House GOP Caves On Redefining Rape Bill

House GOP Caves On Redefining Rape Bill

There are 4 comments on the motherjones.com story from Feb 3, 2011, titled House GOP Caves On Redefining Rape Bill. In it, motherjones.com reports that:

No means NO

Last week, Mother Jones' Nick Baumann broke the story on Chris Smith's "No Taxpayer for Abortion" Act, which would rule out federal assistance for abortions in many rape cases, including instances of statutory rape.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at motherjones.com.

goose

Los Angeles, CA

#1 Feb 3, 2011
polls show most people are in favor of abortion in cases of incest and rape. I believe it should be allowed for that as well. The problem is the redefinition and enforcement.

“Make America Great Again”

Since: Jun 07

Bring Obama Back!

#2 Feb 3, 2011
Come Election 2012, the Democratic Party had better put this in several campaign commercials to remind women voters exactly what they would be supporting if they decided to vote for one of these despicable republicans.
Peralta de Peralta

Fort Huachuca, AZ

#3 Feb 3, 2011
In forcible rape, the victim shares absolutely NO responsibility. In date rape, the victim should share some of the responsibility. And before you yell at me, I've been the victim of both. The first time, I was with someone I shouldn't have been and somewhere I shouldn't have been doing something I shouldn't have been. In the second, I had no choice from beginning to end. And the witch from NARAL has no business comparing forcible rape to underage consensual sex. If the girl is old enough to consent & her body is mature enough to give birth, then that's NOT even close. I personally believe abortions should be ONLY for mother's health, forcible rape [violence] or incest involving a minor or force [violence].

Here's another example of why:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-135...

“It's a Brand New Day”

Since: Feb 06

New Rochelle

#4 Feb 3, 2011
Peralta de Peralta wrote:
In forcible rape, the victim shares absolutely NO responsibility. In date rape, the victim should share some of the responsibility. And before you yell at me, I've been the victim of both. The first time, I was with someone I shouldn't have been and somewhere I shouldn't have been doing something I shouldn't have been. In the second, I had no choice from beginning to end. And the witch from NARAL has no business comparing forcible rape to underage consensual sex. If the girl is old enough to consent & her body is mature enough to give birth, then that's NOT even close. I personally believe abortions should be ONLY for mother's health, forcible rape [violence] or incest involving a minor or force [violence].
Here's another example of why:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-135...
Sure, I believe your phony story, which is actually a commercial for anti-abortion.

Here is a better approach:
If you are opposed to abortion, learn about sex, and the consequences.

If you are prone to make up stories to trivialize rape, go shit in your hat and pull it over your ears.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Democratic IT staffer who fled the country stri... (Sep '17) Jun 6 C Kersey 2
News GOP establishment plans Trump takedown (Aug '15) May '18 Romney lost 757
News This PAC wants to help you 'fire' your member o... Apr '18 mr gleeble 1
News Wasserman Schultz wants background checks for a... Mar '18 What The 2
News House to take up school safety bill after Flori... Mar '18 Tie Your Mother Down 6
News Russian election assault poses quandary for 201... Mar '18 pleaer 17
News Russian election assault poses new concerns for... Mar '18 Marco R s Secret ... 5