You need to take off your blinders and follow the fact trail.<quoted text>
All you ever saw was 'Meg Fired Illegal Maid', as the headline,'Worked For Her 9 Years' as the subheading and you stopped there.
Meg broke no laws - but if you want Brown agai (and Boxer); that's your lookout.
And when you find yourselves disappointed; that your lives have been sold to maintain Union Pensions; elitist World Trade Organization agendas and the proliferation of third world economics and cultures; then MAYBE you'll dig up those old facts that the rest of us have been trying to give you to provide BALANCED information for INTELLIGENT decisions (yes. I know Intelligence and Liberal are incompatable, but I'm an optomist) and read what you've chosen to ignore.
There's more to news than just headlines, soundbites and pretty pictures. There is fact, speculation and opposing viewpoints. Non-Liberal Media (once you find it) provides that. It assumes that we - the reader or listener - are smart enough to take the information given to us and form our own opinions.
You have chosen to ignore that information. If you were able to debate me; I'd have more to say to you. Instead, in the future, I'll let your own words speak in rebuttal to you. You have the facts from more than one source; including the more intelligent and knowledgeable (and sane) of us commenting. You state the same old dribble; which is false.
The truth - Meg did not know, nor was it her job to find out, that she'd hired an illegal. The agency she retained to supply the housekeeper was required to verify the person's right to work. If it was Meg's responsibility, she would not have used the agency; thus it WOULD be her fault for hiring the illegal.
When she found out, she followed the law and canned her.
Do you validate your gardener? The guy at the car wash. Your paperboy?
I doubt it. Yet you pay them all. Yes, even by paying your subscription to the Daily News for home delivery, you may be supporting an illegal. By your own logic - you're no different than Meg.
Get over yourself and open your eyes. Take off the blinders. You probably either weren't here during the mess Brown made during his two years as Governor in the late '70's and early '80's or you were too young. Or you were liberally educated.
I WAS here. I remember clearly the damage caused. Reagan left this state fiscally sound. Brown left it in a deficit so deep California has never come close to recovering.
You want more of the same?
You want somebody who takes money from big business as campaign contributions and winds up owing those people and companies for the money they spent?
Or do you want somebody who knows how to manage money; who by using her own money owes nothing to any group.
Kinda like Ross Perot in '92. NOBODY COMPLAINED ABOUT HIS CAMPAIGN BEING ENTIRELY FUNDED BY HIS OWN MONEY!!!!
Why the hypocracy now?
Or are you afraid of a self-made millionaire?
And a woman?
Boxer's not a woman. She's a 'Senator'. She said so herself.
Haven't identified that alien life-form yet.
'If It's Brown, Flush It Down!'
'K.O. The Boxer!'.