Join the discussion below, or Read more at DispatchPolitics.
#65 Nov 21, 2010
We are a group of students from the University of Southern California's law school who are trying to evaluate the market feasibility of our idea that revolves around proper management of ones real estate assets.
It will be great if you all could help us in getting a fair idea about the needs of the market by filling out the following survey:
Please be rest assured that your responses won't be misused in any way. If you want to know more about our business idea, then please feel free to contact me at [email protected]
#66 Feb 13, 2011
> Legal Lady #26 Nov 3, 2010 Columbus, OH
The article was silent about then Judge Acker usurping the exclusive jurisdiction of the juvenile court because the article's author was unaware of what was not known.
The mom was unhappy because the ex parte conduct of then Judge Acker was brazenly and inexcusably lacking in basic judicial and attorney ethics.
I respectfully submit that the only folks surprised that the mother was unhappy are those woefully ignorant of the proper procedure when parents do not consent to the marriage of their minor child.
The case was a slam dunk for any one who understands what the words "exclusive jurisdiction" mean.
Agree that "fair" is not the standard. The Rule of Law is the standard and then Judge Acker was clearly ultra vires when he usurped jurisdiction and "granted permission" in an ex parte "application" (as he called it).
I suggest and hope that now Judge Montgomery would send the children to a juvenile judge to obtain consent then return with the consent.
Several "hated" the decision made by a Muskingum County probate judge (with NO jurisdiction) after he ordered a female sterilized.
Not only was his decision "unfair" it was actionable and there was no way that he could claim judicial immunity when he was hammered in a civil action. The Federal court was clear on the issue.
#67 Dec 26, 2012
" and always thinks it is unfair. Fair isn't the standard. "
Opinions are made more valid when decisions stray from standards established by the law. Make no mistake, Acker is a pos.
#68 Dec 26, 2012
Sure do wish I could talk to you. While a matter hasn't been revealed, the effects of Acker's decisions still reverberate today.
Add your comments below
|John Kasich unloads on Donald Trump and Ted Cru...||Apr 15||serfs up||8|
|Democrats dispute Kasich's Ohio success story||Apr 13||HillaryWorse||8|
|Kasich far stronger than Trump against Clinton,...||Mar '16||Whoop day it isth||87|
|Partisan fight over court complicates tight Ohi...||Feb '16||Reality Speaks||5|
|Drug abuse bill raises hopes for election-year ...||Jan '16||Lynn Killed Elyse||1|
|Key same-sex marriage proponent backs Dem in Oh...||Dec '15||Lawrence Wolf||21|
|APNewsBreak: Ohio Gay Marriage Plaintiff Backs ...||Dec '15||Mitt s Dog Crate ...||1|
Find what you want!
Search Ted Strickland Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC