'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Se...

'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

There are 279050 comments on the thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com story from Oct 1, 2010, titled 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate. In it, thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com reports that:

"Fox News Sunday" is heading to Louisville, Ky. Jack Conway, Kentucky's attorney general and the Democratic candidate for Senate , and Rand Paul, the Republican nominee and son of Representative Ron Paul, Republican of Texas, have agreed to a live debate on "Fox News Sunday" on Oct.3 at 9 a.m. (Eastern time).

Join the discussion below, or Read more at thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com.

pshw

Grayson, KY

#48998 Sep 19, 2012
papaderp aka oatmeal man

Florence, KY

#48999 Sep 19, 2012
you know they need too have one tax.say if you work out of town you pay that states tax,but after your done you also have to pay your states tax.but for instance you cross a bridge to another state that state might help too pay because it brings buisness
papaderp aka oatmeal man

Florence, KY

#49000 Sep 19, 2012
they sure do take more out in overtime i once got a check worked extra ten hrs looked the same as if i didnt its bullllllshhhhhiiz
pshw

Grayson, KY

#49001 Sep 19, 2012
you pay at the highest marginal rate for overtime, read the article.
papaderp aka oatmeal man

Florence, KY

#49002 Sep 19, 2012
i did and agree
Justsaying

Rochester, KY

#49003 Sep 19, 2012
American Lady wrote:
One more thing ...
UNIVERSITY OF FLA.--STUDENT-- ALLEGEDLY DENIED ENTRY INTO MICHELLE OBAMA EVENT FOR WEARING JOHN MCCAIN T-SHIRT
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/university-of...
Get of the net and go pay some Mitt taxes today!!!!!!!!!! You 47% POS.
Nerd Rage

Chambersburg, PA

#49005 Sep 19, 2012
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
That's WHAT obot's been doing....hasn't worked!
It’s a waste of time to respond to comments from “WTF” when all he does is throw a tantrum and call everyone names in hopes that somehow name calling is going to hurt someone. I doubt anyone can reach this "kid" and I call him a kid because no one talks like that who is serious about expanding their party’s message. Most liberals/democrats don't seem to say much of anything here because people like "WTF" make it an embarrassment to be associated with trash talk in their party. But if there is anyone out there who wants a serious debate then please put your comments out here and let us debate them rationally.
Nerd Rage

Chambersburg, PA

#49006 Sep 19, 2012
AmericanMan wrote:
<quoted text>In the past 20 years the middle class income has increased by 18%. The top has increased by 287%. That's the only wealth redistribution the Repubs like to see. The rich getting richer and the poor staying poor. Screw the 15% income tax Millionaire and Billionaires. They are screwing America!!!!
How are they screwing America? WE PAY THE MAJORITY OF TAXES YET WE ARE NOT THE ONES USING THE RESOURCES!

Since: Jul 12

Houston, TX

#49007 Sep 19, 2012
Uncle Tab wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow! We have a love story developing here!
It's heart warming to see you two express feelings for each other!
One of you can be a republican senator the other can be a young male page!
LMMFAO sorry..... Had to! You're both pathetic!!
Anywho.... Just checked the polls, Obama still up by 5. You all can bring up Rassmussen if you like, thier credibility is close to Fox. ZERO! But hey, it's fun watching you All bring those sources up in debates!
The National Enquirer of news programs and the National Enquierer of polls.
The ONLY "poll" that matters will happen in November, Tabby. I don't waste my time with any of them. Not a one of them will change the fact that Romney will bulldoze Obama, and he won't need a bunch of dead people to do it, either!
papaderp aka oatmeal man

Florence, KY

#49009 Sep 19, 2012
might as well people dont matter anyway stevie
Uncle Tab

United States

#49010 Sep 19, 2012
Jay wrote:
<quoted text>
**********
Romney told the truth today, and even the conservative media was discussing it. The American people don't like the truth, they would rather live under Obama's fantasies or Hope/Change and Backward! The 47% he was talking about IS the truth. The truth hurts doesn't it? It makes you libs mad to have to face yourself in the mirror and admit what idiots you are. In that collage of people are those who will vote for Obama because they are afraid they will lose their welfare. When someone offers an option: how would you like a good job, regain your self-respect, earn your way in this life, there are too many of your kind out there who would rather not. It's too scary. It's easier to live like a poor slob in government housing, buy your food made in China from the Dollar General, scrounge for a living, and give Obama and his minions the lifestyle they are so accustomed to. The unemployment rate is stuck over 8 and more likely 15 ever since this man took office. People are put on part time rotation shifts so companies don't have to contribute anything but an hourly salary. We are 6 trillion more dollars in debt and borrowing and borrowing, printing worthless money, paying interest up the bookoo on a debt that will never see the end. Our kids are competing against illegals who are reaping the benefits of hard earned taxpayer money. The black Americans are at @ 16% unemployment. He has done nothing for these people because he is sure they will vote for him on color. I know several families who are angry and feeling let down by the lies this man told them. Obama and his family have no "skin" in this game. And the healthcare law he pushed on us is not something he or his cronies would ever stoop so low to participate in.
Your response to me was illiterate, childish and immature. The facts are in your face, and you talk like a 8th grader with a D average. Grow up, and realize I owe you nothing, no explanation unless I choose to. You are just another loud mouth, think you know it all.
Ignorance becomes you!
Conservative media huh? Heh they've got you tools trained pretty good.

I know you don't get what was said here, but he said ALL! Which means retired Repubs too.

But hey , no use in trying to explain something to an idiot brainwashed from TV

Since Fox runs his campaign this is a last ditch effort to get him ellected

See how that works for ya lol
wondering

Elizabethtown, KY

#49011 Sep 19, 2012
Nerd Rage wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you serious? Are you trying to tell me that the numbers NOW are getting better then in 2008? If so, then you need glasses or you didn't read or look at any of the "clear as day" chart. Also the links that I posted are a good source for you to avoid the spin and stick with the facts but it seems as if you're just looking for talking points and not really interested in the facts so they may not help you at all.
Also you only point out the Jobs market which is still higher under Obama then Bush. You can’t take the 2010 stats and say it peaked and its going down when it hasn’t gone down past 2008’s data. You’re trying to ignore all data that clearly points out where Obama stands now Vs 2008, yet you’re forgetting that all of this is taking place under Obama’s watch. I suspect that you’re going to tell me that it’s all Bush’s fault next. You cannot dispute the obvious fact that this president is a failure of 4 years and the link shows it.
[/QUOTE [QUOTE who="wondering"]< quoted text>
I honestly cant believe that you think Obama put policies in place immediately after being sworn in to cause the damage that was caused. Really?!? Please tell me you are not that naive and thick. You dont understand that things were kind of in motion before he clocked in? And just like you cant do things overnight, you cant UNDO things overnight either. Especially with the other team doing everything they can to keep you from doing it. Please tell me youre not that dumb. I will put it as simple as possible for you. When Obama took the office, we were in a free fall, jobs wise and economy wise. Now we are in whats called a "recovery". When someone has open heart surgey, are they better than they were the morning after? Will they ever be better than they were when they were at there healthiest? use that nerd brain of yours.
You can absolutely say" it peaked and started going down" when that is exactly what its doing. According to your charts anyway. Regardless of what the numbers were before. So clueless....wow!
Nerd Rage wrote:
<quoted text>
It’s a waste of time to respond to comments from “WTF” when all he does is throw a tantrum and call everyone names in hopes that somehow name calling is going to hurt someone. I doubt anyone can reach this "kid" and I call him a kid because no one talks like that who is serious about expanding their party’s message. Most liberals/democrats don't seem to say much of anything here because people like "WTF" make it an embarrassment to be associated with trash talk in their party. But if there is anyone out there who wants a serious debate then please put your comments out here and let us debate them rationally.
Then lets take up where we left off then. Since had nothing to say about my last response to you, noted above. To do a little recap. Unemployment Jan 2009, 7.8% today...8.1%+.3%. After climbing to 10%. Seems like quite an improvement. If you look at it rationally that is.
Are You Kidding

Chicago, IL

#49012 Sep 19, 2012
Uncle Tab wrote:
<quoted text>
Conservative media huh? Heh they've got you tools trained pretty good.
I know you don't get what was said here, but he said ALL! Which means retired Repubs too.
But hey , no use in trying to explain something to an idiot brainwashed from TV
Since Fox runs his campaign this is a last ditch effort to get him ellected
See how that works for ya lol
Hey Uncle Tab.

I am a retired Republican and I will vote for Romney. In my opinion Romney was speaking of the millions of Americans who receive government benefits and feel "entitled" to them. Obama has made it very clear he plans to expand government benefits and Romney does not. Those receiving these benefits will most likely vote for Obama and Romney was indicating there was no need to focus on those voters.

President Roosevelt enacted welfare programs after the Great Depression in order to "temporarily" assist families in need until they were able to get on their feet. Unfortunately, it has become a "career" rather than a temporary solution in many situations.

Government anti-poverty programs have grown to serve a record one in five Americans and are continuing to expand. More than 50 million Americans are on Medicaid, the federal-state program aimed principally at the poor. That is up at least 17% since December 2007. The program has grown even before the new health care law adds about 16 million people, beginning in 2014. Every Medicaid director in the country indicates their current enrollment is the highest on record. More than 40 million people get food stamps, an increase of nearly 50%. Caseloads have risen as more people become eligible. The economic stimulus law signed by President Obama last year boosted benefits and decreased eligibility requirements. Close to 10 million receive unemployment insurance, nearly four times the number from 2007. More than 4.4 million people are on welfare, an 18% increase.

As caseloads for all the programs have soared, so have costs. The federal price tag for Medicaid has jumped 36% in two years, to $273 billion. Jobless benefits have soared from $43 billion to $160 billion. The food stamps program has risen 80%, to $70 billion. Welfare is up 24%, to $22 billion. Taken together, they cost more than Medicare.

I certainly realize there are many people who are in need of "temporary" government benefits. My issue is with those who "work" the system to receive benefits "permanently". They make a "career" of receiving the benefits and pass this mind set on to their children. They DO feel "entitled" and we as tax payers carry this burden. I worked in government for 37 years and know first hand the vast amount of abuses which occur. I want less government and an economy which allows more people off benefits rather than continuing to add them on. If this is not turned around, there will eventually be more people receiving benefits than there are tax payers. What then????



Since: Sep 10

Perris, CA

#49013 Sep 19, 2012
Uncle Tab wrote:
<quoted text>
Just funny how you tools won't mention his name. But we all know why don't we? But you do mention hes Christian right??
A fine Christian making an anti Muslim tape that got Americans killed who used a soft porn producer??
Gotcha! ;)
Nutball!!!
...news break!! hey ignormous, its not about a dumbass movie!!!! its about: THEY.HATE.US!!!!!!!...thus, the attack on 9-11, aniversity?? duh?
wtf

Waco, KY

#49014 Sep 19, 2012
jondee wrote:
<quoted text>...news break!! hey ignormous, its not about a dumbass movie!!!! its about: THEY.HATE.US!!!!!!!...thus, the attack on 9-11, aniversity?? duh?
"aniversity"

lmfao
lmfao

You cannot make this stuff up, you are dumber than a rock.

lmfao
Please explain

Greensburg, KY

#49015 Sep 19, 2012
It's class warfare when asking the top 1% to pay the tax rate they paid during the Clinton years. It's patriotism to RAISE taxes on the elderly and working poor. Welcome to the New America everybody!
Uncle Tab

United States

#49016 Sep 19, 2012
BIG_STEVIE wrote:
<quoted text>
The ONLY "poll" that matters will happen in November, Tabby. I don't waste my time with any of them. Not a one of them will change the fact that Romney will bulldoze Obama, and he won't need a bunch of dead people to do it, either!
Keep that in mind. The polls that don't matter, Mitt just took a downward bump!

It's just funny how dumb you fucktards are! Lmao

I'm happy you all listen to the National Enquirer of news. While you idiots soak in the stupid shit, the world passes you by

Fox really does make you stupid! We all see it here on a daily basis!!
papaderp aka oatmeal man

Florence, KY

#49017 Sep 19, 2012
have the middle class to keep the ecomony running have the rich passing down and the poor people to scare the shiz out the middle class ha
Nerd Rage

Chambersburg, PA

#49018 Sep 19, 2012
Please explain wrote:
It's class warfare when asking the top 1% to pay the tax rate they paid during the Clinton years. It's patriotism to RAISE taxes on the elderly and working poor. Welcome to the New America everybody!
Well it is class warfare. Those who earn in the lower income brackets pay "ZERO" federal income taxes. Also who is saying that its Patriotism to raise taxes on the elderly and working poor? And why shouldn't everyone pay taxes? Those on the higher end uses less of the services yet we pay the majority of taxes. Why not pay something into the system? Those on the lower end see no incentive to move up because then they would have to pay taxes. It's inequality and at some point gouging the higher and middle class is going no where. By having only half of our population pay taxes while the other half pay nothing is getting us broke fast.
Are You Kidding

Chicago, IL

#49019 Sep 19, 2012
Uncle Tab wrote:
<quoted text>
Keep that in mind. The polls that don't matter, Mitt just took a downward bump!
It's just funny how dumb you fucktards are! Lmao
I'm happy you all listen to the National Enquirer of news. While you idiots soak in the stupid shit, the world passes you by
Fox really does make you stupid! We all see it here on a daily basis!!
Uncle Tab, can't believe you have lowered yourself to the name calling of wtf!!!! We all have varied opinions and that is the way it should be. Nothing wrong with a little debating, but it has become so ugly in here with all the name calling.

I for one do watch FOX, but I also watch CNN, NBC, CBS, etc., etc. I also read a great deal to try to obtain a wide view of all the facts. Even doing this, I am still strongly conservative and that is my right. You have the same right to be strongly liberal. We can all just agree to disagree. It is as simple as that.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US House of Representatives Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Democrats, civil rights group aim to block Trum... 9 min spud 52
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 22 min Aura Mytha 15,238
News Sessions greenlights police to seize cash, prop... 3 hr Not My Tyrant Tod... 13
News Layoffs begin at Carrier plant that drew Trump'... 3 hr deplorable 3
News House to consider ban on transgender surgery fo... 3 hr Quirky 152
News APNewsBreak: US restoring asset seizures - with... 4 hr Fit2Serve 13
News Australian government demands answers on Minnea... 6 hr 16 TEEN SHOTS chi... 36
More from around the web