Reaction to ruling on supermajority t...

Reaction to ruling on supermajority tax votes

There are 1 comment on the Seattle Times story from Feb 28, 2013, titled Reaction to ruling on supermajority tax votes. In it, Seattle Times reports that:

State officials and other react to a Washington state Supreme Court ruling striking down a requirement for a two-thirds majority vote in the Legislature to increase taxes.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Seattle Times.

William Hattrick

Stevenson, WA

#1 Mar 3, 2013
It is interesting to imagine the good senator saying as he is sworn in that he intends to stand with the Will of the People instead of the State Constitution. I suspect that the word Constitution is an important part of the oath of office. As is the notion that he is a State Senator whose salary and perks are paid by all citizens. Can he say honestly that he did not have his fingers crossed when he swore as required in order to take his seat in the State Senate?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Governors Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 18 min Regolith Based Li... 182,378
News Jenna Bush Hager Gives Birth to Second Daughter... 19 min Ritual Habitual 1
News John McCain: It's 'bizarre' to discriminate aga... 1 hr Ritual Habitual 150
News Public schools and your money 2 hr Exterminate muslims 78
News Syrian family diverted after Indiana changes re... 4 hr Le Jimbo 231
News Casino Ad Wars: Ray Halbritter v. Tom Wilmot 4 hr New Hartford and ... 49
News Understanding the Adirondack Scenic Railroad co... (Mar '14) 6 hr old dirt road 21
More from around the web