Ohio debates sex-orientation rule

Ohio debates sex-orientation rule

There are 55 comments on the Toledo Blade story from Apr 16, 2014, titled Ohio debates sex-orientation rule. In it, Toledo Blade reports that:

A proposal to protect school teachers from being fired or otherwise treated differently on the basis of sexual orientation is dividing the state school board.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Toledo Blade.

First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#48 Apr 20, 2014
Sneaky Pete wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong! You just want to deny love between me and a tree because you don't understand it! Bigot!
"Love" is fine. Whatever suits your wood.

But a contract requires the clear demonstration of comprehension and assent to the terms of the contract by the parties involved.

“Come and get it! ”

Since: Jan 09

Traverse City

#49 Apr 20, 2014
NorCal Native wrote:
<quoted text>
That has NOTHING to do with having the right to marry the person of our choosing!
Oh, but it does. Anyway, by that rationale, I should have the right to line up 10 Hooters girls at the alter and marry them all at once too since they're the persons "of my choosing".

“Equality marches on! ”

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#50 Apr 20, 2014
You might as well marry 10 tables/chairs from Hooters, as you won't find even one Hooter's girl interested in you!

“Come and get it! ”

Since: Jan 09

Traverse City

#51 Apr 20, 2014
NE Jade wrote:
You might as well marry 10 tables/chairs from Hooters, as you won't find even one Hooter's girl interested in you!
Right, because the fact that I disagree with you on a viewpoint automatically means that I'm a fat slob, right?

“Equality marches on! ”

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#52 Apr 20, 2014
Did I mention, "fat" in my post? Sorry if your insecurity speaks for itself. Have a good Easter.

“Come and get it! ”

Since: Jan 09

Traverse City

#54 Apr 20, 2014
NE Jade wrote:
Did I mention, "fat" in my post? Sorry if your insecurity speaks for itself. Have a good Easter.
You insinuated that I was too disgusting to land a Hooters chick.

I'll have a great easter. You do thr same. I'm going to my parents house this afternoon to get "fat" on pork loin and sweet potatos.

“Come and get it! ”

Since: Jan 09

Traverse City

#55 Apr 20, 2014
Sneaky Pete wrote:
<quoted text>
You insinuated that I was too disgusting to land a Hooters chick.
I'll have a great easter. You do thr same. I'm going to my parents house this afternoon to get "fat" on pork loin and sweet potatos.
You do "the" same. Must be my fat fingers can't type properly on my little smart phone...

“THE JOURNEY OF A 1000 MILES”

Since: Aug 08

BEGINS WITH JUST ONE STEP:-)

#56 Apr 20, 2014
Sneaky Pete wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, but it does. Anyway, by that rationale, I should have the right to line up 10 Hooters girls at the alter and marry them all at once too since they're the persons "of my choosing".
If you want to marry 10 women from Hooter's at once.......file a lawsuit challenging Reynolds vs The Untied States......once SCOTUS overturns that previous ruling.........then go for it.......OTHERWISE sit down and shut up!!!

“Come and get it! ”

Since: Jan 09

Traverse City

#57 Apr 20, 2014
NorCal Native wrote:
<quoted text>
If you want to marry 10 women from Hooter's at once.......file a lawsuit challenging Reynolds vs The Untied States......once SCOTUS overturns that previous ruling.........then go for it.......OTHERWISE sit down and shut up!!!
Ah, so you only fight for the "right" to marry when it fits your agenda. Go figure.

“THE JOURNEY OF A 1000 MILES”

Since: Aug 08

BEGINS WITH JUST ONE STEP:-)

#58 Apr 20, 2014
Sneaky Pete wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, so you only fight for the "right" to marry when it fits your agenda. Go figure.
Why SHOULD I fight for something that I'm NOT interested in? I would have to have some sort of STANDING to bring a lawsuit about an issue that I am personally NOT interested in........so, if polygamist WANT to have the right to marry multiple individuals......then THEY must be the ones to file the lawsuits and fight that fight.......when the Lovings wanted to fight the racial inequalities.....they DIDN'T fight for the right of Gays and Lesbians to marry........just the rights of other interracial couples who wanted to have the right to marry outside of their particular race....did they to have an agenda?

Since: Dec 08

Juarez, Mexico

#59 Apr 20, 2014
Sneaky Pete wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, so you only fight for the "right" to marry when it fits your agenda. Go figure.
And you think you have common sense? Really?

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#60 Apr 20, 2014
Sneaky Pete wrote:
<quoted text>
You insinuated that I was too disgusting to land a Hooters chick.
I'll have a great easter. You do thr same. I'm going to my parents house this afternoon to get "fat" on pork loin and sweet potatos.
Such need not be a revulsion based upon physical characteristics.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#61 Apr 20, 2014
Sneaky Pete wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, so you only fight for the "right" to marry when it fits your agenda. Go figure.
As we've said before, make a case. If we think it has merit, we'll support it ... AFTER we're done with the current project.

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#62 Apr 21, 2014
fr Sneaky Pete:

>Oh, but it does. Anyway, by that rationale, I should have the right to line up 10 Hooters girls at the alter and marry them all at once too since they're the persons "of my choosing". <

No. Polygamy is ILLEGAL, brainiac. Simple as that. Have mommy explain it to you.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#63 Apr 21, 2014
Pattysboi wrote:
fr Sneaky Pete:
>Oh, but it does. Anyway, by that rationale, I should have the right to line up 10 Hooters girls at the alter and marry them all at once too since they're the persons "of my choosing". <
No. Polygamy is ILLEGAL, brainiac. Simple as that. Have mommy explain it to you.
He's dreaming anyway. Not one would have such a pathetic man.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

US Governors Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Same-sex marriage fight turns to clerk who refu... 3 min tat tvam asi 3,521
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 11 min Aura Mytha 174,015
News Auditor: New Mexico had $100M special education... 13 min This 4
News Gov. Snyder To Update Status Of Detroit Rape Ki... 2 hr Subway Girl 2
News Kentucky clerk defies order, refuses to issue s... 2 hr EdmondWA 635
News What rights do immigrants in the US have? 2 hr R12 Freon 72
News Kentucky Marriage License Dispute 'Up To Courts... 8 hr Krispy 47
More from around the web