Resolution honoring Jackson faces GOP...

Resolution honoring Jackson faces GOP opposition

There are 80 comments on the Marin Independent Journal story from Jul 8, 2009, titled Resolution honoring Jackson faces GOP opposition. In it, Marin Independent Journal reports that:

Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee may have trouble keeping the promise she made at Michael Jackson's public memorial for a House resolution that "forever" honors the late pop star.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Marin Independent Journal.

First Prev
of 4
Next Last

“End the War on Arizona”

Since: Jan 08

El Paso, TX

#70 Jul 10, 2009
Stop the Church wrote:
<quoted text>
Kind of funny that you are commenting on whether or not Michael Jackson was a pedophile since you are one of the biggest defender of the church's protection of pedophile priests on Topix!
Actually, although it has now been years since all this data came to light, you can't seem to get your little mind around the fact that for the most part (accounting for the overwhelmingly greatest number/percentage/share of the known incidents of priestly misconduct), what the Church really had was a proliferation of homosexual priests who preyed upon post-pubescent males, many of whom were underage. Pedophilia has a meaning and thatmeaning is inconsistent with your consistent misrepresentation of the facts. I doubt you have ever seen me defend the actions of any bishop who knowlingly passed this problem from one Parish or See to another. your problem is that you think not burining down every Cathedral is the same thing as condoning the sometimes cowardly, sometime outright evil actions of a few priests and even fewer bishops.

I recognize your style and angst from your other webnames, so I know this is a real problem for you. You need help and you really should get it. If this touched you personally (considering the consistently high level of malice in your posts, that seems likely), I am sorry for your pain, but there are folks who will help.
progressive

Lamoni, IA

#71 Jul 10, 2009
bikerknight sounds like a condescending scuz doesn't he? even if there is a different age-limit in the legal and technical definition of pedophilia. Guess that lets Gary Studds off the hook, and Foley of Fla. too. If a girl is under l6, in most civilized states, there is a crime called statutory rape - except when the FLDS destroys the records of how old the girls are, and wimpy state officials don't arrest the men and test the DNA. A similar protection should be given to a young man of 16. Since I am not male, not Catholic, luckily never abused, I can safely say that it is possible to object to the criminal negligence of the institutional Roman Catholic church, and its continuing insensitivity (as attested to by the presence of Mr. Law at the Vatican) without being condescended to as being a previous victim needing help. Cathedrals should not be burned down. The Vatican porn collection should be burned, however. Maybe allow substantial contributions to the victgims' fund for a sneak pak at it by all the hypocritical old leches, before lighting the fire.(I refer to porn and obscenity and sm, not charming erotica a la Mr. Sanford-style!) And every bit of precious metal or stone taken down and sold and used to pay off the victims of abusive priests who were very likely abused themselves, by priests of another generation, In a hierarchy like the Catholic church, it does not take many permissive Bishops or Cardinals to allow the abusive priests to move around from place to place, and escape being caught or even forced to have therapy. The institutional Catholic Church is an accomplice to statutory rape of young males, and probably some young women, also. I have been amazed to see some very good statements from this Pope - the former head of the Inquisition - recently. It does not offset all the evil that he and his church have done, but it might help, if he cared enough to make helping the poor a priority, rather than railing against homosexuals' right to marry. The blaming of so-called "homosexual" priests is likely a blaming of the victims of other priestly abusers- long-ago victims of other priests, also not stopped or disciplined or forced to be medicallty treated by the institutional Catholic church hierarchy.
progressive

Lamoni, IA

#72 Jul 10, 2009
nina wrote:
America's Speaker of The House, Nancy Pelosi, has blocked plans to honour Michael Jackson as an official American legend.
Texas congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee announced at the King of Pop's memorial on Tuesday that Resolution 600 would be presented to politicians this week.
Representing Congress and the Congressional Black Caucus at the Los Angeles tribute, Lee told the cheering masses at the Staples Center the motion claimed Jackson "as an American Legend and musical icon, a world humanitarian (and) someone who will be honoured forever and forever and forever and forever and forever."
She then revealed the framed resolution.
But politician Pelosi has rejected the proposal, stating such a resolution "will open up two contrary views that are not necessary at this time to be expressed".
Pelosi has called on Lee and other politicians to concentrate on more pressing matters.
As Dick Cheney would famously say, "So?"Good for Pelosi. She has enough sense to concentrate on stuff that matters, not pandering to the fans of a guy who could dance in an interesting way, and was cute when he was 8 years old. anyone who knows sheila Jackson Lee - and I have seen her speak dozens of times on cspan - knows that she may be correct once in a while, and even do well on some things (the lovely unveiling of the statue for sojourner Truth, and the ceremony, and even her remarks there), but that she is no centrist, and not a thoughtful leader. More of a panderer and a personal loyalist, an enthusiast, etc. she wears grat colorful scarves however, and she represents the views of some, as she has the right to do. But honoring celebvrities is not what ?Congress should be doing. Neither is funding buildings named aafter Rangel or Maxine Waters or anyone else. the Black Caucus needs to be led by its best people and the press should not get by with only featuring its share of extremists. The great one is John Lewis. All by himself. Not even needing to lead anyone. Anyone who thinks otherwise is no historian! He does not need to lead. He can speak for himself. If he makes a mistake now and then, as he did recently - then he has been too brave and magnificent throughout his career to not forgive him. John Conyers is brilliant on issues and tactics - but not a person of great integrity, in his personal connections and political ways. He comes out of sloppier traditions of the past, and is provisionally forgiveable, but not one to give a pass to - he has to be made to shape up if he or his wife do some act of wrong-doing. But Pelosi knows that it would be insane to waste time on resolutions to praise celebrities, dead or alive! It is just pandering, and excess of personal enthusiasm, on the part of individual House members. Even re-naming National airport Ronald Reagan airport, or re-naming Cape Cannaveral Cape Kennedy - is silly. or Dulles international - both Dulles brothers were scum!

“End the War on Arizona”

Since: Jan 08

El Paso, TX

#73 Jul 10, 2009
progressive wrote:
bikerknight sounds like a condescending scuz doesn't he? even if there is a different age-limit in the legal and technical definition of pedophilia. Guess that lets Gary Studds off the hook, and Foley of Fla. too. If a girl is under l6, in most civilized states, there is a crime called statutory rape - except when the FLDS destroys the records of how old the girls are, and wimpy state officials don't arrest the men and test the DNA. A similar protection should be given to a young man of 16. Since I am not male, not Catholic, luckily never abused, I can safely say that it is possible to object to the criminal negligence of the institutional Roman Catholic church, and its continuing insensitivity (as attested to by the presence of Mr. Law at the Vatican) without being condescended to as being a previous victim needing help. Cathedrals should not be burned down. The Vatican porn collection should be burned, however. Maybe allow substantial contributions to the victgims' fund for a sneak pak at it by all the hypocritical old leches, before lighting the fire.(I refer to porn and obscenity and sm, not charming erotica a la Mr. Sanford-style!) And every bit of precious metal or stone taken down and sold and used to pay off the victims of abusive priests who were very likely abused themselves, by priests of another generation, In a hierarchy like the Catholic church, it does not take many permissive Bishops or Cardinals to allow the abusive priests to move around from place to place, and escape being caught or even forced to have therapy. The institutional Catholic Church is an accomplice to statutory rape of young males, and probably some young women, also. I have been amazed to see some very good statements from this Pope - the former head of the Inquisition - recently. It does not offset all the evil that he and his church have done, but it might help, if he cared enough to make helping the poor a priority, rather than railing against homosexuals' right to marry. The blaming of so-called "homosexual" priests is likely a blaming of the victims of other priestly abusers- long-ago victims of other priests, also not stopped or disciplined or forced to be medicallty treated by the institutional Catholic church hierarchy.
Actually, there is a difference between being condescending and being informative. The definition of pedophilia does not hinge upon age, but upon the onset of puberty. The reason this is significant is that sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children (who, by definition have not yet begun to sexually mature) is often associated with (though not necessarily caused by), a pre-pubescent arrestation of emotional development in the pedophile. Such arrested development does tend to follow severe emotional trauma; such as would follow sexual or severe physical abuse.

That is why pointing out that the Church has a much greater homosexual priest issue is important.
You seem to insist that you are not a victim of such abuse, so I won't tell you there is help for you. Judging from the rest of your post, there is no help for you but repentance.
Enjoy hell!
Too Simplistic

El Paso, TX

#74 Jul 10, 2009
Getting back to this proposed RESOLUTION and away from the priests, I say nay! I stand behind Pelosi's decision. There is much more going on right now that needs to be taken care of. Jackson was an entertainer for Pete's sake! Where's the resolution to honor all of the other rich people that have done positive things for others because they could, but did not have charges of pedophilia put against them?
LC REALTOR

United States

#76 Jul 10, 2009
Are you people really still talking about this topic?????

This is a dead deal as long as Pelosi (God, I can't stand her!) keeps her thumb on it!(This is one of the few things she's done right IMHO.)
Support

Cresskill, NJ

#77 Jul 10, 2009
no way wrote:
The guy was a creepy, child molester who was was rich enough to buy his way out of jail.
Don't honor this guy.
Terrorize American citizens = terrorists

the slime ball hells angels attacked a durango with just 3 teenagers inside and one was pregnant.2 young women and 1 young man. The hells angels are American terrorists.

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/newark-nj/TAB...

http://www.topix.com/forum/source/marin-indep...

here is a gang of creeps you can complain about Punk
Bozosrus

Monterey, CA

#79 Jul 11, 2009
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>Gee, and I was hoping to squeeze that 20 million out of you.
Look, I don't know whether or not Jackson was a pedophile. I do know the kid who accused him was coached by his father, and that the kid's family had a history of phony lawsuits. Even if Jackson were innocent, I could see his lawyers and advisors telling him to make this go away with a payoff.
Interestingly, my wife used to insist that Jackson was not a child molester, and I called her naive. Now I'm not so sure.
You are confusing cases. It was the second kid that he went to court for whose family had a series of questionable lawsuits not the first kid who got the money. He was the son of a successfull screenwriter and I have never seen any evidence that he was coached or that they had ever filed a lawsuit before.

“Support SAR, get lost. ”

Since: Oct 08

East Haven, CT

#80 Jul 13, 2009
Bozosrus wrote:
<quoted text>We keep hearing how philanthropic he was. What are your sources? My guess is that you are just repeating what was said by others. Opening up your ranch to potential victims is not philanthropic. And in any acse being generopus does not forgive the bad things you did.
Google is such a difficult tool to use, I went ahead and did the ground work for you.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_contributions_...
Bozosrus

Monterey, CA

#81 Jul 13, 2009
flywatt wrote:
<quoted text>
Google is such a difficult tool to use, I went ahead and did the ground work for you.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_contributions_...
First of Wikipedia is not even an accepted source for college term papers. Anybody can write virtually whatever they want there. Secondly, as I have said before, just because he invited kids to his ranch doesn't mean he didn't have ulterior motives.

“HEISENBERG”

Since: Apr 09

MONTREAL

#82 Jul 14, 2009
Bozosrus wrote:
<quoted text>We keep hearing how philanthropic he was. What are your sources? My guess is that you are just repeating what was said by others. Opening up your ranch to potential victims is not philanthropic. And in any acse being generopus does not forgive the bad things you did.
do you actually believe your own bulklshit buddy...cause not only are you smug over something which you have completly ass backwards but you are STUPID BVEYOND BELIEVE NOT TO SEE THE OBVIOUS...

ATTACHED TO EVERY SINGLE ONE OF HIS DONATIONS, WAS MASSIVE INCME TAX BREAK FROM THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT...

WHAT MICHALE DID WAS WHAT ANY OTHER REGULAR NORMAL HUMAN BEING WOULD HAVE DONE...EXCEPT IN HIS CASE HE IS/WAS COMPLETELY ABNORMAL AND HE DID IT...

IT'S CALLED...SMART BUSINESS PRACTICE AND HAD ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH ANYTHING ELSE.

HOW IN THE FUCK DO YOU MORONS JUSTIFY AND RESOLVE THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE GUY ON STAGE WHO FOR THE PAST 18+ YEARS SIMULATED FULL FEMALE MASTUBATION COMPLETE WITH ANNULAR FINGER STROKING A SIMULATED CLITORUS AND VAGINA WITH THIS GUY YOU CLAIM WAS SUCH AN ICON AND A HERO?

IF THIS IS THE KIND OF PERSON YOU PEOPLE HOLD UP AS HEROS ALL OF YOUR CHILDREN ARE DOOMED.

THIS WAS A VERY SIVCK AND TROUBLED INDIVDUAL WHO IN HIS DEATH COMMITED THE SINGLE MOIST SELFISH ACT ANY HUMAN BEING CAN EVER COMMIT !!!

HE DOES NOT DESERVE ANY OF THIS....HE WASS N HERO, NO ROLE MODEL, AND WAS NOTHING REALY OTHER THAN A 2ND LEVEL TOP TIER DANCER WHO LIP-SYNCHED MORE THAN 50% OF HIS LIVE PERFORMANCES AND WITHDREW FROM POERSONAL, FAMILY, AND PUBLIC LIFE, TO NURTURE HIS HOBBY....DOING DRUGS !!!

PERIOD !!!

3/4'S OF THIS EARTH IS DELUSIONAL RIGHT NOW !!!

THIER HERO IS A PEDEFILE ADMITTING JUNKIE !!!
AND... he SETTLED OUT OF COURT FOR 25+ MILLION DOLLARS ON A 2ND CHILD MOLESTATION CHARGE DESPITE BEING AQUIITED OF ANOTHER- AND I ASK YOU WHAT FUCKING INNOCENT PERSON ON EARTH WITH AS MUCH TO LOSE WOULD EVER DO SUCH A THING UNLESS THEY WERE 100% GUILTY...EVER !!!

AMERICA...THE STUPID !!!

THATS WHAT EVERY MICHALE JACKSON LOVING PERSON IS PART OF NOW - A COUNTRY THAT HAS NO CLUE WHAT A GOOD EXAMPLE IS !!!!!

WHICHG ISNL;T SUPRISING GIVEN THAT HALF OF YOU IDIOTS STILL BELIEVE THAT O.J. WAS INNNOCENT OR BETTER YET...FRAMED...

LMFAO...AMERICA THE RETARDED IS MORE LIKE IT !!!

IN THS HISTORY OF CRIMNINAL LAW, THERE HAS NEVER BEEN MORE OVERWHELMING DNA EVIDENCE POINTING TO ONE AND ONLY ONE MANS POSSIBLE GUILT AS WELL.

IN THE HISTORY OF CRIMINAL LAW !!!

NOT SURPRISING, WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE A
SAME RACE HERE THAT GAVE US MICHAEL JACKSON, AL SHARPTON, AND O.J. SIMPSON, MERRIAN BERRY, AND JOE JACKSON, JANET JACKSON, AND SHEILA JACKSON, THE SENATOR !!!

THESE PEOPLE HAVE THEIR COLLECTIVE HEADS BURIED UP THYERI OWN COLLECTIVE ASSES !!!

THEIR JUST CAN BE NO DENYING THIS!!!

UBNLESS YOUR BLACK AND STUPID AND LIVING IN AMERICA!!!

“Support SAR, get lost. ”

Since: Oct 08

East Haven, CT

#83 Jul 14, 2009
Bozosrus wrote:
<quoted text>First of Wikipedia is not even an accepted source for college term papers. Anybody can write virtually whatever they want there. Secondly, as I have said before, just because he invited kids to his ranch doesn't mean he didn't have ulterior motives.
There are tons of websites that show what Michael Jackson contributed to the world. I encourage you to google it yourself, seeing as how you will probably find a way to discredit any source I throw up there. Just because it's wikipedia doesn't mean it isn't true.

“HEISENBERG”

Since: Apr 09

MONTREAL

#84 Jul 14, 2009
flywatt wrote:
<quoted text>
There are tons of websites that show what Michael Jackson contributed to the world. I encourage you to google it yourself, seeing as how you will probably find a way to discredit any source I throw up there. Just because it's wikipedia doesn't mean it isn't true.
WHAT EXCATLY DID HE CONTRIBUTE...BE SPECIFIC?
I GUESS THAT RIGHT THERE IS ALL THE PROOF THAT ANYONE NEEDS THAT 3/4'S {NEVER MIND 1/2} OF AMERICA IS COMPLETELY DELUSIONAL AND IS LIVING IN UTTER DENIAL...!!!
AND EVERY ONE OF YOU THAT SAYS YOU "LOVED HIM" IS A FUCKING LIAR BECAUSE YOU HAD ZERO PERSONAL EXPERIENCE WITH THE MAN, DID NOT EVEN KNOW THE MAN, NEVER MET HJIM OR SPENT EVEN ONE MINUTE OF YOUR LKIFE WITH HIM, HAVE A COMPLETELY OVERBLOWN FALSE PROPHET IMPRESSION OF THE MAN AND THEREFORE ARE NOT NOW NOR HAVE YOU EVER BEEN IN LOVE WITH THIS MAN...NOR WOULD Y=OU BE CAOPABLE OF TRULY LOVING SOMEONE LIKE THIS WHO WAS THIS TROMENOUSLY FLAWED AS A HUMAN BEING...AND IF YOU ADD TO IT THE SHOCK YOUR ENTIRE SYSTEM IS GOING TO SUFFER WHN YOU FINALY ADMIT THE TRUTH TO YOURSELVES ABOUT THIS LITTLE TROUBLED BOY...IT WILL BE A MIRACLE IF YOU CAN EVER LISTEN TO ONE MORE TRACK FROM ONE MORE ALBUM OR EVEN WATCH ONE MORE
VIDEO FROM ONE MORE LIP-SYCNCHED AND COMPLETELY FRAUDULENT LIVE CONCERT PERFORMANCE...
AMERICA IS A COUNTRY FILLED UP WITH COMPLETELY BRAIN DEAD RETARDS !!!
3/4'S OF YOU ARE IN DENAIL AND HAVE THIS ENTIRE THING WRONG IN YOUR HEADS KNOW THIS, AND REFUSE TO ADMIT TO YOURSELVES AND ARE HOLDING UP A FUCKING SICK AND DISEASED LOSER IN LIFE AS AN ICON
AND A HERO !!!
GOOD LUCK WITH THAT
I LIVE IN REALITY
HE WAS THE 3RD BEST DANCER I EVER SAW, A SERUIOUS ASS DRUG ADDICT, AND THAT'S IT !!!
EVERY SINGLE FUCKING DOINATION THE MAN EVER MADE CAME ATTACHED TOM A HUGE FUCKING GOIVERNMENT KICKBACK !!!
WHICH THE GUY DIDN'T EVEN DESERVE !!!
HIS SISTERS ARE SICK, HYIS BROTHERS ARE SICVK, HIS FRIENDS WERE AND ARE ALL SICK, AND HNO MATTER HOW MUCH YOU LIE TO YOURSELVES AND SUGAR COAT THIS THING HE HAD HALF THE CHARACTER THAT FARRAH FAWCETT DID !!!
PERIOD !
Bozosrus

Monterey, CA

#85 Jul 15, 2009
Spartacus1962 wrote:
<quoted text>
do you actually believe your own bulklshit buddy...cause not only are you smug over something which you have completly **** backwards but you are STUPID BVEYOND BELIEVE NOT TO SEE THE OBVIOUS...
ATTACHED TO EVERY SINGLE ONE OF HIS DONATIONS, WAS MASSIVE INCME TAX BREAK FROM THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT...
WHAT MICHALE DID WAS WHAT ANY OTHER REGULAR NORMAL HUMAN BEING WOULD HAVE DONE...EXCEPT IN HIS CASE HE IS/WAS COMPLETELY ABNORMAL AND HE DID IT...
IT'S CALLED...SMART BUSINESS PRACTICE AND HAD ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH ANYTHING ELSE.
HOW IN THE **** DO YOU MORONS JUSTIFY AND RESOLVE THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE GUY ON STAGE WHO FOR THE PAST 18+ YEARS SIMULATED FULL FEMALE MASTUBATION COMPLETE WITH ANNULAR FINGER STROKING A SIMULATED CLITORUS AND VAGINA WITH THIS GUY YOU CLAIM WAS SUCH AN ICON AND A HERO?
IF THIS IS THE KIND OF PERSON YOU PEOPLE HOLD UP AS HEROS ALL OF YOUR CHILDREN ARE DOOMED.
THIS WAS A VERY SIVCK AND TROUBLED INDIVDUAL WHO IN HIS DEATH COMMITED THE SINGLE MOIST SELFISH ACT ANY HUMAN BEING CAN EVER COMMIT !!!
HE DOES NOT DESERVE ANY OF THIS....HE WASS N HERO, NO ROLE MODEL, AND WAS NOTHING REALY OTHER THAN A 2ND LEVEL TOP TIER DANCER WHO LIP-SYNCHED MORE THAN 50% OF HIS LIVE PERFORMANCES AND WITHDREW FROM POERSONAL, FAMILY, AND PUBLIC LIFE, TO NURTURE HIS HOBBY....DOING DRUGS !!!
PERIOD !!!
3/4'S OF THIS EARTH IS DELUSIONAL RIGHT NOW !!!
THIER HERO IS A PEDEFILE ADMITTING JUNKIE !!!
AND... he SETTLED OUT OF COURT FOR 25+ MILLION DOLLARS ON A 2ND CHILD MOLESTATION CHARGE DESPITE BEING AQUIITED OF ANOTHER- AND I ASK YOU WHAT **** INNOCENT PERSON ON EARTH WITH AS MUCH TO LOSE WOULD EVER DO SUCH A THING UNLESS THEY WERE 100% GUILTY...EVER !!!
AMERICA...THE STUPID !!!
THATS WHAT EVERY MICHALE JACKSON LOVING PERSON IS PART OF NOW - A COUNTRY THAT HAS NO CLUE WHAT A GOOD EXAMPLE IS !!!!!
WHICHG ISNL;T SUPRISING GIVEN THAT HALF OF YOU IDIOTS STILL BELIEVE THAT O.J. WAS INNNOCENT OR BETTER YET...FRAMED...
LMFAO...AMERICA THE RETARDED IS MORE LIKE IT !!!
IN THS HISTORY OF CRIMNINAL LAW, THERE HAS NEVER BEEN MORE OVERWHELMING DNA EVIDENCE POINTING TO ONE AND ONLY ONE MANS POSSIBLE GUILT AS WELL.
IN THE HISTORY OF CRIMINAL LAW !!!
NOT SURPRISING, WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE A
SAME RACE HERE THAT GAVE US MICHAEL JACKSON, AL SHARPTON, AND O.J. SIMPSON, MERRIAN BERRY, AND JOE JACKSON, JANET JACKSON, AND SHEILA JACKSON, THE SENATOR !!!
THESE PEOPLE HAVE THEIR COLLECTIVE HEADS BURIED UP THYERI OWN COLLECTIVE ASSES !!!
THEIR JUST CAN BE NO DENYING THIS!!!
UBNLESS YOUR BLACK AND STUPID AND LIVING IN AMERICA!!!
First of all, genius, I guess you have not read all my postings. If you were to have, including the one you quote, you would have seen little in the way of support of support for Michael Jackson. So if you are going to go on a pathetic, racist, mindless rant don't be attaching my quote to it.
Bozosrus

Monterey, CA

#86 Jul 15, 2009
flywatt wrote:
<quoted text>
There are tons of websites that show what Michael Jackson contributed to the world. I encourage you to google it yourself, seeing as how you will probably find a way to discredit any source I throw up there. Just because it's wikipedia doesn't mean it isn't true.
It also doesn't mean it is true just like anything else written here.
nina

Ottawa, Canada

#87 Jul 15, 2009
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>Michael Jackson was not a "normal grown man", that's not debatable. However, as a child, Michael received brutal treatment, and never had the chance enjoy childhood. As I see it, Jackson spent the rest of his life trying to find that childhood. If that is so, I can see him wanting to hang around kids, and even have innocent sleepovers with them.
I'm not naive. I really don't know how innocent these friendships were. I'm simply saying that, given Jackson's hunger for a childhood he never had, it is conceivable that these relationships were innocent.
doesn't excuse him from stealing childhood from children

and, many many many people don't have a childhood for a variety of reasons

they don't spend their adult lives trying to reclaim childhood

you suck it up and be a grown up
nina

Ottawa, Canada

#88 Jul 15, 2009
Bozosrus wrote:
<quoted text>... Secondly, as I have said before, just because he invited kids to his ranch doesn't mean he didn't have ulterior motives.
I have a bridge to sell you
Bill from cruces

Albuquerque, NM

#89 Jul 15, 2009
When the resolution came up on the floor, most of the black caucus walked out on the introduction, that in itself speaks loud and clear to me what other blacks thought of MJ. Besides, Maxine Waters had only one other co-sponsor even sign the damn thing.
Bozosrus

Monterey, CA

#90 Jul 16, 2009
nina wrote:
<quoted text>
I have a bridge to sell you
Yeah I guess you were so close to Michael that you know what his motives were and what he did behind closed doors. People who defend this guy because they liked his music need to make sure they are never on a jury. The defenders of Jackson are the same kind of people that found OJ not guilty at his first trial.

“HEISENBERG”

Since: Apr 09

MONTREAL

#91 Jul 17, 2009
THATS JUST IT
LIKING HIS CHARACTER AND LIKING HIS MUSIC ARE 2 COMPLETELY FUCKING DIFFERENT THINGS
ARE YOU ALL SO RETARDED YOU CAN'T SEE THIS?
FACT: DRUG ADDICT
FACT: DID THE SINGLE MOST CLASSLESS DTHING REGULARLY ON STAGE AS PART OF HIS ROUTINE
FACT: SCREWED EVERY SINGLE PERSON IN HIS EMPLOY, EVEN HAD SOME OF HIS EMPLOYEES COMMIT CRIMINAL ACTS ON HIS BEHALF AND MANY OF THEM QUIT OVER IT.
FACT: HE COULD NEITHER READ NOR WRITE MUSIC
FACT: HE SETTLED OUT OF COURT ONA CHILD MOLESTATION CHARGE FOR 25+ MILLION DOLLARS CASH...AND THEN WENT OPN NATIONAL TELEVISION AND DECLARED HIS INNOCENCE.
FACT:HE WAS PERHAPS THE 3RD BEST DANCER TO EVER LIVE
FACT: HE LIP-SYSNCHED THE MAUJORITY OF HIS LIVE PERFOMRNACES AND IN THIS REGARD COMMITED A MASSIVE ACT OF FRAUD.{DON;LT KNMOW ABOUT YOU BUT WHEN I PAY $150 + BUCKS TO SEE AN ARTIST THEY BETTER BE SINGKING FOR REAL...IN MOST OF HIS...HE JUST PLAIN FOR A FACT WAS NOT !!!
FACT: ANYONE THAT THINKS BECAUSE HE GAVE A LOT OF MONEY TO CHARITYS THIS AUTOMTICALLY MAKES HIM SPECIAL IS BRAIN DEAD, BECAUSE ANYONE WHO HAD AS MUCH MOINEY AS HE DID WHEN HE MADE THOSE DONATIONS WOULD HAVE DONE EXACTLY THE SAME FUCKING THING. HE WASN'T SPECIAL BECASUSE OF THIS AT ALL...AND HE GOT MASSIVE TAX BREAKS AND KICKBACKS BECAUSE OF THEM ALL.
FACT: HIS DAUGHTERS ARE BEING TAKEN TO JAHOVA WITNESS CHURCH BY HIS FAMILY MEMBERS- SOMETHING HE WAS SPECIFICA\LLY AND EMPHATICALLY AGAINST
IN HIS OWN DEATHG, HIS OWN FAMNILY IS ALL SO GREEDY THEY ARE SELLING MERCHANISE AND THEIR TIME AND LIKELIENESSES IN ORDER TO PRFIT FROM THIER OWN BLOOD RELATIVES DEATH...MAKING THE ENTIORE JACKSON CLAN A GROUP OF BLOODSUCKINJG VAMPIRES WIHT SHIT FOR INTELLIGENCE !!!
SWALLOW SOME OF THOSE FACTS AND THEN RECTIFY THEM FOR ME WITH YOU ALL LABELING THIS ASSWHIPE SOME SORT OF ICON AND A HERO...
INCREDIBLE !!!
KEEP IT UP!!!
THEIR ARE MANY MORE FACTS !!!
LMFAO !!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Sheila Jackson-Lee Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Maxine Waters: 'The tea party can go straight t... (Aug '11) Oct '16 Serial Marriage T... 4
News Confident Texas Dems Lay Down General-Election ... Oct '16 Mayor McGhetto 4
News Lynch vote: Why Cruz skipped and McConnell vote... (Apr '15) Jul '16 swedenforever 9
News Condolences pour in after Harris County Commiss... (Jan '16) Jan '16 Francois Pharts 3
News The increasing uselessness of speaking on the H... (Dec '15) Dec '15 Ritual Habitual 1
News Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee defends Obama with bord... (Jan '15) Aug '15 SourKraut 6
News 2 US Congresswomen support #BringBackourGirls c... (Aug '15) Aug '15 SaveOurMoronSheila 22
More from around the web