You did not answer my question. Was Origin of Species peer reviewed? They have the credentials and simply come to different conclusions.<quoted text>
There are a few problems with it that science knows how to counteract and take into account. These problems are VASTLY overrated by fundie Christian propagandists like yourself.
Peer-reviewed science journals submit papers to scientists who work in the exact fields that the submitted paper covers. They check the paper for mistakes in methodology and make sure it adheres to the basic principles of the scientific method. Peer-reviewers do NOT have to agree with the paper's conclusions, and often don't.
Evolution is science and ID is religion badly-dsiguised as science. If an IDer submits a paper to a REAL science journal, it will probably be rejected science ID is not science and does not follow the scientific method. That's not science's fault, it's the fault of your deceptive Christian religionists pretending to DO science.
And you speak for all working scientists?You sound like a chickensh#t making excuses.And no working scientist "relishes the opportunity" to engage Christians
There is more going on here given your vitriol. That does not win arguments nor is it indicative of professional standards. You sound like a wannabe hanging out on Topix. Pissing on the porch with the pups.deceptively trying to push their religion as real science. It's considered a total waste of time by the science people and only gives credibility to the Jesus Freaks, who are desperate for it.