Global warming: NASA study sees drama...

Global warming: NASA study sees dramatic ecoystem shifts

There are 8 comments on the Summit County Voice story from Dec 23, 2011, titled Global warming: NASA study sees dramatic ecoystem shifts. In it, Summit County Voice reports that:

A United States military inquiry concluded that mistakes by both American and Pakistani troops led to airstrikes against two Pakistani posts on the Afghanistan border.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Summit County Voice.

“Happy, warm and comfortable”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain retreat, SE Spain

#1 Dec 23, 2011
"ecoystem?"
ֿ
LessHypeMoreFact

Toronto, Canada

#2 Dec 23, 2011
Earthling-1 wrote:
"ecoystem?"
ֿ
OHMYGOD!! Earthling spotted a typo!! Years, maybe decades of vital research costing billions down the drain. What a waste.. Now I guess we have to do it all over again, huh?
LessHypeMoreFact

Toronto, Canada

#3 Dec 23, 2011
P.S. The preceding post was sarcasm. Anyone not pick up on that? See a doctor..

“Happy, warm and comfortable”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain retreat, SE Spain

#4 Dec 23, 2011
This wasn't sarcasm though:
LessFactMoreHype, alias:
NobodyYouEverWantToKnow wrote:
That CO2 cannot be a 'pollutant'? Wrong. Anything CAN and IS a pollutant in a specific context. In this case, as a greenhouse gas causing 'thermal pollution' of the planet.
-
The point is really that the whole claim of 'CO2 is vital to life' and 'CO2 is plant food' promoted by Earthling is not so much that it is technically wrong, but that it is IRRELEVANT to the issue of CO2 as a 'thermal pollutant'. Agreed?
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
-
I'm still waiting for an explanation of your CO2 as a thermal pollutant theory?

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#5 Dec 25, 2011
After reading that I have to say that NASA must believe in creationism instead of eveolution.
umm

United States

#6 Dec 25, 2011
Isn't NASA an American company or something. Majority of Americans don't believe in global warming.

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#7 Dec 25, 2011
Actually NASA is part of the goverment. One that is sometimes quoted by alarmist and other times quoted by skeptics.

“Happy, warm and comfortable”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain retreat, SE Spain

#8 Dec 26, 2011
NobodyYouEverWantToKnow, alias:
LessFactMoreHype wrote:
P.S. The preceding post was sarcasm. Anyone not pick up on that? See a doctor..
You're the one who needs to see a doctor, for something other than your heart condition.
Then you should have these comments peer reviewed:
Forty is spelt with a U
Etymology is not a serious subject
Deforestations is a consequence of AGW
Epistemologists compile dictionaries
Epystemologists compile dictionaries
Samuel Johnson was an American
Ice calving is restricted by size
Spelt is an ancient grain
The equator doesn't have season
Cars can be charged with road collisions
Vikings didn't know how to live in a warmer Greenland
How much heat you are transferring at one time has NO relationship to the temperature of any objects
Alberta is a country
New Moore island is in the MOUTH of the several rivers
Insects and plants don't qualify as species
Enercon install offshore wind generators
Scientific laws aren't science
Climate and weather are not 'linked'
Predictions are just for astrologers
Ethanol is a very workable and effective solution
AGW is just the warming of the global average surface temperature due to GHGs
AGW is the global average
The science says that human emissions are responsible for MOST of AGW, which has SOME unknown but significant part of climate change
The IPCC report of 2001 and 2007 clearly show that GHGs are by far the largest contributor but not the exclusive contributor to AGW
America has two political parties
Climate and weather are not 'linked'
'nondenier' is a real word
Fruiting plants are especially chosen by bees for, "polination"
We acted on CFCs in the 70s
CO2 causes, "thermal pollution"
CO2 is a 'thermal pollutant'
CO2 levels are rising faster than the temperature can react
AGW is comparable to the Holocaust
Please show this 'ararmist club' and membership list.
And theory is the endpoint of science.
The 'unproven' stuff is 'hypothesis'.
The fact that all the scientific authorities confirm AGW as theory means that it IS science fact as defined.
There are no 'laws of science'
Scientific laws are NOT science
the science isn't going to change
While the science doesn't change rapidly it does change
And nowhere is there 'skepticism' of the science
Experiment is NOT science
Experiment can only give you data. It cannot PROVE anything
-
Plus what your crazy idea of what a PoP forecast means:
LessFactMoreHype wrote:
A POP of 30% means that the forecast is that about 30% of the area will get rain. They measure the 'area' of rain in the forecasts model(s) relative to the entire region.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Mark Udall Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News GOP Faces Uphill Climb With Latino Voters In Ke... (Oct '15) Nov '15 Raydot 7
News For Obama, golf is an escape, even when he brin... (Aug '15) Aug '15 American_Infidel 56
News Avoiding the Trump Trap on Immigration (Jul '15) Jul '15 Jesus Latter Day ... 13
News Tom Steyer, billionaire environmentalist, calls... (Jun '15) Jun '15 Satan Pickets 1
News Can Republicans Repeat an Upset in Colorado? (May '15) May '15 Le Jimbo 1
News Self-Inflicted Wounds: Phony 'War on Women' Fal... (May '15) May '15 Responsibility 4
News Gary Hart apologizes to Cory Gardner for barbs ... (May '15) May '15 Holy Silicon Wafer 1
More from around the web