6 leaking tanks at Hanford reservatio...

6 leaking tanks at Hanford reservation raise more concerns about urgency of nuclear cleanup

There are 7 comments on the Squamish Chief story from Feb 24, 2013, titled 6 leaking tanks at Hanford reservation raise more concerns about urgency of nuclear cleanup. In it, Squamish Chief reports that:

Federal and state officials say six underground tanks holding a brew of radioactive and toxic waste are leaking at the country's most contaminated nuclear site in south-central Washington, raising concerns about delays for emptying the aging tanks.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Squamish Chief.

“Make America Great Again”

Since: Jun 07

Bring Obama Back!

#1 Feb 24, 2013
Concerns that don’t exist when it comes to Wind and Solar Energy… but the ignorant among us are too stupid and gullible to get on board these common sense and future sources of energy.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#2 Feb 24, 2013
How many decades has this site been on the "superfund" list?

WHEN are they actually going to clean it up?

WHEN??
sickofit

Owatonna, MN

#3 Feb 24, 2013
I say if the GOP wants new nuke plants then put all toxic waste and nuke plants in the very very rich neighborhoods....No more putting it close to poor and workingclass people. Want to see nuke waste dump sites next to conutry clubs and mansions. If it is such a good source of power then let those who want by there houses.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#4 Feb 24, 2013
sickofit wrote:
I say if the GOP wants new nuke plants then put all toxic waste and nuke plants in the very very rich neighborhoods....No more putting it close to poor and workingclass people. Want to see nuke waste dump sites next to conutry clubs and mansions. If it is such a good source of power then let those who want by there houses.
Same goes for any new coal fired electric plants or oil refineries.
sickofit

Owatonna, MN

#5 Feb 24, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Same goes for any new coal fired electric plants or oil refineries.
Yep
Sheik Yerbouti

Richmond, IN

#6 Feb 24, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
How many decades has this site been on the "superfund" list?
WHEN are they actually going to clean it up?
WHEN??
It's pretty hard to clean up nuclear waste since some of that stuff will be radioactive for hundreds of years. So far no one has come up with a safe viable solution to nuclear waste.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#7 Feb 24, 2013
Sheik Yerbouti wrote:
<quoted text>
It's pretty hard to clean up nuclear waste since some of that stuff will be radioactive for hundreds of years. So far no one has come up with a safe viable solution to nuclear waste.
Launch it into the sun.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Senate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min Joy 1,566,271
News GOP at war with itself (Mar '16) 7 min Tm Cln 4,014
News We could do more to fight cancer like McCain's.... 18 min YouDidntBuildThat 18
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 22 min Jacques Ottawa-O... 242,291
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 35 min Rider on the Storm 17,240
News GOP favor dropping tax beneficial to blue states 36 min Retribution 4
News Trump intensifies criticism of his own attorney... 41 min Trump Tweets Angry 6
More from around the web