Woolsey makes bid for 10th term

Full story: Marin Independent Journal

Seeking her 10th term in Congress, Democrat Rep. Lynn Woolsey faces a Republican opponent who is voicing the same themes as many Tea Party candidates around the country while denying any direct connections to the movement.

Comments (Page 8)

Showing posts 141 - 153 of153
|
next page >
Go to last page| Jump to page:
kevin

San Anselmo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#143
Oct 12, 2010
 
Kevin wrote:
...why do the Blue Dogs Democrats have a particular dislike for Woolsey?
I'm not certain they do but I do know that unlike Woolsey, blue dog democrats are right of center.
Kevin

San Rafael, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#144
Oct 12, 2010
 
kevin wrote:
<quoted text>
He wants to become a career politician.
So it is bad for him to want to be what Woolsey already has become?
Kevin

San Rafael, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#145
Oct 12, 2010
 
The founding fathers gave Congress 2 year terms. I'd say they wanted the ability to change Representatives to change at the will of the population. Everyone gets to vote on November 2nd and we will see what our district wants.
kevin

San Anselmo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#146
Oct 12, 2010
 
Jim Judd is inept at representing a constituency. He didn't see reason to verbalize his disdain for government until 2009 which in my opinion illustrates his complacency during the most heinous times our nation has ever endured. His lips were sealed during the entire Bush administration.

To this you said that he was not a career politician.

Tell me, how does Judd feel about the cost of Wars?

What regulations does Judd want to eliminate?

What is the tax rate he wants?

To these question you asked if I wanted you to read his website. If you can find Judd answering these simple questions at his site then yes do so and report back ASAP.
kevin

San Anselmo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#147
Oct 12, 2010
 
Kevin wrote:
The founding fathers...
"When American colonists declared independence from England in 1776, they also freed themselves from control by English corporations that extracted their wealth and dominated trade. After fighting a revolution to end this exploitation, our country's founders retained a healthy fear of corporate power and wisely limited corporations exclusively to a business role. Corporations were forbidden from attempting to influence elections, public policy, and other realms of civic society.

Initially, the privilege of incorporation was granted selectively to enable activities that benefited the public, such as construction of roads or canals. Enabling shareholders to profit was seen as a means to that end.

The states also imposed conditions (some of which remain on the books, though unused) like these:

- Corporate charters (licenses to exist) were granted for a limited time and could be revoked promptly for violating laws.

- Corporations could engage only in activities necessary to fulfill their chartered purpose.

- Corporations could not own stock in other corporations nor own any property that was not essential to fulfilling their chartered purpose.

- Corporations were often terminated if they exceeded their authority or caused public harm.

- Owners and managers were responsible for criminal acts committed on the job.

- Corporations could not make any political or charitable contributions nor spend money to influence law-making." - reclaimdemocracy.org

Point being the founding fathers did not believe in corporate personhood.
Kevin wrote:
...2 year terms...
"States also limited corporate charters to a set number of years. Unless a legislature renewed an expiring charter, the corporation was dissolved and its assets were divided among shareholders." - reclaimdemocracy.org

Does Judd want corporate term limits like this country used to have?
Kevin

San Francisco, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#148
Oct 12, 2010
 
Kevin wrote:
<quoted text>
So it is bad for him to want to be what Woolsey already has become?
A career politician.
You never answered this question.

This is getting boring and not worth my time.
You like Woolsey. I like Judd.
kevin

San Anselmo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#149
Oct 12, 2010
 
Kevin wrote:
You like Woolsey. I like Judd.
I've listed many reasons for why I like Woolsey. I'm sorry your Judd is such an undefendable dud.
FedUpEditor

Belmont, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#150
Oct 12, 2010
 
Woolsey has been nothing but a rubber stamp for Pelosi and Obama. If you like where our economy is and the high unemployment that goes with it, vote for Woolsey. It won't take much longer to reach Marin and Sonoma Counties. However, if you want someone who has actually created a job and knows how to meet a payroll, vote for Jim Judd. Many District 6 voters have been voting Democrat so long maybe they thought they didn't have a choice. Thinking people choose Judd.
meg for meg

San Anselmo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#151
Oct 12, 2010
 
FedUpEditor wrote:
Woolsey has been nothing but a rubber stamp for Pelosi and Obama...
Dubya and his cronies ran the US into the ground, raped it and picked it's pocket for 8 years and left us in a horrible mess. Now barely 2 years into a new presidency and it's the new guy's fault?

http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/dont-blame-oba...
meg for meg

San Anselmo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#152
Oct 12, 2010
 
FedUpEditor wrote:
...if you want someone who has actually created a job...
They've all created jobs.
kevin

San Anselmo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#153
Oct 12, 2010
 
FedUpEditor wrote:
Thinking people choose Judd.
Maybe you can answer some questions since you seem to think you know Judd.

Tell me, how does Judd feel about the cost of Wars?

What regulations does Judd want to eliminate?

What is the tax rate he wants?
kevin

San Anselmo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#154
Oct 12, 2010
 
Does Judd want corporate term limits like this country used to have?

Since: Oct 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#155
Oct 13, 2010
 
Kevin wrote:
HP, Cisco, Microsoft, and Intel were started long before Woolsey and Boxer took office.
That does not negate the fact that both Meg and Carly got rich in California while Boxer was in office.

By they way, since you brought it up.

Microsoft's Bill Gates started under a tax rate of 70% in 1979

Gordon Moore of Intel started with a tax rate 75% in 1968

Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard started HP in a garage in 1939 with a tax rate of 79% and then took the company public in 1957 with a tax rate of 91%!

http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/displ...

I must ask, which years tax rate do you feel was the most conducive?

Do you feel America was the worst place in the world to do business in the 1940's and 50's?

How about during Clinton's tenure (39.6%) and Bush's (35%)? Which had the healthier economy?

Keep in mind that countries with the lowest tax rates and weakest regulations are not countries that are good for business. They are countries that are in disarray like Afghanistan and Somalia.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 141 - 153 of153
|
next page >
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••