Sessions and Schumer differ on Sotomayor style
Join the discussion below, or Read more at WHEC-TV Rochester, NY.
#1 Jul 13, 2009
The reason Sotomayer is a disaster as a judge, is because:
60%+ of her decisions were overturned, by higher courts!
A record like gets you 'fired', in any work but govt.
She's a member of 'The Race'(La Raza) racist party,-advocating 'Hispanics to Power'!,(racism) and Mexico regaining the 6 or so southern states they lost during the war.
She's continually voted to destroy American's individual natural and constitutional liberties, such as property rights, 2nd amendment rights, and the right to 'equality under the law' & simple 'rule of law'.
She's bragged to the press that she wants to be Supreme Court Justice because: that's where she can set government policy!
Driving her personal selfish agenda through court decisions.
This is exactly the opposite, of what we want in a Supreme Court Justice!
She's a disaster, and a reflection the radical racist socialist agenda of her and her ilk.
#2 Jul 13, 2009
I think the best woman for the job is a MAN.
#3 Jul 13, 2009
Historic hearings????????? LOL
#5 Jul 13, 2009
Why is always about race with the liberal media? Why do we focus on what the individual is rather then who they are? This was an obvious politically correct choice so why do we throw around word like historic? What I want to know is will they be a good judge and not have a political bent. Based on her ruling in Rhode Island and the comment she made about white males I tend to think not.
#6 Jul 13, 2009
Wow...You couldnt have said it any better...DISASTER.
#7 Jul 13, 2009
What else would she say ???
"Yes. I will be partial " ?????
Another smoke screen for minorities and their agenda. But then again, she knows how things are better than white males..........
#9 Jul 14, 2009
Affirmative action in action.
Plucked up to the Ivy League -took remedial reading classes AT COLLEGE.
She became a student activist and co-chair of the Acción Puertorriqueña organization. After she agitated, agitated, and agitated until professors were too intimidated to give anything less than an 'A'.
She's a fraud who bullied her way to the top, much as Anne Mulchahy and Ursula Burns did at Xerox, in my opinion.
This is a disgrace.
#10 Jul 14, 2009
She will be about as impartial as a .45 caliber bullet. If she is confirmed there is no turning back. When will we ever learn?
Add your comments below
|'Dance Moms' Is Bigger Than Ever (Jan '13)||May '14||amw||56|
|NBC Picks Up 'Chuck,' 'Life' - Freshman series ... (Sep '09)||Apr '14||Dawgz70476||7|
|'Bonanza' memorabilia going up for auction in Nev. (Jun '13)||Jun '13||A Thought||2|
|Chuck: The Complete Fifth and Final Season (May '12)||May '12||JosephMendiola||1|
|'Chuck' series finale: The end is a new beginning (Jan '12)||Jan '12||mmmmmmmmm||2|
|Happy 90th birthday, Betty White (Jan '12)||Jan '12||Otis B Driftwood||1|
|10 Reasons To Keep 'Chuck' On The Air (May '09)||Nov '11||lilygraceheminsley||3|
Find what you want!
Search Chuck Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC