GOP's message to Mitt: Step it up

GOP's message to Mitt: Step it up

There are 17 comments on the Politico story from Feb 9, 2012, titled GOP's message to Mitt: Step it up. In it, Politico reports that:

Mitt Romney's poor performance Tuesday is prompting congressional Republicans to go public with a bracing message to the front-runner: time to step it up, Mitt.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Politico.

Makes sense

Dearborn, MI

#1 Feb 9, 2012
Can't wait....

You tell 'em, Mittens.

RON PAUL 2012!
Cat74

Westmont, IL

#3 Feb 9, 2012
Believe me, we get Mitt's message, and we aren't buying it. He is a chameleon. Right now there is a poll showing Santarum one point ahead of the President. Mit is not the one who beats Obama.
Leo

Tulsa, OK

#4 Feb 9, 2012
Come on now Mitt, pretend to be a conservative better ok? Ok so we all know you are the white Obama. At least lie to us better like Newt can do.
Don Joe

Saint Paul, MN

#5 Feb 9, 2012
Maybe Mittens could do the two step. Accuse Santorum of being a cannibal, and praise conservative principals.
Gravediggers

United States

#6 Feb 9, 2012
Would you rather have Obama for another 4 years or Mitt Romney?
Edgar

Spring, TX

#7 Feb 9, 2012
Oh my, someone came through here and deserted the comments with disappointed emoticons...

Lemme say something that'll get a good one.

MITT ROMNEY FOR PRESIDENT!

(Great. I just made myself lie for approval...LIKE ROMNEY!)
Makes sense

Dearborn, MI

#8 Feb 9, 2012
Gravediggers wrote:
Would you rather have Obama for another 4 years or Mitt Romney?
RON PAUL. If not RON PAUL, then Obama. NEVER Mittens. He's a phoney who can't be TRUSTED.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#9 Feb 9, 2012
Cat74 wrote:
Believe me, we get Mitt's message, and we aren't buying it. He is a chameleon. Right now there is a poll showing Santarum one point ahead of the President. Mit is not the one who beats Obama.
Obama would turn Santorum into hamburger.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#10 Feb 9, 2012
Gravediggers wrote:
Would you rather have Obama for another 4 years or Mitt Romney?
Personally, I wouldn't want Romney fo another four minutes.
Responsibility

San Bruno, CA

#12 Feb 9, 2012
Please Mitt don't step it up with singing again.

Gawd, Mitt can even butcher a beautiful song!
Cat74

Westmont, IL

#13 Feb 9, 2012
Evidentally Mitt is not electable. If he was he would not have lost 5, Primaries, and caucuses of the last 8. There is a poll showing Santorum beating Obama by one point. If Mitt does not win in Michigan, and win big the 28th, he should drop out. The people do not want him. We do not believe he is electable, and we won't vote for him. His only chance is in Democrat crossovers in the 11 states that allow it, but I think he will have to drop out before any of them are scheduled.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#14 Feb 9, 2012
Responsibility wrote:
Please Mitt don't step it up with singing again.
Gawd, Mitt can even butcher a beautiful song!
Mitt will be singing the blues soon enough.

Since: Aug 10

Hugoton

#15 Feb 9, 2012
Why do we keep getting milk toast republicans. They tried to foist McCain on us and boy did that work out great. The best conservative is santorum.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#16 Feb 9, 2012
radar814 wrote:
Why do we keep getting milk toast republicans. They tried to foist McCain on us and boy did that work out great. The best conservative is santorum.
I agree. He's certainly the most intolerant.

Since: Aug 10

Hugoton

#17 Feb 10, 2012
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>I agree. He's certainly the most intolerant.
with Satan's minions running the whitehouse and Senate, I certainly hope so.

“Time to take back America”

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#18 Feb 10, 2012
Not step it up, step aside.
Cat74

United States

#19 Feb 10, 2012
I give Romney, and Gingrich until Super Tuesday, then they will have to decide how much money they are willing to throw away on a losing proposition. The Republicans do not want them. Romney is saddled with too much money, and too glib an approach to governance, and Gingrich is saddled with too much baggage, and a whinny wife.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Roy Blunt Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The controversy behind the painting that will h... Jan '17 Janice Brown 1
News Massive security preparations under way for ina... Jan '17 Fundie Concernd B... 3
News Democratic PAC Transitions to Advocacy Role in ... Dec '16 Le Jimbo 1
News Republican Party Clinches House, Senate Nov '16 Weasel Gets Rewarded 1
News Spokesman for Missouri official who committed s... (Mar '15) Nov '16 Geezer Files 7
News Missouri Senate Hopeful Jason Kander One of Man... Nov '16 El OxyCONtin 2
News Race in GOP-friendly Missouri could determine S... Oct '16 Moment of Clarity 7
More from around the web