Three jailed over gay-hate leaflet

Three men have been jailed after becoming the first to be convicted of stirring up hatred on the grounds of sexual orientation for handing out a leaflet calling for gay people to be executed.

[MarXPacE]

I always thought that the way these people pray that they were either seriously anally fixated, or that they believed their god to be up the guy in front of him's backside!

[WDRussell]

Muslim fundamentalists, Christian fundamentalists, two sides of the same coin.

[Tucksun Jack]

I don't think they should be jailed. I think they should be executed. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

EXECUTE EM ! NEXT CASE !

[tiqueboy]

Tucksun Jack wrote:

I don't think they should be jailed. I think they should be executed. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
EXECUTE EM ! NEXT CASE !

Agree, their religion calls for executions of transgressors so why are they any different?

[disaster in the making]

Let them Rot in Jail than send them back to what ever desert they came from we don't need there kind in this country

[Sir Andrew]

WDRussell wrote:

Muslim fundamentalists, Christian fundamentalists, two sides of the same coin.

Let's not forget the Jewish fundamentalists. They've worked just as hard at punishing gays, even going so far as to attack and kill gays during gay pride parades in Israel.

So does that make it three sides of the same coin??

[Reverend Alan]

Sir Andrew wrote:

<quoted text>
Let's not forget the Jewish fundamentalists. They've worked just as hard at punishing gays, even going so far as to attack and kill gays during gay pride parades in Israel.
So does that make it three sides of the same coin??

If gays want to have a three sided coin, I say, go for it. Soon every one will want one.:)

Oh, about the criminals, I say, let them prove their God actually exists and then they can get out of jail. Until then they should be forced to care for dogs at local animal shelters and fed only pork.

[Curteese]

HairyArry wrote:

So... is you all poofters?

So is you a drop out?

From your "grammar" I would guess so. I suppose that piss poor school in Elephant and Castle was so pitiful that you cannot even think. I note the worse the grammar, the more opinionated and ignorant the posting is.

[jpeg]

New kind of terrorism. That's why religions should be banned.

[Santorum On Dawg Sax]

HairyArry wrote:

So... is you all poofters?

Pardon my unfamiliarity - I only deal with the xstain sort of taliban normally.

Why is the convicted perpetrator in the small photo accompanying this story at topix dot net wearing his merkin around his chin and throat area?

Did he not get the instruction booklet that comes with the merkin? Or is wearing it there a protest of his jail sentence or something?

[Faith]

Santorum On Dawg Sax wrote:

<quoted text>
Pardon my unfamiliarity - I only deal with the xstain sort of taliban normally.

Oh yes...everyone is persecuting you...aren't they? You poor poor thing. The "xstains" don't want you to get married. These three would saw through your neck with a boning knife and consider it an act of piety. If I were you...I would be be thanking your lucky stars you live in America....among the "bigots".

[hi hi]

Faith wrote:

<quoted text>Oh yes...everyone is persecuting you...aren't they? You poor poor thing. The "xstains" don't want you to get married. These three would saw through your neck with a boning knife and consider it an act of piety. If I were you...I would be be thanking your lucky stars you live in America....among the "bigots".

If there's anything disturbing in today's world, it's the tendency to think it's A-OK to imply that others are ungrateful to dare to complain. Next time I see a woman breaking down for the loss of her little boy, I'll be sure to tell her, How dare she complain or shed a tear! At least she didn't lose her whole family!

I'm not noticing much "gratitude" in America that terrorists such as these hold little sway in American government and policy. Rather, the tendency seems exactly the opposite: Those who cherish American freedom have suggested extraordinarily colorful, unprintable and unrepeatable (in polite society) ways of ending the lives of these terrorists, should they ever dare to encroach upon American freedoms. Those same cherishers of freedom DON'T suggest the same violence against the "christians" for the very reason YOU stated: The "christians" in question are not calling for the death of gays. Go check out abortion skirmishes sometime; they get far more vicious and violent than pro-/antigay skirmishes BECAUSE of the violence associated with those AGAINST the right to abort.

In other words, one opposes what they oppose; there is no mitigating circumstance except the opposition's relative lack of obsession (i.e., one is condemnatory to the degree that the opposition is condemnatory). Your "argument" fails to acknowledge that many of the pro-gay are unbudging in their determination that there IS NO REASON ON EARTH to condemn gays for ANYTHING whatsoever, the end.

Yet on the other hand, isn't it funny that these terrorists give CLEAR reason to condemn their "belief," as they seem to find FIRST-DEGREE MURDER acceptable in much the same way that Charles Manson does.

[ralph]

WDRussell wrote:

Muslim fundamentalists, Christian fundamentalists, two sides of the same coin.

It is an unfortunate idea that Christians would handle homosexuals the same as other religions. I do not believe, despite the rot you wrote, you could show where a true Christian has beheaded, or hung a homosexual in recent history. How about other areas of the world?

[McMike]

So in the UK the imprison people who call for the death of homosexuals but in America we publish such literature in grade school newspapers. It's astonishing we had two parallel stories at the same time with polar opposite effects. Quoting Leviticus in an op-ed grade school newspaper is on par with the values if America.

[Khatru]

ralph wrote:

<quoted text>It is an unfortunate idea that Christians would handle homosexuals the same as other religions. I do not believe, despite the rot you wrote, you could show where a true Christian has beheaded, or hung a homosexual in recent history. How about other areas of the world?

You're making the mistake of taking the word "fundamentalist" and applying it to all of your religion. The person you quoted made a clear distinction between fundamentalists and normal believers. No doubt he was referring to the whackjobs that exist in both faiths.

Yet for some reason, you choose to lie by making out that he was targeting all Christians. Is that your victim complex coming through or is just more lies for Jesus?

[HairyArry]

HairyArry wrote:

So... is you all poofters?

Curteese wrote:

<quoted text>So is you a drop out?
From your "grammar" I would guess so. I suppose that piss poor school in Elephant and Castle was so pitiful that you cannot even think. I note the worse the grammar, the more opinionated and ignorant the posting is.

I'll take that as a 'yes' then.

[FaFoxy]

If these people were not born in Britain, then after they serve their sentences, they should deported to wherever they came from.

[Curteese]

HairyArry wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
I'll take that as a 'yes' then.

yep, and proud of it, whanker.

[Faith]

hi hi wrote:

<quoted text>
If there's anything disturbing in today's world, it's the tendency to think it's A-OK to imply that others are ungrateful to dare to complain. Next time I see a woman breaking down for the loss of her little boy, I'll be sure to tell her, How dare she complain or shed a tear! At least she didn't lose her whole family!
I'm not noticing much "gratitude" in America that terrorists such as these hold little sway in American government and policy. Rather, the tendency seems exactly the opposite: Those who cherish American freedom have suggested extraordinarily colorful, unprintable and unrepeatable (in polite society) ways of ending the lives of these terrorists, should they ever dare to encroach upon American freedoms. Those same cherishers of freedom DON'T suggest the same violence against the "christians" for the very reason YOU stated: The "christians" in question are not calling for the death of gays. Go check out abortion skirmishes sometime; they get far more vicious and violent than pro-/antigay skirmishes BECAUSE of the violence associated with those AGAINST the right to abort.
In other words, one opposes what they oppose; there is no mitigating circumstance except the opposition's relative lack of obsession (i.e., one is condemnatory to the degree that the opposition is condemnatory). Your "argument" fails to acknowledge that many of the pro-gay are unbudging in their determination that there IS NO REASON ON EARTH to condemn gays for ANYTHING whatsoever, the end.
Yet on the other hand, isn't it funny that these terrorists give CLEAR reason to condemn their "belief," as they seem to find FIRST-DEGREE MURDER acceptable in much the same way that Charles Manson does.

" Go fck yourself!"

---Richard B. Cheney (2004).

[ralph]

Khatru wrote:

<quoted text>
You're making the mistake of taking the word "fundamentalist" and applying it to all of your religion. The person you quoted made a clear distinction between fundamentalists and normal believers. No doubt he was referring to the whackjobs that exist in both faiths.
Yet for some reason, you choose to lie by making out that he was targeting all Christians. Is that your victim complex coming through or is just more lies for Jesus?

There are some that do not make that distinction, and that is what I was trying to point out. There is also a difference between some annoying people by screaming at gays, and others seperating their head from the rest of their body. The term "Christian" is too loosely used when discribeing people that are not.