I will because unlike majority of the populace, I will do my research.<quoted text>
If you can find someone better than Hillary, then by all means you should vote for that person.
I will refuse to vote for the largest hypocrite in the world. Some who wants to preach to the world about freedom and who keeps her mouth shut when the government takes away freedom and liberty from it's very people.
Some who will sit there and applaud freedom of speech in other countries while she will have her goons attack a silent protester at her speaking event.
Someone who tries to dictate morals onto other nations while having no morals herself and failure in doing her job in reading embassy cables.
Someone who calls themselves "an early 20th century progressive". Meaning global central authoritarian control. But what does this mean? Progressivism is not Classic Liberalism.
Have to look at those who molded the progressive ideal of global central control. Starting with Teddy Roosevelt, the founder of the Progressive Party. Teddy pushed the US into a more global role, intertwining the US with internal matters of other nations while increasing the size of the Federal Government.
After Teddy, we got Woodrow Wilson and the Progressive in charge. Wilson not only increased the size of the Federal government, but, managed to get us involved into WW1, a war we should have never been involved in. And just prior to our entrance, he gave us the Federal Reserve. Something he regretted later when he wrote, "I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men."
The final outcome to Wilson's progressive policies? The League of Nations a failed attempt of a global governing body.
After Wilson, the people worshiped the next major Progressive in FDR. FDR, a guy who tripled the size of the Federal Government, instituted the "Progressive" income tax, and got us involved in WW2 by his administrations actions against Japan and economic sanctions his administration levied against the,. Thus creating the atmosphere of retaliation, which the Japanese seized upon.
FDR's legacy will remain with the UN (a global governing body), extreme debt to banks, a confiscation of personally owned gold (with prison time), and approximately 25 additional federal agencies.
So why would any self respecting individual accept that?