Why a Mark Sanford victory would be g...

Why a Mark Sanford victory would be good news for Democrats

There are 182 comments on the The Washington Post story from May 6, 2013, titled Why a Mark Sanford victory would be good news for Democrats. In it, The Washington Post reports that:

Yes, you read that right. Losing a potentially winnable seat in a special election might wind up helping Democrats nationally more than emerging victorious would.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Washington Post.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#165 May 10, 2013
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>Is that the same CIA that didn't process Russia's warning of not letting terrorist back into the country to bomb Boston. People make mistakes pookie. No one in there right mind want to see a 9/11, Boston or an Oklahoma City, but you don't give a terrorist on a watch list $100,000 grand in welfare. We have systems to stop this shit and it's time government employee start earning their paychecks and golden parachutes.
Amazing! Did Bush put you in his will?

And just to somewhat mitigate your latest distortion, Russia did not tell us the Boston bomber was a terrorist. They just said he was a religious extremist. Surely you have first-hand knowledge of what it is to be an extremist.

Since: Feb 08

Hypoluxo Fl

#166 May 11, 2013
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>W.H. Marks Mother's Day By Celebrating Free Birth Control...
GALLUP SHOCK: Gosnell Trial 'One of the Least Followed News Stories' in Poll History...Man butchers babies, liberals go, oh well.
And you celebtrate everyday with cross thread off topic DUMBOSPAM.

“Leonardo Di Vinci died here”

Since: Nov 08

Perpignan

#167 May 11, 2013
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>You can keep playing the Blame Plame Game. I guess it's easier than facing the truth.
The Bush-Cheney hydra is a reprehensible stain on America, and will always remain so.
Bush surely had his faults, but the blame game cuts both ways pookie. Clinton started the ball rolling in Iraq, he was President while the terrorist trained here, and his gutting of the CIA helped information to not be accumulated as normal. Clintons own rules made it illegal for agencies to share information, plus he passed three time on bin Laden. There is plenty of blame to go around, but you can't blame Bush without first blaming Clinton for his failures and of course Obama continued failures as well.

“Leonardo Di Vinci died here”

Since: Nov 08

Perpignan

#168 May 11, 2013
Mykro wrote:
<quoted text>And you celebtrate everyday with cross thread off topic DUMBOSPAM.
Oh my, a little maggot, there must be a pile of chit around.........Oh Barry, come out come out where ever you are.
conservative crapola

Zionhill, PA

#169 May 11, 2013
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>
Maggot card day for the teabeggar.....tweaked.

hahahahahahahahaha

Since: Feb 08

Hypoluxo Fl

#170 May 11, 2013
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>Bush surely had his faults, but the blame game cuts both ways pookie. Clinton started the ball rolling in Iraq, he was President while the terrorist trained here, and his gutting of the CIA helped information to not be accumulated as normal. Clintons own rules made it illegal for agencies to share information, plus he passed three time on bin Laden. There is plenty of blame to go around, but you can't blame Bush without first blaming Clinton for his failures and of course Obama continued failures as well.
DUMBOSPAM.

Since: Feb 08

Hypoluxo Fl

#171 May 11, 2013
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>Oh my, a little maggot, there must be a pile of chit around.........Oh Barry, come out come out where ever you are.
DUMBOSPAM.
Responsibility

Redwood City, CA

#172 May 11, 2013
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>If you post of cut and paste was meant to impress, try harder. It failed the smell test.
Jumbles, for once I agree with you - your off topic spam is laughable.

Since: Feb 08

Hypoluxo Fl

#173 May 11, 2013
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>Oh my, a little maggot, there must be a pile of chit around.........
Yes you are.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#174 May 11, 2013
But here one big difference between Liberals and Conservatives.
Liberals all but wordhip their political leaders , Hold them in the highest regard, want them to save them from what ever they se as evil(Like Oil companies and the Catholic church) and want the government to control their lives.
Conservative realize 90% of ALL politicians are scum and most the rest are fools. And that includes the so called conservative on es. We tend to hold even our so called political leaders in contempt.
We dont need to be saved from anything as we can take care of ourselves. We want the government to leave us alone and respect our rights.
see the light

El Paso, TX

#175 May 11, 2013
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>Amazing! Did Bush put you in his will?
And just to somewhat mitigate your latest distortion, Russia did not tell us the Boston bomber was a terrorist. They just said he was a religious extremist. Surely you have first-hand knowledge of what it is to be an extremist.
Yes Wolfie the Russians told FBI he was a terrorist. Supposedly the FBI did not communicate with others.

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#176 May 11, 2013
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>Horseshit, Le Douchebag. Bush had been warned that enemy planes were planning to attack us on our soil, and chose to ignore the warning. And when told that Saddam had no WMD's, he ignored that too. The blame belongs to the Bush/Cheney Siamese bobblehead.
Site the document with the Flight number. Don't have it?
How about the date and time of an attack. Hmmmm, no?
How about the date? Still nope?
How about the week? Ah....?
The month?
Private or commercial? Transport? Military?

Apparently the loons think it would have been prudent to shut down the air indefinitely. Probably could collapsed the economy in no time.

And then, once the air trade was resumed, the attackers could have proceeded with their plan.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#177 May 11, 2013
Aprilvue wrote:
<quoted text>
Site the document with the Flight number. Don't have it?
How about the date and time of an attack. Hmmmm, no?
How about the date? Still nope?
How about the week? Ah....?
The month?
Private or commercial? Transport? Military?
Apparently the loons think it would have been prudent to shut down the air indefinitely. Probably could collapsed the economy in no time.
And then, once the air trade was resumed, the attackers could have proceeded with their plan.
they could have been looking out for people training for such a thing.

we in MN detained one guy for trying to learn how to fly a jet, but not land it.(but we're above average, up here..)

we even had an FBI agent that had to go whistle blower about her warnings about the 9-11 attacks. if Bush had taken them seriously, these agencies would have been ont he lookout for just these sort of things. yes, he totally dropped the ball on that.

basically, the blame goes more to Cheney, as he was brought on the ticket for just that reason, national security. he knew afterward, that he had failed completely ot his one task. most people int eh administration believe that led directly to his later mental snap where he insisted he was infected by a biological agent in the situation room.

poor old boy really lost it at the end of his term there...it was his guilt over his total and known failure that drove him to such down and out ends...

your sad MSM did'nt report much about his breakdown, but google Cheney thinking he was infected and such and you will see it did happen. he totally lost it. because he knew he had failed miserably. sad story...

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#178 May 11, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>they could have been looking out for people training for such a thing.
we in MN detained one guy for trying to learn how to fly a jet, but not land it.(but we're above average, up here..)
we even had an FBI agent that had to go whistle blower about her warnings about the 9-11 attacks. if Bush had taken them seriously, these agencies would have been ont he lookout for just these sort of things. yes, he totally dropped the ball on that.
basically, the blame goes more to Cheney, as he was brought on the ticket for just that reason, national security. he knew afterward, that he had failed completely ot his one task. most people int eh administration believe that led directly to his later mental snap where he insisted he was infected by a biological agent in the situation room.
poor old boy really lost it at the end of his term there...it was his guilt over his total and known failure that drove him to such down and out ends...
your sad MSM did'nt report much about his breakdown, but google Cheney thinking he was infected and such and you will see it did happen. he totally lost it. because he knew he had failed miserably. sad story...
Site the source to the time frames. Nothing else matters.

Regardless, It is not illegal to go to flight school. Did flight schools prior to 9-11 have to report their rosters to the federal government?

This was pre 9-11 interagency cooperation, not the glory days of our Homeland Security boss who famously declared the security system worked because the panty bomber wasn't able to detonate his shorts. Apparently, passengers are now part of HS's overall security program. I wonder, do we qualify for federal benefits?

How about those guys in Boston? Again, these are the days of mandated information sharing. The guy was returning for extended visits to the terrorist hotbed from whence he asked asylum. No red flags?

Why isn't the MSM raking Obama, Hillary or Biden over the coals for failing to connect dots? And what about Bill? He had eight years and an attack on the WTC to put into place operations that folks are dither over because Bush didn't put it all together in a seven and a half months.

“Leonardo Di Vinci died here”

Since: Nov 08

Perpignan

#180 May 12, 2013
Aprilvue wrote:
<quoted text>
Site the source to the time frames. Nothing else matters.
Regardless, It is not illegal to go to flight school. Did flight schools prior to 9-11 have to report their rosters to the federal government?
This was pre 9-11 interagency cooperation, not the glory days of our Homeland Security boss who famously declared the security system worked because the panty bomber wasn't able to detonate his shorts. Apparently, passengers are now part of HS's overall security program. I wonder, do we qualify for federal benefits?
How about those guys in Boston? Again, these are the days of mandated information sharing. The guy was returning for extended visits to the terrorist hotbed from whence he asked asylum. No red flags?
Why isn't the MSM raking Obama, Hillary or Biden over the coals for failing to connect dots? And what about Bill? He had eight years and an attack on the WTC to put into place operations that folks are dither over because Bush didn't put it all together in a seven and a half months.
He won't. He never does show his sources, but demands others do. He is just another liberal clown doing bot babble.

“Leonardo Di Vinci died here”

Since: Nov 08

Perpignan

#181 May 12, 2013
Responsibility wrote:
<quoted text>
Jumbles, for once I agree with you - your off topic spam is laughable.
That's ok, so are your constant alibi's for odoodle.

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#182 May 13, 2013
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>He won't. He never does show his sources, but demands others do. He is just another liberal clown doing bot babble.
Yeah, I know. I stopped responding to his multi-identities, but gave them another chance.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#183 May 13, 2013
We all should have known 9/11 was coming as Ben laden all but took out an add in he Superbowl to announce his attentions.
Any of you ever here of the Bojinka plot?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Bojink... .
In a capsule, Al qaada planned on hijacking Airliners in Asia and crashing them into buildings on the west coast. But a Bar girl one of the plotters was seeing went to the Philippines FBI after they tested a bomb in a movie theater killing one person.
Now with the attack on the US Cole, the bombing of the African embassy and the bombing of the Khobar , Barracks you would think these people would have been on the Radar, but did either George Bush or Al Gore even mention them during the 2000 election, did the media ever have any specials or bring them up during the debates?
and what did Bill Clinton do during the almost 4 years he had left after the Bojinka plot?
Fact is Clinton should have done something, And Bush should have known, and we, as a people should have been awake to this threat, but we where allasleep till 9/11

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#184 May 13, 2013
californio wrote:
We all should have known 9/11 was coming as Ben laden all but took out an add in he Superbowl to announce his attentions.
Any of you ever here of the Bojinka plot?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Bojink... .
In a capsule, Al qaada planned on hijacking Airliners in Asia and crashing them into buildings on the west coast. But a Bar girl one of the plotters was seeing went to the Philippines FBI after they tested a bomb in a movie theater killing one person.
Now with the attack on the US Cole, the bombing of the African embassy and the bombing of the Khobar , Barracks you would think these people would have been on the Radar, but did either George Bush or Al Gore even mention them during the 2000 election, did the media ever have any specials or bring them up during the debates?
and what did Bill Clinton do during the almost 4 years he had left after the Bojinka plot?
Fact is Clinton should have done something, And Bush should have known, and we, as a people should have been awake to this threat, but we where allasleep till 9/11
Clinton could have no more shut down the air than Bush. It's all so easy to say what could have been done.

If Homeland Security got information that another identical WTC attack was going to occur, what would YOU deem appropriate action.

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#185 May 13, 2013
Can we please get back to the topic?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Bobby Jindal Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 28 min Aura Mytha 201,709
News 'Duck Dynasty' Star Ditches Bobby Jindal For Do... (Sep '15) Wed Death on 2 Legs 10
News 4 GOP candidates sign anti-gay marriage pledge (Aug '15) Jul 23 swedenforever 513
News Black students disproportionately suspended in ... (Sep '15) Jun 28 Serial Abandonment 77
News Jeff Sadow: Public should not let Edwards fool it Jun '16 julikemp 1
News Ted Cruz: Excluding Muslims from presidency is ... (Sep '15) Jun '16 Green Billionaire 15
News Donald Trump blasts John McCain over 'crazies' ... (Jul '15) May '16 Swedenforever 698
More from around the web