Rush Limbaugh

Mar 3, 2012 Full story: www.washingtonpost.com 475

Send Katie your tips and suggestions via the Buzz's drop box , e-mail , Facebook or Twitter . Well, this time Ol' Lard Ass stuck his foot in his mouth, I'm happy to say! This DRAFT DODGER deserves all that he gets!Where are the "DITTOHEADS" to defend him!

Full Story
First Prev
of 24
Next Last
aaron

Carrollton, GA

#2 Mar 3, 2012
I can see where he is coming from.This broad wants US, the american tax payer, well probably not you if your on welfare and food stamps, to HER CONTRACEPTIVE.If she wants to not get pregnant, BUY HER OWN pills or IUD or whatever she uses to not get pregnant.How about this?Lets vote if she needs to just get her tubes tied, since she wants US to buy her method of birth control, lets choose what she gets.TUBES TIED.That solves that problem, NEXT CASE PLEASE.

“Troll Slayer”

Since: Dec 11

---<>---

#3 Mar 3, 2012
He no more speaks for the Republicans than Al Sharpton does for the Demotards.
Weatherman

Brentwood, NY

#4 Mar 3, 2012
Captain Revenge wrote:
He no more speaks for the Republicans than Al Sharpton does for the Demotards.
He speaks for the Repubacunts
Raydot

California City, CA

#8 Mar 3, 2012
Well one thing is sure clear, Americans hate Obama and illegal mexican aliens.

Since: Feb 12

making it right

#10 Mar 3, 2012
comeonman wrote:
<quoted text>That's not true concerning myself. I have many good friends that are Mexican illegals. I do hate the policy's of our President and most politicians though.
Thats worse they hanging out with convicted felons.Tells us a lot about you
mike

Crossville, TN

#12 Mar 3, 2012
Rush is an arrogant SOB
OBAMA NUTJOB OUT in 2012

Wasilla, AK

#14 Mar 3, 2012
Rush speaks for the silent MAJORITY CENTER RIGHT AMERICA.

Obama speaks for about 6 lib subversive UN-American cities in the US that have large populations.

These filty urban dogs are SICK!
mike

Crossville, TN

#16 Mar 3, 2012
comeonman wrote:
<quoted text>True. But this time he is correct.
Doesnt give him the right to call a person a slut.
Jenna

Columbia, MO

#18 Mar 3, 2012
Raydot wrote:
Well one thing is sure clear, Americans hate Obama and illegal mexican aliens.
Nah AMERICANS love Obama, REPUBLICANS hate Obama
OBAMA NUTJOB OUT in 2012

Wasilla, AK

#19 Mar 3, 2012
comeonman wrote:
<quoted text> I have not heard the term "silent majority" since tricky Dick's days.
HAHAHA, thats FUNNY, No wonder, ALL YOU have heard is GAYS, Deviants, Presidents with MUSLIM names AND HOW ABOUT A NEW TERM FOR sICKO lIBS WHO HATE wHITE MEN.... misandry!!! hAHHAAAA
CONSERVATIVE

Dawsonville, GA

#21 Mar 3, 2012
Jenna wrote:
<quoted text>
Nah AMERICANS love Obama, REPUBLICANS hate Obama
Nah irrisponsible, freeloading, douchbags love nobama. Tea Party 2012!
CONSERVATIVE

Dawsonville, GA

#22 Mar 3, 2012
mike wrote:
<quoted text>Doesnt give him the right to call a person a slut.
If the shoe fits...

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#23 Mar 3, 2012
comeonman wrote:
<quoted text>I believe the cheese has fell off your cracker.
^^^ That is a wonderful Southernisms!
CONSERVATIVE

Dawsonville, GA

#25 Mar 3, 2012
If Limbaughs ACCURATE statement about an obvious fraud, who NEVER should have been given credence in the first place, is detrimental to the right. We are worse off than I ever thought. This farce is nothing more than another liberal attempt to keep us from focusing on the nobama's abject failure do anything possitive to help the American get back to work. The fact that pelosi gave this slut valuble congressional time. Time that should have been used to sort out REAL problems like the economy, unemployment, energy concerns, and any other of a thousand issues facing us at this time. Just shows how desperate and petty they really are! Make no mistake, the liberals are starting to realize they are in deep shyt, and it's not going to get any better before November! Tea Party 2012!

Since: Aug 10

Buffalo, NY

#26 Mar 3, 2012
comeonman wrote:
I seen her interview on msn yesterday. According to her she would have to work the entire summer just to pay for her contraceptives. I'll agree with Rush on this one, sounds kind of slutty to me also. I could care less about her promiscuous behavior. Why on earth should it be mandated by law to supply her or anyone else with the lifestyle she chooses? Just another "gimmie,gimmie" mentality.
You "seen" her interview? You certainly are the common conservative man!

Since: Aug 10

Buffalo, NY

#27 Mar 3, 2012
CONSERVATIVE wrote:
If Limbaughs ACCURATE statement about an obvious fraud, who NEVER should have been given credence in the first place, is detrimental to the right. We are worse off than I ever thought. This farce is nothing more than another liberal attempt to keep us from focusing on the nobama's abject failure do anything possitive to help the American get back to work. The fact that pelosi gave this slut valuble congressional time. Time that should have been used to sort out REAL problems like the economy, unemployment, energy concerns, and any other of a thousand issues facing us at this time. Just shows how desperate and petty they really are! Make no mistake, the liberals are starting to realize they are in deep shyt, and it's not going to get any better before November! Tea Party 2012!
The FACT is that a guy who is three times divorced, a known drug abuser, has been caught bringing home illegal viagra from 3rd world countries known for child prostitution..........Probably shouldnt be calling anyone names based on sexual behavior
Lee

Carrollton, GA

#28 Mar 3, 2012
mike wrote:
<quoted text>Doesnt give him the right to call a person a slut.
if she wants ME a tax payer to furnish her birth control, I can call her what I want.

Since: Aug 10

Buffalo, NY

#30 Mar 3, 2012
comeonman wrote:
<quoted text>Yep. I'm a lip reader.
you still dont get it huh?

Since: Aug 10

Buffalo, NY

#31 Mar 3, 2012
Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
if she wants ME a tax payer to furnish her birth control, I can call her what I want.
Who said anything about taxpayers covering it? Youre clearly not bright enough to understand the issue!

This whole thing is about PRIVATE employer provided isnurance, the taxpayer is in no way involved! Moron!
Lee

Carrollton, GA

#32 Mar 3, 2012
FFS- wrote:
<quoted text>Who said anything about taxpayers covering it? Youre clearly not bright enough to understand the issue!
This whole thing is about PRIVATE employer provided isnurance, the taxpayer is in no way involved! Moron!
who do you think pays the claims and monthly premiums on the insurance companies???? It aint welfare rats.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 24
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Nancy Pelosi Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Elizabeth Warren was told to stay quiet, but sh... 4 min serfs up 165
Nancy Pelosi 'Enormously Disappointed' With Whi... 1 hr red and right 131
Gay marriage (Mar '13) 17 hr HOLME 56,692
Democratic backlash throws spending bill in doubt Fri spocko 32
Democrats, Obama part on $1.1T spending bill Dec 17 Cricket 23 1
Defiant Pelosi Stands Firmly on Left Dec 16 Sterkfontein Swar... 3
Obama, Pelosi rift opens up over spending bill Dec 15 El oh El 33
More from around the web