I would add, furthermore, that your syntax, and disjointed grammar remind me of the chief violator of human rights in the USA, i.e. Dubya himself.OOK TERRORIST SUPPORTER DUG WUG VON DUMMB AZZ SO YOUR SAYING
YOUR PASSING JUDGEMENT ON THE U S A FOR HOLDING TERRORIST FROM RUNNING AMUCK
WE SHOULD OF JUST SENT THEM TO YOU HEY.
TERRORIST SHOULD MOVE TO YOU AN EAT OFF YOUR TABLE .DUG WUG VON DUMB AZZ SUPPORTER OF TERRORISM
STILL WANT CHANGED THE FACT WILLMETTS WOULD NOT GET A FAIR TRIAL IN UK
UN FAIR TRIAL FOR WILLMETT AN BANKERS
Britain allows freedom of speech, yet the USA, under Dubya and the Halib Burton oil brigade, discouraged it. It was the USA that arrested teenagers for singing Bob Dylan's Masters of War, so there you go. You had no human rights under Dubya, and politically you are still in a vacuum in the USA due to Dubya. At least our leaders in Britain are elected via a modern Cursus Honorum: the presidency of the USA is left open to lunatics from The Tea Party, religious Creationists, and a madcap governor from Alaska. None of these mad fools would stand a chance in Britain, yet it is you, and your countrymen, whose ears have been bent by pseudo-rhetoric, pseudo-oratory, and money. It is not the British legal system that has a problem, but yo, and your blind voting into power lunatics !