BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
American Lady

Danville, KY

#135042 Dec 29, 2012
Citizenship

The issue of citizenship is no less clouded by such use of language than is any other area of law. The definitions of words or "legal terms" must be sought out diligently and the context in which they are used always carefully considered.[See The Law for information on "words" v. "legal terms" and issues of "context".] <<---<<<<

http://www.originalintent.org/edu/citizenship...

Context:
Something some of you peeps are in dire need of help with ...!!!
Anonymous

Somerville, MA

#135043 Dec 29, 2012
American Lady wrote:
Citizenship
The issue of citizenship is no less clouded by such use of language than is any other area of law. The definitions of words or "legal terms" must be sought out diligently and the context in which they are used always carefully considered.[See The Law for information on "words" v. "legal terms" and issues of "context".] <<---<<<<
http://www.originalintent.org/edu/citizenship...
Context:
Something some of you peeps are in dire need of help with ...!!!
Morons can't understand "settled law". Sad. Long settled.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#135044 Dec 29, 2012
Justus Liebig wrote:
<quoted text>Morons can't understand "settled law". Sad. Long settled.
Birfoons can't understand basic English. Sad doesn't cover it. Pathetic
Frank

Spokane, WA

#135045 Dec 29, 2012
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
We the people elected our President, for the second time, per the Constitution.
You have the right to moan and piss and make a fool of yourself.
All that November 6 proved is that 50.4 percent of the voters are idiots who prefer to vote against principles,values and morals that make our country strong. Every one knows that there will always be a portion of the population that won't care about our country,preferring instead to to opt for hedonism and evil. There are still tens of millions of dedicated Americans that believe in our country,over forty nine percent did indeed vote for the better good of our country.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#135046 Dec 29, 2012
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>All that November 6 proved is that 50.4 percent of the voters are idiots who prefer to vote against principles,values and morals that make our country strong. Every one knows that there will always be a portion of the population that won't care about our country,preferring instead to to opt for hedonism and evil. There are still tens of millions of dedicated Americans that believe in our country,over forty nine percent did indeed vote for the better good of our country.
50.4 % of the voters, if we extrapolates, 50.4% of the population, are idiots who prefer to vote against principles, values and morals that make our country strong? Well, well, aren't you one of those who once or twice wrote that the United States is the best country in the world, number 1? Yet, you claim that more than half its population is idiotic and against principles, values and morals? In view of the fact that half the population is useless and rotten, please explain the number 1 standing.
Kapiolani

Honolulu, HI

#135047 Dec 29, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
You got a scholarship? Was it because you earned it or was it because of your ethnicity? I had a friend who was half Cherokee and her education was all paid for by us tax payers just because she was 50% American Indian.
She got a masters degree in nursing and had agreed to work one year on an Indian reservation for every year of school but to the best of my knowledge she never did. But she did enlist in the Army at age 38 and retired a year and a half ago as a LTC (O-5).
Now I earned my retirement. Every last cent. Tell me, would you ever fly in any aircraft that was not FAA certified? I did!
LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL,LO L,LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL, LOL,LOL

I do agree with you, Rouge, that our vets deserve their government checks. But the Tea Partiers don't want them, and you, to have that anymore!!!

Hey, but whatever. Thank you for you service.

You'll learn soon enough, if the GOP wins big in the next few years.

Aloha & Hauoli Makahiki Hau, from Honolulu, Hawaii, the Birthplace of President Barack Hussein Obama
Anonymous

Brighton, MA

#135048 Dec 30, 2012
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>All that November 6 proved is that 50.4 percent of the voters are idiots who prefer to vote against principles,values and morals that make our country strong. Every one knows that there will always be a portion of the population that won't care about our country,preferring instead to to opt for hedonism and evil. There are still tens of millions of dedicated Americans that believe in our country,over forty nine percent did indeed vote for the better good of our country.
If Republicans keep on thinking like Frank they will never again win a national election. Keep it up Frank.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#135049 Dec 30, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>Not bad. Have you figured out why there have been 190+ lawsuits? When 53% of our population are not sure if Obama is a Natural Born Citizen, something is wrong!
<quoted text>
I noticed that you did not contest the "53%" figure!!!
<quoted text>
Yesterday I did for about the sixth time. It was a Gallup pole!
Now, who did YOUR poling? YouGov? Do you think they are more reliable than .... Gallup.
But even given the YouGov pole, at least 40% on their Sep. 2012 are not 100% sure Obama was born in the U.S. And you think that is insignificant?
Donít know Rogue but it appears Gallup and Rasmussen was polling for Romney. Donít know how true it is but I heard both came in 24 of 28 for accuracy.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/07/1158...

Oh Lord whatís this? Why the only pollster Rogue and Romney trusts of course. LOL

In Colorado, Rasmussen polled at 50%-47% for Romney. The actual result was 51%-47% for Obama, the reverse of Rasmussen's poll.

In Florida, Rasmussen polled at 50%-48% for Romney. The actual result was 50%-49% for Obama, the reverse of Rasmussen's poll.

In Iowa, Rasmussen polled at 49%-48% for Romney. The actual result was 52%-47% for Obama, the reverse of Rasmussen's poll, doubled.

In New Hampshire, Rasmussen polled at 50%-48% for Romney. The actual result was 52%-47% for Obama, the reverse of Rasmussen's poll.

In Ohio, Rasmussen polled at a 49%-49% tie. The actual result was 50%-48% for Obama, a two-point swing.

In Virginia, Rasmussen polled at 50%-48% for Romney. The actual result was 50%-48% for Obama, the reverse of Rasmussen's poll.

In Wisconsin, Rasmussen polled at a 49%-49% tie. The actual result was 52-47% for Obama, a six-point swing
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/08/1158... #

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#135051 Dec 30, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>Sorry Jacques, it is still at least 40% who are not certain Obama is a NBC! And We the People have the right to know whether of not our president is a crook!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =sh163n1lJ4MXX
There is more than enough evidence to conduct a criminal investigation. Either the FBI can do it or the State of Hawaii. Of, the other states can but Hawaii does not have to honor their subpoenas! Oh, and neither Hawaii or the FBI will as the are being run by you Democrats!
The only evidence that counts proves Obama was born in Hawaii Rogue. Always has, always will.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#135052 Dec 30, 2012
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
The only evidence that counts proves Obama was born in Hawaii Rogue. Always has, always will.
There is a fiscal cliff and a Rogue cliff. I don't know about the former, but as to the latter, it's plain to see Rogue has gone off his own cliff. He does not say "I believe, I think, that the President may be a crook, and that there should be a criminal invetigation". No. Not your ole Rogue. He "throws it out there", writes that "THE PRESIDENT IS A CROOK AND THAT THERE SHOULD BE A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION. Now, not any ole investigation, but a criminal investigation, yessirree. 180+ tribunals have dismissed lonney tooney BC challenges. Rogue's contention ? All those tribunals are democrat-appointed or they don't know the law. The Sennate, the House, have not had ONE dissenting voice as to the President's eligibility. Rogue's contention? They're afraid to speak up! ALL 485 congressmen and senators are afraid. Yes indeed. The Supreme Court stomped on all challenges, and the Chief Justice inaugurated Obama. Rogue's contention? Roberts was bought off in a meeting with Obama a few minutes before the 2009 inauguration. As usual, Rogue did not say he "thought he was bought off", noooo, he merely stated "that he had been bought off just prior to the inauguration".

Other things that Rogue KNOWS , not guesses or thinks, but KNOWS OR KNEW : A) What whent on that night between Zimmerman and Martin. He gave us a runnning account, which made everyone think he was present. B) What went on in the minds of the 9 Justices of the Supreme Court when obamacare was deliberated. Why, he KNEW, did not THINK OR GUESS that they had already come to the conclusion it was illegal, HE KNEW. BTW, The Supremes squashed the challenge. C) Rogue also KNEW Romney would win on November 6, along with his birther ilk. Why, Rogue did not THINK OR GUESS Romney had a chance, that prospects were bright. NOOOOO. He KNEW, HE AFFIRMED that Romney would win. He lost. Miserably. Rogue's contention? It was fixed. Yup, and his idol, "offshsore Romney" confirmed Rogue's conclusion that Obama bought the election by distributing "gifts", notably condoms. Yup, that is how he won. Rogue ascertained, not guessed or thought, that the tea party birther candidate would win the Jacksonville mayoralty. Rogue's contention when that didn't happen? Well, two contentions, actually, the first and immediate one being that odds were so in favour of the looney tea party candidate, it HAD to be fixed and, later, that the newspapers mislead him. Not his fault.

Now Obama is a crook and needs to be criminally investigated.

I could go on and on...
Please Get A Room

San Jose, CA

#135053 Dec 30, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
There is a fiscal cliff and a Rogue cliff. I don't know about the former, but as to the latter, it's plain to see Rogue has gone off his own cliff. He does not say "I believe, I think, that the President may be a crook, and that there should be a criminal invetigation". No. Not your ole Rogue. He "throws it out there", writes that "THE PRESIDENT IS A CROOK AND THAT THERE SHOULD BE A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION. Now, not any ole investigation, but a criminal investigation, yessirree. 180+ tribunals have dismissed lonney tooney BC challenges. Rogue's contention ? All those tribunals are democrat-appointed or they don't know the law. The Sennate, the House, have not had ONE dissenting voice as to the President's eligibility. Rogue's contention? They're afraid to speak up! ALL 485 congressmen and senators are afraid. Yes indeed. The Supreme Court stomped on all challenges, and the Chief Justice inaugurated Obama. Rogue's contention? Roberts was bought off in a meeting with Obama a few minutes before the 2009 inauguration. As usual, Rogue did not say he "thought he was bought off", noooo, he merely stated "that he had been bought off just prior to the inauguration".
Other things that Rogue KNOWS , not guesses or thinks, but KNOWS OR KNEW : A) What whent on that night between Zimmerman and Martin. He gave us a runnning account, which made everyone think he was present. B) What went on in the minds of the 9 Justices of the Supreme Court when obamacare was deliberated. Why, he KNEW, did not THINK OR GUESS that they had already come to the conclusion it was illegal, HE KNEW. BTW, The Supremes squashed the challenge. C) Rogue also KNEW Romney would win on November 6, along with his birther ilk. Why, Rogue did not THINK OR GUESS Romney had a chance, that prospects were bright. NOOOOO. He KNEW, HE AFFIRMED that Romney would win. He lost. Miserably. Rogue's contention? It was fixed. Yup, and his idol, "offshsore Romney" confirmed Rogue's conclusion that Obama bought the election by distributing "gifts", notably condoms. Yup, that is how he won. Rogue ascertained, not guessed or thought, that the tea party birther candidate would win the Jacksonville mayoralty. Rogue's contention when that didn't happen? Well, two contentions, actually, the first and immediate one being that odds were so in favour of the looney tea party candidate, it HAD to be fixed and, later, that the newspapers mislead him. Not his fault.
Now Obama is a crook and needs to be criminally investigated.
I could go on and on...
At 8:30 AM, your time, on the Sunday morning of a Holiday weekend:

You incorporated 2087 characters to create 433 words in 30 lines in 4 paragraphs.
On an open forum to state nothing but your opinion of Rogue.
Finishing your summary with "I could go on and on..."

Instead of going on and on, please contact this person in private and meet with them. You are obviously infatuated with this person.
Please free this forum up for things other than your infatuation.

Thank you

PS you make yourself out to be quite a fool
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#135054 Dec 30, 2012
Please Get A Room wrote:
<quoted text>
At 8:30 AM, your time, on the Sunday morning of a Holiday weekend:
You incorporated 2087 characters to create 433 words in 30 lines in 4 paragraphs.
On an open forum to state nothing but your opinion of Rogue.
Finishing your summary with "I could go on and on..."
Instead of going on and on, please contact this person in private and meet with them. You are obviously infatuated with this person.
Please free this forum up for things other than your infatuation.
Thank you
PS you make yourself out to be quite a fool
And 5:30AM in California, insomnia-ridden and sleepless nut ball with nothing better to do, types totally-irrelevant post highlighting his utter ignorance of things written, by counting the number of characters, words and lines (thanks to computer program) instead of concentrating on contents which, incidentally, are totally relevant to Rogue's incredible ability to live in a world of make-believe. Your words, however, consist of triviality and obvious inability to sleep. Apnea, perhaps?

One thing you cannot hide, however, is your adherence to birther principles. As you no doubt know, "birther" is synonym for "fool". You wrote : "PS you make yourself out to be quite a fool". May I respond with : "You make yourself out to be quite a birther".

I believe this the first time I've seen you post here. Not impressive. Try again.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#135055 Dec 30, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>Not bad. Have you figured out why there have been 190+ lawsuits? When 53% of our population are not sure if Obama is a Natural Born Citizen, something is wrong!

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I noticed that you did not contest the "53%" figure!!!
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
Depends on the poll and when it was taken Rogue, but Iíd like to see the poll that says 53 percent of Americans are not sure Obama was born in the US. Republicans on the other hand, well__________
http://today.yougov.com/news/2012/10/01/birth...
How many times do I have yto post thois. You must have the attention spand of a golden retreaver!

GALLUP: MOST STILL QUESTION OBAMA'S BIRTH
Less than 1/2 of Americans say prez 'definitely' born in U.S.
Published: 05/13/2011

In a Gallup Poll taken May 5-8, 47% of those surveyed ó less than a majority ó say they believe the president was "definitely" born in the United States.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2011/05/298501/#pDAm0ec0wj...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#135056 Dec 30, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
You totally missed the point. only 47% knew he was born in Hawaii and the other 53% are either not sure or doubt it, or believe he was NOT born in the U.S. And that is very sad.
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
According to WND the latest survey has only 40% of Americans not believing that Obama was born in Hawaii OR NOT SURE ( http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/americans-distrust... )
Well, that is hardly surprising with the birther sites have been screaming that Obama was not born in the USA for years and years. In fact, the percentage of 40% not believing or not sure is relatively low, considering the length and extent of the effort made by birther sites.
HOWEVER, the effort is failing where it counts. Not one single case found for the birther side in more than 100 cases. Not one single member of the Electoral College changed her or his vote to vote against Obama. In the 2008 election not one single member of Congress voted not to confirm Obama's election out of the belief that he was not born in the USA, and he will be confirmed again, probably again UNANIMOUSLY, in January 2013.
You are right, in THIS pole 41% either do not believe he was born in America or they are not sure.
http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/10/BIRTHERS-ber...
Now it comes to who did the polling and was it a scientific poll? It was done by YouGov who is not n American polling company and other that stating they called 1,000 people, how many are Democrats, Republicans or other party affiliations. So we don't know how scientic this poll really is, do we Toozie?
Frank

Spokane, WA

#135057 Dec 30, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
50.4 % of the voters, if we extrapolates, 50.4% of the population, are idiots who prefer to vote against principles, values and morals that make our country strong? Well, well, aren't you one of those who once or twice wrote that the United States is the best country in the world, number 1? Yet, you claim that more than half its population is idiotic and against principles, values and morals? In view of the fact that half the population is useless and rotten, please explain the number 1 standing.
Our country has risen to the top *because* of those principles,values, and morals. Fifty million is not half the country,our country has 310 million. Of the people that voted for Obama,the ones that are the absolute idiots are the ones that claimed they voted for change yet they voted to re-elect the problem. They re-elected the worst resident of the White House in history and they also voted to re-elect numerous members of the Congress that are also the problem. Our problems became magnified during the 2006 election,if the voters were paying attention we could have been a lot better off by leaving Obama in Chicago. All fifty million of those voters need to take responsibility for how they voted and share the blame for the consequences that resulted from how they voted.
Frank

Spokane, WA

#135058 Dec 30, 2012
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
The only evidence that counts proves Obama was born in Hawaii Rogue. Always has, always will.
Barack Obama's father was never a citizen of the United States,not even for one day. Barack Obama's father was a visiting student.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#135059 Dec 30, 2012
Kapiolani wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL,LO L,LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL, LOL,LOL
I do agree with you, Rouge, that our vets deserve their government checks. But the Tea Partiers don't want them, and you, to have that anymore!!!
Hey, but whatever. Thank you for you service.
You'll learn soon enough, if the GOP wins big in the next few years.
Aloha & Hauoli Makahiki Hau, from Honolulu, Hawaii, the Birthplace of President Barack Hussein Obama
I hope you own your own sail boat that is capable of making it to the West Coast because Oahu is dissolving!

Tech / Sci > Science
Oahu Dissolving: Hawaiian Island Slowly Losing Mountain Ranges
http://www.ibtimes.com/oahu-dissolving-hawaii...
Frank

Spokane, WA

#135060 Dec 30, 2012
Justus Liebig wrote:
<quoted text>If Republicans keep on thinking like Frank they will never again win a national election. Keep it up Frank.
Obama didn't even win close to half of the counties in the country. Eventually,people will take accountability for how they vote and they will vote for the best interests of our country. Until then,we are doomed to the waste,failure,corruption,and organized destruction that is typical of the liberals that serve in the Democrat Party.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#135061 Dec 30, 2012
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>Our country has risen to the top *because* of those principles,values, and morals. Fifty million is not half the country,our country has 310 million. Of the people that voted for Obama,the ones that are the absolute idiots are the ones that claimed they voted for change yet they voted to re-elect the problem. They re-elected the worst resident of the White House in history and they also voted to re-elect numerous members of the Congress that are also the problem. Our problems became magnified during the 2006 election,if the voters were paying attention we could have been a lot better off by leaving Obama in Chicago. All fifty million of those voters need to take responsibility for how they voted and share the blame for the consequences that resulted from how they voted.
How can you be so blind? You wrote "Fifty million is not half the country,our country has 310 million". You can safely assume that if every man woman and child voted, you'd have half + voting for Obama. It's as easy as that. And I said it, unless you don't know what "extrapolates" means. And, just to make things clear, as you seem to have great difficulties with numbers, it's not 50 million voters, but rather 52% of the voters.

Gotta go, things to do, will add more later, not to worry.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#135062 Dec 30, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
50.4 % of the voters, if we extrapolates, 50.4% of the population, are idiots who prefer to vote against principles, values and morals that make our country strong? Well, well, aren't you one of those who once or twice wrote that the United States is the best country in the world, number 1? Yet, you claim that more than half its population is idiotic and against principles, values and morals? In view of the fact that half the population is useless and rotten, please explain the number 1 standing.
Just about everyone knows that driving drunk is stupid but they still do. Does that make them wise? You do know that half of our population has an IQ under 100, don't you? And when you add the mentally ill, you have a simple majority.
If I had my way anyone with an IQ under 90 should be prevented from voting. I would also include the mentally ill. But you don't want that because that would mean a disproportional number of Democrats would not be able to vote.
I was not always a Conservative. Although I was not a Liberal a lot of thing Liberals said made sense like "paying your fair share of taxes". But then I became smarter and I started to see where my tax dollars were going so I now believe that 50% of my tax dollars are wasted by our governments.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Senate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 9 min TheIndependentMaj... 1,142,236
New fear: What happens in Ferguson if no charges? 11 min monadian 2,534
Obama: Americans want 'new car smell' in 2016 15 min spud 3
Republicans strike early blow in U.S. midterm e... 30 min Go Blue Forever 485
The Neocon Plan for War and More War 31 min Lukashenko is Dr ... 18
Obama sets off on a sales mission on immigration 32 min spud 107
Why GOP won: Shifting white votes hurt Democrats 1 hr Go Blue Forever 342

US Senate People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE