Actually, although it has now been years since all this data came to light, you can't seem to get your little mind around the fact that for the most part (accounting for the overwhelmingly greatest number/percentage/share of the known incidents of priestly misconduct), what the Church really had was a proliferation of homosexual priests who preyed upon post-pubescent males, many of whom were underage. Pedophilia has a meaning and thatmeaning is inconsistent with your consistent misrepresentation of the facts. I doubt you have ever seen me defend the actions of any bishop who knowlingly passed this problem from one Parish or See to another. your problem is that you think not burining down every Cathedral is the same thing as condoning the sometimes cowardly, sometime outright evil actions of a few priests and even fewer bishops.<quoted text>
Kind of funny that you are commenting on whether or not Michael Jackson was a pedophile since you are one of the biggest defender of the church's protection of pedophile priests on Topix!
I recognize your style and angst from your other webnames, so I know this is a real problem for you. You need help and you really should get it. If this touched you personally (considering the consistently high level of malice in your posts, that seems likely), I am sorry for your pain, but there are folks who will help.