Because his character needs attacking...not that I'd expect you or any other illiterate, teabagging slavery apologist to be any kind of character judge.<quoted text>Hey why don't you attack his substance instead of his character...oh yeah you can't everything he posted was true. Lincoln even agreed to allow slavery to continue in state where slavery was already established. But outlaw it in any new states. The war of nothern agreesion was about taxation not civil rights.
As for the "substance" of your argument, no decent American buys the idea that there is some kind of moral cause behind white, Christian racists opening fire on the nation--then or now.