Romney version 2012 means smaller Iow...

Romney version 2012 means smaller Iowa presence

There are 29 comments on the Kansas City Star story from May 26, 2011, titled Romney version 2012 means smaller Iowa presence. In it, Kansas City Star reports that:

Perhaps nowhere is the difference between Mitt Romney version 2008 and version 2012 more evident than in Iowa.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Kansas City Star.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Taxpayer

Shorewood, IL

#2 May 26, 2011
Romneycare=Obamacare.

“The Buybull is innerrrent.”

Since: Jun 08

Tappahannock, VA

#4 May 26, 2011
Romney changes positions on major political issues more often than he changes his magic underpants.

And the latter are nothing less than sanctified.

Since: Mar 07

Washington DC

#5 May 26, 2011
Democraps = Dipsh!t
CHAS

Dillon, CO

#6 May 26, 2011
It is encouraging to see the moronic intelligence level of the anti-gays. Give them enough rope and they will hang themselves.
Frank Stanton

New York, NY

#7 May 26, 2011
Despite all our differences, at LEAST we can all agree that ObamaniacŪ is Evil. PURE EVIL !
At least we can all agree on that !
:)
And I would never even consider voting for a Mormon because you seriously have to question someone's mind and sanity and judgment if they believe in the tenets of the Magic Underpants Cult.
Ross

Lady Lake, FL

#8 May 26, 2011
Democraps wrote:
Romney will kick odumba's azz! hell, even a drunken dope smokin' monkey can beat our LOSER-IN-THIEF!!!
Nice job. You speak the truth.

“Baby Obama”

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#9 May 26, 2011
Don't waste your time and money Mitt.

You're not the one.

Since: Feb 10

Woodstock, Illinois

#10 May 26, 2011
Sadly, the two most qualified Republicans, Romney and Huntsman will never get the nomination. The primary voters would not elect a Mormon. Instead they will look to the "Christian" Palin or Backmann. Morons rather than Mormons.

“Baby Obama”

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#11 May 26, 2011
Ron431 wrote:
Sadly, the two most qualified Republicans, Romney and Huntsman will never get the nomination. The primary voters would not elect a Mormon. Instead they will look to the "Christian" Palin or Backmann. Morons rather than Mormons.
Herman Cain is Obama's worst nightmare.

Take that race card right off the table.

Cain/West 2012

“Created Equal”

Since: Feb 08

USA

#12 May 26, 2011
Happily, there isn't a single republicant who has a prayer of beating Obama. At it's very lowest, Obama's job approval rating never dipped below 44%. Right now, it's 52%.

The tea party is rapidly floating out to sea, and the GOP, contrary to it's usual strategy, can't get behind a single candidate.

Romney is the only one who might stand a chance, but he won't clear the primary. The Grandad Old Party has already self destructed.
Frank Stanton

New York, NY

#13 May 26, 2011
Ron431 wrote:
Sadly, the two most qualified Republicans, Romney and Huntsman will never get the nomination. The primary voters would not elect a Mormon. Instead they will look to the "Christian" Palin or Backmann. Morons rather than Mormons.
Because Mormons aren't Christians, and very few voters, white, black, Hispanic, or whatever race the voter is, will not vote for a Non-Christian for President.

And it's not prejudice. It's "voting your values" because most Americans are Christians.

Even Kennedy, the only non-Protestant to be elected President, did not recieve a majority of the votes.

“Baby Obama”

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#14 May 26, 2011
ScottyMatic wrote:
Happily, there isn't a single republicant who has a prayer of beating Obama. At it's very lowest, Obama's job approval rating never dipped below 44%. Right now, it's 52%.
The tea party is rapidly floating out to sea, and the GOP, contrary to it's usual strategy, can't get behind a single candidate.
Romney is the only one who might stand a chance, but he won't clear the primary. The Grandad Old Party has already self destructed.
You just keep telling yourself that.

Barack al-Hussien al-Obama is slowly becoming the most dispised man in America.

al-Obama pissing on Israel will be his undoing.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#15 May 26, 2011
Space Cowboy wrote:
<quoted text>
Herman Cain is Obama's worst nightmare.
Take that race card right off the table.
Cain/West 2012
Cain is as dead as burnt pizza - no matter how you slice it.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#16 May 26, 2011
Space Cowboy wrote:
Don't waste your time and money Mitt.
You're not the one.
You mean Mr. Charisma won't make it? How about Chris Christie? Not one person can fill his suit. Not even five persons.

“Unconvinced”

Since: Nov 09

Seattle, WA

#17 May 26, 2011
Democraps wrote:
Romney will kick odumba's azz! hell, even a drunken dope smokin' monkey can beat our LOSER-IN-THIEF!!!
Then I guess John McCain doesn't even qualify as a drunken dope smokin' monkey. Even with Sarah Palin as his top banana, too.

Since: Feb 10

Woodstock, Illinois

#18 May 26, 2011
Space Cowboy wrote:
<quoted text>
Herman Cain is Obama's worst nightmare.
Take that race card right off the table.
Cain/West 2012
I don't recall Obama playing the race card in 2008. Do you have some example?

As to Cain, he doesn't have a chance. I actually agree with some of what he claims to support, but he has too many negatives to get through a primary. If he did, he could not outshine Obama in a debate. He is already done.

Since: Feb 10

Woodstock, Illinois

#19 May 26, 2011
Frank Stanton wrote:
<quoted text>
Because Mormons aren't Christians, and very few voters, white, black, Hispanic, or whatever race the voter is, will not vote for a Non-Christian for President.
And it's not prejudice. It's "voting your values" because most Americans are Christians.
Even Kennedy, the only non-Protestant to be elected President, did not recieve a majority of the votes.
That line about Mormons not being Christians I will never understand. They are cut from the same cloth with a minor exception.

“Baby Obama”

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#20 May 26, 2011
Ron431 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't recall Obama playing the race card in 2008. Do you have some example?
As to Cain, he doesn't have a chance. I actually agree with some of what he claims to support, but he has too many negatives to get through a primary. If he did, he could not outshine Obama in a debate. He is already done.
al-Obama never dose it himself. He's not man enough.

His thugs in the media, unions, and every slack-jawwed idiot in his Administration does it for him. Jim Clyburn just in the last 24 hours threw the race card down again.

As far as negatives go.

You could combine every Republican candidates negatives, an all that wouldn't add up to the negatives that Barack al-Hussien al-Obama does.

A pile of dogsh*t has more positives than Barack al-Hussien al-Obama.
Frank Stanton

New York, NY

#21 May 26, 2011
Ron431 wrote:
<quoted text>
That line about Mormons not being Christians I will never understand. They are cut from the same cloth with a minor exception.
What don't you understand ? The fact is is that Mormons, like Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, and Hindus, are not Christians. What is there not to understand about that ? NO Christian denomination, be it Protestant, Orthodox, Roman Catholic, nor other, rrecognizes Mormons as Christians. They have very differnt beliefs than Christians. Saying that Mormons are not Christians is not an insult, it's just a fact.

Just as Hindus are not Christians, so to are Mormons not Christians. What do you not understand about that ?

“Unconvinced”

Since: Nov 09

Seattle, WA

#22 May 26, 2011
Frank Stanton wrote:
<quoted text>
What don't you understand ? The fact is is that Mormons, like Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, and Hindus, are not Christians. What is there not to understand about that ? NO Christian denomination, be it Protestant, Orthodox, Roman Catholic, nor other, rrecognizes Mormons as Christians. They have very differnt beliefs than Christians. Saying that Mormons are not Christians is not an insult, it's just a fact.
Just as Hindus are not Christians, so to are Mormons not Christians. What do you not understand about that ?
THEY say they are. They believe in Jesus Christ and that he is their saviour. They claim to follow his teachings. I don't know what else you need to call yourself a Christian, other than to be a devotee of someone named Christ.

Everyone raise your hand if you're tired of seeing Christian "A" point at Christian "B" and saying "You're not a TRUE Christian!!". NONE of you are really Christians, according to each other.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Terry Branstad Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Perry seeks to win over Iowa, a handshake at a ... May '15 Le Jimbo 22
News Branstad Tours Storm Damage May '15 school roof off i... 1
News Iowa Caucus Kingmaker Assesses 2016 GOP Field May '15 Tazo 1
News Q&A: What Is Meerkat and Why Do Politicians Car... Mar '15 Barry Le Pew 1
News Where corn is king: Jeb Bush, White House hopef... Mar '15 woodtick57 25
News Iowa making plans to close 2 of its 4 mental in... Feb '15 Elise Gingerich 1
News Jane Fonda's Vietnam-era arrest bolsters GOP cr... Jan '15 Le Jimbo 45
More from around the web