No end in sight to 'war on women' att...

No end in sight to 'war on women' attacks

There are 332 comments on the Politico story from Nov 10, 2013, titled No end in sight to 'war on women' attacks. In it, Politico reports that:

Hardly a commercial break went by in October when Virginia voters weren't reminded of Ken Cuccinelli's far-right views on abortion and other social issues.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Politico.

Ink

Havertown, PA

#78 Nov 12, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
You're delusional.
You don't even know that you are being manipulated.
Eric Gustafson

Virginia Beach, VA

#79 Nov 12, 2013
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>....Or the Confederate Flag that is flown on private property, or religious items....all contested by the left and yet you blame republicans for what you claim is the same thing.
I've not seen a protest about flying what you want on private property...... that's your business.

Leave me alone on my property and don't F with my gun...... and I support those rights among others for the next man.
Eric Gustafson

Virginia Beach, VA

#80 Nov 12, 2013
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>Can you quote me a law that restricts your reproductive rights..........other than the law of nature.
Virginia with the Republican imposed Vaginal Probe legislation.... State Rape.
Eric Gustafson

Virginia Beach, VA

#81 Nov 12, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
As I recall, it was muslim extremists who attacked the wtc, right. Stands to reason, there may be an itsy bitsy sense of anxiety having a mosque built in NYC..........
That's not reason enough to deny a man the Right to build what he wants on his property so long as it come within the existing Regulations.
Eric Gustafson

Virginia Beach, VA

#82 Nov 12, 2013
Georgetown could have provided they give back all public money and only accept closed students to their university who are members of some association or club exclusive to those individuals.

Preventing them from advertising their programs on commercial services in print or via some electronic network.

Private clubs and facilities can discriminate. Any business open to the general public can not. That has been sealed by the Court already.
incredulous wrote:
<quoted text>What you keep forgetting is the right to practice your religion which is why Georgetown should have had every right to deny bc coverage in it's health plan. The govt has no right to discriminate by giving funding to certain schools and not others based upon their right to express their religious beliefs. But all that is changing because the liberal elite have taken over. No denying the extreme right's micromanaging a woman's decision to terminate her pregnancy. This vocal few have destroyed any possiblity for fiscal conservatives to restore this nation to greatness.
Like a good commie, you think everyone should be the same. You want the rich, the comfortable or the just plain average person to hand over their paychecks to anyone who has less. You want the productive to support the parasites. This country was not founded on Robinhood principles. It broke away from an oppressive govt. then and it should break away from the same kind of oppression now.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#83 Nov 12, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't even know that you are being manipulated.
I'm not. YOU are, by the fear mongers on your side.
Ink

Havertown, PA

#84 Nov 12, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not. YOU are, by the fear mongers on your side.
Some people have the ability and perception to see trends and others don't. They like you are always surprised by change.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#85 Nov 12, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
As I recall, it was muslim extremists who attacked the wtc, right. Stands to reason, there may be an itsy bitsy sense of anxiety having a mosque built in NYC..........
And it was christian extremists who attacked blacks all across the south for decades, so by your logic we should be able to ban Christian churches anywhere below the Manson-Nixon line.

Since: Aug 12

Buffalo, NY

#86 Nov 12, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
So, how do you feel about the freedom to display a Nativity scene on private property? Seems the liberal atheists are pushing frivolous lawsuits because it insults them to see those displays of Christ's birth. Appears as thou your side of the isle wishes to trample on Religious Freedom under the guise of political correctness.
A nativity scene on private property is no problem.
If it's your money , property and faith
A minor bit of false assumption
Not all atheists are liberal and not all liberals are atheists.
Some atheists are evangelical in their rejection of faith and for my money they are everybit as annoying as the most strident in your face evangelical Christian, And neither is likely to recognize boundaries. Personal nor political

Since: Aug 12

Buffalo, NY

#87 Nov 12, 2013
incredulous wrote:
<quoted text>I agree the Christian right has ruined the Republican party.....and if it weren't for them......oscumma would not have been elected. Now, that some of them are trying to impose more abortion restrictions further jeopordizes 2016. The only way to stop the commie/socialists from taking over Washington is to begin reducing govt. We need to elect someone who is as serious about shrinking govt. as oscumma was about growing it.
Ironically, those lunatics who want govt. to control healthcare are begging for trouble in regards to abortion. When govt. controls your healthcare, you will no longer be able to make decisions with your doctor and family. The govt. will ultimately decide if you need a new knee, an abortion or a c section. There will come a time when govt. may demand that some women should have an abortion. After all, if they can't pay their own way, why should the taxpayers be expected to cover the costs of a new baby? If I'm forced to fork over half my income to support this ridiculous program, I'm going to say make the bitch abort.
Govt controlled healthcare is not necessarily going to be good for women or their children. They are being duped by the libs although some of these moronic social conservatives are helping them along.
Compared to the United States...
What do Canada, England and say...Cuba spend per capita on health care?
Where do they rank compared to the United States in infant mortality...or life span?

Since: Oct 08

Decatur, GA

#88 Nov 12, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
And it was christian extremists who attacked blacks all across the south for decades, so by your logic we should be able to ban Christian churches anywhere below the Manson-Nixon line.
Msnson Nixon line?

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#89 Nov 12, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Some people have the ability and perception to see trends and others don't. They like you are always surprised by change.
The 'trends' you are 'seeing' don't exist.

Once again, abortion has been around for all of human history. It has been legal in this country for more years than it was illegal, advertised in newspapers in the very beginning of our country's existence. There are no new 'trends' there.

Your paranoid fantasies are just that; fantasies.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#90 Nov 12, 2013
inbred Genius wrote:
<quoted text>
Msnson Nixon line?
You're unaware of the steaming affair between Charlie and Richard? I can still recall when Nixon looked at Manson's Confederate uniform, and drawing closer he said, "Look Charles. In the moonlight it's almost blue."
Manson then confided to Nixon, "Try to understand, Richard. It's not just that they killed maw and paw and burned down the house. It's more than just that."

But each man did not dare cross the Manson-Nixon line. What had begun as a civil conversation between two simple fellers, unaccountably drawn to each other despite a huge ideological chasm, had turned into an uncivil war. Though both sides suffered enormous casualties, the union won (that is, the union between Charles Manson and Richard Nixon).
And that is the story of Minnie the Moocher.
Ink

Havertown, PA

#91 Nov 12, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
And it was christian extremists who attacked blacks all across the south for decades, so by your logic we should be able to ban Christian churches anywhere below the Manson-Nixon line.
I don't think so since the Christian Churches in the south are full of black people. Where would they go.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#92 Nov 13, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't think so since the Christian Churches in the south are full of black people. Where would they go.
Who cares? They're all religious nutjobs regardless of color.
Reality Bites

AOL

#93 Nov 13, 2013
The ACA/Obama War on middle class non union families is firmly embraced by Congressional Democrats.

Since: Oct 08

Alpharetta, GA

#94 Nov 13, 2013
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>You're unaware of the steaming affair between Charlie and Richard? I can still recall when Nixon looked at Manson's Confederate uniform, and drawing closer he said, "Look Charles. In the moonlight it's almost blue."
Manson then confided to Nixon, "Try to understand, Richard. It's not just that they killed maw and paw and burned down the house. It's more than just that."
But each man did not dare cross the Manson-Nixon line. What had begun as a civil conversation between two simple fellers, unaccountably drawn to each other despite a huge ideological chasm, had turned into an uncivil war. Though both sides suffered enormous casualties, the union won (that is, the union between Charles Manson and Richard Nixon).
And that is the story of Minnie the Moocher.
a real hoochie coocher
Reality Bites

AOL

#95 Nov 13, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Who cares? They're all religious nutjobs regardless of color.
Spoken like a true Communist. You are so Obama.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#96 Nov 13, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
So, how do you feel about the freedom to display a Nativity scene on private property? Seems the liberal atheists are pushing frivolous lawsuits because it insults them to see those displays of Christ's birth.
Atheists don't sue over Nativity scenes on private property.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#97 Nov 13, 2013
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>....Or the Confederate Flag that is flown on private property, or religious items....all contested by the left and yet you blame republicans for what you claim is the same thing.
Examples of liberals filing lawsuits over Confederate Flags or religious items on private property, please.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News GOP establishment plans Trump takedown (Aug '15) Aug 17 Trumpty Dumpty Korea 740
News Hacker posts personal info of House Democrats a... Aug 14 Le Jimbo 2
News Debbie Wasserman blasts emails questioning Sand... Aug 12 South Knox Hombre 1
News WikiLeaks, Assange continue hacking away at Ame... Aug 3 LeDuped 22
News What The DNC Leaks Say About Our Need For Self-... Aug 2 southern at heart 3
News South Florida braces for affects of possible Ha... (Jan '10) Jul 31 Missy 17
News Cal Thomas: The juicy bits you may have missed ... Jul 31 Le Jimbo 8
More from around the web