Bloomberg to buy big for McAuliffe

Bloomberg to buy big for McAuliffe

There are 102 comments on the Politico story from Oct 22, 2013, titled Bloomberg to buy big for McAuliffe. In it, Politico reports that:

Michael Bloomberg's pro-gun-control super PAC will drop $1.1 million on ads for Democrat Terry McAuliffe in the final two weeks of the Virginia governor's race.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Politico.

First Prev
of 6
Next Last

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#1 Oct 22, 2013
That will give you an idea on who <NOT> to vote for.
Jorja Fox

Waynesboro, VA

#2 Oct 22, 2013
A better choice for Virginians then the cu cu man.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#3 Oct 22, 2013
How so???
Jorja Fox

Waynesboro, VA

#4 Oct 22, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
How so???
Terry appears to have the ability to work with everyone-to do what is best for all. Ken, on the other hand is a tea party extremist,if he/they don't like/want it there is no room for compromise. Ken is a tea party puppet. I prefer someone who can think for themselves. Politics is like food-we all have our own preferred taste.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#5 Oct 22, 2013
Jorja Fox wrote:
<quoted text>
Terry appears to have the ability to work with everyone-to do what is best for all. Ken, on the other hand is a tea party extremist,if he/they don't like/want it there is no room for compromise. Ken is a tea party puppet. I prefer someone who can think for themselves. Politics is like food-we all have our own preferred taste.
One extremist going up against another one. No clear winner in this contest.

I'll take the non-Socialist side. Thanks anyway.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#7 Oct 22, 2013
Why are you stalking me, troll???
Jorja Fox

Waynesboro, VA

#8 Oct 22, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
One extremist going up against another one. No clear winner in this contest.
I'll take the non-Socialist side. Thanks anyway.
You have your preference and I have mine. You prefer Ken--why?

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#9 Oct 22, 2013
Jorja Fox wrote:
<quoted text>
You have your preference and I have mine. You prefer Ken--why?
Because he is NOT MCauliffe, and he is the only one who has a chance to beat him (lesser of two evils) I haven't voted "for" someone in a long time. And his backing by Bloomberg is a HUGE part of the reason I will not vote for him. You are known by the friends you keep, and I seriously do NOT like Bloomberg.
Jorja Fox

Waynesboro, VA

#10 Oct 22, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Because he is NOT MCauliffe, and he is the only one who has a chance to beat him (lesser of two evils) I haven't voted "for" someone in a long time. And his backing by Bloomberg is a HUGE part of the reason I will not vote for him. You are known by the friends you keep, and I seriously do NOT like Bloomberg.
Am I understanding correctly? You dislike Terry because of his friends and like Ken because of his friends? How they stand on issues is of lesser importance?

I do have to agree-many vote for the lesser of 2 evils.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#11 Oct 22, 2013
Jorja Fox wrote:
<quoted text>
Am I understanding correctly? You dislike Terry because of his friends and like Ken because of his friends? How they stand on issues is of lesser importance?
I do have to agree-many vote for the lesser of 2 evils.
No. I dislike him because of his stance on the issues AND the friends he keeps (those endorsing him and their similar stance).
Jorja Fox

Waynesboro, VA

#13 Oct 22, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
No. I dislike him because of his stance on the issues AND the friends he keeps (those endorsing him and their similar stance).
Understood. Same for me only on the other side. I can't find where Ken stands on gun control(?) Where do you stand? More? Less? None? Leave it as it is? I do agree-people kill people-therefore we need to be very careful.
Jorja Fox

Waynesboro, VA

#14 Oct 22, 2013
MD Conservative wrote:
<quoted text>
"..who can think for themselves", while falling in goosestep with the anti-gun nutters. He thinks for himself while being led around with the ring in his nose, re: Gun control. Yea that makes sense... NOT
Cant make this sh1t up people. This is how ridiculous and ignorant the brain dead "thinks" (I use "think" loosely because obviously they don't).
I strongly suggest you step away from the crack pipe Skippy.
Ken's nose ring is a whole lot bigger!

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#15 Oct 22, 2013
Jorja Fox wrote:
<quoted text>
Understood. Same for me only on the other side. I can't find where Ken stands on gun control(?) Where do you stand? More? Less? None? Leave it as it is? I do agree-people kill people-therefore we need to be very careful.
Cuccinelli is NOT pro gun control.

My stance.....too much gun control now. As another gun-free school zone shooting proved a couple days ago, gun control only disarms those who choose to follow the law, and leaves the rest of us as disarmed sheep.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#16 Oct 22, 2013
Jorja Fox wrote:
<quoted text>
Ken's nose ring is a whole lot bigger!
LOL......riiiiiiight.
Gun Control Does Not Work

Seymour, CT

#18 Oct 23, 2013
MD Conservative wrote:
<quoted text>
Nothing compared to the one in McAuliffe's nose. Being dictated too, and against the Second Amendment. Nothing compares to that. He is running to protect the Constitution, not to dismantle.
That is the problem with you liberal scum, you are so anti-Constitution and USA. You ignorant fcuks are so anti-America why the fcuk do you remain living here? There are plenty of other countries out there that will cater to your every controlling need.
Well said, and you are exactly right!!!
SatanRules

Seattle, WA

#19 Oct 23, 2013
Gun Control Does Not Work wrote:
<quoted text>
Well said, and you are exactly right!!!
the American Taliban is voicing their horse$hit....they think they own this count.ry.. bwhahahhahahahahahah

http://imageshack.us/a/img716/1784/americanta...
SatanRules

Dallas, TX

#20 Oct 23, 2013
Bloomberg is my idea of a real man. He can boss me around anytime.
Jorja Fox

Eagle Rock, VA

#22 Oct 24, 2013
Armed Veteran wrote:
<quoted text>
Cuccinelli is NOT pro gun control.
My stance.....too much gun control now. As another gun-free school zone shooting proved a couple days ago, gun control only disarms those who choose to follow the law, and leaves the rest of us as disarmed sheep.
Virginia has some gun control laws that seem well balanced. You say to much gun control--what in Virginia's control laws need to go?

As for Ken - not sure what "not for gun control" means- would he get rid of all gun control laws--change them-what? What does "not for gun control" mean anyway? Get rid of all gun control?

I think Virginia is one of those states that can accept or reject federal gun laws-so whatever is decided in Washington has no effect on Virginia unless Virginia says so..right?
Jorja Fox

Eagle Rock, VA

#23 Oct 24, 2013
MD Conservative wrote:
<quoted text>
Nothing compared to the one in McAuliffe's nose. Being dictated too, and against the Second Amendment. Nothing compares to that. He is running to protect the Constitution, not to dismantle.
That is the problem with you liberal scum, you are so anti-Constitution and USA. You ignorant fcuks are so anti-America why the fcuk do you remain living here? There are plenty of other countries out there that will cater to your every controlling need.
I find no information about anyone being against the second amendment-anti-gun--can't find that either.

Ken is intolerant..........and scared to death of the tea party.

“Si vis pacem, para bellum !!”

Since: Dec 07

Southeast Virginia

#24 Oct 24, 2013
Jorja Fox wrote:
<quoted text>
Virginia has some gun control laws that seem well balanced. You say to much gun control--what in Virginia's control laws need to go?
As for Ken - not sure what "not for gun control" means- would he get rid of all gun control laws--change them-what? What does "not for gun control" mean anyway? Get rid of all gun control?
I think Virginia is one of those states that can accept or reject federal gun laws-so whatever is decided in Washington has no effect on Virginia unless Virginia says so..right?
Which ones needs to go? How about requiring a license to exercise a constitutional right to bear arms (concealed)? There are four states that do not require a license to do so, and it is referred to as "constitutional carry". Another...get rid of these so-called "gun-free" zones. As anyone can see by the latest number of mass shootings, those are the places that these mass murderers choose to carry out their destruction because they KNOW they will not be met with any kind of like resistance....at least for a little while anyway. Columbine, VT, Sandy Hook, Aurora theater, etc. are all perfect examples of such.

"Not for gun control" means he realizes how asinine assault weapons bans, magazine capacity limits, etc. are and knows they will not do a damn thing to prevent anything from happening.

Any restrictions or hurdles the law-abiding must jump through in order to exercise a right needs to go. Criminals don't follow them. Laws should only be in place to punish those who infringe on the rights of others. Not to infringe on the constitutional rights of the innocent.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 6
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Cory Booker Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News On Criminal Justice Reform, Ted Cruz Is Smarter... May '15 Tazo 1
News Democrat Booker Wins New Jersey Senate Election (Oct '13) Feb '15 boobie man 33
News States threaten lawsuit against Obama's municip... (Jan '15) Jan '15 jeffry 1
News 40,000 Expected at India Day Parade (Aug '14) Sep '14 I Agree 3
News Warren, Booker are Dems' secret weapons (Jun '14) Aug '14 swedenforever 31
News New Jersey's Christie takes Ice Bucket Challenge (Aug '14) Aug '14 Vaccines Cause Au... 7
News Cory Booker wins New Jersey Senate seat (Oct '13) Aug '14 swedenforever 4
More from around the web