLD OBJECT HAS EVER "HEATED-UP" A WARMER OBJECT
- EVEN "ONE" MEASUREMENT WHERE THE COLDER ATMOSPHERE HAS "HEATED-UP" A WARMER EARTH

If YOU think otherwise, then POST A MEASUREMENT!!!

You CAN'T, BECAUSE THE MEASUREMENTS DO NOT EXIST.
----------
The AGW INDUSTRY is HUGE and involves TRILLIONS of Dollars.

AGW is a COMPLETE FRAUD and a SCAM.

Hell, the IPCC EVEN ADMITS that they ARE ONLY CONCERNED WITH "REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH".

FP’s Peter Foster: Canada dodges carbon suicide

"Before he was forced to talk the minority talk, Mr. Harper described climate change as a “socialist plot.” Intriguingly, this fact is now openly acknowledged.

This week, German IPCC official Ottmar Edenhofer said in an interview:“[O]ne must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy.…One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy any more.”
http://opinion.financialpost.com/2010/11/18/p...

These are the type of people who are using the AGW FRAUD to implement their real Marxist Agenda, that they have PUBLICLY STATED.
----------
You can even go back to the very beginning of the the IPCC that the Screw Ball Nut and FOUNDER of the IPCC, Maurice Strong said PUBLICLY:

"Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring about?" - Maurice Strong

"Licences to have babies incidentally is something that I got in trouble for some years ago for suggesting even in Canada that this might be necessary at some point, at least some restriction on the right to have a child." - Maurice Strong

Maurice Strong (a buddy of Al Gore) is presently hiding in Communist China because he was implicated in the UN Iraq Oil for food Scam.
----------
ARE YOU STARTING TO GET IT NOW?

Or, are you just another AGW CULT MEMBER?
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#31099 Jan 21, 2013
Useless scientific science fiction.
ObamaSUX

Calgary, Canada

#31100 Jan 21, 2013
PHD wrote:
Useless scientific science fiction.
You have nothing to say, but you delight in saying it.

PHD is All foam, no beer.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#31101 Jan 21, 2013
ObamaSUX wrote:
<quoted text>
You have nothing to say, but you delight in saying it.
PHD is All foam, no beer.
Sure do your nothing but Useless scientific science fiction.
Pete

Bethel, CT

#31102 Jan 21, 2013
ObamaSUX wrote:
<quoted text>
You have nothing to say, but you delight in saying it.
PHD is All foam, no beer.

I am a stupid fucking nigger.
I Agree with the last line.
ObamaSUX

Calgary, Canada

#31103 Jan 21, 2013
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>Sure do your nothing but Useless scientific science fiction.
Were you born during low tide in the gene pool?
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#31104 Jan 22, 2013
ObamaSUX wrote:
<quoted text>
Were you born during low tide in the gene pool?
I bet you were.Also low on the brain cell pool aren't you
ObamaSUX

Calgary, Canada

#31105 Jan 22, 2013
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>I bet you were.Also low on the brain cell pool aren't you
From your posts you seem to be Ignorant, and proud of it.
PHD

United States

#31106 Jan 22, 2013
ObamaSUX wrote:
<quoted text>
From your posts you seem to be Ignorant, and proud of it.
From your posts you seem to be black. You know, with an IQ of about 59.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Senate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Sanders rallies against GOP health care plan at... 15 min Retribution 48
News GOP at war with itself (Mar '16) 16 min Tm Cln 3,411
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 20 min Chris Rather 25,281
News Trump charges, without evidence, millions voted... 28 min Chris Rather 94
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr JRB 239,518
News Trump's immigration crackdown is hurting US far... 1 hr Well Well 17
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 hr Cheech the Conser... 1,509,496
More from around the web