Vicar fury at new home for Jehovahs

A VICAR'S passionate plea for councillors to reject the Jehovah's Witnesses plans for a new place of worship has fallen on deaf ears.

[dr Shrink]

people suppose tp have passinate fury agains Vicar spiritual lies, and man made bulcrap misleading souls of neighboprhood
JW at least make some few a little bit better women and man
new converts jw STOP DRINKING ADULTRY,FORNIACATION officaly,only are doing this in silence of own closets
vicar clients pervets do,not hide own transgressions and evil sins together with Vicar against God

so alcoholics,and huren!!! start to be jw, clothed nice and with sins step down behind public cutrtains

[Duh-boy]

"He said:“This is not a Christian denomination and so it is misleading to use the phrase ‘Christian place of worship’ in its application."

I would like to ask this guy what would qualify us as a Christian denomination? I leave the question open to the forum.

[Olin Moyle]

This vicar is ridiculous. Peddlers of religious superstition don't like competition.

[dr Shrink]

Duh-boy wrote:

"He said:“This is not a Christian denomination and so it is misleading to use the phrase ‘Christian place of worship’ in its application."
I would like to ask this guy what would qualify us as a Christian denomination? I leave the question open to the forum.

if you are no biblical christians? who are you at all? PAGANS? OR JUST SPIRITUAL IDIOTS WANDERING AROUND AND NOT KNOWING WHAT YOU WERE PREACHING ABOUT 10 YEARS AGO and not know what are you talking about today???

It seems to me mister
you do,not know?what are you talking about?
or maybe I did nt understand clearly your remarks

who is this crazy VICAR?..grave digger? he he heee

[borgfree]

Duh-boy wrote:

"He said:“This is not a Christian denomination and so it is misleading to use the phrase ‘Christian place of worship’ in its application."
I would like to ask this guy what would qualify us as a Christian denomination? I leave the question open to the forum.

I think he answered your question, at least somewhat, in the article:

“This new religious movement, adopting its name in 1931, departs from key traditional Christian doctrines and practices and disassociates itself from all main Christian denominations.

“It is not part of Churches Together in Berwick, it has its own translation of the bible and to my knowledge discourages independent thinking with the real threat of members being shunned by all other members if they dispute their governing body’s official doctrine.

“I am not trying to say in a free country they can’t hold these views or should not have a building in which to meet but I am saying that their views are not Christian and that if they insist on using this misleading term it has a direct impact on their application. People need to know what they are getting.”

[Duh-boy]

borgfree wrote:

<quoted text>
I think he answered your question, at least somewhat, in the article:
“This new religious movement, adopting its name in 1931, departs from key traditional Christian doctrines and practices and disassociates itself from all main Christian denominations.
“It is not part of Churches Together in Berwick, it has its own translation of the bible and to my knowledge discourages independent thinking with the real threat of members being shunned by all other members if they dispute their governing body’s official doctrine.
“I am not trying to say in a free country they can’t hold these views or should not have a building in which to meet but I am saying that their views are not Christian and that if they insist on using this misleading term it has a direct impact on their application. People need to know what they are getting.”

What are these key traditional doctrines, is what I would like to know.

[Duh-boy]

dr Shrink wrote:

<quoted text>
if you are no biblical christians? who are you at all? PAGANS? OR JUST SPIRITUAL IDIOTS WANDERING AROUND AND NOT KNOWING WHAT YOU WERE PREACHING ABOUT 10 YEARS AGO and not know what are you talking about today???
It seems to me mister
you do,not know?what are you talking about?
or maybe I did nt understand clearly your remarks
who is this crazy VICAR?..grave digger? he he heee

What did you just say to me!? How dare you call me a wandering grave digger.. hehe.

[wasdeceivedonce]

Duh-boy wrote:

<quoted text>
What are these key traditional doctrines, is what I would like to know.

it has its own translation of the bible and to my knowledge discourages independent thinking with the real threat of members being shunned by all other members if they dispute their governing body’s official doctrine.

That's not true is it Duh-by?

JW's don't get shunned by all other members if they dispute their governing body’s official doctrine do they?

[Duh-boy]

wasdeceivedonce wrote:

<quoted text>
it has its own translation of the bible and to my knowledge discourages independent thinking with the real threat of members being shunned by all other members if they dispute their governing body’s official doctrine.
That's not true is it Duh-by?
JW's don't get shunned by all other members if they dispute their governing body’s official doctrine do they?

Shunning is scriptural, the first-century Christians practice shunning. If you advocated something different from what the apostles and other older taught, you were shunned. You and other opposers simply don't agree that the gb are in similar position of those older men. Next!

[Duh-boy]

wasdeceivedonce wrote:

<quoted text>
it has its own translation of the bible and to my knowledge discourages independent thinking with the real threat of members being shunned by all other members if they dispute their governing body’s official doctrine.
That's not true is it Duh-by?
JW's don't get shunned by all other members if they dispute their governing body’s official doctrine do they?

Yes we publish our own bible, that makes us not Christians? Nope!

[Duh-boy]

Discouraging independent thinking from the biblical aspect. If we are all like-minded, all speak in agreement, and have the same mind, as the scriptures below suggest, then there is very little independent thinking.

(1 Peter 3:8). . .Finally, all of YOU be like-minded,. . .

(1 Corinthians 1:10) Now I exhort YOU, brothers, through the name of our Lord Jesus Christ that YOU should all speak in agreement, and that there should not be divisions among YOU, but that YOU may be fitly united in the same mind and in the same line of thought.

(Philippians 2:2) make my joy full in that YOU are of the same mind and have the same love, being joined together in soul, holding the one thought in mind,

[Prime]

Duh-boy wrote:

<quoted text>
What are these key traditional doctrines, is what I would like to know.

Oh please! Here learn something about your cult!

1. The divinity of Jesus Christ!

2. That Jesus was created!

3. That Jesus was Michael the Archangel!

4. That Jesus didn't have a bodily resurrection!

5. That Jesus was a RANSOM!

6. That Jesus already returned invisibly in 1914!

7. That people will be cloned from GODS memory instead of resurrected!

8. That only 144000 will rule in heaven with Jesus!

9.That everyone else but Jehovah witnesses will be destroyed at armageddon!

10. That The Holy Spirit is GODS active force!

And I'm sure there are more! But you get the point right Dumboy?

[Duh-boy]

Prime wrote:

<quoted text>Oh please! Here learn something about your cult!
1. The divinity of Jesus Christ!
2. That Jesus was created!
3. That Jesus was Michael the Archangel!
4. That Jesus didn't have a bodily resurrection!
5. That Jesus was a RANSOM!
6. That Jesus already returned invisibly in 1914!
7. That people will be cloned from GODS memory instead of resurrected!
8. That only 144000 will rule in heaven with Jesus!
9.That everyone else but Jehovah witnesses will be destroyed at armageddon!
10. That The Holy Spirit is GODS active force!
And I'm sure there are more! But you get the point right Dumboy?

So your misunderstandings of what we teach make us not Christians. Got it!

[Prime]

Duh-boy wrote:

<quoted text>
So your misunderstandings of what we teach make us not Christians. Got it!

My misunderstandings? You said what are basic doctrines that are different from Christianity! Show me where I'm wrong!

[Prime]

It figures you would spout something turn tail and run!

[Duh-boy]

Prime wrote:

It figures you would spout something turn tail and run!

I'm ignoring you dude, you should be use to it. You misunderstood what I said from jump and I have little patience for you.

[Prime]

Duh-boy wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm ignoring you dude, you should be use to it. You misunderstood what I said from jump and I have little patience for you.

You're ignoring me because you can't refute what I posted! Patience has nothing to do with your inability to show me where I'm wrong if I am!

[Duh-boy]

Prime wrote:

<quoted text>You're ignoring me because you can't refute what I posted! Patience has nothing to do with your inability to show me where I'm wrong if I am!

I'm ignoring you because you are annoying. Of course I can't refute it when you have your fingers in your ears. I've been down a few roads with you, no need for me to travel there again.

[wasdeceivedonce]

Duh-boy wrote:

<quoted text>
Shunning is scriptural, the first-century Christians practice shunning. If you advocated something different from what the apostles and other older taught, you were shunned. You and other opposers simply don't agree that the gb are in similar position of those older men. Next!

Duh-by, are you obedient to those taking the lead among you?

[wasdeceivedonce]

Duh-by, are you obedient to those taking the lead among you?

Addendum:

I can't wait for you to put the burned out light bulb above this post dumbass.