Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 222191 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#75582 Feb 13, 2013
TerryL wrote:
<quoted text>Thanks for supplying an example of what I was referring to! If you weren't so stupid you might have seen that before you hit "Post Comment"
Then tell me how the universe came into form, if you are not STUPID?

“Putten the SIN ”

Since: Nov 08

back in Wisconsin

#75583 Feb 13, 2013
xxxooxxx wrote:
<quoted text>
Your failure to comprehend the cause of the effect of an event (or events) is simply labeled random, not because it is truly random, but by the fact that you fail to see perceive the causes that lead up to the event(s).(butterfly effect)
Nothing is truly random in the sense of the word. throwing a pair of dice would be considered to give a "random" number...but in reality the outcome would be the result of weight,speed air density and so forth.
My bad. What your talking about actually is determinism.

life, as in biological, is deterministic. It conforms to fit its surroundings.

A car crash,(if the person isnt trying to get into one), would be considered random.

Ok Ima try and stay on point now lol.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#75584 Feb 13, 2013
Thomas Robertson wrote:
woodtick57 wrote:
You have no evidence of his existence.
you have no evidence the flying spaghetti monster doesn't exist, therefore he must be your god.
Charles Idemi wrote:
Liar!
There, there, now, take it easy.
I don't think woodtick was really claiming that you believed in the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
I think he was just making an analogy.
Do you know what an analogy is?
Let me tell you what an analogy is.
An analogy, according to Wikipedia, is "a cognitive process of transferring information or meaning from a particular subject (the analogue or source) to another particular subject (the target)."
For example, I remember a comic strip in which Blondie said, "Gee, I don't know what to wear to the party."
Her husband Dagwood said, "How about all those dresses?"
Blondie said, "Everyone's seen me in those dresses."
Dagwood said, "I guess I can't go to the office tomorrow, then. Everyone has seen my blue suit."
Dagwood did not really intend to stay home from the office the next day.
Rather, he was momentaily assuming Blondie's implied premise that one should not appear in public wearing an outfit which everyone has already seen.
From this premise, he arrived at an absurd conclusion.
Therefore, he is arguing that Blondie's premise is absurd.
Back to the subject:
As I recall, you challenged woodtick to prove that the Judeo-Christian god doesn't exist, which he admitted he could not do.
From that information, you concluded that he believed in the Judeo-Chriatian god.
I understood, and woodtick apparently understood, that your premise was that anyone believes in a deity whose existence he cannot disprove.
So he switched it around and asked you to disprove the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
When you were unable to do that, he applied your own premise--not his own, not mine, or anyone else's.
That's how he concluded that you believed in the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
Could you please explain why your premise applies in woodtick's case but not your own?
I would like to know, and I'm sure woodtick would like to know.
The same Blah blah blah blah blah. Tell me if you have one single shred of evidence, how the universe came into form?

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#75585 Feb 13, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Then tell me how the universe came into form, if you are not STUPID?
You love asking this question, but no matter how many answers you get, you will still make up a lie instead of just admitting that you don't know.

We have the answer to within a few moments, split seconds, of it coming into existence. It's just that we need to figure out what's "outside" before we can begin to explore what actually started it. In short, we don't know, and neither do you.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#75586 Feb 13, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> The same Blah blah blah blah blah. Tell me if you have one single shred of evidence, how the universe came into form?
So, you say you know how it happened?

Why do you have to lie? Why can't you just be honest and say you don't know?

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#75587 Feb 13, 2013
gotnatas wrote:
<quoted text>
My bad. What your talking about actually is determinism.
life, as in biological, is deterministic. It conforms to fit its surroundings.
A car crash,(if the person isnt trying to get into one), would be considered random.
Ok Ima try and stay on point now lol.
To your last point, easier said than done on any forum.:P

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#75588 Feb 13, 2013
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>
However the evidence is building up on our side Charles. We have disproven most of Genesis, most of Exodus, and most of Joshua. We know that Moses was a fictional character. We know that the writers of the four Gospels are anonymous and were NOT eyewitnesses.
We have proven that modern humans are the last in a long line of ‘Homo’ hominids therefore evolution did happen.
We know that Adam and Eve did not exist and that puts a real crimp in the need for Jesus. We can now trace human activity all over the face of the globe during prehistoric times….and it DOES NOT match up with the Bible.
So although we can’t disprove God ‘at this moment’….the time is fast approaching when we WILL be able too. We're working on the Bible right now.
Irony!
One book is not the entire 66 books. And it is not even all the entire Genesis that you can say such a thing to.
Where is your evidence, how the universe came into form?

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#75589 Feb 13, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Irony!
One book is not the entire 66 books. And it is not even all the entire Genesis that you can say such a thing to.
Where is your evidence, how the universe came into form?
Where is your evidence?

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#75590 Feb 13, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Then disprove leprechauns. Something so simple and common place, and there is more evidence of your caliber supporting the existence of leprechauns than your god. So, prove that leprechauns don't exist first, then you can shift the burden of proof.
Christians believes in the existence of God, disprove that?
I ask again, how did the universe came into form, when we truly know that the universe didn't came from the handiwork of humans, animals nor plants?

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#75591 Feb 13, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually no, non-falsifiable means that your notion is wrong. If it's not falsifiable then it cannot be stated as fact.
A simple answer, you can not disprove the existence of God, simple!

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#75592 Feb 13, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Christians believes in the existence of God, disprove that?
I ask again, how did the universe came into form, when we truly know that the universe didn't came from the handiwork of humans, animals nor plants?
Disprove leprechauns first, then you can ask to have your god disproved. Until you do that though, your god is simply not real. You do know what we call people who believe the soap opera characters are real people, right? It's the same problem you have, it's called delusion.

I already answered your question a bunch of times, and I was honest, why can't you answer it honestly?

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#75593 Feb 13, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
You love asking this question, but no matter how many answers you get, you will still make up a lie instead of just admitting that you don't know.
We have the answer to within a few moments, split seconds, of it coming into existence. It's just that we need to figure out what's "outside" before we can begin to explore what actually started it. In short, we don't know, and neither do you.
I notice shit when i see one.
So far, i have been receiving shit as answers, yours is also one of them.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#75594 Feb 13, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> A simple answer, you can not disprove the existence of God, simple!
You cannot disprove that leprechauns steal your underwear at night, therefore leprechauns are real as well. It's the same thing as your god.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#75595 Feb 13, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
So, you say you know how it happened?
Why do you have to lie? Why can't you just be honest and say you don't know?
Give me your evidence, but i don't need any shit.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#75596 Feb 13, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> I notice shit when i see one.
So far, i have been receiving shit as answers, yours is also one of them.
So you don't think "I don't know" is honest, makes sense since all you do is lie.

Since: Feb 12

Taipei, Taiwan

#75597 Feb 13, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> A simple answer, you can not disprove the existence of God, simple!
Simple answer is that ur god was the protagonist of a book called the bible. Much like the land of Narnia.

“Putten the SIN ”

Since: Nov 08

back in Wisconsin

#75598 Feb 13, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Technically, it's not "random," but so difficult to predict that we simply describe it as such. A physicist with a decent computer model could predict it all, but certainly not in real time. Much of what we call random is not even close, even how the dice land or which cards are drawn from a deck, that's why probability is a really complex set of laws and notions, every outcome is the result of cascading forces and reactions, and tons of chemistry. However, it is all natural, nothing "super" about it. ;)
This is an interesting topix to hammer out lol.

I see what your saying about being possibly able to "predict" what an object will do, or what will happen with a set of objects.

For instance, whats the variable that a car will crash into another car as oppose to a car crashing into a mountain.

The way I see it is objects have a *behavior* if you will, and yes there are TONS of variables that go into how an object will interact with another.

For instance I could see a boulder falling down a hill being predetermined where it going to land even with all the variables,(wind, ground texture, terrain, ect) as oppose to a car accident.

Id say ones random, ones deterministic.

But you right, nothing supernatural about it.

Except for when your socks come up missing after doing laundry.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#75599 Feb 13, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Give me your evidence, but i don't need any shit.
Dodge, that's all you just did, dodge. Are you even reading what I post? I'd wager not, so I can call you a nazi pedophile and you'll not even know I did. Unless you deny that, then you are admitting to being a nazi pedophile and I will be forced to send some people to your house to detain you indefinitely in the penitentiary.

“Putten the SIN ”

Since: Nov 08

back in Wisconsin

#75600 Feb 13, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Christians believes in the existence of God, disprove that?
I ask again, how did the universe came into form, when we truly know that the universe didn't came from the handiwork of humans, animals nor plants?
Its a simple answer.

We dont know.

You do *know* that its ok to *NOT* know something right??

“Putten the SIN ”

Since: Nov 08

back in Wisconsin

#75601 Feb 13, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> A simple answer, you can not disprove the existence of God, simple!
Can you prove or disprove the existence of a god??

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Bobby Jindal Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The Year's Craziest Right-Wing Conspiracy Theor... (Jul '15) May '17 Geezer in the Casket 7
News 'Duck Dynasty' Star Ditches Bobby Jindal For Do... (Sep '15) Mar '17 Missy 11
News How strict should public school letter grades b... (Feb '17) Feb '17 Cfnm 2
News Jindal Twists Himself In Knots Over Question On... (Jun '15) Jul '16 Obsession 3
News Will Americans say - No we can't' to the idea o... (May '16) May '16 Three Days 1
News James Gill: As Jindal sees it, Trump is all Oba... (Mar '16) Mar '16 wild child 1
hole (Jan '16) Jan '16 aaron 1
More from around the web