Missouri Lawmakers Pass 3-Day Abortion Wait Period

There are 16 comments on the National Public Radio story from May 14, 2014, titled Missouri Lawmakers Pass 3-Day Abortion Wait Period. In it, National Public Radio reports that:

Missouri's Republican-controlled Legislature gave final approval Wednesday to legislation requiring a woman to wait three days after first seeing a doctor before having an abortion.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at National Public Radio.

Cordwainer Trout

Elizabethtown, KY

#1 May 14, 2014
The "progressives" will hate this. They are intent on killing their own. Everything about them is suicidal, but they want to kill their own and they want to kill them NOW.

“Crybaby men are such a bore”

Since: Mar 14

The wild wild north

#2 May 15, 2014
OH LOOK! The Rapepublicans strike again!!

""But women do have to wait in cases of rape and incest.""

Funny they allowed for a woman with a medical emergency, how very very kind of them...must have half killed the boys to allow that.

Guess that want that fetus a little riper and a little fatter before termination. Go figure!
cancer suxs

Owatonna, MN

#3 May 15, 2014
So far righters want women to wait to control there own bodies but don't want anyone to wait buy a gun and go kill people.
Brilliant

Beverly, MA

#4 May 15, 2014
cancer suxs wrote:
So far righters want women to wait to control there own bodies but don't want anyone to wait buy a gun and go kill people.
Wicked Smart!
So what

Beverly, MA

#5 May 15, 2014
Cordwainer Trout wrote:
The "progressives" will hate this. They are intent on killing their own. Everything about them is suicidal, but they want to kill their own and they want to kill them NOW.
If Liberals are the only ones wanting to kill their own and right away, why do you care? I mean, abortion on demand should rid the world of all these evil Liberals, so let it be. Why not? Then the world can be left to you and your kind. What is keeping you Conservatives from breeding us Liberals off the planet? Your stupid laws maybe?
Eleanor

Mundelein, IL

#6 May 15, 2014
Too many rules and regulations.

The government thinks IT knows better than the individual.

It is already legal to terminate a pregnancy.

NOTHING more needs to come from the government to restrict a woman's right to choose.

The article states that "Supporters argue that women need more time to digest information received by a doctor." .... actually means that the GOVERNMENT knows best .... and the government wants to INFRINGE upon a person's right to choose .... that a woman is incapable of knowing when she wants to abort. <WRONG>

While I tend to be pro-life, I respect a woman's right to choose WITHOUT the government preventing the woman from having the abortion at the time of HER choosing, without governmental restriction.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#7 May 15, 2014
I think abortion is awful, but forcing a woman to wait for a procedure to which she is legally entitled is unjust.
Cordwainer Trout

Elizabethtown, KY

#8 May 15, 2014
It is a very common practice at Planned Parenthood and other clinics to counsel in a biased way concerning abortion. They have often been found to withhold information helpful to making an informed decision. Often, it is young people targeted by people with an pro-abortion agenda, which leads to emotionally ignorant, quick decisions harmful to the young women. Women have been literally manipulated into abortions by people who've had many more than three days of training in how to increase the number of abortions performed and the profit made. A life and death decision should have sufficient consideration. Any objection to encouraging thorough consideration by the mother shows the horrendous deterioration of morality amongst the Leftists pushing death as eugenics policy and population control. Yet, such is not uncommon amongst the Left, who have a history of mercilessly murdering many millions of people worldwide to fill their own coffers of profit and ensure their power over others.
Alma

Imperial, MO

#9 May 15, 2014
If you are going to keep your baby, it's called a baby.
If you are going to kill your baby it's called a fetus.

There's a lot of money being made in baby killing and a lot of blood money being given to DemocRATS to keep the vermin in office.

“Crybaby men are such a bore”

Since: Mar 14

The wild wild north

#10 May 16, 2014
Alma wrote:
If you are going to keep your baby, it's called a baby.
If you are going to kill your baby it's called a fetus.
There's a lot of money being made in baby killing and a lot of blood money being given to DemocRATS to keep the vermin in office.
There is a lot of money to be made in forced gestation. Giving birth far outweighs the cost of an abortion rendering your argument lame and defeated.

http://www.wcnc.com/news/local/The-cost-of-ha...

Now your defeated lame argument will need to read:

There's a lot more money to be made in forcing women/girls to gestate and give birth money being given to RAPEpublicans to keep the misogynists in office.

THERE! I fixed it for you...no need to thank me..you are welcome.
Sterkfontein Swartkrans

Lambertville, NJ

#11 May 16, 2014
I thought repigs were for LESS government! What a bunch of hypocrites. They should mind their own business and stay out of the medical decisions of others.
Mary

Imperial, MO

#13 May 19, 2014
Democrats don't have any respect for human life. That is why they support baby killing and are constantly trying to infringe upon our Constitutional right to self defense with firearms.

Democrats pretend to be for the rights of women, but they prefer helpless unarmed women.

It is a big democrat lie to say that they support women controlling their own bodies, when the fact is, the baby is a totally separate being with its own unique set of chromosomes.

Truly democrats are evil and immoral.

When only democrats and criminals have guns, how safe will true Americans be?

Since: Mar 14

United States

#14 May 19, 2014
How can one be pro abortion and pro women at the same time when half of the babies that are slaughtered are female?

Since: May 14

Location hidden

#15 May 19, 2014
Mary wrote:
Democrats don't have any respect for human life. That is why they support baby killing and are constantly trying to infringe upon our Constitutional right to self defense with firearms.
Democrats pretend to be for the rights of women, but they prefer helpless unarmed women.
It is a big democrat lie to say that they support women controlling their own bodies, when the fact is, the baby is a totally separate being with its own unique set of chromosomes.
Truly democrats are evil and immoral.
When only democrats and criminals have guns, how safe will true Americans be?
The Democrats are coausing a lot of harm. Ever notice that our so called president will not do anything about the Christians being tortured and slaughtered in the mideastern countries? These idiots send out little hashtags . We have wiped out our future by abortion, the muslims are going to find it very easy to take over our Country.

“lightly burnt,but still smokin”

Since: Dec 06

in the corner of your mind,

#16 May 20, 2014
"Mychihuahuawillbite " brayed
The Democrats are coausing a lot of harm. Ever notice that our so called president will not do anything about the Christians being tortured and slaughtered in the mideastern countries? These idiots send out little hashtags . We have wiped out our future by abortion, the muslims are going to find it very easy to take over our Country.

wtf do you think the president can do about xtains in other countries?....how come jebus hasn't done anything? other than bitch and whine,what have you done? the so called conservatives are the ones ruining our country.

“lightly burnt,but still smokin”

Since: Dec 06

in the corner of your mind,

#17 May 20, 2014
"Mary" whined
Democrats don't have any respect for human life. That is why they support baby killing

ahh another clueless republican anti choicer that doesn't know the difference between abortion(no babies involved and legal) and infanticide(involves babies and illegal),I'm glad I could clear that up for you....esad

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jay Nixon Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Ferguson Police Are Being Relieved Of Their Dut... (Aug '14) May 18 Silent Echo 6,366
News New fear: What happens in Ferguson if no charges? (Aug '14) May 10 Massa 3,424
News Missouri Senate votes to override veto of welfa... May 5 see the light 1
News Missouri Gov. Nixon Refuses to Save Failing Wel... May 5 James 2
News Missouri Lt. Gov, Ferguson mayor: Where was the... Mar '15 sam 2
News Former Cape Girardeau mayor chosen as president... Mar '15 Guest 3
News EMAIL: Missouri Democratic Governor ORDERED Nat... Jan '15 Ex-Democrat for M... 1
More from around the web