It's Politics: Losers spend big
Join the discussion below, or Read more at San Gabriel Valley Tribune.
#1 Nov 5, 2010
can you image how many people they could have put to work with that money!! also how many men,women and esspecially children who could have been fed!! if they could have supplied jobs like some of the wealthy said they could why didn;t they do it then and i am sure people would have voted them in! the old saying goes put your money where your mouth is!!!
#2 Nov 6, 2010
These rich snobs need to learn that California is not for sale
#3 Nov 7, 2010
MEG WHITMAN -- THE WORST PER $ CANDIDATE IN THE US HISTORY
Meg Whitman spent $150 million of her own money to get her one vote. She would not even be this voting if it was not for her $150 million.
Meg Whitman received 3,300,000 votes or 41.5% for Republican candidate for Governor. Any Republican candidate in California without spending even one-dollar of his or her own money would have probably garnered more than 41.5% of votes in this election.
It just proves that she ran for her own one vote. So, it is wrong to say she spends $47 (or whatever) per vote, the correct answer is: she spends $150 million (or whatever exact amount) for her one vote.
She may be “tough as nail” for Pete Wilson but for Californians, she may be the worst per $ candidate in the US election history.
Add your comments below
|Confidence in PUSD (Oct '08)||Feb '17||Michael Pacer||5|
|Tom DeLay, others offer support for accused chi... (Apr '16)||Apr '16||Anita Bryant s Jihad||6|
|Essential Politics: Bush coming to Brentwood to... (Nov '15)||Dec '15||goonsquad||7|
|Stung By Scandals, GOP Proposes New Ethics Rules (Mar '06)||Nov '14||andet1987||11|
|Dreier: Welcome China into Trans-Pacific Partne... (Jun '13)||Jun '13||Andrez Lopez||1|
|"Fiscal cliff" averted -- now what? (Jan '13)||Jan '13||The Pelosi Knot||2|
|San Gabriel Valley makes national headlines in ... (Dec '12)||Jan '13||Steve||4|
Find what you want!
Search David Dreier Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC