Obama threatens to veto new sanctions...

Obama threatens to veto new sanctions against Iran

There are 29 comments on the Tri-cityherald.com story from Jan 28, 2014, titled Obama threatens to veto new sanctions against Iran. In it, Tri-cityherald.com reports that:

It was the sharpest part of a State of the Union speech that overall was skimpy on details for his foreign policy agenda for the year.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Tri-cityherald.com.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Syrian

Waterford, CT

#1 Jan 29, 2014
Obama wants the Iranian deal to go through!
George

Red Deer, Canada

#2 Jan 29, 2014
Of course, they have started a settlement with Iran and the plan is to settle without bloodshed, unlike Assad, Obama wants a political negotiated outcome with no bloodshed and so far Iran is in agreement. The nuclear situation is under control and Iran is stopping its production. In 2008 Obama said he would invite Iran to the table and discuss a peace agreement with no preconditions and here we are he is doing it.
Syrian

Waterford, CT

#3 Jan 29, 2014
At least Obama is not calling for war!
George

Red Deer, Canada

#4 Jan 29, 2014
Syrian wrote:
At least Obama is not calling for war!
He has been very clear for 6 years that he is going to always push for a diplomatic finish to a conflict and war only as a last resort, I think Americans should be happy with their stand.
Oliver Cromwell

Darwen, UK

#5 Jan 29, 2014
Yes but the neocon nutters are in the wings.
Avenger

Cambridge, Canada

#6 Jan 29, 2014
Tell the Ayatollah scum to stop supplying terrorists like the Taliban and others while they are at it. Hehe
George

Red Deer, Canada

#7 Jan 29, 2014
Oliver Cromwell wrote:
Yes but the neocon nutters are in the wings.
What does that mean?
ocxz

Neuilly-sur-seine, France

#8 Jan 29, 2014
Avenger wrote:
Tell the Ayatollah scum to stop supplying terrorists like the Taliban and others while they are at it. Hehe
First read appropriate books and study subject before mouthing off stupidities like that.
ocxz

Neuilly-sur-seine, France

#9 Jan 29, 2014
George wrote:
<quoted text>
What does that mean?
it means people like you are in the wings
Avenger

Cambridge, Canada

#10 Jan 29, 2014
ocxz wrote:
<quoted text>
First read appropriate books and study subject before mouthing off stupidities like that.
It's already widely known little one.
Post a cow pic that's your expertise.
The big Syrian Pretender

Neuilly-sur-seine, France

#11 Jan 29, 2014
Avenger wrote:
<quoted text>
It's already widely known little one.
.
that you don't master your subject hence post stupidities ?
you confirm thank you, midget.
Syrian

Waterford, CT

#12 Jan 30, 2014
Oliver Cromwell wrote:
Yes but the neocon nutters are in the wings.
LOL!!!
lolol

Albuquerque, NM

#13 Jan 30, 2014
only our idiot in chief would trot the army ranger out in his speech for a cheap photo op as he panders to his iranian muzz buddies by making sure they get all the money they need to provide the ied's to our enemies like the one that blew up in the rangers face. wake up military, your commander in chief is NOT on your side and is responsible for getting you killed and maimed by providing aid to the enemies he sends you to face. used to be called treason, now it's called political business.
Oliver Cromwell

Accrington, UK

#14 Jan 30, 2014
lolol wrote:
only our idiot in chief would trot the army ranger out in his speech for a cheap photo op as he panders to his iranian muzz buddies by making sure they get all the money they need to provide the ied's to our enemies like the one that blew up in the rangers face. wake up military, your commander in chief is NOT on your side and is responsible for getting you killed and maimed by providing aid to the enemies he sends you to face. used to be called treason, now it's called political business.
What IEDs idiot?they don't need to get them from Iran all they need is a battery unexploded mine or shell and a cell phone,they don't need to get that from Iran so what are you talking about?
George

Red Deer, Canada

#15 Jan 30, 2014
Oliver Cromwell wrote:
<quoted text> What IEDs idiot?they don't need to get them from Iran all they need is a battery unexploded mine or shell and a cell phone,they don't need to get that from Iran so what are you talking about?
spoken like a true al Qaeda cell member
Bee Eff Dee

Webster, MA

#16 Jan 30, 2014
We should back the Pres on this because Libya, Egypt and Syria went so well. Ohh wait...
St Reformed

Stillwater, OK

#17 Jan 30, 2014
Obama has his long-sought legacy after all: a nuclear-armed Iran---destined to haunt us all.
George

Red Deer, Canada

#19 Jan 31, 2014
St Reformed wrote:
Obama has his long-sought legacy after all: a nuclear-armed Iran---destined to haunt us all.
Obama has a plan with Iran and so far it is going well, the Iranians have allowed inspections, decreased the plutonium upgrades and wanted to sit down and help stop the war in Syria, I think more talks, friendly talks, will yield even more growth between the US and Iran, remember they used to be allies and can be again. The new President of Iran has said that many times and may even be interested in pulling back troops are arms from Syria, I believe that is coming. We cannot always assume Iran is the bad guy.
Oliver Cromwell

Blackburn, UK

#20 Jan 31, 2014
George wrote:
<quoted text>
spoken like a true al Qaeda cell member
No spoken like someone who knows what he is talking about and not being told what to think by fox news.
Avenger

Cambridge, Canada

#21 Jan 31, 2014
Oliver Cromwell wrote:
<quoted text> No spoken like someone who knows what he is talking about and not being told what to think by fox news.
You hate all western news silly one you read joke spam sites like globalresearch.ca. lol

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Senate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Ten Commandments judge faces runoff in Alabama ... 4 min ThomasA 337
News Many Christian conservatives are backing Alabam... 5 min Sandra 1,489
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 9 min Canuk 1,658,343
News Trump accusers call for congressional investiga... 14 min Thank you John Mc... 134
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 39 min loose cannon 243,094
News Trump says US 'cannot afford' Roy Moore loss in... 40 min DR X 180
News Democrats silent on whether Trump should resign... 45 min Abrahamanic Relig... 7
More from around the web