Rove under fire

Nov 10, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: KVII-TV Amarillo

Read more: National , Politics , Politico , Karl Rove , Karl Rove under Fire , Donors Unhappy with Karl Rove , Crossroads Political Organizations , Rove Superpacs , Superpacs , Political Action Committees , Rover Super PACS , Super PACS , Money in Politics , Mitt Romney , Barack Obama , President Barack Obama The face of the historic $1-billion ... (more)

Comments
1 - 11 of 11 Comments Last updated Dec 7, 2012
observer_009

Modbury, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Nov 10, 2012
 
For heaven's sake, in all competitions there's a winner and a loser. That's life, get over it.
conservative crapola

Allentown, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Nov 11, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

His superpac wasn't so super & Adelson is going to have to tighten those Macau slot machines.

hahahahahahahahahaha
What a bunch of dorks

Santa Rosa Beach, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Nov 12, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Poor Karl.
I hope he doesn't end up accidentally dead. That would be a shame.
Just goes to show......
Money does NOT win an election.
Romney was not the guy. That is why he lost.

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Nov 12, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

What a bunch of dorks wrote:
Poor Karl.
I hope he doesn't end up accidentally dead. That would be a shame.
Just goes to show......
Money does NOT win an election.
Romney was not the guy. That is why he lost.
. Hispanics are family orientated, religious and against abortion. Who do you think Hispanics will identify with, other than amnesty,.

Beware of the rabid touting of a single election results to think you have won the war, and not just a battle.
lee nine

Corpus Christi, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Nov 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

karl and dick are just a bunch of bullshitters. Dick is still insisting that they will win the next election cause obama will screw things up. Still talking out of his ass post election.

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Nov 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

lee nine wrote:
karl and dick are just a bunch of bullshitters. Dick is still insisting that they will win the next election cause obama will screw things up. Still talking out of his ass post election.
Hold you bag open, let's see how much candy you got.
Jared Allen

Dallas, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Dec 5, 2012
 
On election night his career melted in front of everyone watchin FOX.
Ratliff

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Dec 7, 2012
 
au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>. Hispanics are family orientated, religious and against abortion. Who do you think Hispanics will identify with, other than amnesty,.
Beware of the rabid touting of a single election results to think you have won the war, and not just a battle.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scien...

Why Liberals Are More Intelligent Than Conservatives
Liberals think they’re more intelligent than conservatives because they are

It is difficult to define a whole school of political ideology precisely, but one may reasonably define liberalism (as opposed to conservatism) in the contemporary United States as the genuine concern for the welfare of genetically unrelated others and the willingness to contribute larger proportions of private resources for the welfare of such others. In the modern political and economic context, this willingness usually translates into paying higher proportions of individual incomes in taxes toward the government and its social welfare programs. Liberals usually support such social welfare programs and higher taxes to finance them, and conservatives usually oppose them.

Defined as such, liberalism is evolutionarily novel. Humans (like other species) are evolutionarily designed to be altruistic toward their genetic kin, their friends and allies, and members of their deme (a group of intermarrying individuals) or ethnic group. They are not designed to be altruistic toward an indefinite number of complete strangers whom they are not likely ever to meet or interact with. This is largely because our ancestors lived in a small band of 50-150 genetically related individuals, and large cities and nations with thousands and millions of people are themselves evolutionarily novel.

The examination of the 10-volume compendium The Encyclopedia of World Cultures, which describes all human cultures known to anthropology (more than 1,500) in great detail, as well as extensive primary ethnographies of traditional societies, reveals that liberalism as defined above is absent in these traditional cultures. While sharing of resources, especially food, is quite common and often mandatory among hunter-gatherer tribes, and while trade with neighboring tribes often takes place, there is no evidence that people in contemporary hunter-gatherer bands freely share resources with members of other tribes.

Because all members of a hunter-gatherer tribe are genetic kin or at the very least friends and allies for life, sharing resources among them does not qualify as an expression of liberalism as defined above. Given its absence in the contemporary hunter-gatherer tribes, which are often used as modern-day analogs of our ancestral life, it may be reasonable to infer that sharing of resources with total strangers that one has never met or is not likely ever to meet – that is, liberalism – was not part of our ancestral life. Liberalism may therefore be evolutionarily novel, and the Hypothesis would predict that more intelligent individuals are more likely than less intelligent individuals to espouse liberalism as a value.

Analyses of large representative samples, from both the United States and the United Kingdom, confirm this prediction. In both countries, more intelligent children are more likely to grow up to be liberals than less intelligent children. For example, among the American sample, those who identify themselves as “very liberal” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 106.4, whereas those who identify themselves as “very conservative” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 94.8.

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Dec 7, 2012
 
Korean Rapper Under Fire for Spewing Anti-American Hate...

Slated to Perform in Obama Christmas Special...
Ratliff

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Dec 7, 2012
 
The dumber the state the more likely they are a red state. On the other hand, Obama won Florida which has only 23% college graduates.
"According to a state-by-state breakdown by the Census Bureau, here are the top 15 states with the best college completion rates as of 2010. All of them have at least 43 percent of its young residents holding a college degree, but only two states have over 50 percent. D.C., which was included in the study, beat out all of the states with an impressive 68.8 percent.
Blue - Massachusetts 54.3% of the population
Red - North Dakota 50.8% of the population
Blue - Minnesota 49.8% of the population
Blue - New York 49.6% of the population 47.2% of the population
Blue - New Jersey 47.2% of the population
Blue - New Hampshire 46.0% of the population
Blue - Connecticut 45.9% of the population
Blue - Iowa 45.5% of the population
Blue - Maryland 45.5% of the population
Blue- llinois 45.3% of the population
Blue - Virginia 44.6% of the population
Blue - Vermont 44.5% of the population
Red - Nebraska 44.2% of the population
Blue - Pennsylvania 43.9% of the population"
So out of the fifteen states with the highest percentages of college graduates, twelve voted for Obama. And as for the nonsense some have proposed about liberalism being "cyclical", republicans have gotten the majority of the white vote in every presidential race since 1964.
Ratliff

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Dec 7, 2012
 
The ONLY ethnic group where Romney lead was white men. "Republicans have won the white vote in every presidential election since 1964, and that continued Tuesday with Romney beating Obama by 20 points, 59 percent to 39 percent, according to exit polls. Obama won 80 percent of the minority vote, which, besides Latinos, included African Americans, 13 percent of turnout, the same as 2008, and Asian-Americans, who were 3 percent of the vote, up a point from the last election. President Barack Obama on Tuesday won a whopping 71% of the Latino vote, up from 67% in 2008. By contrast, John Kerry only managed to get about 53% of the Latino vote in 2004 when he lost in his bid to unseat President George W. Bush, according to publicly available exit polls. In Colorado, he captured three-quarters of Hispanic voters, up from 61 percent in 2008. He also improved his Hispanic performance in Florida, a result that included dominance of the heavily Puerto Rican swing precincts around Orlando and the election of a Cuban American Democrat to Congress, symbolizing the end of the GOP’s decades-long lock on that community. In 2012, the share of the Latino vote rose to a record high 10%, a number that’s doubled in the past 16 years. President Obama won about 8.4 million Latino votes, using a rough calculation based on exit-poll data. Romney captured no more than 3.44 million votes. In Iowa and New Hampshire, states without big minority populations, Obama won by gaining the support of nearly six in 10 women. Obama won 71% of the Asian-American vote. From the exit polls, President Obama’s support from men slipped a few points from 49% four years ago, but women supported the president over Romney by 55% to 44%."

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••