Bailout plan delays will hurt, lawmakers told
Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Herald.
#1 Sep 24, 2008
Why Did It Happen?
On the financial crisis of the past several months, a knowledgeable reader says that this column by Kevin Hassett is "all you need to know:"
The economic history books will describe this episode in simple and understandable terms: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac exploded, and many bystanders were injured in the blast, some fatally.
Fannie and Freddie did this by becoming a key enabler of the mortgage crisis. They fueled Wall Street's efforts to securitize subprime loans by becoming the primary customer of all AAA-rated subprime-mortgage pools. In addition, they held an enormous portfolio of mortgages themselves.
In the times that Fannie and Freddie couldn't make the market, they became the market. Over the years, it added up to an enormous obligation. As of last June, Fannie alone owned or guaranteed more than $388 billion in high-risk mortgage investments....
The problem was that the trillions of dollars in play were only low-risk investments if real estate prices continued to rise. Once they began to fall, the entire house of cards came down with them. Take away Fannie and Freddie, or regulate them more wisely, and it's hard to imagine how these highly liquid markets would ever have emerged. This whole mess would never have happened.
It is easy to identify the historical turning point that marked the beginning of the end.
Back in 2005, Fannie and Freddie were, after years of dominating Washington, on the ropes. They were enmeshed in accounting scandals that led to turnover at the top. At one telling moment in late 2004, captured in an article by my American Enterprise Institute colleague Peter Wallison, the Securities and Exchange Commission's chief accountant told disgraced Fannie Mae chief Franklin Raines that Fannie's position on the relevant accounting issue was not even "on the page" of allowable interpretations.
Then legislative momentum emerged for an attempt to create a "world-class regulator" that would oversee the pair more like banks, imposing strict requirements on their ability to take excessive risks. Politicians who previously had associated themselves proudly with the two accounting miscreants were less eager to be associated with them. The time was ripe.
The clear gravity of the situation pushed the legislation forward. Some might say the current mess couldn't be foreseen, yet in 2005 Alan Greenspan told Congress how urgent it was for it to act in the clearest possible terms: If Fannie and Freddie "continue to grow, continue to have the low capital that they have, continue to engage in the dynamic hedging of their portfolios, which they need to do for interest rate risk aversion, they potentially create ever-growing potential systemic risk down the road," he said. "We are placing the total financial system of the future at a substantial risk."
Add your comments below
|Mark James Miller: Why Republicans Wage War On ...||May '15||Tazo||1|
|News Guide: Highlights of Georgia elections (Nov '14)||Nov '14||Mykro||6|
|Republicans demand President Obama institute a ... (Oct '14)||Oct '14||TeaBagging for Am...||3|
|Don't like the cameras? Don't run the red light (Jul '14)||Sep '14||Stone||4|
|With GOP Runoff Over, Perdue and Nunn Face Off (Jul '14)||Aug '14||Mr Minder||27|
|GOP works to avert Senate upset in Georgia (Jul '14)||Jul '14||Le Jimbo||6|
|Perdue wins Republican Senate runoff in Georgia (Jul '14)||Jul '14||Cat74||10|
Find what you want!
Search Jack Kingston Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC