BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

[Terri Tanna]

Just Sayin wrote:

After GoDaddy refused to identify the complainant, only saying that it was not “any official government agency,” further investigation by Hagmann revealed that the order came from a .group tied to Obama campaign headquarters.
=
Turning to his contacts within government, Hagmann then spoke with another source who confirmed that the ‘Obama Truth Team’ was responsible for the shut down order.

Then you should be able to name the specific names of the individuals involved with this "truth team" -- unless, of course, this is just another example of baseless innuendo.

[Terri Tanna]

Just Sayin wrote:

“There’s never been a preemption against the states enforcing the law, never,” he said.

Sadly, another state senator reveals that he is not familiar with our sacred Constitution and, in particular, Artile VI.

[Terri Tanna]

There's a reason that Article is called the "preemption clause."

[Terri Tanna]

wojar wrote:

Similarly, if I want to disassociate myself from a client I currently represent in an open case (for example someone who refuses to pay his fees), I must ask for an order relieving me of the responsibility of representing the client. I cannot simply quit the case unilaterally and walk away.
Grow up!

Sadly, the "birther" children are way over their little heads when it comes to the Code of Professional Responsibility (or equivalent in other jurisdictions).

[Terri Tanna]

akpilot wrote:

Keep pandering you little sheep. That is why you will never make anything of yourself.

How strongly will the pilot be supporting Willad this autumn? Is he your first choice?

[Terri Tanna]

Just Sayin wrote:

Rep. Peter King (R-NY), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, wants to know why the Obama administration allowed a member of a designated terrorist organization to enter the United States unimpeded and attend meetings inside the White House with senior-level Obama administration and State Department officials.

Possibly the same reason Krushchev and Kosygin were allowed in the United States after they vowed to "bury us?"
We are a free and open nation following the principles of free market economics that doesn't have to keep "undesirables" out.

[Cancer on the pResidency]

Terri Tanna wrote:

<quoted text>
How strongly will the pilot be supporting Willad this autumn? Is he your first choice?

Hello SKANK!

SHEEPLE must really be happy that Mitt Romney will be the Republican candidate.
It will certainly be troubling for them that the candidate they wanted to face will beat Obama in 2012.

I know that this must make your panties get wet, huh?

[Terri Tanna]

Just Sayin wrote:

Not surprisingly, the Chicago economy is in meltdown.

HARDLY. An informal survey of the members at our little privated golf club (founed in the 1890s but not in Hinsdale)at a recent dinner dance revealed that most members have more than doubled their net worth during the past three years.
(Less anecdotally, one of our members was authoritatively reported by Forbes in their list of the wealthiest Americans to have increased his family's net worth to $4 Billion from under $2 billion during that same three years.)
Guess the economy is only in "meltdown" for "birthers" and the other little people who didn't go to Harvard. How they lacked common sense.

[Terri Tanna]

American Lady wrote:

Exclusive: Joseph Farah says high-court decision moves us 1 more step toward tyranny

Remind the Class again about Mr. Farah's background in The Law. Or is he just another ignorant blogger who wallows in the ignorance of his own lack of education. Thank you.

[wojar]

Cancer on the pResidency wrote:

<quoted text>
Looks like you are still having a problem telling a believable LIE, huh?
You NEVER answered the question, WoTARD!
Exactly what was the reason for the 2 different DNC Certifications, one with the Constitutionally eligible language and one without?
The RNC got the job done with only one Certification containing the Constitutionally eligible language, why couldn't the crooked DemocRATS do that?
Wanna try again to come up with a believable LIE, WoTARD?

As usual,l Tqacky wants a lie rather than the simple truth.

Simple truth: pro forma.

wojar wrote:

<quoted text>
The real reason: to cover up the fact that he was one of twin test tube babies conceived in a laboratory in MOSCOW! One was planted at the Punahou school and later at Occidental, Columbia, and Harvard while the other received intensive Marxist training. Then the swicheroo! That's the ticket!

[Cancer on the pResidency]

wojar wrote:

<quoted text>
As usual,l Tqacky wants a lie rather than the simple truth.
Simple truth: pro forma.
<quoted text>

Looks like you have nothing intelligent to say about the matter, huh?
We all know what the truth is!

You NEVER answered the question, WoTARD!

Exactly what was the reason for the 2 different DNC Certifications, one with the Constitutionally eligible language and one without?
The RNC got the job done with only one Certification containing the Constitutionally eligible language, why couldn't the crooked DemocRATS do that?

Wanna try again to come up with a believable LIE, WoTARD?

[Jacques Ottawa]

Cancer on the pResidency wrote:

<quoted text>
Hello SKANK!
SHEEPLE must really be happy that Mitt Romney will be the Republican candidate.
It will certainly be troubling for them that the candidate they wanted to face will beat Obama in 2012.
I know that this must make your panties get wet, huh?

What a gross and vulgar individual.

[wojar]

Cancer on the pResidency wrote:

<quoted text>
Looks like you have nothing intelligent to say about the matter, huh?
We all know what the truth is!
You NEVER answered the question, WoTARD!
Exactly what was the reason for the 2 different DNC Certifications, one with the Constitutionally eligible language and one without?
The RNC got the job done with only one Certification containing the Constitutionally eligible language, why couldn't the crooked DemocRATS do that?
Wanna try again to come up with a believable LIE, WoTARD?

Pro forma.

Prove me wrong.

[Terri Tanna]

Terri Tanna wrote:

Remind the Class again about Mr. Farah's background in The Law. Or is he just another ignorant blogger who wallows in the ignorance of his own lack of education. Thank you.

That would be the distinguished Wm. Paterson STATE non-college.

[Terri Tanna]

American Lady wrote:

We learn that the legislative branch, and only the legislative branch, may make laws, and that it is then the solemn duty of the President to see that the laws are faithfully enforced.

The President has the authority to enforce laws. Please quote the exact words of our sacred Constitution that require her to enforce all laws. Thank you.

[Terri Tanna]

Terri Tanna wrote:
"Who would be YOUR choice?"
=
"Who would you have preferred as Dr. Paul's running mate?"

spud wrote:

Thank you. Coming from you, I consider that a compliment.

By this post the simpleton shows he doesn't support anyone -- only opposes.

[Terri Tanna]

American Lady wrote:

Watchdog group says without 'full disclosure,' Americans will question ruling

Patriotic Americans (most of our citizens) abide by the final decisions of the judiciary.

[Cancer on the pResidency]

wojar wrote:

<quoted text>
Pro forma.
Prove me wrong.

I don't have to prove anything!
You just did it again for me.

Looks like you have nothing intelligent to say about the matter, huh?
We all know what the truth is!

You NEVER answered the question, WoTARD!

Exactly what was the reason for the 2 different DNC Certifications, one with the Constitutionally eligible language and one without?
The RNC got the job done with only one Certification containing the Constitutionally eligible language, why couldn't the crooked DemocRATS do that?

Wanna try again to come up with a believable LIE, WoTARD?

[Terri Tanna]

Cancer on the pResidency wrote:

Herb Titus, Esq., a constitutional attorney who has over thirty-years of writing, advocating and lecturing on constitutional law.

Titus did not do well enough in law school to be invited on The Law Review. EVERY real constitutional scholar was an editor of law review.

[Cancer on the pResidency]

In a proposed memorandum opinion and order Klayman has just submitted to the judge, he asks for a determination that Florida Secretary of State Ken Detzner “has an affirmative duty to determine the eligibility of defendant Obama before his name is placed on the Florida primary or general election ballots, or before the presidential electors for the state of Florida cast their votes after the 2012 general election should he ‘win’ the Florida presidential election.”

Klayman suggests that the court issue “preliminary and permanent injunctions
preventing the certification, by the Florida Election Canvassing Commission, of defendant Obama as Democratic Party nominee for the 2012 presidential primary and Florida general elections, as well as preliminary and permanent injunctions preventing the placement of defendant Obama’s name on the 2012 Florida presidential primary and general election ballots and with regard to the presidential electors voting for defendant Obama should he ‘win’ the Florida general election for the office of the president of the United States.”

The court should “issue a writ of mandamus requiring that the Florida Secretary of State adhere to the Florida and U.S. Constitutions and verify the eligibility of defendant Obama for the office of the president of the United States, or rule that the failure to do so is an abuse of discretion, arbitrary and capricious and contrary to law,” the proposal recommends.