Why Romney lost

[bottlecap]

Pamela wrote:

<quoted text>That's true. The Fox followers all have IQs of about 90, and 80 is retarded. This is WHY they repeat the TV and can't read books nor investigate things for themselves nor think for themselves. They sit in here and fight over TV channels for years now. That is the definition of low IQ. Yes, Ron Paul has an IQ in the 150s. He is an M.D., a Constitutional expert, an economic expert and a Congressman. Yes, he has a very high IQ, and yes, his followers are super smart young educated people. All the dummies repeat Fox TV, and Fox TV got rid of Dr. Paul because the people on fox are war profiteers and they wanted to place someone in the White House who was like Bush and who would have war after war for them to make money off of, so when they saw Dr. Paul is a decent and honest man and would not have a war with Iran, people like Dick Morris and Sean Hannity lied about Dr. Paul and said he is nuts, and, the low IQ Fox followers buy all of it. The country went under from the people being so dumb so they don't think for themselves.
Tell me ONE thing Dr. Paul said that is crazy?? Just because you don't understand sound economics doesn't mean that he is crazy. It means you are stupid.

Ron Paul got along great with Jesse Waters. ha ha

But I have to part company with you on Fox News, as, was clear in Paul's Statement "...to the government media complex that controls the news and most political propaganda,” where he was talking about fascist, bankster controlled outlets like the Washington Post, the New York Times, ABC, NBC, CBS, Hollywood, etc. As far as Fox goes, IMO, they represent a SCHISM in the Elite Power Structure and we need to take advantage of that it while it lasts.

Fox News does promote a bellicose foreign policy which needs to resisted yet serves a very useful function as a counter-weight to the dems big-government socialism.

[bottlecap]

Researcher wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually, Obama is highly intelligent and Bush, though a failure in every way that counts, has a surprisingly high I.Q.
"When the Harvard historian James T. Kloppenberg decided to write about the influences that shaped President Obama’s view of the world, he interviewed the president’s former professors and classmates, combed through his books, essays, and speeches, and even read every article published during the three years Mr. Obama was involved with the Harvard Law Review
"His conclusion is that PRESIDENT OBAMA IS A TRUE INTELLECTUAL."
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/28/books/28klo...

His performance, then, leaves alot to be desired.

No NET JOBS since inaugeration day, Middle-Class Wealth plummeting, big banks BIGGER THAN EVER, The blunders in Syria, Libya, Egypt and Afghanistan, Credit Rating falling, Tuitions Skyrocketing, High Unemployment, Poverty at Record Levels, Gasoline Prices High, Schools Failing, States and Cities facing Bankruptcy, Dollar Weakening, Debt Over 16 TRILLION, Internet Freedom Threatened and now if United States Astronauts want to go to the Space Station, they have to buy a ticket from Russia for $50 Million to get a Ride aboard Russia's shuttle.

If Hurricane Sandy didn't come along when it did, he could very well be retired now.

[Pamela]

bottlecap wrote:

<quoted text>
Ron Paul got along great with Jesse Waters. ha ha
But I have to part company with you on Fox News, as, was clear in Paul's Statement "...to the government media complex that controls the news and most political propaganda,” where he was talking about fascist, bankster controlled outlets like the Washington Post, the New York Times, ABC, NBC, CBS, Hollywood, etc. As far as Fox goes, IMO, they represent a SCHISM in the Elite Power Structure and we need to take advantage of that it while it lasts.
Fox News does promote a bellicose foreign policy which needs to resisted yet serves a very useful function as a counter-weight to the dems big-government socialism.

Sure. And that's exactly what Ron Paul was saying about how both parties spend and spend and borrow money, it's just that the Dems do it on social programs whereas the Repubs do it on oil wars and war profiteering for the rich. Unfortunately when the Tea Party started, Fox got ahold of them and got them to vote in the Republicans rather than stand as Libertarians with Ron Paul. Although with a two party system no one can break, I guess they did have to go with one major party or the other. But RP would have set all of their pants on fire had he been elected president.

[Researcher]

Fox does not do news. Fox does paid advertising propaganda for its advertisers.

Fox executives have said publicly that their advertisers influence what they say on the air.

There is nothing wrong with advertising, and everybody is entitled to his/her own opinion.

But it is downright indecent to refer to any of what Fox does as "news." It is not that.

Rupert Murdoch is a genius at making money for himself, but he is a disaster for the United States. He is an outsider here only to pluck us clean. He's doing a fine job of it.

[Pamela]

Rupert Murdoch sells to the highest bidder. He goes to both political parties in the UK and in other countries and tells them he can win elections for them by using his newspapers and his TV stations. Here the Repubs paid him to do a Republican election channel for them. In the UK he helps to get liberals elected because they paid him to do so.

You can tell Fox is phony because it sells wars, a third war after two 10 years wars, it sells staying on oil yet cheap oil has run out, it sells it that global warming is not real yet everyone else knows it is real.

What they do is they carefully craft every word that is going to be said on Fox by everyone on Fox, except Shep Smith, the rest are simply repeating a play that Roger Ailes scripted for them, and it is always about stay on ending oil, global warming is not real and have a war with Iran. So that tells you they work for the major oil companies and make a ton of money off of the wars. And, because they are all uber rich, they sell it not to raise their taxes. And then they sell books and show tickets and website memberships. And then they sell it that they are the only honest ones.

And on days when they have no negative stories to tell about the Dems, they just make them up. And everything is lied about and spun into things other than what they really are. And then they tell viewers that they are looking out for them and taking care of everything for them and that they are the ONLY honest media left and that viewers should be so thankful that Fox exists. It's the smoothest con job I have seen.

[why]

bottlecap wrote:

<quoted text>

.

do you hate America? Get out of the way with your negativity and crazy assertions.

[Fed Up in North Carolina]

Romney lost because he offered jobs to a country that doesn't want to work.

[Go Blue Forever]

Researcher wrote:

Fox does not do news. Fox does paid advertising propaganda for its advertisers.
Fox executives have said publicly that their advertisers influence what they say on the air.
There is nothing wrong with advertising, and everybody is entitled to his/her own opinion.
But it is downright indecent to refer to any of what Fox does as "news." It is not that.
Rupert Murdoch is a genius at making money for himself, but he is a disaster for the United States. He is an outsider here only to pluck us clean. He's doing a fine job of it.

You are absolutely correct about Fox and i wondered if you might also contend, they may actually be doing some harm to the republican party? I, like many american's felt offended at this smear campaign, directed at Susan Rice, and the fact it came 10-14 days before election day, was fascinating. Throw in the President and FEMA's quick response to Sandy and their positive reviews, one would wonder what the cumulative effect of Fox's timing, had any change in possible republican momentum?.....

[Pete-o]

Fed Up in North Carolina wrote:

Romney lost because he offered jobs to a country that doesn't want to work.

No he lost because he wanted to give away things to people who didn't need it. The rich need no further subsidies.

[Pete-o]

If the republicans could repudiate the likes of Limbaugh, O'Reilly and Beck, they would be a lot better off and the country as well.

[FFS-]

Fed Up in North Carolina wrote:

Romney lost because he offered jobs to a country that doesn't want to work.

china doesn't want to work?

[bottlecap]

Go Blue Forever wrote:

<quoted text> Throw in the President and FEMA's quick response to Sandy and their positive reviews, one would wonder what the cumulative effect of Fox's timing, had any change in possible republican momentum?.....

Although FEMA's handling of Hurricane Sandy was screwed-up, the MSM, including Fox, gave Obama high marks for "handling" Sandy and with it handed him the election.

Chris Cristie also hurt Romney with his over the top praise.

[bottlecap]

Pete-o wrote:

<quoted text>
No he lost because he wanted to give away things to people who didn't need it. The rich need no further subsidies.

Important TRUTH here. Obama was a politician who gave things away, and literally bought votes with tax payer money. It is hard to run against Santa Claus.

Obama had more sense than to openly give anything to the Rich; even though he is the BANKSTER's puppet. Romney's honesty worked against him.

[Mr Big Bad John Roberts]

Fed Up in North Carolina wrote:

Romney lost because he offered jobs to a country that doesn't want to work.

Yo' pissface, is that why your lazy monkey azz no longer do tricks at the I-95 truck stops? By the way you stupid pea brain, Romney lost because like your monkey azz with your clients, he sucked.
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Lol!!!!!!!!!!

[Mr Big Bad John Roberts]

bottlecap wrote:

<quoted text>
Important TRUTH here. Obama was a politician who gave things away, and literally bought votes with tax payer money. It is hard to run against Santa Claus.
Obama had more sense than to openly give anything to the Rich; even though he is the BANKSTER's puppet. Romney's honesty worked against him.

Yo' pissface, is that why your lazy monkey azz no longer do tricks at the I-95 truck stops? By the way you stupid pea brain, Romney lost because like your monkey azz with your clients, he sucked.
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Lol!!!!!!!!!!

[Mr Big Bad John Roberts]

Pete-o wrote:

If the republicans could repudiate the likes of Limbaugh, O'Reilly and Beck, they would be a lot better off and the country as well.

Romney was a coward to do what you advised. So are the GOPunkkks.

[tony1003]

bottlecap wrote:

<quoted text>
Important TRUTH here. Obama was a politician who gave things away, and literally bought votes with tax payer money. It is hard to run against Santa Claus.
Obama had more sense than to openly give anything to the Rich; even though he is the BANKSTER's puppet. Romney's honesty worked against him.

I wonder if you are inhabiting a parallel universe with a post like this. Votes were not bought by any side in this election, literally or metaphorically. Romney's greatest weakness was his inability to tell the truth, which is why he ended up being accused of flip-flopping from one side to another.

Unless Republicans face up to the weaknesses in both programme and candidate in the last election, they may find in 2016 that history will repeat itself. What's the betting that Hilary decides to try again for that one?

[Pete-o]

bottlecap wrote:

<quoted text>
Important TRUTH here. Obama was a politician who gave things away, and literally bought votes with tax payer money. It is hard to run against Santa Claus.
Obama had more sense than to openly give anything to the Rich; even though he is the BANKSTER's puppet. Romney's honesty worked against him.

Romney's honesty! Hilarious!

[Therealnews com]

Fed Up in North Carolina wrote:

Romney lost because he offered jobs to a country that doesn't want to work.

CORPORATE CRIME REPORTER / Ronald Reagan Started The Wall Street Takeover of America:/ February 13, 2010 / http://tinyurl.com/ye9hp4j
The Monopolization of America
You walk into your local convenience store and head to the cold walk-in beer room in the back.
The choice is overwhelming.
Budweiser, Michelob, Bud Light, Busch Light, Stella Artois, Grolsch, Kirin,Tsingtao, Corona, Negra Modelo, Rolling Rock, Widmer, Miller and Coors.
In fact, all of these beers are controlled by two companies.
MillerCoors under the direction of South African Breweries (SAB) and AnheuserBusch In Bev.
Two multinational corporations controlling the beer choices of 300 million Americans.
And it’s not just beer.
One single multinational corporation dominates the world supply of eyeglass stores.
One dominates the milk supply.
Barry Lynn goes down the list of industries.
And he finds a similar story across the board.
A handful of multinational corporations controlling each industry – or the supply chains of each industry./ http://corporatecrimereporter.com/barrylynn02...

==========

Document uncovers details of a planned coup in the USA in 1933 by right-wing American businessmen / 23 July 2007 / http://tinyurl.com/2cc7af
The coup was aimed at toppling President Franklin D Roosevelt with the help of half-a-million war veterans. The plotters, who were alleged to involve some of the most famous families in America,(owners of Heinz, Birds Eye, Goodtea, Maxwell Hse & George Bush’s Grandfather, Prescott) believed that their country should adopt the policies of Hitler and Mussolini to beat the great depression.

Mike Thomson investigates why so little is known about this biggest ever peacetime threat to American democracy.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/document/...

Document uncovers details of a planned coup in the USA in 1933 by right-wing American businessmen / 23 July 2007 / Audio
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/document/...

[bottlecap]

Mr Big Bad John Roberts wrote:

<quoted text>Yo' pissface, is that why your lazy monkey azz no longer do tricks at the I-95 truck stops? By the way you stupid pea brain, Romney lost because like your monkey azz with your clients, he sucked.
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Lol!!!!!!!!!!
Lol!!!!!!!!!!

Hurrican Sandy bailed out your Uncle Tom President. Everybody knows it. Even your own intellectual leaders:

Please! Mitt lost BECAUSE of Hurricane Sandy; Uncle Tom was just fortunate. Who else thinks so.

http://nation.foxnews.com/hurricane-sandy/201...

In his post, he, Michael Moore, thanked a number of people who helped make the president’s re-election possible, especially “Mother Nature.”

“You, Mother Nature, with all your horrific damage, death and destruction you caused last week, you became, ironically, the undoing of a Party that didn’t believe in you or your climate changing powers,”

http://nation.foxnews.com/chris-matthews/2012...

“I’m so glad we had that storm last week.‘Cause I think the storm was one of those things. No. Politically, I should say. Not in terms of hurting people. The storm brought in possibilities for good politics.”
----------
No storm? Then Obama gives a concession speech.