BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#129668 Nov 24, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, hammer head hit both your silly thumbs smack on, simultaneously. ha ha. Justice (ha ha Dale) and LSR (Low slug redneck).The most undynamic duo.
Now that would be a pretty cool trick, no? If the hammer is in one hand,.....nevermind it's too far over your head. Goofball. Run get me a left-handed screwdriver will ya? I've come to the conclusion there is not a shred of hope for you jacqazz. Life lesson #1 for jacqazz: No one likes a stuck up azzhole.
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

#129669 Nov 24, 2012
Goat Boy wrote:
<quoted text>
Will you admit your own ignorance?
Simple, Explain the missing seal and the error in the registrars stamp.
We know that Hawaii DOH did NOT create that long form birth certificate.
It contains a one-of-a-kind error that has never been seen on any other known Hawaii DOH issued long form birth certificate.
None of those copies, including the digital copy, were created by Hawaii DOH!
Obama and his minions are responsible for that error and missing seal!
SHEEPLE, we are still waiting for you to post ANY COPY of Obama's long form birth certificate that contains a raised visible embossed seal that was released to the public in April 2011.
Even the hard copies do not contain that seal,(but they do contain that same one-of-a-kind error).
All copies are fraudulent documents.
You are failing this assignment spectacularly because the smart people know it can't be done.
Sorry, birther fool, no birth cert is required.....besides, it's already been released anyway.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#129670 Nov 24, 2012
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
One look at how they treat this president should give them a clue as to how the average black fairs in this country, but I suppose to them ignorance is a blessing.
They all pretend to “believe in equality” and equal opportunity until Obama won the 08 election. Now upon reflection they’re not at all sure equality is all it’s cracked up to be. LOL…….. As Romney said,“no one ever asked to see my birth certificate”
Blacks and other minorities are "fine" and are good guys to people like Rogue and his ilk, AS LONG AS THEY STAY IN LINE, AND DO NOT AFFIRM THEIR RIGHTS. In other words, speak when spoken to. And Obama, and you are so right, Poppo, he crossed the line, DARED to become president. Wow. Fortunately, not all is bad, as the majority of whites in the US are fair people, and many voted for him. I will, however reiterate, based on my personal experiences, that blacks are better treated in the US than almost anywhere else. Many blacks have been elected at all levels, which is a phenomenon you hardly see in any other country. Add to that more and morer successful black business people and community leaders, etc. And birther-like groups,thanks to education, are declining daily , thank god.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#129671 Nov 24, 2012
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>He is so full of himself, it would even turn a libs stomach, that would trake an act of God!! We can't even fart, without him sticking his nose in it, this time he got the farts and the shit.
Do you remember the pencil-neck in high school, that always had his hand in the air, when a queastion was asked. Oh, me, me, me!!!
The boy needs some help.
YOU nailed it. The guy who could always answer in class! YOU could NEVER answer, and became resentful. This resentment would grow, not diminish as the years went by. In school, you and your ilk would bully the smart "pencil-neck" types, believing physical superiority was way better than the intellectual kind. Being older now, you can no longer bully, so you resort to crass and vulgar language, like above (fart, shit).Like I said in my just-previous post, education is eradicating loser-birther like you and your comrades. But prejudice is hard to conquer, and you will not change, only the new ones can.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#129672 Nov 24, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
This latest uptick is due to economic news out of Germany. What did Omammie do between '09 and now to cause this rise jacqazz? Printing more money certainly doesn't help. Credit Rating drop (twice) doesn't help either. Regulating small businesses right out of business surely didn't help. Taking us further into debt didn't help. So, I really don't see what he's done to influence the market as you suggest.
Goit it, got all that (above). Then why the hurry to blame him when the DJIA tanks?

Incidentally,È

-Unemployment is down from 10.5 to 8%;
-Manufacturing and output are both upè
-The big three are saved, there is still an auto industry in the US;
-Trade deficit is inching down;
-Domestic oil production is up, imports are way down;
-Withrawal from disastrous Iraq, soon to withdraw from equally disastrous Afghanistan;
-A semblance of universal health care plan, would've been better if not for GOP foot-dragging;
-Extraction of $27 billion from BP (rogue says : "Poor BP") for damage to Gulf - a landmark, if you compare to Bush sr Exxon Valdez
-Death of Osama bin Laden and many of his lieutenants. Was GWB's goald, all achieved by Obama;
-Stiffer regulations of wall street, stock brokers, banks, corporations.

And the list goes on and on. All this in dire economic times and unsettled Europe and Asia.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#129673 Nov 24, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh yes the president does. When Obama gave his White House press conference just a week ago the stock market jumped downward within minutes.
Again, In October 2007 the DJIA peaked at 14,164. Taking into account inflation that is equivalent to about 15,500 TODAY. The average stock market correction is 12-18 months and we are 61 months into this one and we are now where near 14,164 much less the inflation corrected 15,500.
And I say if it was not for Obama pushing his radical progressive agenda we would have fully recovered from that correct TWO YEAR AGO!!!
Any improvement in the economy has been in spite of Obama!
You tie inflation to the stock market, even when said stock market is up 100%? To you, had the stock market risen to 20,000 instead of 14,164, you still would have claimed it should've been 22,000 with added inflation factored in. Do you realise how ridiculous your contention is, and how it would earn you an F Minus in high school home economics?

Yes, the Dow went down after his speech. What did I say? There you go again. A momentary drop, he gets the blame. Then, as we saw this last week, UP IT GOES. If you're gonna blame Obama for daily drops in the DJIA, you'll have to credit him when it rises, no?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#129674 Nov 24, 2012
loose cannon wrote:
"A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men"
Winston Churchill
Do you know the U.S. Navy has a ship named after him?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Winston_S._C... (DDG-81)
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#129675 Nov 24, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
jacqazz, you're not even amusing. Not even a little.
1. Ah, you're a mindreader again
2. The Pres. doesn't make the market go up and down.
3. Unemployment - still stinks
4. Many Muslims in the Middle East are upset with Obama. Love your last one though; "the way he pushed Morsi into arranging a cease-fire". You have no idea who did what! You're just FOS jacqazz.
Number 2 : Still playing hookey, are you? And yet, those grade 2 remedical reading classes could do you so much good. Too bad. Now read this slowly, as I am typing slowly for you. Tell Rogue that "The Pres. doesn't make the market go up and down.". I've been tellng him this ad infinitum. But, as you no doubt unclearly refer to the 4-year rise in the DJIA, the said 100% rise IS due to Obama, make no mistake about that. Long-term stock market bullishness is a direct result of the administration's economic policies. Always Long term I said, not short or medium like your buddy Rogue maintains.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#129676 Nov 24, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
You tie inflation to the stock market, even when said stock market is up 100%? To you, had the stock market risen to 20,000 instead of 14,164, you still would have claimed it should've been 22,000 with added inflation factored in. Do you realise how ridiculous your contention is, and how it would earn you an F Minus in high school home economics?
Yes, the Dow went down after his speech. What did I say? There you go again. A momentary drop, he gets the blame. Then, as we saw this last week, UP IT GOES. If you're gonna blame Obama for daily drops in the DJIA, you'll have to credit him when it rises, no?
Ah, what had the inflation rate been in 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011? If it is 2% per year the first year would be 102%, the second year would be 104.04%, the third year 106.12% the forth year 108.24 and at the end of the fifth year it would be 110.40% so a DJIA would be inflation corrected from 14,164 to 15,637!!!! Using the 2012 high, sop far, of 13,610, we are still 2,000 points from just breaking even! Again, this is the longest stock market correction since the correction of October 1929 which took 15 years to correct!
No, not every drop and not most of the drops but what the presidents says and does, does have an impact of the daily stock market activity.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#129677 Nov 24, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
You do know that 100% third-generation African-American person in the U.S. has some "white" blood in him, don't you? And about 50% of all Eyro-Americans have some black-African blood in them, don't you.
What makes a person "black" in America has nothing to do with skin color. Justice Clarence Thomas is NOT black but Obama and Bill Clinton are!
Thank you for confirming my post. OMG, what a microscopic study that was. Julius Streicher would be proud.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#129678 Nov 24, 2012
America Got Stupid wrote:
<quoted text>
No rational human being would blame Bush for what happened under Obama’s watch either, Poopoo stain.
Do you blame Bush for the loss of our AAA credit rating?
Do you blame Bush for Obama spending 6 Trillion dollars that we don't have as well?
Do you blame Bush for Obama's nationalizing of the U.S. healthcare system too?
I guess you give a pass to the DemoKKKrats in Congress who really created this mess in 2007 and 2008, huh?
A resounding YES to the first two questions and no possible reply to the last one which makes no sense.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#129679 Nov 24, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Now that would be a pretty cool trick, no? If the hammer is in one hand,.....nevermind it's too far over your head. Goofball. Run get me a left-handed screwdriver will ya? I've come to the conclusion there is not a shred of hope for you jacqazz. Life lesson #1 for jacqazz: No one likes a stuck up azzhole.
With you and Justice ha ha Dale, I have much to be stuck up about. You make it so easy. Larry the stooge would act stuck-up with you two.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#129680 Nov 24, 2012
That also worked with Ronald Reagan's 25% tax cut. The Democrats insisted that it be broken up into three cuts. 10% for the first year, 10% for the second and 5% for the last and the end result was a 23.01% tax drop!
And then the Democrats cut "loopholes" and one man's loophole is another man's tax INCREASE. And that resulted in the Bank and S&L Debacle of the early 1990's which you Libtards blamed on G.H.W. Bush.
Yep, if the Democrats screw up they end up blaming a Republican president and there also always more than enough sub-IQ voters who will believe anything the Democrats say!
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#129681 Nov 24, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, what had the inflation rate been in 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011? If it is 2% per year the first year would be 102%, the second year would be 104.04%, the third year 106.12% the forth year 108.24 and at the end of the fifth year it would be 110.40% so a DJIA would be inflation corrected from 14,164 to 15,637!!!! Using the 2012 high, sop far, of 13,610, we are still 2,000 points from just breaking even! Again, this is the longest stock market correction since the correction of October 1929 which took 15 years to correct!
No, not every drop and not most of the drops but what the presidents says and does, does have an impact of the daily stock market activity.
You wrote : "No, not every drop and not most of the drops but what the presidents says and does, does have an impact of the daily stock market activity. " .Okay, then please credit him for this week's huge rise in the DJIA. That would be fair as you lambasted him for last week's dip, for the dip days after his election victory and following his economics speech. Fair is fair, no?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#129682 Nov 24, 2012
Libtards never understand Cause and Effect. In 1981 I supervised an airfield service section and my first female soldier and in just a few months she became ... pregnant so I had to council her. And she said she did not know how she got pregnant! I don't think it was by immaculate conception!!!
Like I said, Libtards don't seem to understand cause and effect. You get naked with a person of the opposite sex, someone is likely to get knocked up!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#129683 Nov 24, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
You do know that 100% third-generation African-American person in the U.S. has some "white" blood in him, don't you? And about 50% of all Eyro-Americans have some black-African blood in them, don't you.
What makes a person "black" in America has nothing to do with skin color. Justice Clarence Thomas is NOT black but Obama and Bill Clinton are!
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you for confirming my post. OMG, what a microscopic study that was. Julius Streicher would be proud.
Then you agree that a persons "blackness" (or "whiteness") has nothing to do with the color of his skin? In other words, Pres. Obama is blacker than Justice Thomas!!!
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#129684 Nov 24, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Libtards never understand Cause and Effect. In 1981 I supervised an airfield service section and my first female soldier and in just a few months she became ... pregnant so I had to council her. And she said she did not know how she got pregnant! I don't think it was by immaculate conception!!!
Like I said, Libtards don't seem to understand cause and effect. You get naked with a person of the opposite sex, someone is likely to get knocked up!
Misogynistic pre-historic mindset. Maybe she didn't know who got her pregnant, and I'm willing to bet whoever got her in that state has no clue either. But he gets to carry on, right? Maybe even gets promoted. And who said she wasn't raped, and is forced to keep quiet about it, as has happened to tens of thousands of female military, as we are finding out now?

So easy to make a hasty judgement based on gender, isn't it? Specially when that gender is female.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#129685 Nov 24, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
You do know that 100% third-generation African-American person in the U.S. has some "white" blood in him, don't you? And about 50% of all Eyro-Americans have some black-African blood in them, don't you.
What makes a person "black" in America has nothing to do with skin color. Justice Clarence Thomas is NOT black but Obama and Bill Clinton are!
<quoted text>
Then you agree that a persons "blackness" (or "whiteness") has nothing to do with the color of his skin? In other words, Pres. Obama is blacker than Justice Thomas!!!
You just carry on, regardless. Can't stop, can you? I don't give a hoot about colour, race, their politics, sexual preferences, etc. I'm far from perfect, I'm human and will trip too. I admit, but I try to judge people according to their heart and mind. Period. Can't you do that?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#129686 Nov 24, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Libtards never understand Cause and Effect. In 1981 I supervised an airfield service section and my first female soldier and in just a few months she became ... pregnant so I had to council her. And she said she did not know how she got pregnant! I don't think it was by immaculate conception!!!
Like I said, Libtards don't seem to understand cause and effect. You get naked with a person of the opposite sex, someone is likely to get knocked up!
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Misogynistic pre-historic mindset. Maybe she didn't know who got her pregnant, and I'm willing to bet whoever got her in that state has no clue either. But he gets to carry on, right? Maybe even gets promoted. And who said she wasn't raped, and is forced to keep quiet about it, as has happened to tens of thousands of female military, as we are finding out now?
So easy to make a hasty judgement based on gender, isn't it? Specially when that gender is female.
First of all I did not ask her who or how. She just said she was pregnant and didn't know how. Oh, she did get an abortion but that was her decisions. I ran into her a few years later at Fort Hood, TX and she was married and had a small child.
And she noticed me and approached me. Maybe because I took care of my soldiers when she knew me in Korea. Notice I did not mention her race, skin, color, etc.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#129687 Nov 24, 2012
$85K a year for a baker?

What The Media Won’t Tell Us About The Union That Killed Hostess
NOVEMBER 23, 2012 BY DR. KEVIN "COACH" COLLINS

In perfect “Animal Farm” style, the upper leadership of this criminal gang pulls down from two to three times what the average worker they “represent” makes for actually working for a living. For instance, Frank Hurt (a name you couldn’t make up) makes $262,654.00 to “guard the interests” of his members who make about $85,000 a year, which itself is $35,000 more than the average salary for workers across America.
Since 2002, the membership of the BCTW&GMU has fallen by more than 32,000. This is not surprising because while there are no available data after 2009, during the period between 2002 and 2009, an average of more than one workplace a month decertified this monster by direct vote of the workers involved. There you have the reason the unions want “Card Check.”
http://www.westernjournalism.com/what-the-med...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Senate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Paul slams Rubio as 'isolationist' on Cuba 12 min barefoot2626 23
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 21 min Smart Alex 1,154,065
Body cameras for cops could be the biggest chan... 29 min Aprilvue 1,397
Obama and the U.N. vs. Israel? 49 min SobieskiSavedEurope 5
US and Cuba move to normalize ties, open embassy 2 hr tha Professor 113
Cheney again defends interrogation techniques 2 hr tha Professor 287
Nancy Pelosi 'Enormously Disappointed' With Whi... 3 hr Guess Who 135
More from around the web