Army to shift jobs from Belvoir to Sp...

Army to shift jobs from Belvoir to Springfield --

There are 1 comment on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Jul 27, 2007, titled Army to shift jobs from Belvoir to Springfield -- In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

Thousands of military jobs slated for Fort Belvoir will instead move closer to mass transit, and the number of jobs moving to the Army base will be dramatically reduced under an agreement between the military ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Don Carr

Detroit, MI

#1 Jul 31, 2007
Regarding recent media accounts of the announcement late last week about the Army's agreement with the Virginia Department of Transportation to complete the construction of the Fairfax County Parkway through Fort Belvoir’s Engineer Proving Ground:

* Army has agreed that a federal entity can build the connector using state funds, and to cap at 8,500 the number of employees to be placed at EPG. Current planning for Fort Belvoir’s realignment suggests placing 18,000 workers at the EPG. The concern many planners and others have with that is that the larger road network serving the EPG can’t handle traffic expected to be generated by 18,000 workers, even with the completed connector.

* VDOT's current design for the connector, approved in 2004, can accommodate up to 8,500 workers. The connector would have to be redesigned for the larger traffic volume, a process that would delay the road. Fairfax County needs the connector now -- certainly the incoming employees need it to be able to get to work, and to get home to their families after work.

* Putting the other 9,500 somewhere else at Fort Belvoir is part of the agreement. While last week's announcement does say the Army would, "... locate some employees at the GSA Warehouse adjacent to the Springfield-Franconia Metro/VRE station," that doesn't completely reflect where the Army is in its agreement with VDOT to get the road built. Army is still studying the extent to which the GSA site in Springfield might work.

* The DOD organizations involved must agree the site meets their needs, of course, but, the most critical point is that BRAC law requires that wherever the total 22,000 people end up, it be on ground that is in fact part of Fort Belvoir. To that end, Congressmen Tom Davis and Jim Moran have put language in the appropriations bill now being debated that would make the GSA site part of Fort Belvoir.

* There has been no decision on how Fort Belvoir's realignment will be executed. The Final Environmental Impact Study is the analysis of potential action. A Record of Decision expected in August will determine what will actually be done.

Don Carr
Fort Belvoir

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

James Moran Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Protecting the kids from ED ads (May '09) Jan '16 Tara 15
News LuAnn Bennett Announces Run for Congress (Dec '15) Dec '15 Vrmaddox 1
News Russia pulls welcome mat on Rep. Moran, disgrac... (Jul '14) Jul '14 Captain Yesterday 4
News Ban erectile dysfunction ads, lawmaker says (May '09) Jun '14 Willdon 17
News Groups push for more humane slaughter of chickens (Mar '14) Mar '14 Jim the Hoax Denier 2
News 3.3 percent pay raise proposed for federal empl... (Mar '14) Mar '14 atthebeach 1
News Virginia's Moran Announces Retirement from Cong... (Jan '14) Jan '14 Asian Guy 28
More from around the web