White House Denies Memo Was About Ben...

White House Denies Memo Was About Benghazi Attack

There are 66 comments on the National Public Radio story from Apr 30, 2014, titled White House Denies Memo Was About Benghazi Attack. In it, National Public Radio reports that:

The White House on Wednesday denied that a staff member's email three days after the deadly attack on the U.S. mission at Benghazi, Libya, was actually about the attack.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at National Public Radio.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#21 May 2, 2014
Cat74 wrote:
We are already celebrating the election..
It's great that you can celebrate losing 7 out of 8 elections in 2013.

By 2014 you'll be ecstatic.
Dubya Tee Eff

Webster, MA

#22 May 2, 2014
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
It's great that you can celebrate losing 7 out of 8 elections in 2013.
By 2014 you'll be ecstatic.
So, what does any of your %s and 7 out of 8 numbers have to do with the topic? The GOP could have a 0% rating and it still wouldnt have anything to do with the topic you are desperately trying to deflect away from. Why so overly defensive? Your lord and savior caught in (another) lie to the people? Every GOPer could be convicted of murder, sent to jail, put in the chair and be 6 feet under ground and it STILL wouldn't change the fact that more and more evidence is coming out about more lies from the Liar of the Year. Care to deflect more? I mean you left out Bush and Cheney, hell might as well bash Reagan and Halliburton while you are dodging the topic of the thread.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#23 May 2, 2014
Dubya Tee Eff wrote:
<quoted text>So, what does any of your %s and 7 out of 8 numbers have to do with the topic?
Not the sharpest knife in the drawer, are you sweet pea?
foster

Ashburn, VA

#25 May 2, 2014
Cat74 wrote:
All these months the Democrats, and their criminal loyalists have covered up the incompetence of this President. Obama wasn't in the war room when the decisions to stand down were made, and when we decided to sacrifice the Ambassador, and those hero's. No wonder he couldn't look the families of the dead in the face. Someone must be held responsible for the useless deaths of our people. If it was done to save the election for the Democrats the entire party should be shunned out of existence.
The Republicans are responsible for Benghazi. Their spending cuts killed Stevens
foster

Ashburn, VA

#26 May 2, 2014
senior citizen wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep and if you like your doctor you can keep him.
NO one in their right mind is going to believe Jay's comments. This e-mail was hid from the public - if you have NOTHING to hid then you put all your cards on the table - this president wanted to win the ELECTION and he told Americans that Al-Qaida was gone and he did not want Benghazi to be held against him - NO he would NOT have been voted in office for a second term had the people known his tactic on so many LIES.
Obama only stated the VIDEO is what caused this at Benghazi. Your comment is a lie when you say he referred to the video at times. NEVER did he refer to Benghazi as anything else but a video. Don't you remember on Romney and Obama's debate Candy Crowley agreeing with Obama saying Obama said that Benghazi was a terrorist attack and then had to apologize to Romney because Obama NEVER SAID IT.
It is not the video but Republicans that directly murdered Stevens and the Contractors with funding cuts for security in Benghazi
foster

Ashburn, VA

#27 May 2, 2014
Dubya Tee Eff wrote:
<quoted text>So, what does any of your %s and 7 out of 8 numbers have to do with the topic? The GOP could have a 0% rating and it still wouldnt have anything to do with the topic you are desperately trying to deflect away from. Why so overly defensive? Your lord and savior caught in (another) lie to the people? Every GOPer could be convicted of murder, sent to jail, put in the chair and be 6 feet under ground and it STILL wouldn't change the fact that more and more evidence is coming out about more lies from the Liar of the Year. Care to deflect more? I mean you left out Bush and Cheney, hell might as well bash Reagan and Halliburton while you are dodging the topic of the thread.
This is a desperayte ploy to change the Facts from the ARB Report that GOP Funding cuts killed Stevens
foster

Ashburn, VA

#28 May 2, 2014
Republicans priorities to extend Bush tax cut made security at overseas consulates and Embassies vulenerable by shifting the funds for personal and facility security to those Bush Tax cuts extension.
Cat74

Bolingbrook, IL

#29 May 2, 2014
The Republicans, and their spending cuts are not being investigated. Ms Hillary, and the Lying President are going to be looked at very carefully, and we will get the truth out of those slime balls. It may take years, and millions of dollars, but we will get to the truth. All this could be over with already if Hillary, and Barack just told the truth. Pathetic.
VN Vet

Hopewell, VA

#30 May 2, 2014
Those brave heroes were killed by Obama and Hillary as if they fired the death shot themselves. The only person in the "situation room" was the little "DUDE" kid with no Obama or Hillary to be found( so much for the 3AM phone call). What a pathetic bunch of crap.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#31 May 3, 2014
VN Vet wrote:
Those brave heroes were killed by Obama and Hillary as if they fired the death shot themselves.
Yea, that's they way it work.

Of course, Ronald Reagan killed 241 Marines and sailors so he had to reload a few dozen times.

Sixty died in embassy and mission attacks when George Bush was president.

And that doesn't include 9-11 where he was given a month warning.
Responsibility

Petaluma, CA

#32 May 3, 2014
VN Vet wrote:
the death shot themselves.
Too much histrionics but one question - did you blame previous presidents for deaths that happened on their watch or is it just this one?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#33 May 3, 2014
VN Vet wrote:
The only person in the "situation room" was the little "DUDE" kid with no Obama or Hillary to be found
From now on, all presidents will have an implant that goes off whenever any event happens at any time anywhere on the planet.

Like The Borg... presidents will hang from a hook and regenerate rather than sleep... and their eyes will snap open whenever the USA is threatened even when terrorists think about attacking and they will step out of their chamber and walk out robotically to defend us...
Cat74

Oswego, IL

#34 May 3, 2014
So the new mantra is W H denies, W H warns, W H is concerned. Really who is the W H? Is it the President? So where is he? Pelosi, and Cummings, and Obama want to stop talking about Benghazi. Fair enough. Stop lying about it, tell us where the CinC was during the massacre, and we will go on about other business. Just as Nixon thought he could get away with the Watergate break in, and Clinton thought he could lie under oath in a court of law, Obama thinks he can out run the Benghazi investigators. If Speaker Boehner gets Trey Gowdy to investigate the Benghazi attack the results will be the same, another American President will have disgraced himself, and slimed the office of the President.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#35 May 3, 2014
Cat74 wrote:
So the new mantra is W H denies, W H warns, W H is concerned.
Consider the source...
Cat74 wrote:
Women aren't stupid, they are just slow.
Delbert

Virginia Beach, VA

#36 May 3, 2014
Because of the Republicans low approval rating on 7%, it's to the benefit of the Democrats to provoke the Republicans to continue with Benghazi being the center of their campaign rhetoric. The Democrats are missing an opportunity backing off ACA given the huge number of sign up in Republican States and the consequences of those States not taking the funding to expand Medicaid. Texas and Georgia along with Arkansas and Louisiana are definitely in play in both the House and Senate. Where the Senate looked to be a breeze the races are to close and the House Representatives in Southern District are ripe for plucking off.

Some of you were counting your proverbial chickens before the eggs hatched. Republicans keeping the House will prove to be a difficult task, no less trying to snatch the majority in the Senate. Especially now the Courts are ruling those Voter ID Law unconstitutional.
Cat74 wrote:
So the new mantra is W H denies, W H warns, W H is concerned. Really who is the W H? Is it the President? So where is he? Pelosi, and Cummings, and Obama want to stop talking about Benghazi. Fair enough. Stop lying about it, tell us where the CinC was during the massacre, and we will go on about other business. Just as Nixon thought he could get away with the Watergate break in, and Clinton thought he could lie under oath in a court of law, Obama thinks he can out run the Benghazi investigators. If Speaker Boehner gets Trey Gowdy to investigate the Benghazi attack the results will be the same, another American President will have disgraced himself, and slimed the office of the President.

“HILLARY OR TRUMP”

Since: Mar 09

WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?

#37 May 4, 2014
Obama let them die because they were white.
Grayson

Dexter, MO

#38 May 4, 2014
American_Infidel wrote:
Obama let them die because they were white.
Good one and why not that is the way Liberals think. Don't agree with them about this president racist.
Delbert

Virginia Beach, VA

#39 May 4, 2014
American_Infidel wrote:
Obama let them die because they were white.
Desperate to rally the Skin Head types as a Republican Voting Block, hum, It's been 5 years. It's safe to assume the paranoid xenophobic are with you already.
Delbert

Virginia Beach, VA

#40 May 4, 2014
Grayson wrote:
<quoted text> Good one and why not that is the way Liberals think. Don't agree with them about this president racist.
A Missouri Republican definitely would know and embrace anything racist.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#41 May 4, 2014
American_Infidel wrote:
Obama let them die because they were white.
Why did Reagan let those 241 Americas die in Beirut?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Senate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 42 min President Trump 1,396,590
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 57 min buckwheat 217,145
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 1 hr Frankie Rizzo 13,225
News West Virginia floods devastate 1,100 homes, man... 1 hr worried 22
News Criminal Aliens Are Being Released in US Becaus... 2 hr worried 33
News Efforts to fight Zika fail as lawmakers play po... 2 hr woodtick57 30
News The Republican Party is dead 3 hr serfs up 1,859
More from around the web