PHILLIPS: The last days of the Republ...

PHILLIPS: The last days of the Republican Party

There are 2196 comments on the Washington Times story from Oct 12, 2013, titled PHILLIPS: The last days of the Republican Party. In it, Washington Times reports that:

The Republican Party saved the Union and abolished slavery. The Republican Party stood against Franklin Roosevelt's internment of Japanese Americans during World War II and against Jim Crow laws in the 50's.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Washington Times.

First Prev
of 110
Next Last

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#2285 Feb 3, 2014
Bama wrote:
<quoted text>
Good lord, You have got to be the dumbest man or most insane man I have ever met.
To attribute the creation the economic model of wealth in capitalism to a communist is absurd. Adam Smith is the father of Capitalism not Marx. That is simply historical fact
What you propose is that the economic, political and societal history of the world over the last 250 years was really the enlightened idea of the daddy of all commies that was born decades after the world has put the very thing you are crediting him for creating into effect.
Next thing you are going to try to tell me is that Obama really won the nobel peace prize in 1930.
Good Lord your posting confirmed to us all that you are the dumbest man or most insane man that I have ever seen post nonsense other than barefoot2626 and Adam Smith is not the father of Captialism but the father of Wealth of Nations which I already knew that about Adam Smith besides it is a known fact that Karl Marxs was the man that created the Terms what we all know today as Communism, Socialism and Capitalism and just think Karl Marxs spent 25 years for his life writing the 4 volumes of what we know today as the term Capitalism and you want to know the real thing about True Capitalism, just like True Communism they have never existed just in name only and all economcial systems of today that claim to be based on Communism or Capitalism are Hybird forms of Socialism that incorporate certain aspects of Capitalism and Communsim and you can see it here in the US and China and especially China because if China was based on True Communism US Corporations wouldn't be flocking to China to do business and setup Manufacturing Facilities and the real thing is about China that people don't want to admit it is more based on True Captialism then anything because the so called Communist Party is actually the Plutocracy within China and the Citizens of China don't have the ability to vote democratically which True Capitalism rejects and the Plutocracy has the say in Society only which is the so called Communist Party and another thing the People China cant elect people to vote themselves other peoples money like here in the US and have done for years and we can thank the Republican party for passing the 16th Amendment too which if the Federal Government wants too they can tax 100% of our income which the Federal Government is entitled to do.

Adam Smith

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Smith

History of the 16th Amendment Overview

“The income tax is bad because it was conceived in class hatred, is an instrument of vengeance and plays right into the hands of the communists. It employs the vicious communist principle of taking from each according to his accumulation of the fruits of his labor and giving to others according to their needs, regardless of whether those needs are the result of indolence or lack of pride, self-respect, personal dignity or other attributes of men.”

“The income tax is fulfilling the Marxist prophecy that the surest way to destroy a capitalist society is by steeply graduated taxes on income and heavy levies upon the estates of people when they die.”

http://articlevprojecttorestoreliberty.com/16...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#2286 Feb 3, 2014
Wake wrote:
The death of the current Republican party can't come soon enough. When they clear out the nutjobs in the teaparty from their party maybe we can get some reasonable people in there again.
Liberal's have taken over the Republican Party just like they have done with the Democrat Party and Fourth Party System is making a Comeback and it is not good and wasn't then either and pushing communsim then too.

Fourth Party System

The Fourth Party System is the term used in political science and history for the period in American political history from about 1896 to 1932 that was dominated by the Republican Party, excepting the 1912 split in which Democrats held the White House for eight years. American history texts usually call it the Progressive Era.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Party_Sys...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#2287 Feb 3, 2014
Eric Gustafson wrote:
<quoted text>
Government in the colonies represented an extension of the English government. Courts enforced the common law of England. The Governor's Council or the Governor's Court was a body of senior advisors to the governor. The General Assembly was elected by the enfranchised voters; by 1750, most free men could vote. In New England, the towns had annual town meetings where all free men had a voice. Diplomatic affairs were handled by London, as were some trading policies. The colonies handled their own affairs (and wars) with the Native Americans, but Britain handled foreign wars with France and Spain
The Council
Governor council members were appointed, and served at the governor's pleasure
That is why there was an American Revolution too and people want nothing to do with a dictatorship which is what England was over the Colonies which England had the final say.

Colonial government in the Thirteen Colonies

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonial_governm...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#2292 Feb 3, 2014
fingiswold wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL...literally one of the dumbest things I've ever read in my life. And I didn't even read the whole insane post.
THIS...folks....is the Right wing. Read it and weep!:)
you dont know what Right Wing is and the reason is you are so far to the Left which explains your stupidity and dependence on Communism and US Federal Government redistribution of wealth and without that your own existence would be in trouble just like most of your kind that cant and will not provide for themselves.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#2293 Feb 3, 2014
fingiswold wrote:
<quoted text>
Point (misspelling of the word "know," just so you know) goes WHIZZING over Anony's pointy little noggin! LOL
Is that all you can come up with to defend your stupidity and dependeny on the Federal Government which everyone knows you advocate for Communism.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#2295 Feb 4, 2014
fingiswold wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't...blah, blah, blah...Right wing..blah, blah...Communism...blah, blah...redistribution....blah, blah, blah....provide...blah, blah, BARF.
Your a communist for sure but for Leninism.

[email protected]

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#2297 Feb 9, 2014
Bama wrote:
<quoted text>
Good lord, You have got to be the dumbest man or most insane man I have ever met.
To attribute the creation the economic model of wealth in capitalism to a communist is absurd. Adam Smith is the father of Capitalism not Marx. That is simply historical fact
What you propose is that the economic, political and societal history of the world over the last 250 years was really the enlightened idea of the daddy of all commies that was born decades after the world has put the very thing you are crediting him for creating into effect.
Next thing you are going to try to tell me is that Obama really won the nobel peace prize in 1930.
Don't bother confusing the Indy with facts. He believes that something never existed till someone named it. Like American Indians were discovered and named, before that they never existed in the history of the world.

It's magic really, just yesterday I named the bright, hot, round light that was out in the sky the badada, I created that you see, because I named it. I came up with a name for it thus it's existence started when I named it, according to indy.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#2298 Apr 22, 2014
Dajokerman wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't bother confusing the Indy with facts. He believes that something never existed till someone named it. Like American Indians were discovered and named, before that they never existed in the history of the world.
It's magic really, just yesterday I named the bright, hot, round light that was out in the sky the badada, I created that you see, because I named it. I came up with a name for it thus it's existence started when I named it, according to indy.
you really proved your not too brite and can be confused real easy which is the case with all Liberals.

[email protected]

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#2299 May 10, 2014
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>you really proved your not too brite and can be confused real easy which is the case with all Liberals.
Really? you stated that Capitalism was created by Karl Marx because he named the economic system that was adopted and applied that was laid out in "The Wealth of Nations" which was written and applied throughout the world decades before Karl Marx was even born.

Your logic would say that an object does not exist at all till someone names it. Which is absurd.

Explain how that is a confusion on my part and not your own?

I understand what you are trying to do however. You want to pretend the fact that national government's throughout the world did not redistributed the wealth of the nobility, most of it farm land, and gave it to the lower classes so the lower classes may create more wealth for the nation.

You want to ignore the fact that the greatest redistribution of wealth in the history of the world is the application of Capitalism through out the world.

The original point still stands. Why is redistribution so evil now if it was so good for the application of capitalism and the free market?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#2300 May 10, 2014
Dajokerman wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? you stated that Capitalism was created by Karl Marx because he named the economic system that was adopted and applied that was laid out in "The Wealth of Nations" which was written and applied throughout the world decades before Karl Marx was even born.
Your logic would say that an object does not exist at all till someone names it. Which is absurd.
Explain how that is a confusion on my part and not your own?
I understand what you are trying to do however. You want to pretend the fact that national government's throughout the world did not redistributed the wealth of the nobility, most of it farm land, and gave it to the lower classes so the lower classes may create more wealth for the nation.
You want to ignore the fact that the greatest redistribution of wealth in the history of the world is the application of Capitalism through out the world.
The original point still stands. Why is redistribution so evil now if it was so good for the application of capitalism and the free market?
Obviously your confused since first of all you dont understand capitalism or what true capitalism advocates which rejects free market principles and advocate monopolies where one individual has total economical domiance and sets the prices without any government interference(Sherman Anti Trust Act) since the plutocracy is the government in capitalistic society.

How Capitalism Works

by Julia Layton

In this article, we'll explore capitalism: its roots, principles and effects, benefits and shortcomings. We'll find out how capitalism compares to the alternative method of doing business. Incidentally, the United States doesn't actually practice capitalism. No one does these days.

Real Capitalism: The Idea

Befor­e the Industrial Revolution in the 1800s, countries like Britain and the United States had true capitalist economies. With industrialization, though, came sweat shops, social protest and resulting government intervention in the form of fair labor laws. That's when real capitalism ended.

Today, the economies of nations that are typically referred to as capitalist are in fact mixed economies -- they incorporate certain aspects of capitalism and certain aspects of planed economies. In pure capitalism, things like child labor laws, Social Security, anti-discriminatory hiring practices and a minimum wage have no place. Capitalism rejects all government intervention in economic matters.

http://money.howstuffworks.com/capitalism1.ht...

Das Kapital

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Das_Kapital

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#2302 Sep 5, 2015
SurrenderCON Trump lol!
Self Deportation

Silver Spring, MD

#2303 Dec 31, 2015
Limp marriages
Cheap labor CONS

Washington, DC

#2304 Jan 16, 2016
Mexican refugees work in my kitchen, I have a slave restaurant full of refugee worms
Cheap labor CONS

Silver Spring, MD

#2305 Jan 16, 2016
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>I'm available.
Carson fires campaign manager because he is LBGT
Cheap labor CONS

Silver Spring, MD

#2306 Jan 16, 2016
Lol wrote:
Wait, so what is your solution? Who do you suggest we vote for?
Your wife's 'sons hot virgin friend' who is full of life
Klingon

Silver Spring, MD

#2307 Mar 3, 2016
Romney/Ryan slavemaster 2012

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 110
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US House of Representatives Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Rendell says Wasserman Schultz shouldn't take t... 7 min Mitts Gold Plated... 1
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 8 min Jay 232,884
News DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz will not spe... 17 min Mitts Gold Plated... 25
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 19 min One way or another 201,193
News Democratic chief Wasserman Schultz quits amid S... 42 min BHM5267 37
News Could NATO be the next alliance to unravel? 1 hr davy 61
News The Latest: 4 still hospitalized after nightclu... 1 hr davy 2
More from around the web