9/11 survivors appear with the Christian Action Network

There are 10 comments on the Mar 18, 2011, Herald-Sun story titled 9/11 survivors appear with the Christian Action Network. In it, Herald-Sun reports that:

Calling Feisal Abdul Rauf an "imposter imam" who "would again victimize the families of 9/11" by building the Ground Zero mosque in Manhattan, retired New York City firefighter Tim Brown labeled the building a Muslim "victory tower" that should never be built at the site where nearly 3,000 people died ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Herald-Sun.

“... truth will out.”

Since: May 08

Stratford, Connecticut.

#1 Mar 18, 2011
from: Herald-Sun

"'Imam Rauf says the United States Constitution is Sharia compliant ...' Brown said.'They fell for that in England. They fell for that in France, and they fell for that in Germany, and all three of them now say multiculturalism is a failure.'"

“PROUD INFIDEL”

Since: Nov 08

The Crusades got it right!

#3 Mar 18, 2011
Forza_Egyptians Nephew wrote:
Just stop to listen to those scum bag and giving them so much importance, are we westerners really fags? With our stupid political correctness attitude?
Hey, kick them hard in the a$$, what's all these things they keep demanding?
The answer is NO, period!
Let them understand that they are already very lucky to live on the WEST soil.
Who they think they are?
We know how they are, you give them a finger they will want to take your arm.
Just stop dealing with these people.
But I have to say at this point is our fault, leftist,liberals or whatever you want to call them, brought as at this point.
Is time to stop PC, and say what we have to say.
Porco il loro dio allah
Fottuto maometto pompinaro e porco allah beduino!!!

“The Defiant Dhimmi”

Since: Apr 08

Scholar of the Obvious

#4 Mar 18, 2011
Muslims complain that we don't show respect for what they respect.

Yet they find no need to respect the grounds of 9/11.

“PROUD INFIDEL”

Since: Nov 08

The Crusades got it right!

#6 Mar 20, 2011
Forza_Egyptians Nephew wrote:
<quoted text>
ha ha.. fortissima :D
Thanks, my written Italian isn't so good, but I need to practice, so here's a few more insults dedicated to the religion of peace.

Maometto puzzolente ingoia cazzi figlio di una scrofa puttanna vacca da monta e il suo porco allah magnaccio culo sfondato!!! HA!HA!!! Other than that, muslims have absolutely no respect for the victims of 9-11, and a mosque at ground zero would be a slap in the face for all the Western nations!!
Alex Jones

United States

#7 Mar 20, 2011
Thunder-Girl wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks, my written Italian isn't so good, but I need to practice, so here's a few more insults dedicated to the religion of peace.
Maometto puzzolente ingoia cazzi figlio di una scrofa puttanna vacca da monta e il suo porco allah magnaccio culo sfondato!!! HA!HA!!! Other than that, muslims have absolutely no respect for the victims of 9-11, and a mosque at ground zero would be a slap in the face for all the Western nations!!
These 9/11 victims' family members want answers:



Our own government officials have shown absolutely no respect for these family members and surviving first responders. Officials ignore obvious questions and evidence, provide conflicting statements (some of which must be lies, obviously), and have obstructed the pursuit of answers and accountability at every turn.

And the persistent ignorance and apathy of large segments of the American public is a slap in the face to those who were directly affected by the attack and have to deal daily with reminders. It's also a slap in the face to our servicemen and women, who have put their lives on the line and their trust in policy makers (who deserve criminal prosecution!).

And of course it's a slap in the face to all the victims of American and allied military aggression.

See www.buildingwhat.org for a much more significant story regarding Ground Zero.
more truth

Tallahassee, FL

#8 Mar 20, 2011
Building 7 was damaged during the attack and the owner said go ahead and bring it down, so it was imploded. Yes, it was deliberately brought down.

That was on a TV program that was trying to put to rest some of these stories.

Like "there were no planes" or "they were planes dressed as missles." Puleeeze, enuf.
Alex Jones

United States

#9 Mar 20, 2011
more truth wrote:
Building 7 was damaged during the attack and the owner said go ahead and bring it down, so it was imploded. Yes, it was deliberately brought down.
That was on a TV program that was trying to put to rest some of these stories.
Like "there were no planes" or "they were planes dressed as missles." Puleeeze, enuf.
I see...

So you think that a highly engineered event, the building implosion of a 47-story steel-frame structure, that would normally take weeks if not months to prepare could be done in a few hours IN a a building that was on fire and allegedly unstable? Remember, this happened at 5:20 pm on the afternoon of 9/11:



Your claim sounds as wacko as "there were no planes" or "they were planes dressed as missles." What was the TV program that gave you these crazy, unsupported ideas?
Alex Jones

Austin, TX

#10 Mar 21, 2011
Anyway, we are in agreement that 7-WTC was a demolition. But since demolitions take time to plan and execute, the building must have been rigged BEFORE 9/11.

Does that seem strange to you? Seems strange to me...

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

.
Alex Jones

Austin, TX

#11 Mar 22, 2011
The World Trade Center Towers were designed to survive the impact of a Boeing 707 airliner, which is not substantially different than the 767s that struck the towers on 9/11. So why did the Towers collapse? And what could possibly have been the explanation for "river of steel flowing" at Ground Zero that WTC architect Les Robertson witnessed.



The answer is that the Towers did not "collapse." They were blown apart with pre-positioned demolition tech, and the molten metal witnessed by many at Ground Zero that persisted for weeks was a byproduct of incendiary arson.

A team of international scientists FOUND actual, unreacted pyrotechnic material as well as residues from thermitic reaction in abundance in the World Trade Center dust and published their findings in the Chemical Physics Journal. Look up "ACTIVE THERMITIC MATERIAL DISCOVERED IN DUST FROM THE 9/11 WORLD TRADE CENTER CATASTROPHE."

It's a slap in the face to the victims, family members, first responders that our media won't cover these issues and continue to promote the false official narrative.
Retired SOF

Fayetteville, NC

#12 May 9, 2011
Alex Jones wrote:
The World Trade Center Towers were designed to survive the impact of a Boeing 707 airliner, which is not substantially different than the 767s that struck the towers on 9/11. So why did the Towers collapse? And what could possibly have been the explanation for "river of steel flowing" at Ground Zero that WTC architect Les Robertson witnessed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =rjmHqES_ltoXX
The answer is that the Towers did not "collapse." They were blown apart with pre-positioned demolition tech, and the molten metal witnessed by many at Ground Zero that persisted for weeks was a byproduct of incendiary arson.
A team of international scientists FOUND actual, unreacted pyrotechnic material as well as residues from thermitic reaction in abundance in the World Trade Center dust and published their findings in the Chemical Physics Journal. Look up "ACTIVE THERMITIC MATERIAL DISCOVERED IN DUST FROM THE 9/11 WORLD TRADE CENTER CATASTROPHE."
It's a slap in the face to the victims, family members, first responders that our media won't cover these issues and continue to promote the false official narrative.
CLUELESS!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Mike McIntyre Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News In the Loop: Want to stop enriching people whos... (Aug '14) Aug '14 Le Jimbo 9
News Democrat Aiken goes for GOP-heavy House district (Apr '14) May '14 barefoot2626 9
News Longtime Dems McIntyre, McCarthy to Retire (Jan '14) Jan '14 conservative crapola 4
News House GOP Targets NC Dem Despite His Staunch Op... (Dec '13) Dec '13 Storm Warning 5
News Lumbees say they'll keep their eagle feathers, ... (Feb '13) Oct '13 Tim in Cali 7
News Hagan supports recognition of Lumbees (Mar '09) May '13 Anonymous 96
News Expert: Lumbee bill a long shot (Mar '13) Mar '13 SamT 4
More from around the web