Gay marriage

There are 61362 comments on the Los Angeles Times story from Mar 28, 2013, titled Gay marriage. In it, Los Angeles Times reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court is considering two controversial cases involving whether same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry: Proposition 8, California's 2008 ban on gay marriage, and the Defense of Marriage Act, which since 1996 has defined marriage for federal purposes as a union between a man and a woman.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Los Angeles Times.

Nine Ball

Harrodsburg, KY

#21418 Jan 25, 2014
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
Religious Marriage is not at issue.
Civil Marriage is.
There has ben something called common law marriage for a long time. Just shak up gays and you gots it maid.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Tits McGee

Harrodsburg, KY

#21419 Jan 25, 2014
Professor Kingsfield wrote:
Tits McGee (joke?) and her female husband committed several crimes.
They're more depraved than the lesbian in The World According to Garp stalking VA hospitals for brain-dead vets with autonomic erections.
I hope they get arrested! How can I report them?
How dare you judge me. The boy that fathered our two children was 19. He was starving for sex and we taught him how to do it. We knew that he was going to move away with his parents. We wanted our children to be biologically related. I suppose that we could have been inseminated artificially but then we would have to only guess about the father. Here we had this virile young man that we could examine. It was a win win situation. He got what he wanted and so did we. If we had used a sperm donor he would never know that he had sired our boys so what is different using a live male. To be truthful men are only useful to sire children. Outside of that they are worthless. Want to know the meaning of my screen name? Look it up.
Tits McGee

Harrodsburg, KY

#21420 Jan 25, 2014
Nine Ball wrote:
<quoted text> There has ben something called common law marriage for a long time. Just shak up gays and you gots it maid.
Get off this message board. The only result of your ridiculous remarks is the proof of stupidly. If you must post do it on our local message board. People of San Francisco: Ignore this bore.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#21421 Jan 25, 2014
garylloyd wrote:
Slow Descent Into Filth
Huffpost used to be a good online news organ (no pun, cuz I'm not that clever).
So know you're afraid a piece of artwork that's meant to cause you to think?

Really, Gary. Man up.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#21422 Jan 25, 2014
TN Voter wrote:
Look... I know all the queers are trying to justify their points, but it's simple.... Men are meant to be with women... Folks today are passive, gutless, godless and the majority especially out there in taxifornia ( California ) are cowards.... It's ok to tell a pervert that he or she is now offending you!!! What about my rights??? Phuck your rights... We need to continue screaming the facts that they are now offending us and need to be tolerant now!!! Gay marriage is disgusting and they are sick perverted people!!!! There now deal with it!!!!
What's to deal? I don't have to come to your dinner party, do I?

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#21423 Jan 25, 2014
snyper wrote:
Religious Marriage is not at issue. Civil Marriage is.
You have the freedom to live as you please in every state; but that's not good enough. Your goals are to rewrite marriage law for everybody, in support of sex segregation over integration and diversity.

That's why they are wrong and doomed for failure; unity trumps disunity every time.

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#21424 Jan 25, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
You have the freedom to live as you please in every state; but that's not good enough. Your goals are to rewrite marriage law for everybody, in support of sex segregation over integration and diversity.
That's why they are wrong and doomed for failure; unity trumps disunity every time.
Brian, are you an idiot?
How does allowing someone else to marry the adult consenting partner of their choosing have any impact upon you or your marriage?

Be specific.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#21425 Jan 25, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>You have the freedom to live as you please in every state; but that's not good enough. Your goals are to rewrite marriage law for everybody, in support of sex segregation over integration and diversity.
That's why they are wrong and doomed for failure; unity trumps disunity every time.
Brian, how has federally recognized marriage equality re-written laws pertaining to your marriage?
What have you lost? What is the penalty to your relationship in marriage equality?

I already know the answer, so the question is rather rhetorical.
Professor Kingsfield

Sweden

#21426 Jan 25, 2014
Tits McGee wrote:
<quoted text>
How dare you judge me. The boy that fathered our two children was 19. He was starving for sex and we taught him how to do it. We knew that he was going to move away with his parents. We wanted our children to be biologically related. I suppose that we could have been inseminated artificially but then we would have to only guess about the father. Here we had this virile young man that we could examine. It was a win win situation. He got what he wanted and so did we. If we had used a sperm donor he would never know that he had sired our boys so what is different using a live male. To be truthful men are only useful to sire children. Outside of that they are worthless. Want to know the meaning of my screen name? Look it up.
Your name isn't all that fascinating.

The children don't want that. That was their father. They'll go looking for him soon enough. You sound like Kramer v. Kramer: The adults want want want, and it was the child who had to be an adult about it. Children want one thing: Their Mom and Dad together. The lesbian in World According to Garp was bad, but you take the cake, you filthy animal.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
anonymous

Absecon, NJ

#21427 Jan 25, 2014
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
WTF does your rambling, pretentious babble have to do with gay marriage?
It just seems to be a perfect illustration of Rose's Law.
You don't have any sort of argument against gay marriage, you abandon the subject, and bring up children to try and whip up emotion.
WTF does being gay have to do with marriage?

Sound-bite-Rosie! You have to pay to play in this game!

Judged:

12

12

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Mikey

Fullerton, CA

#21428 Jan 25, 2014
Why is it every time one of these morons try to dictate Morality, their minds are always in the gutter?

“Shoot for the stars”

Since: Dec 10

Planet Earth

#21429 Jan 25, 2014
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
Brian, are you an idiot?
How does allowing someone else to marry the adult consenting partner of their choosing have any impact upon you or your marriage?
Be specific.
He has control issues and insecurities with his own sexuality and that's what's eating his goat. He knows damn well that another's marriage, whether heterosexual or homosexual, does not affect his marriage nor the way he goes about his life.

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#21430 Jan 25, 2014
Earth Child 1 wrote:
He has control issues and insecurities with his own sexuality and that's what's eating his goat. He knows damn well that another's marriage, whether heterosexual or homosexual, does not affect his marriage nor the way he goes about his life.
There's nothing wrong with Brian that couldn't be fixed by professional medical help, and some remedial education.
anonymous

Absecon, NJ

#21431 Jan 25, 2014
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Stupid, I am talking about passing on of genes. It's would be very difficult for a pregnant woman, completely on her own, to give birth and raise a child who can pass on genes.
<quoted text>
Zzzz...
You forgot to mention "socialism".
Hey, dummy-dumb-dumb! That doesn't make any sense! and I don't need to mention Socialism. The concept applied to the animal kingdom is fully documented.

Social insects exist because they are genetically linked to the genes of the hive queen and are typically guaranteed of at least partially passing on their own genetics by serving the hive. There's a trade-off in that the individual mutations of the hive workers do not get a chance to thrive. Drones have to cross over to different hives in order to keep the genes of the hive healthy.

Mammals don't exist in hives. They don't! Apes tend to exist in packs that are dominated by an alpha male, thus they tend to suffer from the lack of genetic diversity caused by inbreeding. When it comes down to it, Evolution isn't about social thinking. Social behavior can enhance the survivability of the group, but it can also be a liability. It's typically best to throw it out as a major motivator in Evolution because in the end, it's still all about the passing on of genes.

Darwin himself spent great amounts of time documenting sexual selectivity. Male birds are typically brightly colored and exotically feathered compared to females. Why would that be? Probably there's a competition within in the species factor along with intimidation/distraction factor when confronting potential predators, but when it comes down to it, if you apply that to the human species, then homosexuality IS a perversion of the genetic strategy.

No. Once again, you're just demonstrating that the whole cause is simply a case of compromising the conventional authorities in the herd, all in the name of wildly untested theories of survival strategy. Those things are best done by introducing positive reasons for change, not just to make the Jesus nuts throw a tantrum and certainly not just to get gubbermint money to subsidize your form of masturbation.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
anonymous

Absecon, NJ

#21432 Jan 25, 2014
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
There's nothing wrong with Brian that couldn't be fixed by professional medical help, and some remedial education.
Parse bunny! Adding patronization to your list of bad habits? Don't talk about education if you aren't ready to provide some.....and yes, forget about your gubbermint's compelling interest in "close scrutiny" of yours or anyone else's masturbation habits. That's not education. That's voyeuristic thought-policing.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
anonymous

Absecon, NJ

#21433 Jan 25, 2014
garylloyd wrote:
Slow Descent Into Filth
Huffpost used to be a good online news organ (no pun). Then gays took it over. Today it is awash with homosexuality. Usually, there are no less than three gay articles on the front page. And then there's the overall slant. During that Dynasty Duck thing the gay editors couldn't write enough articles slamming the guy. They went digging way back in his history to find dirt on him. First they found an interview where he had said, "I think blacks were happier before integration (which just happens to be true), then based on the quote they began calling him a racist.
And god help anyone who even accidentally is seen talking to a homophobe. Recently, Goldie Hawn was in a photo next to the President of Nigeria, a known homophobe. The gays at Huffpost had a field day calling her out on it. It got so bad Hawn called a news conference to inform the world she doesn't ascribe to the man's views.
But perhaps the most troubling aspect of all this is the addiction to naked men these people have. Earlier in the year it was just partial nudity; now its in your face smoking hot gay porn. Here's two naked men from today's headline:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/22/basq...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/24/gay-...
And please note how the gay editors cover their perversity by using black nudes. Who'd risk being called both a homphobe and racist by objecting?
This is not rocket science, folks. You can't hit a straight lick with crooked stick. Gay pride parades should be all the evidence a sane person needs to know that homosexuality is a sickness of the heart, mind, and soul.
Actually, the Black community is often actively removing themselves from the White Liberals. White liberals try to use Black stereotypes to "normalize" what they observe to be reckless self-indulgence as "cool", evolutionarily edgy, and perfectly normal. I'm pretty sure that Blacks don't think of themselves that way, but are forced into such imagery by the prejudices in the White culture.

Just goes to show, some people are genuinely empathetic and some are just complete political tools.

I HOPE that statement is significant enough to penetrate some thick egos!

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Xavier Breath

Brooklyn, NY

#21434 Jan 25, 2014
anonymous wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm fairly sure that snow plowing doesn't involve the redistribution of wealth.
It involves government supplying the service. THAT is socialism.

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#21435 Jan 25, 2014
anonymous wrote:
Parse bunny! Adding patronization to your list of bad habits? Don't talk about education if you aren't ready to provide some.....and yes, forget about your gubbermint's compelling interest in "close scrutiny" of yours or anyone else's masturbation habits. That's not education. That's voyeuristic thought-policing.
Wake up, mental midget. The court in Oklahoma did not apply heightened scrutiny. Instead the struck the ban for lack of a rational basis.

The dominoes are falling, and the end result will be equality. This will be so, in part, because there are no ill effects of allowing equality for same sex couples to marry on anyone who would not enter into such a union.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#21436 Jan 25, 2014
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
The bottom line is that polygamy is no longer a felony in the state of Utah.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/federal-judge-rul...
Nope.

COHABITATION is no longer a felony in Utah.

You obviously don't understand the difference between cohabitation and polygamy.

Cohabitation is living with another person.

Polygamy is being married to more than one person at a time.

Polygamy remains a felony in Utah.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#21438 Jan 25, 2014
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Anne Wilde of Salt Lake City, co-founder of the polygamy advocacy group Principle Voices, said polygamous families have lived under the threat of arrest for decades and no longer have to worry about being charged with a felony.
For LIVING together.

How stupid ARE you?

If they attempt to legally marry more than one of their "wives", then they can still be charged with a felony.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US House of Representatives Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
new jersey inhumane justice took place today 4 min impeach trump hes... 1
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 5 min Hypocrite watch 86,719
News Dem lawmakers visit ICE detainees in Oregon, sa... 6 min tomin cali 13
News Donald Trump calls unauthorized immigrants 'ani... 7 min eggosaurus 892
News Analysis: Tax cuts, spending to raise deficit t... 9 min Asspony lying bitch 53
News White House: Trump supports GOP leaders' immigr... 19 min tbird19482 17
News Bernie Sanders won't endorse own son's US House... 21 min inbred Genius 7